[angelscourse]

blog run by an anonymous runner. my main blog is a secret & i simply made this so that i don't flood my actual main blog with discourse posts lol

also i'm an adult i say this bc i reblog kink discussion and stuff so for everyone's peace of mind Do Not Worry i am over 18

note: i like talking and sometimes i can struggle to articulate myself sorry

i will block freely. minors do not follow

[leyleyboy-moved]

I need you to stop talking to antis. I'm serious, I need you to stop answering those threatening anon asks, no, don't even say you're getting them, don't even screenshot them to "clown" on them, don't even argue with them in your replies, or reblogs on your own posts.

Spot them, block them, and erase their comment, spot them, delete that anon ask, and move on. MOVE ON

[susiehunsecker-remade]

this is one of my favourite posts of all time

[pro-sipper]

Antis think that proshippers claim fiction can never affect reality when really what we say is, by and large, "fiction is not reality".

If there's one group who has a problem understanding this, it's antis.

"If I tell you to kys then it doesn't matter bc it's just words". Incorrect. You are directing your vitriol to a real human being that just happens to be behind your screen

"If I post a pic of your house from google maps it doesn't matter bc it's just pixels on a screen". Incorrect. The house exists in real life, and the person who lives there is a real person that you are threatening

"If you enjoy this content in fiction, why not just look it up in real life? The dark web exists and you can find what you enjoy there". Incorrect and also extremely sick. Characters in a story are not real and cannot be hurt. You are urging someone to give up writing fiction in favor of seeking out content of real life people being hurt and exploited because you think "hurting" fictional characters is worse than hurting a human being

Antis are the ones who have shown time and time again that they literally cannot tell the difference between fiction and reality, and they insist on projecting that onto those of us that can.

These examples are all lifted directly from posts I've seen in my time on this blog. If I had more time rn I would hunt them down and link them all, but in the meantime, if anyone has the links on hand, feel free to add them!

[even-more-magical-f00t]

As an actual paraphile myself (the specific "bad" one I won't state directly...), radqueers are not good. The last thing we need is people telling us it's okay to act on our attractions irl. We need reassurance that we're not evil for having thoughts, but it's very much not okay to act on them.

Also "transracial" is just incredibly racist.

Yeahh that's what I'm thinking, but thank yous for your input gang 🥹

[angelscourse]

Also worth noting that transracial is actually a stolen term!

Transracial belongs to the adoptee community, specifically for adoptees who were adopted into a different culture (i.e. Asian child adopted into a White family). And it sucks to know some people co-opted an adoptee term like this.

[angelscourse]

following up No i do not have a discourse opinions dni because i am open to respectful conversation. keyword is respectful, however — i will not entertain disrespect and purposeful & willful ignorance (simply not knowing is one thing; someone choosing to stay ignorant when something is explained to them is another).

[angelscourse]

well i should probably add a minors dont follow to this blog now (idc if they interact w my One Self•Ship post that blew up because whatever one post)

[woundfag]

no i actually do think if yr a self proclaimed map saying that kids should interact with yr nsfw blog & encouraging others to remove their mdni boundaries u Are predatory & a bad person no matter how much u wrap it up in 'youthlib!!!' rhetoric

[woundfag]

this shit isnt cute & isnt funny. idc if yr transage or a regressor or like ageplay i dont think u are a good person no matter how much u post about 'freeing kids from their abusive parents!!!' if u talk abt wanting kids to be in kink spaces & having sex with them. its not a kink its not a fetish its not play its real life & real kids are getting raped by real predatory adults every day. ppl arent getting mad at u for thoughtcrime or kink theyre getting mad bc yr trying to revive nambla. fuck entirely off

[woundfag]

