The Paradox of Identity: The Search for Meaning in an Anti-White World
He who does not have faith in religion or higher ideals is not willing to die for a cause. So what does it say that our culture seems intent on stripping us of both? Because even our deaths have become of no value to them. Our existence then becomes a mere obstacle.
Knowledge is useless without the intrinsic connecting bits from which one can derive the understanding and motivation to act. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Paradox of Identity The search for meaning, identity and community in an anti-white world Whites today arrive at a crisis point. With declining birthrates and an increasing number of immigration in various countries, whites are set to become a minority in America and Europe within only a few decades. To some this may seem like a form of justice, believing that White people, despite their contribution to creating the modern world and all of its pleasantries, deserve to face retribution for the path of history. This outlook of Whites as model citizens and builders of civilization to pariahs in their home lands poses one of the single most important issues of our time. This shift in cultural attitudes has not only hurt the spirit of the nations that Whites had built but has led to a clear decline in morale among whites themselves. This decline in morale can be shown most profoundly with the rates of white male suicide. In a country that has come to uphold the notion that a White patriarchy gleefully holds dominion over women and all other races, why would we see such a number? Does it not make more sense that such a figure would be the result of the decline of Christianity as well as the stigmatization of the white consciousness? Authors like Robin DiAngelo with her best selling book White Fragility, would wish whites to develop and utilize a white consciousness so as to encourage them of their inherent and supposed negative characteristics which foster hatred and superiority. To DiAngelo, white people are a different species which is apparently both cunning in their capability for cruelty and yet too stupid to discover basic moral attitudes themselves. And we can see that her usage of this term was no doubt borrowed from thinkers such as Jared Taylor who utilize this concept in almost an antithetical manner. For Diangelo she wishes that whites become more aware so that they make bow before the other races. Whereas Taylor sees the white consciousness as something to be achieved and revered, as a token of triumph from which white people may choose to pursue their own destiny, albeit apart from the whim of others. And so we see that we are met with a struggle with characters like Robin Diangelo serving as gate keepers and people like Taylor attempting to liberate us from the ideological and spiritual prison that we have been imposed. From this we can begin to piece together the goal, the obstacle and the solution. What is this white consciousness and why would we want it? On the surface it sounds rather mundane. The idea that you are conscious of being white seems like a silly and rather achievable goal. However, it is possible to know something but to not act in accordance with that knowledge. To be white, itself a bastardization in terms of our various European backgrounds, is more than a checkbox on a government form. To be white is to be part of a story, a lineage, a path. Some may say that their race does not matter, as is a common belief, but one does so at the expense of an expanded understanding of both self and the passage of time. A wolf who hates that he is a wolf and chooses to live as a deer becomes sick and serves only to demoralize his pack. Likewise a bird who does not know from what direction it has come, gets lost. History is a story of successes and failures done by people who, to varying degrees have shared our genetics. From the web of that understanding one can better learn ones own self, their impulses, drives and the consequences of various manners of living. These lessons are best suited for those who share in these lineages, because if nothing else, they explain the very nature of our existence. To deny interest in ones race is likewise to deny interest in the brutal evolutionary struggle from which you were bestowed. It is a spit in the face of your ancestors and a spit in the face of the cosmic plans of the gods themselves.
There are things in life which are self-evident but not felt or explored until one comes upon the need for them. For many this is the quest for the divines, of a spiritual path or a sign from god. Yet in our increasingly secular world, people are still possessed with the native characteristic to see more in themselves and this world than a mere triviality. And bestowed from this curious desire we also find ourselves secular sorts of spirituality from which we may feel a deeper sense of community or bond. This drive, which builds and wanes, constitutes that which man derives a sense of deeper purpose and value from himself and his ideals. One's sense of value is increased both to himself and in view of others when he works not for himself but for the betterment of some collective endeavor. The sheer cacophony of the modern world has made it in such a way as to stifle the consciousness of not only whites, but I presume a great many other peoples. Instead of working cooperatively toward an established end, we are met with what equates to sibling rivalries. A quick glance at social media and one can see the manner in which the races self-segregate even in the free realm of cyberspace. Language, customs, cultures ultimately serving as impediments toward the furthering of an idea than a purveyor. Thus it is quite clear, that in all domains in which races and cultures class, this cacophony begins, driving away potential solutions, higher states of being and the cooperative capability of those involved. This is best illustrated with our modern state of affairs, our media, our legal system, our places of education, etc.
