Lightyears in Time and Not Distance*
*Not a scientific commentary on the way we use words, I promise
How long does it take to fall in love? It’s a question I find myself asking really often - and a question I don’t really seem to be able to find the answer to. There are love languages and a million articles about love out there and there’s so much everyone has to say about the ways we love, the moments we fall in love, the things that were said and the things left unsaid, but I don’t think I’ve gotten an answer on the number. If the clock keeps ticking and we all experience love in a myriad of ways that’s unique to us, surely, I should be able to quantify that number and say, “On average, this is how long I take to fall in love.”
“On average, a mammal takes about 21 seconds to pee.” We have the answer to a question I don’t think most people thought to ask - certainly not the question posed by the average mammal, and yet. And yet this is an answer we have, and yet this is knowledge that I can’t erase from my head (and now you can’t either, and you’re welcome). But ask the same people who won an ignoble how long it takes to love, and they can’t answer it. Maybe I’ll win one for this in the future. That’d be nice.
I’m a researcher. I like numbers, I like data that flows, that makes sense to me, things I can put into neat little slots - and this means I’d like to this to my feelings too. Numbers have long been used as a tool of oppression by many and that shocks me, because if all I have in my hand is a tool that’s been used to slot and delete and discriminate, is it going to do any better in my hand? Are these numbers I want to be looking for? Am I any different? I have a lot of questions but a lot of ways of getting answers seem wrong and reductive and I don’t know if the sum total of the human experience can be reduced to this. But also know that I’m not trying to achieve this - I’m trying to make sense of things the way I best know how.
If you spend your entire life reducing your experiences to keywords and numbers for filing away, it easily becomes a pattern of processing that occurs to you without prompting. And I’m fine with that, for the most part. Or at least I’d like to think so. Injured X times in my childhood, hit my head Y times, felt like running away from home Z times. Stands to reason I try to slot everything else in manners that meet specific criteria that allow for specific forms of existence. I did this when I wondered if I was ace and wanted to know if I was ace enough to adopt the title. (This was four years better and I know better for myself and for others but when your patterns of thinking are so set, you really don’t know how to unravel them.)
Sometimes you don’t want to? I think that’s true of me too. If I unravel the only pattern of thought I’ve known all this while, what does it mean for me to be able to consider any alternative in its place? I don’t know how. It’s like picking up a research tool you’ve never used before, just assuming you know the process and the mechanics and hoping for the best. Researchers are supposed to thrive in uncertainty, it gives them greater access to the fertile lands of sowing questions and caressing, coaxing, cajoling answers out of barren spaces and while I can do that with most other things, I find it difficult to extend that infinite patience to myself.
So I keep asking this question of people. And I keep not getting answers and not knowing what to do with myself. Because if I have no chances of getting the answers and all the chances to fall in love, I won’t know what to do with myself. Directed emotionality is confusing to me because why would you - anyone really - consciously make the choice to direct any emotion in my direction? What does it for you to not know my flaws and love me? What does it mean for you to know them and continue to love me? When do you leave? What makes you choose to stay? Answers to these questions would help me make a frantic mindmap, a schedule, a calendar list of events that I would need to go through in order to fall in love, stay in love, fall out of love, and everything in between. But I don’t have that, and I don’t know how to, and sometimes that scares me.
I get that life doesn’t come with the neat blueprint I expected and I’ve come to accept that - but that a small facet of it, love in any form goes right now really - the fact that I can’t answer that really wounds my pride. I can’t keep falling in love and sort of hope it’ll make sense along the way - I’ve tried that so far and it hasn’t been working. False and true positives, true and false negatives, I’ve sat on all of those quadrants and I still haven’t found a way to quantify the experience in a way that lets me sigh and go “Okay, this is the result of hypothesis testing” and people keep telling me that’s a good thing that I don’t have the answers, but is it really? They keep telling me to stop looking and just be and let the experience wash over me, but critically, that hasn’t worked in my favour in the past and I have no reason to believe it’s going to start doing so now.
Engaging with my idea of love means engaging with a lot of doubt. I’d like to someday believe that people can love me despite all the doubts, despite the niggling thoughts in my head, despite my body and my mind wanting different things, despite my body occupying a different space of gender than the inside of my head, despite my antidepressants culling very specific emotional responses in me, despite this, despite that. But I don’t know if it’s fair to ask that of anyone. Why would they compromise? What do they stand to gain from my reductivism?
I’m not sure there are ways to ask these questions that don’t sound dismissive and like I’m incapable of love, but I promise it’s not that. It’s that I worry that I’m doing it wrong, and maybe if I had signposts telling me what to do at specific stages along the way, maybe I’ll do it right. And maybe I won’t disappoint and maybe I’ll be enough. But I don’t know. I can’t test. I can’t tell.
I tried to make the question one of grandiosity instead. How long would it have taken for the Universe to fall in love with the Earth? In the scale of things, I’m as insignificant on Earth as the Earth is in comparison to the Universe, so maybe these metrics are useful. And even in my most reductive times, I realise that the Universe probably fell in love with Earth as a process - a process of closeness and slowly drifting away and expanding till love could occupy the vacuum created between them. And maybe I should try that too. And maybe this time it won’t take five billion years, and maybe it won’t make sense on a cosmic scale, and maybe I never get that ignoble after all. And it’ll be okay.












