fiber artists online making the most insane shit and captioning it like "saturday knitting project :)" as if it isn't the yarn equivalent to the sistine chapel

Origami Around

ellievsbear

Product Placement
Sweet Seals For You, Always

pixel skylines

@theartofmadeline
we're not kids anymore.
AnasAbdin
Not today Justin
occasionally subtle
sheepfilms
will byers stan first human second
Monterey Bay Aquarium
One Nice Bug Per Day

shark vs the universe
d e v o n

roma★
hello vonnie
almost home
todays bird

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from Colombia

seen from Singapore
seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from Romania
seen from Nigeria

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@bananapuddingwithwhip
fiber artists online making the most insane shit and captioning it like "saturday knitting project :)" as if it isn't the yarn equivalent to the sistine chapel
Inadvisable tabletop RPG jam premise #137: Game jam where each entry consists solely of paratextual discussion of the mechanics of a hypothetical or invented RPG; examples include an errata document, a developer Q&A, or a forum thread debating the correct interpretation of a particular rule.
@shoutyourporpoise replied:
I could SWEAR you’ve made this post before, or perhaps this is such a characteristically “you” concept that I already imagined a world in which you had
I don't think so, no. I did once (unintentionally) curate a game jam about writing supplements for invented or hypothetical games, the product of which you can find here, but this is a different thing.
(If anyone really wants this one to be a thing, though, feel free to toss your entry into the reblogs. I'm not going to do a proper game jam on itch.io or whatever because its UI really wants you to have cover art and a promotional blurb and such, and this doesn't feel like it warrants it!)
Does the Enchantment Level increase from working with another artificer of equal level stack with the Wondrous Materials modifier? Do they stack past level 30?
Asked 7 years, 4 months ago, by [staminamina]
Modified 2 hours ago
Viewed 1k times
Just like the title says.
The rules text for Fine Materials from Principia says
Fine materials […] when used for an enchantment project, allow you to create things beyond your normal limits, including beyond the normal level cap of 30. […] wondrous materials allow an increase of three levels.
It’s obvious they meant this to go past 30, since they say it, but notably, they also extend the enchantment time/cost/difficulty table to level 33, and add 31 to the prime table, so they clearly have support for it.
The problem is that Toil and Trouble adds tandem enchantment, and I don’t know what to make of its rules!
The text reads:
While enchanters normally guard their secrets jealously, working alone, they can perform remarkable feats together. […] if allowing total cooperation, where no secrets are kept from each other, the boost increases to 5.
Which, unlike Principia, doesn’t stipulate it can go past level 30, but also doesn’t specify otherwise.
Muddying the waters, Toil and Trouble doesn’t extend the time/cost/difficulty table, but does give the appropriate formula for how to calculate those values at each level past 25 (which do line up with Principia).
Perhaps most importantly, if these modifiers did stack, we would have access to the prime 37 enchantments, which are not described anywhere in the book to my knowledge.
My instinct is that tandem enchantment caps at 30, or else does not stack with wondrous materials.
--
ACCEPTED ANSWER by [goodgriefer] (+12)
P.125:Principia states the following on the topic of stacking buffs.
When multiple effects modify some element of the creation process, they apply only to what portion of the process makes logical sense. A 10% reduction to the cost of reagents will not reduce the cost of shipping the final product. When two effects modify overlapping sections of the creation process, additive/subtractive effects are applied simultaneously, then multiplicative effects are applied simultaneously.
Then on P.169:Principia, we see
Drunkenness – A state of intoxication, whether by alcohol or other, more exotic substances, caps an enchanter’s effective level at 2 levels below their actual level, regardless of any other buffs
From this we can gather that multiple ‘effective level’ effects should be able to stack (there just wasn’t another such effect that increased levels, as of Principia), and that if they intend something to set a cap, they probably will.
That implies that, yes, you can technically create a level 38 enchantment (or 37).
As for what the theoretical prime 37 enchantments would be, I would point to P.56:Principia on the existing prime enchantments, which says:
