
No title available

ellievsbear

No title available
DEAR READER
Stranger Things

Discoholic 🪩
h

JBB: An Artblog!
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda

Andulka
Today's Document
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
No title available
noise dept.
RMH
🪼

oozey mess
Xuebing Du
Misplaced Lens Cap

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Brazil

seen from Germany
seen from Malaysia

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from United States

seen from Austria

seen from Ireland

seen from United States

seen from Argentina

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Italy

seen from Finland
@bclawyerlookup
B.C. lawyers vote against accreditation of Christian law school
VANCOUVER -- Members of the Law Society of British Columbia have voted overwhelmingly against accrediting a Christian university's law school.
The referendum was called at the end of September by the society's governors, known as benchers, and was sparked by a community covenant at Trinity Western University in Langley, south of Vancouver.
That covenant prohibits students and staff from sex outside of a marriage between a man and a woman.
The law society said 8,039 of 13,530 eligible voters cast their ballots, with 5,951 voting against accrediting the university and 2,088 voting in favour.
The results are expected to be discussed at a meeting of the governors today
barbara findlay, a self-described "lesbian lawyer," said in a news release that it was a "proud day to be a lawyer."
Former Trinity Western student Jill Bishop, who is now an articled law student, said she was proud that her colleagues stood up for equality.
"The experience of being educated at TWU was very oppressive to me as a lesbian who had to sign the restrictive covenant," she said.
But Trinity Western spokesman Guy Saffold said in a news release that he was disappointed by the vote.
"Trinity Western believes in diversity and the rights of all Canadians to their personal beliefs and values. A person's ability to study and practise the law should not be restricted by their faith," he said.
He said the process is unprecedented, and the result has no effect without a resolution of the benchers.
"The benchers still have the opportunity to do the right thing, and we are encouraging them to think very carefully before passing any resolution against TWU," he said.
The referendum follows a months-long debate among law-society members on accreditation.
In April, the governors decided to accredit the law school, a decision that triggered a non-binding vote in June by B.C. lawyers.
The results were 3,210 to 968 in favour of a motion calling on the society's governing body to reject accreditation of the school slated to open in the fall of 2016.
The governors called a referendum on the issue in late September, saying it would be the most democratic and transparent way for lawyers to express their views because most of the society's 11,000 members were unable to vote in person in June.
Three other provincial legal governing bodies have weighed in on the subject, which is expected to eventually land in the Supreme Court of Canada.
Law societies in Ontario and Nova Scotia have voted against accrediting law students from Trinity, and the university has launched legal challenges of those decisions.
Members of the Law Society of New Brunswick passed a September resolution directing its council not to accredit the law school.
Source: http://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/b-c-lawyers-vote-against-accreditation-of-christian-law-school-1.2080258
Mussio Law Group
One of the ultimate questions when dealing with an ICBC injury claim: "When should I settle?" http://bit.ly/1CThRMs
Source: https://twitter.com/MussioLawGroup/media
Stephen Harper's unappointed Senate seats unconstitutional, Vancouver lawyer says
Stephen Harper: Senate fulfilling its function
Aniz Alani files application in Federal Court calling for PM to appoint 16 senators
A Vancouver lawyer is taking Prime Minister Stephen Harper to court for failing to fill 16 empty Senate seats, claiming the delay in appointing senators is a violation of the Canadian Constitution.
Aniz Alani has filed an application in Federal Court calling for the appointment of 16 senators, arguing the Constitution requires the prime minister to fill empty seats in a reasonable amount of time.
The lawsuit follows comments Harper made at an event earlier this month in Markham, Ont.
"I don't think I'm getting a lot of calls from Canadians to name more senators right about now," Harper said.
That irked Alani, a corporate lawyer who says he has no political affiliation, just an interest in constitutional law.
"I looked at the Constitution myself, and I saw it says 'when a vacancy occurs,' and I thought why isn't there any controversy about this?" Alani told CBC News.
"And it seemed to be that this was a political issue that was kind of ignoring the legal realities of the Constitution," he said.
"As a lawyer, but also as a Canadian, I think the rule of law is especially important," he said.
Harper has named 59 senators since he became prime minister in 2006, but the Senate's speaker has said the number of vacancies is affecting the scandal-plagued chamber's ability to function.
Harper claims it's still working well enough to pass his legislation.
"From the government's standpoint, we're able to continue to pass our legislation through the Senate," he said. "So from our standpoint, the Senate is continuing to fulfil its function," Harper told the crowd at the Markham event.
Source:www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/stephen-harper-s-unappointed-senate-seats-unconstitutional-vancouver-lawyer-says-1.2873629
Search a cellphone? Only with warrant, B.C. lawyer argues
