#MarGotKidsGambling
I don’t know what planet Margot James, Minister of State for the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport is living on, probably somewhere in the far reaches of No Man’s Sky. Unbelievably, she has concluded that loot boxes do not constitute gambling because skins can’t be traded offline. That’s like saying using online bookmakers wouldn't really be gambling if it wasn’t possible to sell a winning bet to a mate down the pub. I’ve never felt the need to call for a Minister’s resignation more than I do right now and it’s not just James that needs to go, the whole department needs a rethink; do they actually have any gamers on their staff? I very much doubt it. I’m tempted to instigate a freedom information request just to find out if anybody in her department has heard of Skins.Cash, CS.Money, Skinbaron, Skin.club or Bitskins. They all trade CS:GO skins for hard cash and that’s just one game. The link between gaming disorder and an addictive personality is well and truly established and it just so happens; that’s an ideal personality to develop a gambling addiction. So, why on earth isn’t she doing something to protect the young gamers that are exposed to the lure of loot box gambling? There’s a whole heap of parents out there that don’t really engage with their children’s gaming activities much beyond applying time constraints. They misguidedly trust the Government to put in place protective measures. Well, here’s the thing: That ain’t happening while James is at the helm. There must be some way to instigate her resignation on grounds of gross incompetence? It’s a shame that we are avoiding exposure at this stage in our product development; if we had loads of followers we could probably do something. But we don’t, so maybe share this with people that do "MarGotKidsGambling” perhaps?
Not convinced? At the Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee inquiry into immersive and addictive technologies, James said: “I would contest the assumption that loot boxes are gambling and I don’t think that all the evidence that I’ve read from your committee’s hearings would support that assumption either. “Loot boxes are a means of people purchasing items, skins, to enhance their gaming experience, not through an expectation of an additional financial reward and importantly they can’t be traded offline for money, so I think that there are big differences.” Ok Margot, if you ever pick up an AWP | Dragon Lore I’ll bung you a fiver, meet me on CS.Money. Oh hang on, I forgot you don’t really play video games. More’s the pity. #LootboxGambling #MarGotKidsGambling Keith Anderson - Managing Director