All energy placed upon another race's dilemma, is almost always at the expense of a similar and equally valid and concerning dilemma for another race. We see this clearly with the clown show that is the modern BLM movement. One becomes quite aware rather quickly that if a black man murdered a white baby in the middle of Times Square that it would not generate the media buzz of the police killing of a hostile black triple felon . This selection on the part of the media serves to imprint a dangerous and rather repulsive sense of value to the lives of human beings. Suddenly it no longer becomes a matter of what the crime is, but what were the races of the perpetrator and victim? This lying of the press, even by sheer omission serves to hurt the morale of the people, particularly whites who are forced to normalize that black life is somehow more valuable. This value being derived from the enforced notion that blacks are somehow under threat and a minority, a statistic easily disproved with a 3rd grade reading comprehension, a stack of FBI statistics and a map of Africa.
One not need to dive into the debate as to whether the liberal privilege schema is valid, one need only observe its effects. By attempting to invert what is perceived to be the pillars of power, we have created a new form of intolerance, subjugation and discrimination. And it is quite clear that the benefits afforded blacks will in no way be repaid, let alone the unequal distribution of power therein be made equal, at least so long as what the most feisty among them call “whiteness” exists. Thus it is quite clear that the system that we are living in is not beneficial to our psychological health, sense of self-worth and our present or future safety. For this reason many choose to avoid engaging in these affairs at all, some even canceling cable entirely due to the statistically absurd rate of black man, white woman interracial couples in advertisement. There is a point at which you can tell that one is advertising to a demographic and there is a point in which there appears to be the fostering of a motive. It is rather strange that there has not been more backlash to the decline of white male athleticism. Somehow that is yet another aspect of our society in which we have simply bowed out and accepted it as a new normal. So then the average person comes to believe at least subconsciously that black people are victims, whites are bastards and thus all energy, both psychic and physical is sacrificed at the alter of social correctness. But what if that energy was focused on ourselves and by extension our own people? It is almost inconceivable, as a modern American to conceive of a life devoid of such inherent tribalistic competition. I do by no means seek to imply that this tribalistic and competitive instinct is a moral good, yet in this conflict inherent in us, present in both marauder and miracle worker, we find its duality. By embracing our awareness of our race, our drive for conflict is made more apparent and in that drive we come to understand the evolutionary instinct which has sought to establish all the world's borders. This is what I call the paradox of identity. By discovering and asserting an identity, one must first detach from another. One cannot think when men of strange ideals and foreign gods are climbing over their walls. One cannot sleep while there are those within his government which seek his annihilation. There is a certain level of security in the conscious upholding of ones own people and the respect to both oneself and others so as to protect that people and its ideals.
We begin to see that the entire system from which the modern world sits seems almost designed for our displacement if not merely our desecration. So it is clear that we need fertile ground free from the noise of the globalist system if nothing else but to re-orient toward the inner calling as well as the outward sense of duty. But within the current system of governing and laws, of which we manufactured we have inadvertantly signed away our power in giving authority to those who would seek our downfall. The tragic olive branch handed down to the masses of conquered people only for them to use it to stab us in the eye in only a few generations. Such a relationship cannot last indefinitely and there will eventually be a breaking point from which a new order will be created, although the manner in which such a system will be created as well as who will benefit is hard to say.
