KIROKAZE
almost home
đ©” avery cochrane đ©”
NASA

⣠Chile in a Photography âŁ

@theartofmadeline
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me

tannertan36
Game of Thrones Daily
Keni
Claire Keane

Product Placement
The Bowery Presents
Misplaced Lens Cap
d e v o n
hello vonnie
todays bird
macklin celebrini has autism
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

bliss lane
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Israel
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Portugal
seen from Malaysia
seen from Bahamas
seen from Germany
seen from Vietnam
seen from Guatemala
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Canada
@altiplano-architecture
Importance du bois mort
Il est particuliĂšrement important de noter que chaque utilisateur de bois mort est associĂ© Ă des caractĂ©ristiques de bois mort (espĂšce, statut, stade de dĂ©composition et taille) qui lui sont propres (Harmon et autres, 1986; Berg et autres, 1994; Jonsson, Kruys et Ranius, 2005; Saint-Germain, Drapeau et Buddle, 2007). Dans bien des cas, diffĂ©rentes Ă©tapes du cycle de vie de ces utilisateurs (ex. : alimentation et reproduction) correspondent Ă diffĂ©rentes combinaisons de ces caractĂ©ristiques (McComb et Muller, 1983; Nappi et autres, en prĂ©paration). La figure 1 reprĂ©sente une succession dâespĂšces, surtout des oiseaux, mais pourrait aussi ĂȘtre adaptĂ©e pour dâautres groupes dâorganismes (mammifĂšres, insectes, champignons, etc.) associĂ©s aux diffĂ©rents stades de dĂ©gradation dâun arbre. Cette figure pourrait aussi sâappliquer pour les dĂ©bris ligneux au sol.
MatthaĂŒs Merian the Elder.
St. Peter Square in Basel : 17th century engraving by MatthaÀus Merian
1654
Frédéric Epaud, historien et archéologue,
Sur la connaissance rĂ©ciproque entre modes constructifs et formes de sylvicoles au Moyen-Ăge dans le bassin parisienÂ
2019
«Contrairement Ă de nombreuses idĂ©es reçues, les bois utilisĂ©s dans les charpentes des cathĂ©drales gothiques ne furent jamais sĂ©chĂ©s pendant des annĂ©es avant dâĂȘtre utilisĂ©s.Â
Ils Ă©taient taillĂ©s verts et mis en place peu aprĂšs leur abattage. Chaque poutre Ă©tait un chĂȘne Ă©quarri (tronc taillĂ© en section rectangulaire) Ă la doloire et conservait le cĆur du bois au centre de la piĂšce.
La scie nâĂ©tait pas utilisĂ©e au XIIIe siĂšcle pour la taille des poutres.Â
Pour cette raison, les chĂȘnes abattus correspondaient prĂ©cisĂ©ment aux sections recherchĂ©es, et leur Ă©quarrissage se faisait a minima au plus prĂšs de lâĂ©corce, avec peu de perte de bois.Â
Les bois ainsi taillĂ©s Ă©taient indĂ©formables, contrairement aux bois sciĂ©s. Les courbures naturelles du tronc Ă©taient donc conservĂ©es Ă la taille, ce qui nâĂ©tait en rien un handicap pour les charpentiers du XIIIe siĂšcle. Ă lâencontre, lĂ aussi, de certains prĂ©jugĂ©s, les bois provenaient Ă plus de 90% de chĂȘnes de moins de 60 ans, au fĂ»t de faible diamĂštre (23-28 cm) et Ă©lancĂ© sur une grande hauteur (10-16 m),avec peu de branches. Ces arbres jeunes, fins et longilignes, provenaient de hautes futaies oĂč la densitĂ© du peuplement Ă©tait maximale, la forte concurrence entre les chĂȘnes les contraignant Ă pousser rapidement vers la lumiĂšre, en hauteur, non en Ă©paisseur. Ces futaies, appartenant le plus souvent Ă lâĂ©vĂȘchĂ© ou au chapitre, Ă©taient gĂ©rĂ©es selon une sylviculture spĂ©cifique, reposant sur la rĂ©gĂ©nĂ©ration par coupe Ă blanc, par rejet de souche, et sur lâabsence dâĂ©claircie, afin de produire rapidement et massivement des peuplements extrĂȘmement denses, et donc des chĂȘnes adaptĂ©s Ă la construction et Ă la taille Ă la hache.»
FrĂ©dĂ©ric Epaud. Les forĂȘts et le bois dâĆuvre au Moyen Ăge dans le Bassin parisien. BĂ©poix S. et Richard H. (dir.). La forĂȘt au Moyen Ăge, pp.142-153, 2019, 978-2-251-44988-3. âšhal-02401264â©
New materials and methods for timber construction
Building Culture PLA is developing new, environmentally and socially responsible methods and components for timber construction, appropriate for one-to three-story structures. Our innovations relate to how certain structural elements (posts and beams) are produced and how these elements are integrated with conventional construction methods and materials.
Our system is, in some ways, a response to standard approaches to timber construction. In many countries, including the United States, Canada, and Sweden, wood building products are commodities manufactured by capital- and energy-intensive, high-volume, export-driven industries. Every step of a commodity manufacturing process aims to overcome the variation that characterizes its feedstock. Just as a chicken, viewed within commodity production, is not a particular bird of the genus Gallus domesticus but a bundle of muscle protein, so a tree, for commodity production, is not a singular tree but a source of homogeneous wood fiber. The most effective way to homogenize a tree is to decompose it. Flaking, veneering, boiling, and crushing operations produce OSB, plywood, LVL, and other types of engineered wood products. Glulam, CLT, and dimensional timber are produced by plain-sawing the tree in parallel slices. Knots and other irregularities, as well as stresses induced by differential radial and circumferential shrinkage, introduce defects. These irregularities are overcome through sorting and finger-jointing. To produce glulam and CLT, finger-jointed timbers (lamellas) are glued together with petroleum-based binders and adhesives. Each step of the decomposition/re-composition process demands energy and capital. Along the way, the macroscopic characteristics of a treeâproperties that make the tree a brilliant structural propositionâare destroyed.