@victimcoded @sibknotter dingdingding!!! just bc we're approaching the topic of attraction, fetishes, & social structures like the disenfranchisement of children that lead to csa with more nuance it is NOT a pass to say 'actually, i want to facilitate a space where i can rape a kid & get away with it'; nor a pass to try to facilitate a space where u can rape a kid & get away with it. u cant just cite the 'most people who molest kids dont self id as pedophiles' & 'most ppl who make csam are their family' stats & talk abt how kids r treated without respect or autonomy & say 'so that makes me wanting to make a world where adults can have sex with kids Fine, Actually'. & then u cant say 'theyre cancelling me for ThoughtCrime!' when u get called out on it! its fucking creepy & predatory as hell! theres nothing 'healthily coping with my thoughts & urges' about 'im an adult who wants to have sex with kids & i wont apologize'. & its certainly fucking unfair for u to rope youthlib & kink positive spaces into it. u do not care for the wellbeing of kids. u can respect a class of people without wanting to fuck them. thats fucking allyship 101. cut it out

[woundfag]

got vagued for this post so im just gonna clarify a few things 1) being hot for littles/age regressors is Fucking Awesome, Actually 2) its different when those people are SELF PROCLAIMED MAPS??? hello??? i feel like im losing my mind!!! if u say 'i am attracted to minors & i want minors to see my posts about wanting to fuck minors & for them to interact with my posts' u dont get to cry wolf when people point out that its predatory!

finally im gonna say this: if i ever say anything genuinely transmisogynistic, if u ever see me posting anything that's transmisogynistic, i want u to tell me. im keenly aware that im tme & transfems are disproportionately pedojacketed & ostracized from the trans community at large & id never want to spread that idea. ive even clarified in other posts that i dont believe in ostracizing & dehumanizing these people, but i also dont think its okay to excuse this behavior

please dm & tell me if u genuinely think im misinterpreting anything or got something wrong. i dont want anyone, least of all my tgirl followers & mutuals, to feel unsafe here

[sals-sonic]

Someone being into cnc or age play (or any other kink that for some reason has become the punching bag of the week) isn't a "red flag". What counts as a red flag is obsessing over strangers consensually engaging in an activity that doesn't concern you.

"But have you considered that they might have been coerced into it" omfg that could apply to any sexual act, yet for some reason you only bring this up when it's about kinks you hate.

Hm. It's almost like you being "pro kink" stops at kink you dislike, then you're just itching to have an excuse to call kinksters you disapprove of "abusers".

[angelscourse]

I hope no one from an•tiship se•lfship community (censored to not show up in tags) ever follows this account given how popular this post got. Because I'm proship.

[finalgirlsw-deactivated20250630]

[amariapsa]

Hello, I made a post to warn people about an incredibly toxic individual in the selfship community who enables harrassment & publically posts death threats towards people who share their F/O.

Do not harass them. This was made to make people aware of their actions, not to enable harassment. Just block, and spread this post to inform others of how toxic they are — don’t bother giving them attention beyond that.

Note: Amaria only uses They/Them pronouns. Please use the correct pronouns while discussing them.

yoomtahsgf is a toxic individual

Do not harass the system in this document. This was made to make people aware of their actions, not to enable harassment. Just block, and in

[angelscourse]

It is okay to be a nonsharing selfshipper.

It's okay to take your selfships seriously.

It is okay to get upset seeing people who share your F/Os.

It's also okay to complain about seeing someone who shares privately to your friends. Key word is privately.

What is not okay is harrassing doubles, publically badmouthing them, encouraging your followers to make fun of them, enabling people to send hate mail to doubles, etc.

Even if you're not directly sending anything to doubles yourselves, by not only linking to their profiles and posting their posts to make fun of them or talk about wanting to kill them (even with their name censored), you are still acting in a toxic way and enabling your followers to harrass and send hate towards them, but especially when you don't condemn harrassment or sending hate.

Harrassment is never okay, but it is especially not okay over fiction. Even if you view your F/O as real, they're pixels on a screen and if you're willing to harm or enable harm towards real people over literal pixels, you are a disgusting, reprehensible person and need to take a step away from selfshipping to sort your shit out.

