JVL
Xuebing Du
art blog(derogatory)
Andulka
todays bird
Peter Solarz
official daine visual archive
@theartofmadeline
will byers stan first human second
No title available
No title available
tannertan36
Game of Thrones Daily
occasionally subtle
Fai_Ryy
Kiana Khansmith
Mike Driver
Stranger Things
roma★
🪼
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Italy
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from France
seen from United States
seen from Greece
seen from Canada
seen from United Kingdom
seen from South Korea
seen from France
@astronautmike-dexter
@staff @support heyyy so it's been months since this account was restricted. I've sent multiple requests to have it reviewed and I've heard nothing. could this please be looked at? I've had the account for over a decade, I'd hate to start a new one. cheers
On AI, Authorship, and Ethical Transparency in Creative Works
So, I’d like to put on my scholarly hat for a moment and have an educational discussion on AI, authorship, and transparency as it relates to fanfiction communities.
Lately I’ve seen discussions about the distinction between “evaluative” and “generative” AI use in writing, and I think it’s worth clarifying some points for the sake of better community understanding. These topics matter not because anyone is looking to shame writers, but because there are well-established boundaries in publishing, academia, and digital ethics that affect how we define authorship.
Below are a list of items that I believe are important to address:
1. AI Cannot “Learn Your Voice” Without Generative Use
A recurring claim I’ve seen is that AI is used strictly for evaluation, yet the same users say the model has “learned their voice” over time.
This is a contradiction.
AI cannot “learn your voice” through passive evaluation. Research consistently shows that large language models do not adapt to individual user style or preferences through ordinary usage. Model behavior only shifts through deliberate alignment techniques such as fine-tuning, reinforcement learning, or controlled inference methods (Li et al., 2023). In other words, simply having an AI “evaluate” your writing does not cause it to internalize your voice, and passive exposure does not produce learning in these systems.
The only way an AI adapts to your prose rhythm, tone, and metaphor patterns is by generating content based on your inputs, meaning that the user is engaging in generative refinement, and not mere proofreading.
If an AI is shaping rhythm, pacing, flow, metaphor structure, or tonal consistency, that is authorship influence and no longer gets to be defined as editing.
2. Revision is Not Ethically Neutral When the Tool Generates Output
There’s a misconception that “I wrote the first draft, so the rest doesn’t count.”
But in academic and publishing ethics, if a tool meaningfully alters style, structure, or expression, the tool is considered a co-authoring agent. Even replacing sentences, restructuring paragraphs, or smoothing dialogue can constitute generative contribution.
Multiple professional organizations make a clear distinction between editing tools and generative systems, and all agree that when a tool contributes to the expressive elements of a text, that contribution constitutes authorship. COPE’s 2023 position statement emphasizes that AI systems generate content and therefore cannot be treated as neutral editors; they produce text that meets authorship criteria even though they cannot assume responsibility for it (Committee on Publication Ethics, 2023). Similarly, the Modern Language Association (2023) states that any text that is generated or significantly shaped by AI must be formally acknowledged, as failing to do so misrepresents the true source of authorship. The U.S. Copyright Office reaches the same conclusion from a legal standpoint: when an AI tool determines or materially contributes to stylistic, structural, or expressive choices, that portion of the work is not human-authored and cannot be claimed as such (U.S. Copyright Office, 2023). Taken together, these guidelines establish that meaningful stylistic or structural alteration by AI moves the tool’s role from editing into co-authoring, requiring transparency.
3. Intent Alone Cannot Establish Authorship
Another idea circulating is: “If the intent comes from me, the work is mine.”
Unfortunately, that is not how authorship is defined in any formal discipline. Authorship is tied to expression, and not intent (U.S. Copyright Office, 2023).
If the expression is significantly shaped by a non-human system, intent doesn’t override the system’s contribution.
If intent alone determined authorship, ghostwriting, translation AI, and text generators would all be considered ethically equivalent to self-written work, which they are not.
4. The Editing vs. Generating Distinction Is Often Misunderstood
Many claim, “I don’t tell the AI to write scenes, so I’m not generating.”
