Is investing in real estate is active or passive?
Many investors are turned off by realty because they are doing not have the time or inclination to become landlords and property managers, both of which are, of course, a career in themselves. If the investor could be a rehabber or wholesaler, realty becomes more of a business instead of an investment. Real Estate is a very big market in Mumbai but currently, all are looking for Properties in Goregaon East because this has every facility which everyone is expecting for.
Many successful property "investors" are realty "operators" within the material possession business. Fortunately, there are other ways for passive investors to enjoy many of the secure and inflation proof benefits of land investing without effort.
Active participation in property investing has many advantages. Middlemen fees, charged by syndicators, brokers, property managers, and asset managers will be eliminated, possibly leading to the next rate of return.
Further, you because the investor make all decisions; for better or worse the underside line responsibility is yours. Also, the active, direct investor can choose to sell whenever he wants out (assuming that a market exists for his property at a price sufficient to pay off all liens and encumbrances).
Passive investment inland is the flip side of the coin, offering many advantages of its own. Property or mortgage assets are selected by professional property investment managers, who spent full time investing, analyzing, and managing to hold.
Often, these professionals can negotiate lower prices than you'd be ready to on your own. Additionally, when a variety of individual investors' money is pooled, the passive investor is in a position to possess a share of property much larger, safer, more profitable, and a far better investment class than the active investor operating with much less capital.
Most land is purchased with a mortgage note for an outsized part of the acquisition price. While the employment of leverage has many advantages, the individual investor would presumably personally guarantee the note, putting his other assets in danger. As a passive investor, the limited partner or owner of shares in a very realty fund would haven't any liability exposure over the number of original investments.
The direct, active investor would likely be unable to diversify his portfolio of properties. With ownership of only 2, 3, or 4 properties the investor's capital may be easily damaged or exhausted by an isolated problem at only 1 of his properties. The passive investor would likely own a little share of an oversized diversified portfolio of properties, thereby lowering risk significantly through diversification.
With portfolios of 20, 30, or more properties, the issues of anybody or two won't significantly hurt the performance of the portfolio as an entire.