[yamikawaii-doll]

🩷 I find it so odd that most profiction antis can seperate fiction from reality when it comes to creating horror media but can't seem to comprehend that's what darkshippers do as well. They aren't as different as one may think.

[sleep-king-ao3]

Proshippers NEED to learn what proship means and stop spreading misinformation about their own community.

Proship is a BELIEF. It's inherently leftist, and it means being against censorship and harassment over fiction.

Proship is NOT a ship. It doesn't mean problematic ship.

A proshipper is someone who is a leftist, against censorship and against harassment over fiction. A proshipper is NOT someone who likes dark themes.

Liking dark themes doesn't make you a proshipper, it makes you a darkshipper. Liking dark themes while being against censorship and such, makes you a darkshipper who's also a proshipper. Proshippers don't all like dark themes.

When antis are caught liking dark fiction, they are NOT "closer proshippers", they're closet darkshippers. If an anti got caught secretly being against censorship, they would be a closet proshipper.

We need to be clear about definitions because antis WILL and DO use it against us when we're not.

[ceoandslutler]

i want to focus on "it's inherently leftist" because this is SO SO SO important

i already know that if i didn't like "controversial" themes in fiction, i still wouldn't be an anti because i'm so fundamentally left. my parents are iranian, the media is censored and time after time, bogus attempts at convincing people this is for "preserving decency" and "the good of the children" when it's just religious extremism proves that being anticensorship is being left and being anti-"shipping" (and in turn, pro censorship) pushes you to the far right.

antis, even unwittingly, are contributing to the rise in censorship. it's time to wake the fuck up (get woke) and remember there was a time where it was fine—no, it was NORMAL—to say rap lyrics and mvs are too vulgar to exist (conservatives still say these things today and even 'progressives'). these sorts of ideas have always disproportionately affected people of colour (particularly black people in the west) as well as women, gay/queer/trans people and disabled people. bodies are becoming controversial again (they always were but it's more overt now), we need to focus on what's important. not who's shipping what because if your activism is telling people that shipping xyz is bad and problematic, congratulations you are helping the rise is fascist ideology around the world. it contributes to the wrong side and it doesn't help improve the world in any way whatsoever.

[sleep-king-ao3]

Proshippers NEED to learn what proship means and stop spreading misinformation about their own community.

Proship is a BELIEF. It's inherently leftist, and it means being against censorship and harassment over fiction.

Proship is NOT a ship. It doesn't mean problematic ship.

A proshipper is someone who is a leftist, against censorship and against harassment over fiction. A proshipper is NOT someone who likes dark themes.

Liking dark themes doesn't make you a proshipper, it makes you a darkshipper. Liking dark themes while being against censorship and such, makes you a darkshipper who's also a proshipper. Proshippers don't all like dark themes.

When antis are caught liking dark fiction, they are NOT "closer proshippers", they're closet darkshippers. If an anti got caught secretly being against censorship, they would be a closet proshipper.

We need to be clear about definitions because antis WILL and DO use it against us when we're not.

[yamikawaii-doll]

🩷 I don't care if you're anti fiction or profiction, if you use the term 'CP' or 'Cheese Pizza', You've lost my respect as a person and I am immediately blocking you.

First off, CP is an outdated and incorrect term. The correct term is CSAM (Child Sexual Abuse Material) or CSEM (Child Sexual Exploitation Material). Also, these terms are only for real children, not fictional ones.

On a similar note, Cheese Pizza is a dog whistle for predators that you guys seem to forget is a dog whistle. STOP USING DOG WHISTLES.

Second off, as a victim of CSAM, it's extremely disrespectful to compare the recordings 4-7 year old me being trafficked and raped by several times to a drawing a FICTIONAL child. How is a fictional child who isn't being harmed on the same level as me and other victims.

Do I have to describe what that experience was like in detail for you dumbasses to understand the difference between a real victim and pixels on the screen. I hate you all.