Its me, im girls
No title available

ellievsbear
Acquired Stardust

JBB: An Artblog!

Origami Around

blake kathryn
Misplaced Lens Cap

pixel skylines
styofa doing anything

Kiana Khansmith
RMH

No title available
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
almost home

oozey mess
🪼
One Nice Bug Per Day

#extradirty
wallacepolsom
Xuebing Du
seen from Japan

seen from United States
seen from Lithuania
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Netherlands

seen from Singapore

seen from Cyprus
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Singapore
seen from Kyrgyzstan
seen from Canada
seen from Uzbekistan

seen from United States

seen from United Arab Emirates
@bittersnakes
Its me, im girls
M-M-M-MULTIKILL!
Saw your Neil Gaiman post and as someone that found comfort in Good Omens (and got hyperfixated on it), I'm finally glad that some people are finally talking about how he isn't that great.
Even as a Fan, GOmens fandom is so...weird. See, in other fandoms people won't give much of a flying f/ck about the authors besides some mild respect or praise, but GOmens praise Neil SO HARD, despite giving off some iffy vibes (that now I understand why, after that big post) Never liked how almost every single POC character in GO has such a minimal role, same with women characters, the fact he's been caught (and that can be easily checked) lying about his ideas surrounding GOmens, the way he went from "Is not a romance, but it can be if you want to" -> "i always wrote it as a love story" also how he went from "There won't be another season because of Terry and because the ideas for the next book were incorporated in the show" -> "It was in 2019 when I finished writing S2 with the ideas I discussed with Terry before he died" and like seriously no one never noticed how much of a clown he his lying and backpedalling all over again again? Then there's how bad rep for fat people Sandman was and instead of accepting criticism he just keeps giving some "vague intelligent answer" and sits and waits for his legion of fans with a parasocial relationship to defend him. But somehow he's treated as a world treasure and a genius with a big brain. And this is less problematic and more petty but I'll be honest. He isn't that much of a good writer anyway? The prose is okay is good, but the worldbuilding and lore and characters is mostly edgy and lacks deepness. His fans seriously want to make a sea out of muddle puddles,,, and that's fair! Is such a big part of fan culture to dig into the smallests of things and make an universe out of a cardbox background character, but please, don't give Neil the credit that he doesn't deserve. And what proves more to me that he isn't that good of a writer, is just...take a look at that mess of a S2 of Good Omens, it was so bad that some people had to THEORIZE that it was bad on purpose. I have such a beef with S2, characters like Muriel, Saraqael and Michael and Maggie and Nina were so heavily promoted and of course everyone was hyped, finally more POC, more disabled characters, and yay, women! And they're lesbians! And and...and hold on, how it is that Muriel didn't do that much at all? How it is that Saraqael after being so hyped BARELY had almost nothing to do, is really that all the disabled rep we got? How is it that Michael and Uriel barely had anything to do and were just background characters again? It just angers me with how with so many fem-presenting characters, and POC and disabled persons cast, they literally add nothing to the series, AND NO ONE EVER TALKS ABOUT IT. Is just this endless praise for Neil and his oh big brain. All praise Neil Gaiman, our lord and saviour of queer people. HOW IT IS, THAT THE TWO LESBIANS HYPED ROMANCE WAS ALL RELATED TO AZIRAPHALE MEDDLING WITH THEM TRYING TO SHIP THEM? And it also was bad, very badly done, is really this the women representation we got, seriously??? Talking about misleading advertising.
S2 was such such a mess, it just shows how much Good Omens needed Terry to be, well, Good Omens. I really suspect Neil stole ideas from the fandom because S2 was just a trainwreck of all the fanfic tropes you could find in GO fandom and is almost disrespectful to Terry's work in Good Omens, and I don't care for how much Neil makes his friendship with Terry as a pity party and as a "it gives me so much joy, Terry would be so happy", because seriously it's almost manipulative. Talking about Manipulative. His meddling with fandom is starting to feel unprofessional, but this ask is already long... Sorry lmao, something on me snapped after getting finally the solid evidence that Neil .Is. Not. Great
