My page will probably consist of mainly reblogs and occasional ramblings every now and then. My bio has all the basic information you need to know about me, but to learn more about me and my views, check out my fluffle.
Thanks!
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
$LAYYYTER
art blog(derogatory)

tannertan36
macklin celebrini has autism

ellievsbear
Claire Keane
No title available

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

oozey mess
One Nice Bug Per Day
Xuebing Du

Kiana Khansmith

No title available
No title available
🪼
tumblr dot com
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
Show & Tell

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Japan
seen from Venezuela
seen from Iraq
seen from Colombia
seen from United States

seen from T1
seen from Australia
seen from Sweden
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Germany
seen from Venezuela
seen from Ecuador

seen from Netherlands
seen from United States
@bishounenic
My page will probably consist of mainly reblogs and occasional ramblings every now and then. My bio has all the basic information you need to know about me, but to learn more about me and my views, check out my fluffle.
Thanks!
blegh deleting those posts bc I need to rewrite them when my mind is more clear, I jumbled my wording but I don't feel like editing
TMEs: Jax is bad trans rep because he's meannnnnnnnnnnnnnn :((
Trans women: Actually, I relate to her because—
TMEs: YOU ARE EVIL AND WORSE THAN AN ABUSER. Jax is soooooooooo bad for the transfem community like sooooooo bad :((
TME = cis men, cis women, trans men, transmasculine nonbinary people.
TMA = trans women, transfeminine nonbinary people.
Both categories include women and nonbinary people
Both categories include people with penises, and people with vaginas, and people with ambiguous genitals.
Both categories include intersex people.
TME includes cis and trans men.
Anyone claiming this is a binary is being disingenuous or willfully ignorant, which is honestly the same thing.
with the way transmascs talk about their goals and what makes them euphoric, it seems like they want to be a fetishized image of a trans woman more than they want to be a man.
Hi why when I see transfeminism posts an alarming amount are bashing trans men. Not ALL. I think it's in the minority. But it's enough to be noticable.
I just want to like support everyone without having to put myself down.
Women being fed up with the main perpetrators and beneficiaries of systemic misogyny (men) is not "bashing" hope that helps.
I think the trans part of my statement was forgotten.
Yes, trans women are women and trans men are men. But my point is gone when you removed the word "trans" in my statement. I am talking about a small part of the trans community that act like transmascs are demons. I am not talking about women and men in general. I understand how women are fed up with misogyny and often take it out on men. But saying "god I hate men" Is different from "all trans men need to die" Which was the type of statements I was referring to. You are specifically excluding an already marginalized group.
Regardless, thank you for your input and have a wonderful day. If this debate must continue I will try to be as respectful as I can.
I'll ask you three questions to illustrate.
If a disabled feminist woman says that about disabled men do you think you can say this isn't a matter of reacting to misogyny, but bashing disabled men?
If a gay feminist woman says that about gay men do you think you can say this isn't a matter of reacting to misogyny, but bashing gay men?
If a feminist Black woman says that about Black men do you think you can say this isn't a matter of reacting to misogyny, but bashing Black men?
The answer to all of these, of course, is no. But then why should a feminist trans woman saying that about trans men work any differently?
Of course if we want to look at the direct application of misogyny we need to look at how it is applied within a same demographic. Otherwise, we have to bring the other factors in as the different factors apply.
For example, a cis feminist saying things about trans men, or a white feminist saying things about Black men, will have to look very different to be done properly. A white woman can jeopardise a Black man's life by utilising her whiteness, after all.
Further, just as the point of feminism is to address misogyny, the point of transfeminism is to address transmisogyny. A trans man can leverage transmisogyny. Observing this, and reacting to it when it happens, isn't exclusionary or marginalising. It can be rude, it can feel mean, it can hurt feelings, which can absolutely be serious at the individual level - but it doesn't have the structural power to exclude or marginalise.
As the "transmisandry truthers" or "transandrophobia truthers" get louder and annoying-er, fair warning: you'll see more of that in response. Just as a cis man who gets feminism doesn't feel individually targeted when cis feminists say "all men need to die" - which they absolutely do - a trans man who gets transfeminism should get to a point where he doesn't feel individually targeted by this. It's the de-fanged reaction of the downtrodden, it's politically motivated, it's not a personal attack or in the position of power necessary to leverage bigotry.
So this guy does multiple dogwhistles for transfems in an extremely short period, compares transfeminists to 4chan nazis, (which is also a dog whistle actually) lies about the history of transfeminism, and gets met with eager support from another pretend transfeminist, and yet people will still think transmisandrobros are nothing but a gaggle of misled but hate-free transmascs? Come on.
"fighting against misandry is real feminism, not like these feminazis"
ONCE MORE FOR THOSE IN THE BACK: THEY'RE GAMERGATERS WHO HAPPEN TO BE TRANS