But generative AI does not require scene-level prompts to be generative.
Examples of generative influence include: restructuring sentences, rewriting passages for tone, creating metaphor suggestions, smoothing dialogue, adjusting prose rhythm, rewriting transitions.
Each of these is generative because the new text did not originate from the author.
If someone rejects “robotic” suggestions yet continues to use the tool until the flow feels natural, the tool is shaping style. This is very different from grammar correcting.
Ultimately, this post is not meant to be anti AI. AI has many valuable uses, but when it begins shaping expression in creative writing, its role becomes an ethical consideration rather than a simple tool choice.
Committee on Publication Ethics. (2023, February 13). Authorship and AI tools: COPE position statement. https://publicationethics.org/guidance/cope-position/authorship-and-ai-tools
Li, Y., Wei, F., Zhao, J., Zhang, C., & Zhang, H. (2023). RAIN: Your language models can align themselves without fine-tuning. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.07124
Modern Language Association. (2023). MLA guidance on the use of generative AI in academic writing. https://style.mla.org/citing-generative-ai/
U.S. Copyright Office. (2023, March 16). Copyright registration guidance: Works containing material generated by artificial intelligence (Policy Statement). https://www.copyright.gov/ai/ai_policy_guidance.pdf
Author is a bilingual person who is one class away from a whole ass science degree, capable of reading primary sources.
2026
FUCK HARD
FUCK FAST
FUCK BADLY
NEVER USE GENERATIVE AI
CREATE JOY
MUSIC ALWAYS
PSPSPSPS AT KITTIES ON THE STREET
YUMMY SOUP
go see the doctor about that thing
BE TRANSGENDER
KISS YOUR FRIENDS
EAT CHEESE
NEVER KILL YOURSELF
THRIVE
What if a Saiyan's spiky hair starts hanging down when they get really sad :( Like an unwatered plant :(
@staff @support heyyy so it's been months since this account was restricted. I've sent multiple requests to have it reviewed and I've heard nothing. could this please be looked at? I've had the account for over a decade, I'd hate to start a new one. cheers
@staff @support back again. might go create a new ticket as well soon, just as a treat. pls give me my blog back. pls. pls. PLS PLS plsplspslspslspsplslslslslsllsksss
I think I liked painting on black backgrounds
Finished + Sketch(No I don't do lineart)
I love them so much I've turned my main art account on twitter into a dumb little parody account dedicated to them so watch out for that.
Sketches will be posted strictly here though cuz why not.
A Country Morning (2020)
Since you're taking queer ship requests I would *love* to see Truten in your style if you're so inclined <3
Hey hey yeah yeah it’s been months Ik ik but hey yk what queer people deserve celebration all year long (I am so sorry)
Anyways here we go with the last but not least request !! I’m sorry to the others who requested ships but I’m going to stop here for now to prioritize regular posting, I’m still glad people made requests!! (Even though I was extremely late with them sigh)
I’d say the theme for this one is… Recharging. Y’all ever get in bro’s lap and hold them real tight? No?
I guess I aged them up a little here let’s say it’s GT Truten but Goten doesn’t have that god awful hair.
That’ll be all hope you enjoy!!
goku and pan 🥹🥹🫶💕
had a funny daydream and this came out , heres eoz truten (except they’re in their early twenties here)
Yes it is, you big dope!
(Tablet is finally working again and I have a lot to do, but this is my fun warm up!)
my mom used to buy me namek vegebul as a kid but she had to stop cause the namek vegebul would make me go crazy and hurt myself and others
Omg i drew this in july 😭
Shout to the Heavens Chapter 4
"Hn, you've had a bad day? Did you wake up to a gun in your face?" he chuckles, and Bulma cringes. "That's right, I did shoot him, didn't I?"
"I'm sorry I tried to kill you. I really thought you were going to eat me," she says softly.
"I still might," and without looking at him, she can hear the smile in Vegeta's voice.
An Archive of Our Own, a project of the Organization for Transformative Works
Vegeta and his loved ones <3 and a detail bonus
