A post for pinning:
I accept anon asks, but if you're being confrontational, I'm really only going to bother replying if I can use you as a volunteer strawman.
If this sounds like I just shitcan any anon asks that make points I don't want to engage with, you're right. I'm not obligated to give you anonymous time on my blog.
Nor am I obligated to reply to your response, but you're much more likely to get a response if you actually reblog with commentary
Don't worry.... 95% of you idiots who think you're making a great point attacking me on anon make wonderful volunteer strawmen.
Seriously, somehow the combination of "I need to argue with this person" and "I don't want to put my name on it" is almost guaranteed to produce easily refuted stupidity.
I don't bother with asks telling me I should stop using the word queer anymore.
I will occasionally reblog donation posts when the people or circumstances reach a specific criteria, but don't ask me to reblog your donation post if we don't have conversations.
I will very rarely reblog anything that says I have to reblog it. Even if it was something I might have reblogged without being ordered to. It's my blog, you don't get to decide its content.
I try to avoid any content that a large number of people would consider triggering, and sometimes if I don't I'll put a warning. But I'm probably not going to be willing to tag a specific trigger. This is less "I don't care" than "Keeping track of everyone's triggers is more effort than I can manage in these trying times in which I can barely walk at the same time, much less chew gum."













