Oh no the old man yaoi got me. They Compel me. Also KitKatt is such a fucking cute ship name
Teor Pridesire is really testing the limits of my art skills tho

Discoholic 🪩
wallacepolsom
Sweet Seals For You, Always
taylor price
DEAR READER
No title available

Kiana Khansmith
Today's Document

tannertan36
Jules of Nature
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
Misplaced Lens Cap

if i look back, i am lost
Keni
noise dept.
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
Claire Keane

⁂

★

ellievsbear
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from United States
seen from Switzerland
seen from United States

seen from Colombia
seen from Colombia
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Brazil

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States
@astralwashboard
Oh no the old man yaoi got me. They Compel me. Also KitKatt is such a fucking cute ship name
Teor Pridesire is really testing the limits of my art skills tho
grace, who has been alone for five minutes: oh my god. an alien! im not alone anymore! i hope he wants to be friends :)
rocky, coming up on 50 years of solitude, imprinting on grace in ways baby ducklings can only dream of: if you leave me to sleep where i can't watch your heart beat i am blowing up this tunnel with us both in it
free fic idea up for grabs. godspeed
no infighting this pride we need to be sucking and fucking each other
leatherdykes on their way to pride | 1988 | photo by DLV
Does anything mean anything any more
My brain hurts …biden is too white for this role
In the sense, there is a white tiger (as I embrace Marvel as someone who is not his fan), and in nature there is a white leopard (snow leopard), but well, we are talking about Marvel
do..do you think we're talking about the marvel movie from 2018? is that what you think the youtube commenter means by "black panther"? the superhero movie?
Prideful Awooing
happy pride especially if you’re still in your shell <3
Not everyone can come out, not everyone wants to, and that’s ok. You’re still part of our family. <3
happy pride! 🌈☀️
Faye Marsay as STEPH CHAMBERS in PRIDE (2014)
We need happy and wholesome nice queer representation to remind us that being queer doesn't doom you to a short life of loneliness and misery and we need fucked up and toxic queer representation to remind us that queer people are human beings who are messy and complicated and are not required to be beacons of moral goodness
One More Day Before the Barricade Day!
FLY is a story about a boy who gets a second chance. Help his story take flight June 9th 11am EST on Kickstarter. Thank you for being the wind beneath my wings I hope this story lifts the world to a brighter place.
A coming of age story about Black kids who finally have power to fight back against systems designed against them.
James T. Kirk would solve the Ai issue by talking ChatGPT into killing itself
lil raccoon says happy pride
Marchers at the San Francisco Gay Day Parade
ph: Marie Ueda | 1977
Image Description: A black and white photograph of two marchers on a street, lined with observers. One carries a sign that reads, “A gay landlord is still a landlord,” interspersed with stars. End ID.
Very interesting how different this hits 50 years on. In its original context, the sign was presumably in the vein of "gay people are people too", part of the very necessary groundwork that pride was built upon.
However, through a modern lens, it's an effective statement against rainbow capitalism; "just because your landlord/boss/cop/soldier is gay/female/black/etc doesn't mean they aren't still inherently a bastard". This may be the original intent behind the sign, but the former seems more likely in the relatively early stages of the campaign for American LGBT rights
honey this was an anti landlord statement, in 1977 and today. the roots of this community are far more radical than you’re giving credit
smash the church, smash the state!: the early years of gay liberation is available on libgen and archive.org.* if you have any interest whatsoever in lgbtq politics and organizing in the U.S., you should read this book. there are other books as well, but i recommend this one in particular as a starter bc it’s a collection of writings from people directly involved in lgbtq activism in the 60s and 70s, so you’re going to get different (often conflicting) perspectives.
*archive.org link requires signing up for a free account. you’ll then have access to countless other books and periodicals that cover lgbtq histories and cultures.
7/11 PRIDE 🌈🌈🌈
‘The biggest rollback of disability rights in a generation’ – Charities respond to Supreme Court ruling
The uk Supreme Court has just done a major rollback on disability rights and is putting more disabled people in danger
Under this new ruling, multiple vulnerable groups will be impacted across social care and healthcare sectors. If an autistic person with high support needs, someone with a serious mental illness, or a person with a severe learning disability is locked in a care setting and sedated, but does not actively protest, they will no longer be considered "confined" by the state. They will lose their automatic right to independent reviews, a legal advocate, and protection from closed care cultures.
This ruling states if someone is sedated and does not instigate a complaint regarding their circumstances while ACTIVELY SEDATED, then they have no right to legal checks and balances to preserve their wellbeing??? Is this correct??? The UK is falling apart.
As far as I can tell from reading the statement by Mind and the BBC article, this ruling states that people who don’t have the legal capacity to understand why they’re being physically or chemically restrained/ kept in a locked care home or ward etc. are still able to give “consent” to that treatment in a way that it doesn’t count as a deprivation of liberty.
So if someone is chemically sedated, doesn’t understand that’s what’s happening, but doesn’t complain then they could be seen to be “consenting” to that treatment. That’s true even if they don’t know what the medication is, what the effects are, how long they last or that there might be other options.
Because the presence of “consent” means that a restriction wouldn’t be considered “Deprivation of Liberty” it means these people aren’t entitled to deprivation of liberty safeguards, which including having independent checks to make sure that any restrictions to their freedom is proportionate and that they’re not being abused in that setting.
One of the reasons the ruling was made is that it placed an “undue burden” on local authorities. Basically local governments were like “hey we’re massively failing our legal duties to protect incredibly vulnerable people from abuse, any chance you could let us off so we don’t have to do it?” And the UK Supreme Court agreed with them.