The question becomes whether this journey is one in which whites must take together acting as a cohesive movement or whether it is the culmination of many unique and simultaneous sub-movements which may be otherwise difficult to perceive to those who are not keen observers of modern trends. The fact of the matter is that the current conditions that befall the average person of white ancestry is felt by many to be unenjoyable. Due largely in part to the effect of the media which has found its influence in our schools and in our governments and thus in the mouths of our youth. Suddenly discrimination is only discrimination if it happens in a particular direction, as terminology has been defined and redefined so as to trap us within a system that no longer serves to benefit or protect us. The most apt among us point it out and we can merely laugh at the dilemma behind the protective shield of our television screen or computer monitor, believing such things only happen at those “crazy colleges” or those “unhinged Democrat-run states”.
So seeing the growing physical, psychological and ideological threats that befell us, what should one do? What can one do? To take any great stand against that which threatens our existence, or at the very least, our interests, is to be met with common terms of slander, “nazi”, “white supremacist”, “fascist”. These terms are successful at scaring away all but the most hardened and headstrong individuals. If one is not willing to have their reputation destroyed for what they believe in, then they probably don't believe hard enough to warrant having the belief in the first place. The fact is that even in peace-time, there is war. Ideological battles are immortal. The media can at any time use its power to blast into the home of every American the new “Crisis of the Week”. This kind of news coverage is often a deliberate attempt to align public opinion to a specific interpretation of events, generally to make a political candidate or president seem evil or foolish or rally us around a cause. And yet those who acquire facts to the contrary, or opinions which are deemed unsavory, suddenly find that in the ensuing war of words, friends and family begin to dig trenches and form alliances. This kind of reporting encourages ideological separation, internal conflict and in some cases destroys families. Of course, there will always be people with differing opinions, but is it so much to ask for a media which lifts us up, inspires us, unites us and doesn't play favorites?
Beyond the issue of politics, representation and the like, there is the question of spirituality. While one could debate for hours what it means to be white or who constitutes whether one is or is not white, the fact of the matter is that to be white is merely to have relation to the people who descended from Europe. This region possessed many different tribes with a history of much conflict and war. Yet despite all of our battles and bloodshed, we ultimately arrived at a general state of peace. When one thinks of spirituality one can think of many things but at the very core of this idea is the notion that one is in touch with something grander than oneself, perhaps god or some kind of energy, or a feeling as if one is in touch with one's ancestors.
What would our ancestors think of us? Would we even be recognizable? Would they be recognizable to us? And at what point in time is the most crucial? How far back should we look before the blur between Man and Ape gets too muddied and confused? If one wished to revere their ancestors, how far back should one look? Should one adopt the beliefs of the old ways? Or should we look toward the future and try to find a sense of transcendence in the ways of our current day? Should one look too far and you arrive at a race of man which is more animal than human with little to nothing of wisdom or values to bestow us, yet go not far enough and you are simply looking at yourself. Perhaps one looks to the past in a state of desperation, attempting to find a place to escape to due to the contemporary problems of the day. If one was to look back, they do so in seek of wisdom, remnants of lost humanity denied to them since birth. Symbols, archetypes, a sense of raw identity, free from the cacophony of noise that keeps us confused and lost in ourselves, living day to day in a nihilistic rot. Considering that we cannot go back to the past, what can we find there that we can take to the present? At this point of the process of discovery one comes to know that many of the symbols and ideas representative of our vast historical past have been dubbed symbols of hate by organizations such as the ADL. At what authority can a foreign people declare our cultural touch stones symbols of hate? Did we not create those symbols and bestow upon them their meaning? And yet you will on such websites they do not even include the original meaning, usage or historical understanding. This serves to dissuade many who are simply looking to discover and celebrate their heritage from doing so on the basis that the apparent love and expression of their ancestry has been declared forbidden. Clearly it is in our best interest that we not rally around our people's flags or dare bestow any symbol of our history let it may offend those who have instructed to be offended. This repression and redefinition of our history is an intentional and malicious psychological trick. Yet the greater sin is that there does not exist an organization, at least not one of respect and renown that seeks to combat such sins of cultural denial. A flag has more than one meaning. A flag has its objective meaning, outlined by the creators of the flag. But it also has the subjective meaning held by the individual who cherishes it. It doesn't take a genius to realize that as whites, we are denied any flags which could be used to rally us toward a cause. The Celtic Cross and Celtic Triskele, both significant symbols of importance to Irish, Scottish and Welsh people are deemed hate symbols because someone, somewhere who the ADL did not like put it on a flag. Likewise, Nazi Germany used the Swastika, also a symbol with deep historical roots and was used around the world, obviously is deemed a hate symbol. The Southern Flag, a flag which to northerners represents slavery and to southerners represents the southern tradition, hate symbol. And even in this past election we have seen that the red hat of the Donald Trump campaign was perceived as a hate symbol with many wearers being harassed or beaten. Where does this trend lead to? If we are not able to have a movement, to stand for our own interests, are we not second class citizens?