Courts to decide whether police should be able to access computer, phone data during arrests
Police should be required to obtain a search warrant before combing through the text messages, emails and other data on a suspect's smartphone after arrest, a defence lawyer told British Columbia's highest court on Monday.
The B.C. Appeal Court case, involving a kidnapping nearly eight years ago, is the latest to consider when police should be able to search the vast amounts of private information stored on modern-day cellphones.
Rajan Singh Mann was convicted two years ago for a June 2006 kidnapping in Richmond, B.C., where Gary Kwong was taken by gunpoint and held for a $100,000 ransom. Kwong was released, relatively unharmed, the following day and no ransom was paid.
Charges were originally laid against Mann, William Scott and Terry Richardson, but Scott pleaded guilty and Richardson died before the case was finished.
In the days and weeks that followed the kidnapping, Mann was arrested twice, and each time police seized a BlackBerry smartphone.
Both phones were protected by passwords, prompting investigators to send them to an RCMP lab in Ottawa for forensic examination. Investigators were able to recover data from one phone two months later, while the contents of the other phone weren't recovered until September 2008.
At trial, the judge saw dozens of text messages from the two phones. The judge concluded whoever used the phones was involved in the kidnapping, and also concluded Mann could be linked to both phones.
But Mann's lawyer, Peter Wilson, told a three-judge panel on Monday that the RCMP should never have searched the smartphones without a warrant.
"Smartphones are potentially repositories of vast amounts of personal information," said Wilson.
"The privacy interests that are engaged with these kinds of devices are markedly different from the privacy interests in other receptacles."
The phones were seized as part of something known as a search incident to arrest, a principle that allows the police to search a suspect for items such as weapons or evidence when they're taken into custody. Police don't require a warrant to seize such items, noted Wilson.
However, Wilson said the power to search a suspect during an arrest doesn't give police officers carte blanche to rifle through the contents of a phone or a computer.
"Because of the significant privacy interests in play, they have to go further and obtain a warrant if they want to do the full forensic analysis of the devices," he said.
Cross-country conundrum
Courts across the country have grappled with the question of when police should be permitted to search the contents of computers or smartphones, but it is a legal debate that has yet to be settled.
The Supreme Court of Canada ruled in a separate case last year that special authorization is needed to search computers and cellphones during the execution of a search warrant. That case involved searches of a location, such as a house, and didn't specifically address a search during an arrest.
The high court will hear another case this spring involving an Ontario man who was convicted after a robbery at a Toronto flea market. Police officers looked through Kevin Fearon's cellphone after he was arrested and found pictures of a gun and cash, as well as a text message about jewelry.
The Ontario Court of Appeal upheld Fearon's conviction, concluding that because his phone wasn't protected by a password, police were permitted to look through the device "in a cursory fashion" to see if there was evidence relevant to the crime.
Had they wanted to search the phone's contents in more detail, or if the phone had been protected by a password, the officers would have required a warrant to search it, the court ruled.
Still, the Ontario Appeal Court declined to craft a blanket rule to govern cellphone searches.
The Supreme Court of Canada is scheduled to hear arguments in Fearon's case in April.
Source: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/search-a-cellphone-only-with-warrant-b-c-lawyer-argues-1.2503063
The BC Lawyer Lookup - How to find a lawyer
The Law Society website now offers lawyers and members of the public a new service - the BC Lawyer Look-up. The look-up allows lawyers and members of the public to search for a current BC lawyer by name. Search results provide a lawyer's basic membership status information and, in the case of a practising lawyer, his or her business address and telephone number. This is the same information that the Law Society routinely provides in response to telephone enquiries and the look-up is an extension of that service.
The Law Society updates the website data daily. The look-up service is intended to be easy for the public and lawyers to use without assistance. However, it is still necessary to contact the Law Society office for information about a former member or to enquire about a lawyer's professional conduct record.
Practising lawyers are categorized as either "in private practice" or "not in private practice." These categories are based on insured/exempt codes on our Member Information System and are intended to help members of the public distinguish lawyers who are eligible to provide legal services from those who are not, although there will be exceptions depending on a lawyer's exact practice situation.
The contact information for non-practising and retired members is excluded from the service, as are email and fax numbers for all lawyers. While email and fax are common and useful means of contacting lawyers, they are also more amenable to misuse for commercial or marketing purposes. The Law Society Disclosure and Privacy Task Force and staff will consider this feature further, possibly posting email and fax numbers on a consent basis.
Source: https://www.lawsociety.bc.ca/page.cfm?cid=1718&t=The-BC-Lawyer-Lookup-.-how-to-find-a-lawyer