Oh he’s always been completely unprofessional but since he types in a mixture of corporate-speak and “cool dad” talk his fanbase doesn’t notice.
Here’s the thing about Neil, he’s both petty and extremely insincere. People criticized lolicon sin his presence and he was so offended on the behalf of weirdos who pleasure themselves to Hentai depicting child molestation that he wrote a several paragraph long response dismissing simulated child pornography as simply being “icky speech” that should be protected by the sacred American constitution despite, you know, the fact he’s not even American so his weird obsession with the first amendment and only ever really bringing it up to defend simulated child porn is and always has been suspicious.
As for his backpedalling, the man sees $$$$ and just goes for anything he can find to make more. People love to say “oh but he donates tens of thousands to charity!” yeah, usually to HIS charity for bailing out pedophiles. With funds typically out of the wallets of his fans due to fundraising it rather than coming out of his own checkbook so it’s not exactly a charitable action as much as it’s an empty gesture. And frankly he almost certainly just does it for tax benefits if we’re going to be honest here. He continued good omens because it would make money and generate more attention towards him and he’d be the brave hero who brought back show that did well. That’s it.
He’s just discount, off-brand Elon. Rich white man who thinks he’s gods gift to man despite bumbling through even the most basic concepts because his fans would walk into traffic blindfolded to defend him from even the mildest of criticism.
People on here just like him because they’re starstruck that a creator of a popular IP is active on this site and because he produces media that’s adapted with white middle aged twinks who are dubiously romantically affiliated.
The simpson did it again, they predicted Neil being actually a jerk
Btw, does anyone remember when this guy insisted that H.P. Lovecraft wasn't a racist? Anyone? Lol
So Neil Gaiman stayed as a proud supporter of the “comic book legal defense fund” even after the executive director was accused of (and admitted to) sexual assault, even after the organization continued to have issues with ignoring those calling out sexual abuse while leaping to defend people like Milo Yiannopoulos, even with these issues Neil served on the board of directors. He was one of the most vocal defenders in the 2010 of the man who was accused of transporting child pornography to Canada because his computer contained a great deal of pedophilic hentai and has never made any statement retracting his support of this pedophile.
Interesting.
Reading his commentary about the likes of lolicon when he wrote a short story about a vampire Snow White sexually abusing her father to death when she was six and then being raped as a teenager after being poisoned and having her heart cut out, the act restoring her consciousness and spurring her to marry the necrophile who became obsessed with her really puts a lot of this in perspective.
In tears at this.
I should also clarify that Neil did not just vocally support this pedophile, he also bailed him out and paid tens of thousands for a legal team that was able to make a case that it did not fit the Canadian definition of child pornography which successfully allowed the pedophile to go free of charge.
Neil’s Snow White “adaptation” was made specifically for the “comic book legal defense fund”. This short story about a rapist 6yo vampire was critically acclaimed and received several adaptations as audio dramas and was re-released as late as 2019 with professional illustration by Colleen Doran.
Below the cut is a more in-depth plot summary from Wikipedia for those who want to know more specifically what takes place in the story without reading it (obviously I recommend you do not because it is legitimately disturbing).
This is pretty much the exact genre of callout post that people have been criticizing on here.
I don't know anything about the case that he was involved in, and you've conveniently not provided any links or even named the parties involved. So the people reading this will have to then 1) Google something like "Neil Gaiman Canada pedophile" to try and find an article on this (good luck!) and 2) see if they themselves can parse media jargon and actually get at an unbiased legal source to figure out what happened.
And guess what! It doesn't matter. Because no one's going to do that. People are just going to reblog this without looking into it.
You've also thrown in "Well, he happened to work in an organization with somebody who--" oh boy, if everybody was suddenly culpable for their coworkers' / bosses' sexual misconduct...? Are we going down this route?