While there are contemporary movements attempting to rekindle the Pagan roots of our people, it is clear that attempting to follow past traditions at the expense of being part of its current traditions seems silly and escapist. There is little power that can be summoned from believing in a dead culture's gods. A god and its people are intrinsically linked, and if the people have moved on, it is probably no longer relevant to that process of self-discovery and revering ones ancestry. Confusing still is the question of Christianity, a religion created by Jews with an intended audience of Jews that has convinced many that it is the “white man's religion”. Hundreds of years of a pale-faced Jesus have somehow convinced many people that Jesus was or could have been Caucasian, which makes for a confusing interpretation of the Bible which clearly states that he and both of his parents were Jewish. The overwhelming issue with Christianity's validity as a white tradition is that the god of the Hebrews is simply not the god of the Europeans. Christianity served to end the traditions of Europeans, in a sense, replacing our pagan roots with a pseudo-Judaic faith. This speaks nothing of the validity of Christianity but simply that from my perspective, it is not something which could be wholly European from which could derive a sense of unique and personal racial pride, nor does its history and its study resonate with the root calling of a white person seeking allegiance with their ancestors.
So rejecting Christianity on the grounds of its lack of continuity with our European ancestry and finding the ancient ways of our pagan ancestors both irrelevant and detached and unable to address our modern considerations, what manner should we go about finding meaning and purpose in relation to distinct racial journey? Many liberals and leftists have chosen to give up any affiliation with their race, and in many cases choosing to see their race as hindrance toward some greater progress or peace. This is often met with a strong and repugnant suicidal inclination toward sacrificing their own people and power for the legions of minorities from which they not only bear no relation but also have assuredly never actually met. This dilemma is a demonstration of the well intentioned nature of white people, despite the naivety instilled by a poor education to as to twist their good intentions back onto themselves at their expense.
Without a faith in our ancestral pagan gods or the god of the bible, one is left with a myriad of possibilities but ultimately at the stage of having detached from the religion of your birth one rarely seeks out another. Atheism is not a movement which can be used to unite a people, particularly of any particular racial background. Atheism is a logical state of indifference which may form the groundwork for secular reasoning, but it is not a motivating force from which a man is made strong or wise. Likewise, agnosticism is a disposition ill-suited to mobilize an army into battle or inspire the painting of a grand cathedral. Mankind longs for the divine, even if the divine in its very nature is simply the conglomeration of his ignorance. Logical and scientific thinking can put a man on the moon but the inherent irrational and subjective drives within our consciousness give the moon its deeper impact upon our psyche, which is the domain of mysteries and storytelling.