Often, a player may wish to create an enchantment that is outside the scope of the primes, especially as it is recommended for a character to have an eventual capstone goal for their enchanting career. In such cases, it is worth remembering that the only enchantment known categorically to be impossible is one that confers true immortality. It may be possible to approximate using a combination of primes, or else by adding the functionality to an existing prime. Page 287 lists commonly used prime combinations.
Which is to say: A prime can have whatever functionality it needs to for a game to make sense. Considering 37 is so far beyond normal enchanting as to be unthinkable to the average enchanter, it makes a logical place to put whatever macguffin result overarches the whole game.
And to be clear, when I say ‘unthinkable’ I mean unthinkable; taking a look at the formula in T&T more closely, as well as taking into account the cost of using Wondrous Materials (or even Marvellous Materials, if you just want a new prime)
First, a theoretical level 38 enchanted item would take over 40 years for an enchanter to create (and no, you don’t get the assistant improvement to creation time from tandem enchantment, you’re doing it purely for the level boost).
Second, the cost, (including the increase from wondrous materials), would be on the order of 12 million gold.
Even if you had the time and the money, you’d still be stuck, because setbacks are rolled for on a monthly basis, and lose a percentage of progress. Without mitigation, you’re looking at losing 4 to 20 years of progress, about every two years. Mathematically, your odds of completing this project, are basically zero, especially if you’re mortal.
The only way to have a reasonable chance of creating an item with level 37/38 enchantments is to have two lead enchanters of level 29/30, with functionally limitless funding, and then also, to have some significant number of assistants, who, I will note, will have to be of at least level 27 to 28, due to the 10 level gap limit for assistants. Doing the math, a quick and dirty estimate suggests you’ll need at least 5 such assistants to maybe break even, and realistically, you’ll the maximum 18-19 of them to actually get the project done in a reasonable timeframe, which, may I note, is still ten years, which is probably more like twenty years, due to the probability of setbacks.
That is to say, to create a prime 37 enchantment, you need a team of about 20 world class enchanters to spend 10-20 years of their lives, with limitless funding (likely in the realm of 50 million gold, after accounting for who you have to pay, and the increased material cost from setbacks), to put their lives entirely on hold, and pool the entirety of their knowledge without reservation.
That is not a two person project. That is the manhattan project. That is the project that your players will, in the endgame, either get pulled into, or have to resist getting pulled into. That is an overarching plot thread that is running from the very beginning of the game.
What will it do? Frankly, that is entirely up to the game master. It may literally be the manhattan project.
peak evocative imagery, 10/10
i do appreciate the way that we tumblr users have evolved our language to discuss our feelings related to The Character/The Guy. you used to have to just say he was hot or he was making your ovaries explode or he was a precious cinnamon roll even if he looked bad or was just kind of standing there or whatever. now you can say things like “the creature” or “he looks so sopping wet here” or “i want to chain him to my radiator” like it’s just more inclusive and adaptable to the situation
as someone on the asexual spectrum, this shift in language genuinely made me feel more comfortable and happy in fandom spaces. i've never once wanted to lick a man's abs. i HAVE wanted to chain a man to my radiator. and that's beautiful.
Rotating the blorbo in the microwave of your mind just says so much. No specifics needed.
“this character did not act in the most objectively logical way possible!” is not ! actually valid literary criticism
i have trust that the media literacy enjoyers will find this one idk
two “cats” interacting
Got possessed in the middle of my work shift.
Sick list of symptoms bro. Now try humanizing your behavior instead of pathologizing it.
Pathologizing: Hey sorry I yelled at you. I have this ADHD symptom called RSD that makes me really sensitive.
Humanizing: Hey, I’m sorry that I blew up like that earlier. In the moment I felt really attacked and overwhelmed and I reacted badly, but I know you didn’t mean to offend me with what you said, so that behavior is on me.
