#bclaw

[bewarethealpacalypse]

We still clean up nice. #lawprom #smithandwollensky #castle #fancy #bclaw (at Smith & Wollensky Boston Back Bay Steakhouse)

[definitlynotdwr]

Manufactured Judgments? How Canadian Courts Are Quietly Reshaping Property Rights.

A recent B.C. Supreme Court ruling has intensified long-standing concerns about the direction of Indigenous-rights jurisprudence in Canada. In Cowichan Tribes v. Canada, Justice Barbara Young recognized that the Cowichan may hold Aboriginal title to a major tract of land in Richmond—land that has been surveyed, subdivided, and privately owned for more than a century. While the court did not…

View On WordPress

[webbchappellphotography]

portraits of Caroline Reilly, BC LAW graduate and women’s reproductive rights advocate for BC LAW Magazine

[webbchappellphotography]

fun shoot for BC LAW Magazine with great art direction and design from Bob Parsons, Seven Elm Design

[bclawyerlookup]

The BC Lawyer Lookup - How to find a lawyer

The Law Society website now offers lawyers and members of the public a new service - the BC Lawyer Look-up. The look-up allows lawyers and members of the public to search for a current BC lawyer by name. Search results provide a lawyer's basic membership status information and, in the case of a practising lawyer, his or her business address and telephone number. This is the same information that the Law Society routinely provides in response to telephone enquiries and the look-up is an extension of that service.

The Law Society updates the website data daily. The look-up service is intended to be easy for the public and lawyers to use without assistance. However, it is still necessary to contact the Law Society office for information about a former member or to enquire about a lawyer's professional conduct record.

Practising lawyers are categorized as either "in private practice" or "not in private practice." These categories are based on insured/exempt codes on our Member Information System and are intended to help members of the public distinguish lawyers who are eligible to provide legal services from those who are not, although there will be exceptions depending on a lawyer's exact practice situation.

The contact information for non-practising and retired members is excluded from the service, as are email and fax numbers for all lawyers. While email and fax are common and useful means of contacting lawyers, they are also more amenable to misuse for commercial or marketing purposes. The Law Society Disclosure and Privacy Task Force and staff will consider this feature further, possibly posting email and fax numbers on a consent basis.

Source: https://www.lawsociety.bc.ca/page.cfm?cid=1718&t=The-BC-Lawyer-Lookup-.-how-to-find-a-lawyer

[familylawyersvancouver]

Common-law couples as good as married in B.C.

Family Law Act says common-law couples considered spouses after 2 years

A new legal definition of "spouse" came into effect in B.C. on Monday, meaning that common-law couples that have lived together for two years have the same rights and responsiblities as married couples.

 Under the act, a spousal relationship begins either the day a couple is married, or on the day they move in together — whichever comes first. And once an unmarried couple spends two years living together, it's a done deal.

Family lawyer Grace Choi says it was time for the old family law act to get a makeover.

"Because the Family Relations Act is now about 34 years old, the [new] Family Law Act wanted to ... reflect more about what was going on in society," Choi she told CBC News.

B.C.'s Family Law Act

3  (1) A person is a spouse for the purposes of this Act if the person

(a) is married to another person, or

(b) has lived with another person in a marriage-like relationship, and

(i) has done so for a continuous period of at least 2 years, or

(ii) except in Parts 5 [Property Division] and 6 [Pension Division], has a child with the other person.

(2) A spouse includes a former spouse.

(3) A relationship between spouses begins on the earlier of the following:

(a) the date on which they began to live together in a marriage-like relationship;

(b) the date of their marriage.

The new stipulations under B.C.'s Family Law Act treat common law couples the same as married couples for purposes of property division if they split up.

Couples who have been living together for two years share the same legal rights as married couples, including a 50/50 split of shared debts and assets, excluding pre-relationship property, inheritances and gifts. In the past, people who had been living together for decades were not entitled to share in assets accrued during the relationship.

"If you're the person who owns the assets and decided that you didn't want to get married — part of the reason was because you didn't want to opt into the property division regime — you're going to find this difficult to swallow,"  Choi said.

In B.C., there were more than 160,000 common law couples in 2011, and that number was growing at a rate three times faster than the number of married couples. Statistics Canada estimated that the number of common law couples across the country was growing four times faster than the number of marriages.

Some family lawyers have advised common-law couples to enter into legally binding co-habitation agreements to save additional grief during a potential future breakup.

Not common across Canada

Though other provinces have some form of marriage-like designation for common law couples, the definitions and rights afforded those couples vary widely.

B.C. family lawyer Grace Choi says the new Family Law Act gives common law couples more rights over shared property. (CBC)

In Nova Scotia, a common law ex-partner would be entitled to spousal support and a portion of pension benefits, but wouldn't be able to claim half of any property, including the family home, the car, or jewelry.

Under existing Quebec law, partners in a de facto relationship have no rights, duties and responsibilities to each other — no matter how many years they've lived together.

The Quebec law was recently challenged by the ex-partner of a business tycoon who sought a $50-million lump sum separation payment, but in January, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that the province's civil code is constitutional in its treatment of the financial entitlement of couples who are not legally married and who separate.

Statistics Canada says nearly 1.4 million Quebecers are in what the federal agency calls "common-law" relationships, according to the 2011 census, and about 60 per cent of children are born to such unmarried couples.

 Source: http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/common-law-couples-as-good-as-married-in-b-c-1.1413551

[icbcadvice]

[sbobblaw]