The best part is the off-topic last ditch effort to discredit: he wrote a story that, from the comments, you clearly just...didn't like?
Okay? Stories can be miserable and gruesome, there's no problem with disliking something and moving on. There is a monumental difference between writing meant to sexually arouse readers, and writing that incorporates unpleasant themes.
The fact that the only evidence presented in this entire thread is just, a screenshotted summary of a story, which completely removes any context for how that material was presented! Do you think Patrick Melrose is also child pornography because a man has flashbacks to being abused as a child, despite the fact that it's presented as a horrifying and terrible thing that happened to him? If you screenshotted the summary and nothing else, you could probably make it seem that way.
I've been vocal on here that fansites need to clean up and prohibit child pornography, written or otherwise, but some of you can't even distinguish between that and an "unpleasant story with themes that make me uncomfortable."
I checked out a copy of Snow, Glass, and Apples from the library. If you think that retelling Snow White to explore what kind of prince would want a dead princess is the same as endorsing necrophilia, you would benefit from a college-level lit class.
If OP ever read any Angela Carter it would make blood shoot from every orifice in their head.
Also can we talk about how part of the point of the story was to… make the “evil” stepmother… right? The whole idea was that the story we know paints the queen as the villain, but what if she wasn’t? You can dislike that the way they make Snow White the villain includes making her sexually predatory as a child, either because that’s not a thing in reality or even just because ew wtf no, but that by itself doesn’t mean it had no point or purpose.
Writing about something does not mean condoning it. Plus someone who would use something like this as a spank bank is either missing the point and/or completely fucked in the head. It's pretty damn obvious from the summary even that it's supposed to be disturbing and not horny.
Also CP involves ACTUAL REAL LIVE CHILDREN. And even though I don't like Milo Yiannopolous and the like I still think he should be able to spread his opinions (even if it is to undermine themselves every time they talk).
op, just go back to judging bird videos and none of this getting the vapors over fiction shit that's clogging your blog
sorry did you say something, all I can hear is “wahhhh waahhhh post only what I think you should post otherwise your blog SUCKS wahhh”
Every single reply to this post so far that I've read is giving me fucking kidney stones.
Also I have blood made of spite so naturally I immediately went to go find evidence.
Warren Ellis and Jason Latour controversy
The specific executive director who had to resign is named Charles Brownstein. He had to resign because of a sexual assault case from 2005
The pedo in question was named Chris Handley; he's from Iowa and was sentenced to 6 months for looking at what is very clearly lolicon.
Here's a bunch of dweebs on Niel's site DISCUSSING the support lended to Chris by CBLDF
And by the way...
Milo Yiannopoulos is an out and about pedophile nazi. His computer password was, comically, LongKnives1290, a clear and direct reference to The Night of Long Knives, a very gruesome event in which many of Hitler's political enemies were killed. He also openly defended pedophilia. This, along with a major email leak revealing exactly what kind of abomination he is, lead him to resign from Brietbart.
If you fucking sit here and tell me that Milo, of all people, deserve to speak his opinion, I'm going to chose to believe that you're just really young and stupid, because the alternative in that case is that you are so far up your own ass about defending Niel and the CBLDF that you are willing to turn a blind eye to a literal nazi pedophile. And so, I have no choice to assume at that point that your silence is acceptance. And that is arguably just as evil imo.
My silliest guy! I hold them so dear! Jiggly jangly darling thing! Look at it go!
Lost and Found
Ok but what if Eclipse finishes cleaning the daycare and waits for the kids to show up like
Its gonna happen again
Eclipse is basically Sun and Moon: Waifu Mode Unlocked
Everything's alright.
I'm completely normal about them.
ruin dlc spoilers!!
im obsessed with them
It’s been a long, long time.
I’ve only had him for 10 seconds, but Eclipse has my entire heart. I will die for him oh my lord
