i don’t base women on numbers. i base them - just like everyone else - on the content of their spirit and the productivity of their lives.
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

Kiana Khansmith

blake kathryn
Sade Olutola
dirt enthusiast
todays bird
No title available

@theartofmadeline

oozey mess
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
DEAR READER
Peter Solarz
cherry valley forever

tannertan36
h

shark vs the universe
NASA
YOU ARE THE REASON

titsay
styofa doing anything
seen from Australia
seen from Malaysia

seen from India
seen from United States

seen from India
seen from Türkiye
seen from Germany

seen from Singapore
seen from France
seen from Canada

seen from Germany
seen from Malaysia
seen from Russia

seen from France

seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia

seen from Germany
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from Belgium
@banditsuitedup
i don’t base women on numbers. i base them - just like everyone else - on the content of their spirit and the productivity of their lives.
too much. way, way, way too much!
don’t get me wrong, i love super heroes, and i yearn for the next issue of my favorite comic books. but all these movies, and all those tv shows about super heroes is making it look cheap. it just seems like the genre will saturate as fast as the hype started. it seems like every hero will have its own screen, if they haven’t already. i mean, right now, it’s easy money, and they’re riding the roller coster until the cogs oxidate.
i’m just playing with words here - nothing more, believe me.
it really is a game for me to know as much as i can about everything. i simply like it. i’m interested in lots of fields, and am genuinely curious. anyway, for as long as i can remember, i always asked myself ‘why is there “something” rather than “nothing”’? mostly, because it requires no background knowledge really to be able to participate to the conversation. although science is really interesting, i don’t really know what i’m talking about.
for this question, i feel like the words, the concepts have to be defined here, in order to understand what it implies. words are words and the existence of any of them have no cause really. i mean, does the word “hello” have any reason to be what it is? it could’ve been “hilo” or any word you could possibly imagine or make up, no? language was invented to facilitate interactions, and so on and so forth, but we could’ve probably been speaking completely different languages by now.
where i really want to get is we know, in our language, the definition and the multi-purposes of the word “something”. on the other hand, i feel like the word “nothing” has no real impact. as someone said, “it may be that there's no such thing as "nothing," and that it is simply an abstraction of the human mind.”
Could the answer to why is there “something” rather than “nothing” be because there is no such thing as “nothing”? because there is always some thing even when there doesn’t seem to be. When my friend asks me what’s in the cup and i answer nothing, it omits the existence of all that it really contains.
if there is always some thing, then what was the “something” before all of this “something”?
in the end, i really haven’t pushed the human knowledge on this topic - nor was it my intention, but the purpose was simply to put my two cents in an ageless discussion.
p.s.: is there anybody out there?
I keep forgetting things. I feel like my brain is secretly turning its back on me...
Ok, it’s been a few minutes since my first message and nothing weird has happened. I guess I think it’s safe to say that I AM NOW IN THE BIZZ!
don’t know where this is leading. it’s a first. this is awkward. hi, ma’, i’m on the web!