Just a Bunny~ @alien--bunny - Tumblr Blog

ex0skeletal-undead

Wedding by Zarzaliel

#eldrich horror #cute~

babyanimalgifs

Little fish eats his foods

(Source)

bunigojade

aflo

this is so sad he doesn’t even know there’s a double barreled shotgun pointed at him

identifying-fish-in-posts

Pacific spiny lumpsucker (Eumicrotremus orbis)

duke-of-fire

splickedylit

His Foods :) 👍

#lumpsucker #fish #so cute~#i love this gummy looking creature

miseria-fortes-viros

ultimately the truth about frankenstein is that we are all grotesque amalgamations of the best and worst parts of everyone who came before us. and sometimes the people who are supposed to love us because of and in spite of this will not. and we can kill them with hammers for that. and i think that’s beautiful

miseria-fortes-viros

my brother in christ frankenstein is the title of the book

warlockofagnesi

COUNTERPOINT

miseria-fortes-viros

well i can’t argue with that one

quacksmith

Ah yes, Mary Shelley’s monster.

miseria-fortes-viros

no mary shelley is the name of the monster not the doctor

villainessbian

common misconception! mary shelley's monster was actually lord byron

zeemczed

I don't think anyone can contest that.

crow-keys

#this version of abstracted jax is so cute~#tadc #the amazing digital circus #tadc spoilers #tadc Jax #tadc pomni #tadc ragatha #jax #pomni #Ragatha

secretmellowblog

So that circus show huh

#the amazing digital circus #tadc #tadc spoilers #the amazing digital circus spoilers #basically

mleelunsford

I don't need to explain myself

#TADC #the amazing digital circus #TADC Spoilers #The Amazing Digital Circus Spoilers #Jax #ragatha

stardog-howls

#mushrooms #fungus

bovid-beauty

The rule could have heavy impacts towards trans people across society.

Last week, the Trump administration quietly released a sweeping new federal rule that would use funding threats to force institutions across the country to reject transgender people. The 400-page proposed regulation would codify the administration's anti-trans executive orders into binding federal policy, imposing a blanket prohibition on federal funds going toward "gender ideology"

The proposed rule, formally titled "Regulation for Federal Financial Assistance," rewrites the government-wide framework governing all federal grants across every agency. Among its most consequential provisions, it requires that before a federal grant recipient can receive money, the award must pass a "pre-issuance review" conducted by a political appointee—not a career expert or peer reviewer—to ensure it is "consistent with applicable law, Federal agency priorities, and the national interest." The regulation explicitly instructs these appointees to screen for "denial by the recipient of the sex binary in humans or the notion that sex is a chosen or mutable characteristic." [...] An institution that acknowledges transgender people exist—through its policies, its training, its healthcare, its bathroom access, its HR procedures, its name-change processes—could be deemed to "deny the sex binary" or to “support the notion that sex is mutable” and have its federal funding blocked.

Importantly, the gender ideology prohibition has no age limitation—hospitals could be targeted not just for providing care to minors but for providing gender-affirming care to adults, because prescribing hormone therapy to a transgender patient of any age could be deemed promoting the belief that "sex is a chosen or mutable characteristic."

junequeer

THIS IS OPEN TO COMMENT UNTIL JULY 13, 2026

featherandstorm

This is all very bad and horrible, but I want to be clear that it’s worse and more sweeping than just eliminating trans research.

This torches everything. And I do mean everything.

A very abbreviated list of its ramifications include (but are not limited to):

ending funding for ALL DEI related initiatives

allowing the government to terminate grants at any point for any reason

preventing researchers from publishing, going to conferences, and being part of academic societies

requiring that topics must support the president’s agenda.

What this means, and if anything I’m under selling it, is the death of science and research in America. It allows the government to restrict any topic they please at a whims notice, putting officials who have no background in the topic in charge of deciding funding continuity. It controls what gets researched and if/how researchers are allowed to share their discoveries. There are no books to burn if the government never allows them to be written. This is fascism plain and simple.

Please, if you only ever write one public comment, this is the one to do.

genderkoolaid

Bringing back this guide to writing an effective public comment. This gives you the basics you need to know, what you need to include, a basic outline you can follow, etc.

Public comments are not a vote, it is a chance for you to say "here is an issue with this law I think you need to address" and provide justification for legal challenges if it goes forward:

"Comments raise the bar that agencies have to meet when making a rule; “if an agency fails to adequately respond to significant, relevant comments in a final rule, members of the public may seek to challenge the rule in court on that basis and claim it could be struck down.ˮ"

But also, if possible, don't stop at writing a comment. Don't stop at calling your representatives. You should ideally be talking to people in your community about this and organizing resistance on-the-ground; there is a good chance people are already doing that even if you aren't hearing about it.