You deprive a person of their identity or distort the identity of a people so as to shame them and you have bestowed upon them a complex which will shape their every thought and action. If a people do not retain the authority to define their own existence and motives then the will of potentially hostile external persons and organizations can shape their destiny. The intrinsic worth of a person of white heritage is determined in the realm of ideas and this overlaying weight upon each member of this group provides some semblance of pressure toward certain actions, thoughts and ways of being. This is the very nature of propaganda, yet instead of it being used to encourage war or promote peace, it can and has been used to encourage and discourage people to the whim of all manners of agendas. Taking back control over the words used to define us, our intentions and our values is one of the first step toward a healthy realignment with the world. Confidence grows when a people feel free to express the most basic of needs and desires and confidence wanes when greater or lesser forces seek our silence. There exists a psychic war which does not end when the television set is turned off and we log out of our social media account. The war continues on and resides within us, challenging our most cherished beliefs and sense of self-worth. Without both the awareness and the desire to remove these toxic foreign ideas about ourselves, we grow ever more discontent and cut off from that which makes us feel happy and unique. We start to mirror the cacophony of disillusioned masses, who know not the path of righteousness nor have the desire to strive for higher ideals.
Within this state of chaos arises the few strong individuals who sacrifice their social standing for authenticity and safety for truth. Yet without a craft to ride out the turbulent waters, one will most assuredly drown lest they develop the strength of many men and build a raft out of will alone. Clearly this strength of will is both rare and rarely taught and those who wish to swim against the waves do not make it far, as waging a war against society is not a task befitting the individual. This desperation can and does lead to all manner of horrors: suicide, homicide and terrorism to name but a few. When a person has felt as though there is nothing left, the final act of sacrifice can seem like a rational calling. Hence this puts into perspective both the rate of white male suicide and the apparent trend of white male perpetrators in school shootings. While black males are much more likely to commit gun violence, the fact that whites target schools and institutions demonstrates a disagreement with the system itself, rather than a mere disagreement among peers. Some famous examples being the Kentucky City Bombing, The Christchurch massacre, the Charleston Church shooting, the Manson Family murders, Columbine and the escapades and writings of Theodore John Kaczynski. All of these individuals were pushed to the point that they felt as though murder and violence were preferable to living or that in their death or imprisonment that they would expose to the world the need for a new social order. There are some who ride the line of chaos encouraging others to take up the mantle themselves, sometimes with disastrous results. The writings of William Luther Pierce, his audio tapes and his literary works have been cited as the inspiration for many acts of violence, yet that by no means indicates this his views are inherently false or his endeavors are particularly sinister. When one speaks of threats and a need to change a system, it no doubt will inspire any number of people with different interpretations on how to resolve the conflict therein. A soldier dies and is mourned for he has died for a righteous cause. Yet if the people of a nation instead perceive the individual, his views, and his affiliated organizations in a bad light, the soldier is but a mere criminal, a terrorist, a pariah.
Violence is a necessary form of protest. It is the very basis from which the world's borders were created, where idealogies were preserved and destroyed through conquest. If one is not willing to die for their beliefs than there is little value in holding them. Yet one should always strive for peace when possible and the disturbing opinion among many who are concerned about white displacement is that they feel pushed into a corner where only physical might can potentially undo the political state from which they feel they are entrapped. Concepts such as 'The Day of the Rope” an idea coined by William Luther Pierce in his book, The Turner Diaries, describes a day, sometime in the future, when whites are so outnumbered and outgunned that a small band of mercenaries attempt to destroy the US government and enact their revenge upon the corrupt system. Day of the Rope then implies a day in which minorities and the morally impure are lynched, beaten and shot. The rather logical and intellectual speaking style of Pierce is sharply contrasted with the books childish and simple presentation. It is not a book one reads for entertainment, but in furtherance of an ideological disposition toward white displacement.
Pierce is but one of many such figureheads that can be pointed to throughout contemporary time who have sacrificed their safety or public opinion to further the interests of white America in the face of the growing threat of multiculturalism. Rockwell, who died from being shot by one of his own members, was a loud and outspoken gentleman who despite his colorful language and clear display of bigotry, possessed a kind of charm rarely seen among Neo-Nazis. Leader of the American Nazi Party, Rockwell lived in a time where even if someone disagreed with you you were still allowed to speak. This, due in part to the fact that during his lifetime the white percentage in America was nearly twice of what it is now. While one may disagree with the content of his beliefs, he possessed a great oratory skill. So skilled in fact that he not only was invited to give a speech to the black nationalist group, the Nation of Islam, but he was met with applause.
