You're never 100% done
You can always go the extra mile. I find it kind of enlightening to go back and look at my work to see how I could improve, even if it was something I wrote just last week! Here's my revised rhetorical analysis; a little more condensed to compensate for the necessary additions.Â
If We Talked About Straight People The Way We Talk About Gay People  your typical Buzzfeed countdown article, meant for ordinary people, (probably of the younger age demographic). It’s meant to be funny, but also to get us to think.Â
Pathos: Showing pictures of excessively happy people who believe everything is a-okay is pathos working to illustrate that straight people can be oblivious to what they are insinuating. By making backhanded comments, they do not realize that they could possibly offend someone.Â
Kairos:Â Gender can be a sensitive topic to some, and this article addresses it head on. Because the article was published on buzzfeed (a widely read website), it is open to a large audience that can read it at any time (because it is published right on the page).
Ethos:Â I think we all see Buzzfeed articles as fairly reliable sources because most of the time, they are about situations we all experience as humans: things we find awkward, funny, etc. Finding common ground based on everyday subjects creates a feeling of reliability. We have all heard people say these things, so we can relate and apply what the author is communicating to our own lives.Â
Logos:Â By directly showing readers what it would sound like if gay people made comments like straight people, we are forced to see what it's like for gay people to experience this. We hear these comments all of the time, and by turning the tables, readers can see that it is truly not logical to say these things to anyone.Â
I thought this was an interesting article because it really turns our perspective around as readers. By condensing all of these little comments into one Buzzfeed post, straight people can see how these comments can affect gay people.Â







