Ambrosia: Could you please introduce yourself with your name and what you do.
Sharon: My name is Sharon, and I am an artist.
A: Cool. The topic of today's interview is on intellectual property, so my first question for you is what is your understanding of intellectual property?
S: My understanding of intellectual property is anything that a person intelligently conceives with their own intellect put to together, or to create something that is of use somehow.
A: And how well would you say you understand the current laws and regulations surrounding intellectual property?
S: As far as understanding the laws, I understand probably very little.
A: Okay, can you explain in your own words what you do understand about the current laws and regulations?
S: I understand that there are laws put into place that help to protect people and that basically what the law covers is your ability to file for having created or discovered the intellectual property by gathering all of your documentation and any information that you would like included and by sending it in and being able to have it protected so that no other second or third or any other party can stake claim to it. If they would like to use any of it or all of it, they would need express permission directly from you as the person who filed first.
A: Wow that's a lot, see you know. Do you think there are ethical dimensions to intellectual property rights, besides just the legal ones?
S: I'm not real clear on what you would consider an ethical dimension...
A: Let me see if I can restate it...do you think there is ethical value in intellectual property rights, besides just legal ones?
S: Okay, so what you're asking is are there further dimensions that should be considered, or...
A: Ya, do you think the way the rights are implemented now, do you believe that there are ethical values or it's strictly monetary and legal?
S: I believe that it contains ethical values, I'm sure that with anything though when a lot of laws are made they don't take every perspective into account so I would assume that there's further work that could be done to protect the intellectual property of people who file.
A: What do you think should not be protected by the intellectual property rights? Or do you believe pretty much anything that anyone thinks should be protected?
S: I would have to hear some examples cause just in thinking off the top of my head, I don't think, I mean I'm sure people would be filing for things that are just totally ludicrous but without knowing what that list is I couldn't agree or disagree. I would think that anything that someone feels is of value that they have been the creator of they deserve the right to that property.
A: Okay, I like that answer. As far as the term that intellectual property is protected, how long do you think that should be?
S: Well, with understanding the length of time that it is now, I kinda feel like, two things I think, once that person's life has expired there really is no necessity for them personally to continue to have that right, that it should be allowed to be then opened for others to use and develop. However, if that person through inheritance has left the rights to someone else and they actively pursue it or even just the mere fact that they have those rights then it should be an inheritable type of situation. So, I think that, in other words, if I created something, filed for it, and I pass a way next year I should have been able to have left it as an inheritance to my children, husband, or whoever my heirs would be and they should have the right to either wave that right to keep it or they should have the ability to keep it.
A: Okay, and would it stop at the generation after you or would you give them permission to pass it on to the next generation and so on?
S: If it belongs to you, and maybe even made it into an entity, a functioning company, or a huge reality, I don't think that right should be taken just because of a time span. I think the original creator intended it to be passed on as a legacy, if it's for that purpose than they should have the right as the heirs to that, just like a house would be or an estate, it's the same thing. Property is property.
A: Thank you so much for doing this interview with me.