Knowing such facts of history, it can feel like regarding race relations, its getting much worse as perceived institutions of power and privilege are dismantled. Anger and violence appear to be on the increase as supposed progress is issued in by the paragons of social correctness. This is best illustrated by the recent George Floyd riots, the most expensive riots in American history, which I believe should rightfully be called a coordinated act of terrorism. African Americans needed only one graphic example of police brutality to force an entire nation to its knees, saying nothing about the validity or actual circumstances of the case itself. Yet one could find hundreds, perhaps thousands of similar and worse instances of black on white crime or circumstances in which whites died in unfortunate police encounters. Yet one can see that the misrepresentative reporting by the media, omitting context and probabilities and downplaying the extrapolating factors of such a scenario, have promoted and exploited chaos. Ever more sinister when one considers that the target of outrage is a demographic of the nation which is notable for having less scholastic ability, thus unable to investigate such matters on their own, albeit during a public outcry of millions of competing voices. Is this progress? Should whites, business owners, the police and general by standards be subjected to the terroristic actions of a misinformed racial demographic that is intertwined with a corrupt exploitative and dishonest press? Is this not an injustice? Is this not a sign of a broken system or at the very least a system worth breaking from?
Yet speak ill of any part of this system or racial demographics and you are branded with the typical slurs meant to push us deeper into ourselves, out of touch with our true and unmitigated instincts. Thus, in the acknowledge that the press itself is not to our favor and the social media monoliths yet another Orwellian shadow of the former, one looks toward other places of refuge. Such buzz has been made about the need for a new conservative social media platform, the irony being that such platforms already exist under a variety of names: Gab, Parler, Minds, but to name a few. It becomes quite clear what one means by conservative however, and that generally means a place where white people can advocate for themselves and be free to speak openly about the various people and demographics within our communities which are antithetical to our values or a direct threat to our way of life. Much attention was placed upon Gab, a social media site which uses a frog reminiscent of Pepe the Frog as its mascot. This social media site and its founder fought tirelessly to free it from the web of the greater system so as to prevent it being taken down for violating what many companies and corporations would deem “hate speech” provisions. Despite the fact that hate speech has no legal definition and one is covered under free speech, this idea has been used and abused in order to silence those that stand outside of established and accepted codes of conduct. And so Gab came to be known as a haven for “White Supremacists”, a term which fails to understand the true nuances of such a position.
The term white supremacist, while perhaps of some historical value and occasionally accurate in describing advocates of white identity, is an attempt to silence and stifle white advocacy. The black nationalist is not called a black supremacist, nor are those who wish to keep Israel Jewish Jewish supremacists. Neither are those from Japan who wish to keep their unique culture intact Japanese supremacists. And yet even if they are supremacists, why is it always omitted? Why is it only when whites congregate and speak positively of themselves and act in accordance with their will that such terms are utilized? If one were to actually spend 5 minutes within these forbidden communities it would become clear that there are many different movements operating synonymously who may or may not share the same approach or objectives. The term “white supremacist” would refer to someone who thinks that white people are superior to all other races. Let us first establish that all races to some extent have a lingering idea that they are better than others. This is just an inherent bias of human nature, attempting to rationalize their people's place in the greater context of civilization. A highly motivated people which believe they are the best wins the race. It may not be right or rational, but it can and does produce results when one elevates oneself in their mind. This is the hallmark of confidence.
Yet on a deeper level, the average educated proponent of white advocacy does not believe that whites are superior due to some indiscernible unprovable standard. Many are quick to point out that the data indicates that blacks are better at athletics while Jews and Asians lead in scores on intelligence. It is also not uncommon to find those within the greater movement to date and marry Asian and Jewish women. While there are no doubt white supremacists which do exist, this kind of classification is very misleading, due largely in part to the fact that all groups are prone to this manner of thinking and yet their rights, interests and values are not intentionally silenced.