Commodity production has many advantages: resulting products are inexpensive, ubiquitous, and standardized. However, our research asks if there might be another, very different way to manufacture high-value timber building componentsâan approach that produces elements that may not be as cheap, universal, and uniform as commodities, but which are not overly expensive, not hard to obtain, and not difficult to integrate with standardized processes. We are developing production and construction methods that are less time- and skill-intensive than traditional craft methods, and less capital- and energy-intensive than conventional industrial methods. In order to match or offset the economic advantages, and overcome the environmental and social disadvantages, of standard industrial production methods for timber building products, we are applying the following ideas:
For some applications, use trees felled during forestry thinning operations. Today these trees are processed in a low-value way: pelleted, pulped, or flaked.
Instead of destroying an important structural property of the treeâthe organization of stronger fibers at the outer circumference of the trunk, at the maximum distance from the neutral axis in bendingâtake advantage of this property in the final structural element.
Donât plain-saw. Cut the tree in a way that minimizes stresses induced by differential radial and circumferential shrinkage. Work with a timberâs desire to shrink and bend, not against it.
Increase the percent of the feedstockâthe debarked treeâthat is retained as solid wood in the final building product. Trees are irregular tapered forms. In conventional processing operations, harvested trees are shaved or turned into a regular cylinder. We eliminate this operation and use the tree trunk in the shape it naturally is: a truncated cone.
Instead of chopping the treeâs continuous fibers, retain the maximum number of continuous fibers in the final building product. Locate the continuous fibers where they are the most structurally effective.
Reduce the number of manufacturing operations between felling the tree and shipping the finished element. Use inexpensive equipment.
Donât process the tree into a perfect rectangular solid. Only machine a timber in places/directions where it needs to be regularized in order to facilitate manufacture, construction, and layout. In other places/directions retain the character of the wood. Reveal its beauty and origin as a tree.
Produce components that are longer than the industry limit for dimensional sawn timber (5.4 meters or 6.0 meters for finger-jointed timbers) and less expensive than conventional engineered wood products like glulam and LVL (which are readily produced in lengths greater than 6 meters). In many situations, posts, beams, joists, and studs longer than 6 meters are highly desirable. Longer timbers allow
undefined
Using longer elements, the resulting structure is stiffer, stronger, and faster to assemble. Swedenâs transit regulations allow trucking of components 12 meters long. Standard glulam and LVL products can readily be used in such situations, but they are overpriced and over-engineered for many applications.
Instead of producing building products in high-volume, energy- and capital-intensive plants that draw their feedstock from a large geographic territory, produce them in local factories that draw upon locally sourced timber, use less energy, require less capital, and employ more people.
Instead of marketing these building components as a commodity, market them as components suited for certain applications. For example, the elements we are developing are highly compatible with small-scale prefabricated wall panels: building elements that could themselves be produced in local, small-scale, low-capital, energy-efficient factories. Production of the structural components we are developing could be vertically integrated, not only with production of custom prefabricated wall panels, but also with design and build services. An approach like this could introduce greater diversity and employment opportunity in the building industry. Sweden, where our research and development is being carried forward, has the most monopolized, energy-intensive, skill-intensive, and capital-intensive building industry in the world. In its Policy for the Designed Environment (prop. 2017/18:110), the Swedish government asks that ânew and innovative material combinations and solutions be [developed and] promoted so that the use of sustainable materials can increase and that more sustainable buildings can be built⊠Increased industrial timber construction, based on sustainably produced forest raw materials, contributes to the development of a circular and bio-based economy and to new sustainable housing, and can create increased employment throughout the country.â
about â building culture PLA
Louis Carmontelle Panorama transparent d'un paysage imaginaire 1790