Once again, a reminder that Montgomery Gator DID NOT have claws before Bonnie's decommission. In no world could he have acquired them, killed Bonnie and then got new ones back to back.
Once again, a reminder that Montgomery Gator envies and hates Freddy and Freddy only, proven with the golf AR-Cade game and the headless Freddy statue. He wears Bonnie's glasses and I have a hard fucking time believing that Freddy would let him wear them if Monty indeed killed Bonnie.
Genuinely, with all kindness and respect - use your fucking brain.
He did kill bonnie sorry but he was programmed to be highly aggresive and hes the only animatronic who is 100% evil no hacks required, i get having a favorite character but you gotta accept when said character is a villain
Not you literally ignoring Freddy's comment how hurting guests goes against their entire programming. And Glitchtrap. And Vanny. And literally every aspect of Security Breach. Gtfo bittersnakes.
And you are ignoring Monty attacked Gregory without being hacked, destroyed his entire room and was so jealous of freddy he was willing to throw him out, you can cry all you want but it doesnt change the fact that Monty is evil since none of the animatronics were hacked even Roxy wasnt, she just hated Gregory because hes a bitch.
"None of the animatronics were hacked" you are literally delusional lmao! Literally every animatronic is being hacked by Glitchtrap and attacking Gregory, including Freddy. Countless dialogue talking about it. Maybe play the game?? Just a thought.
I kindly suggest you leave me alone and swim in your pool of ignorant hatred. Best wishes
Says the one whos denying reality because she doesnt want to admit her fave is literally evil. And no if they were hacked they wouldnt be talking and acting just like Glamrock Freddy is, besides in the books he literally hacked them all to kill his therapists. including freddy whom he modified to be friendly to him. So maybe snap back to reality and accept that Monty is evil and he killed Bonnie, you can keep your trash taste if you want but canon aint gonna change.
So now you're misgendering me? Next time you try and "prove" your insane theories, proofread your comment. The violent shaking and crying made you write incoherent sentences, and I couldn't give less of a fuck about your delusional hatred for a bunch of pixels
You are very much delusional i dont give a fuck who you are so....and if you werent si pissed you wouldnt be denying reality so....
Once again, a reminder that Montgomery Gator DID NOT have claws before Bonnie's decommission. In no world could he have acquired them, killed Bonnie and then got new ones back to back.
Once again, a reminder that Montgomery Gator envies and hates Freddy and Freddy only, proven with the golf AR-Cade game and the headless Freddy statue. He wears Bonnie's glasses and I have a hard fucking time believing that Freddy would let him wear them if Monty indeed killed Bonnie.
Genuinely, with all kindness and respect - use your fucking brain.
He did kill bonnie sorry but he was programmed to be highly aggresive and hes the only animatronic who is 100% evil no hacks required, i get having a favorite character but you gotta accept when said character is a villain
Not you literally ignoring Freddy's comment how hurting guests goes against their entire programming. And Glitchtrap. And Vanny. And literally every aspect of Security Breach. Gtfo bittersnakes.
And you are ignoring Monty attacked Gregory without being hacked, destroyed his entire room and was so jealous of freddy he was willing to throw him out, you can cry all you want but it doesnt change the fact that Monty is evil since none of the animatronics were hacked even Roxy wasnt, she just hated Gregory because hes a bitch.
"None of the animatronics were hacked" you are literally delusional lmao! Literally every animatronic is being hacked by Glitchtrap and attacking Gregory, including Freddy. Countless dialogue talking about it. Maybe play the game?? Just a thought.
I kindly suggest you leave me alone and swim in your pool of ignorant hatred. Best wishes
Says the one whos denying reality because she doesnt want to admit her fave is literally evil. And no if they were hacked they wouldnt be talking and acting just like Glamrock Freddy is, besides in the books he literally hacked them all to kill his therapists. including freddy whom he modified to be friendly to him. So maybe snap back to reality and accept that Monty is evil and he killed Bonnie, you can keep your trash taste if you want but canon aint gonna change.
It was just your imagination
At least they got to see the sunlight.
WHY DO YOU DO THIS TO ME