Because I just saw a post bitching about this one, I want to add: this post is saying that you need to take accountability for the way you hurt other people, even if it happens because of a symptom of your disability/illness. It's also saying that using terms (especially acronyms) that aren't common knowledge isn't a helpful way to explain yourself. It is NOT saying that you need to let people walk all over you because "your disability isn't an excuse."
If you're diabetic, you don't have to eat the honey glazed ham that will send you into a coma (their example). But you also can't yell at the person offering it and accuse them of trying to kill you. You can just say "thanks, but my body can't handle that kind of sugar intake, so I'll pass"
Edit to add: this post is about people who are already apologizing. If your circumstances mean that you are not in a state of mind to apologize, this post does not apply to you. This post says that IF you are giving an apology, make it a meaningful one.
Bosses and Coworkers: you've got a great work ethic, going above and beyond
Me: I am literally just doing my job. Everyone else is slacking off.
Everyone Else: (magically knows somehow the secret amounts of work the boss is actually asking of them, which the boss cannot tell anyone for Reasons)
There always seems to be a gap in instructions (from bosses, parents, teachers, friends, whoever) between 'required' and 'expected', and this gap is:
invisible
never explained
always a different size
you have to guess the size
if you guess wrong you either get Praised or In Trouble
At least on 'the price is right' you know (because someone *actually told you*) that you are playing a guessing game and that there is an over/under mechanic and that the conquence of guessing wrong isn't a punishment or damaged relationship or getting fired
On an unrelated note my psychiatrist has given me a referal for a formal ASD evaluation
This post is about the neurodivergent frustration of having to deal with neurotypical authority figures who don't say what they mean but I love the pro-union labor-rights energy I'm seeing in the notes
so. i just learned that my entirely me-written resume flags as being AI-written by automated HR systems for a few writing quirks and the fact that i followed all the rules of good resume writing, which is apparently a telltale sign of AI use in this fucking hellworld. i've been desperately applying to jobs that i am massively overqualified for for months with no response, not even an interview, and now i find out that at least part of the reason is because some fucking moron decided that following the rules every career advisor has given me for a decade means i cheated and should be disqualified. the ai bubble cannot pop soon enough. what the actual fuck.
"frequent use of action-result sentences. bullet points all start with action verbs. no career gaps." girl what the fuck are you talking about. that's just resume writing advice being followed. i just did what i was told. it's a fucking resume. you're supposed to do all that stuff. what the fuck do you mean it looks ai generated and wouldn't pass basic detection systems?????????? for following the resume writing rules????????????
wishing every AI bro and ceo a very [REDACTED]
knowing when not to open the comments is a skill
internet soft skills
not opening the comments
letting people be wrong
letting people be wrong about YOU
letting people have a bad impression of you (see above)
knowing when your input isn't needed
spotting bot comments
block button
blocking tip: you don't have to wait to have a negative interaction with someone to block them. you can block them without ever interacting with them. I can't tell you how many times I've seen someone being rude to someone else and preemptively blocked them
"why'd they block me? we've never talked" bro if i see you being nasty to the bartender i'm not gonna chat you up
the reality of being a writer
“oh no, my audience has begun to guess the big twists of my story and are accurately predicting what will happen!”
incorrect response: write the rest of the story to be as twisty, shocking and counter to expectations as possible, regardless of whether this is a logical or satisfying way for the plot to go
correct response:
can someone elaborate on the “make hoax” and “post angry tweet about “leak”“ part. i’m stupid and don’t understand things
sure!
(you’re not stupid. I posted this thinking it would amuse a handful of mutuals who all knew the context and that would be about it, so I didn’t think about providing any other explanation. I had no idea it would spread this far.)
I’ll start from the very beginning just to be thorough. so this is Alex Hirsch, creator and head writer of Gravity Falls, a show which had a big focus on mystery, conspiracies, codes and ciphers, etc. the whole plot is kicked off by one of the main characters finding a mysterious old journal in the woods, which detailed all kinds of weird and supernatural things, but then ended abruptly with the author saying they had to hide the journal because they were being watched. the central driving mystery of the show, therefore, was the question of who wrote the journal and what happened to them.
now, the thing about Gravity Falls is that, while it must be said that the writers weren’t always quite as sure of their plans as we tend to like to think they are, it is very much a fair play mystery, with legitimate clues to what was going on. but the writers were caught off guard by how quickly the show attracted a dedicated audience, including a lot of people outside the primary presumed demographic, who started solving the clues faster than expected. so some of the fans were able to correctly guess who the author was before it was revealed in the show, and the theory started spreading. this put the writers in something of a panic, because this was THE mystery that the whole story revolved around, with ¾ of the show building up to the dramatic reveal in the middle of season 2. they wanted it to be a mystery that could be figured out, sure, but they weren’t prepared for people to solve it so far in advance of when it was planned to be revealed, which would have really taken away from the big moment. they weren’t going to change the main story itself, but having been caught unaware by how much attention the fans were paying, they wanted to up the ante and make the mystery more complex to solve going forward–but first they needed to buy some time and throw the fandom off the scent for a little longer.
hence, Alex’s plan as described above. they whipped up a fake shot that appears to give away the identity of the author as being another character in the show, put it on a screen in the studio as if it was a real animation frame, took a picture of it, and ‘leaked’ it online. it was initially decided to be a hoax (albeit, I think, presumed to be a hoax originating from outside the production team), until Alex posted this tweet:
…before quickly deleting it (though not so quickly that it didn’t get seen, of course).
it worked well enough to distract most people for a while, and wasn’t revealed as a hoax until a year later, when an episode aired that definitively proved that the supposed screenshot could never have happened, at which point Alex owned up to the whole thing as seen in the tweet above. by then the episode with the real reveal wasn’t far off, and while people did still work it out ahead of time, it was more of an “OH MY GOD I KNEW IT!” moment than a “booooooring, we’ve known that for ages” moment, which of course was what the writers wanted all along.
personally I find this a fascinating approach to dealing with the problem of spoilers, because it doesn’t affect the story itself at all; if you watch Gravity Falls today–or if you were watching it when it aired without any significant contact with the fandom–you’d never know about it. ultimately, the problem the writers were facing wasn’t that some people might guess the answer to the mystery–they never wanted to make it completely impossible to predict–so much as it was that they hadn’t designed the story to stand up to so many people working on the puzzle together, which resulted in a sort of total output of puzzle-solving ability that far outstripped the capability of any one solo human being. so their solution is something that’s very much targeted toward delaying that group problem-solving, without actually affecting the experience of any individual person watching the show.
plus, it’s very in keeping with the overall tone of the show.
and now you know!
if your audience guesses the ending of your story
don’t:
change the ending
do:
gaslight them
Unofficial Autism Post
never met a sentence i couldn't make incredibly long
[scrolling through a fandom tag] wrong. wrong. incomprehensibly wrong. wrong but harmless. nice style and color palette but I don't care about that ship. mildly entertaining liveblog update. they whitewashed my girl :( . good joke, reblog. wro--well that's my mutual so I will politely look away. fifteen posts in a row by an innocent rp blog that I don't have the heart to block. take I agree with but op was annoying about it. chapter twenty-eight of a longfic wip. !! GOOD POST !!, instafollowed. bot. technically correctly tagged but uses this acronym for something completely different. museum worthy art piece by a sixteen-year-old from the philippines. wrong. wrong but in a new and exciting way that provokes thought.
This one’s for the tumblrinas
lets make cookies guys!
Sugar
Butter
Eggs
Flour
Salt
Baking powder
Vanilla extract
Chocolate chips
Achievement Available:
C'Mon, You Know You Wanna...
Do it. Click that button. You know which one.
I saw the skirt, got super excited, and was not disappointed
Prev tags via @lostlegendaerie because I am LOSING IT at this
"it's not that deep" START DIGGING!!
DIG
DIG
DIG
DIG