After releasing the video from San Francisco yesterday, I took some time to edit the one from my trip to Japan 2 weeks ago.
Hope you’ll enjoy it!
Sade Olutola
𓃗
trying on a metaphor
Game of Thrones Daily
ojovivo

Origami Around

roma★
Today's Document
🪼

blake kathryn
Noah Kahan
cherry valley forever
Not today Justin
Misplaced Lens Cap

ellievsbear
No title available

⁂
DEAR READER
No title available

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Chile
seen from Belarus
seen from United Arab Emirates
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Malaysia

seen from Russia
@botsdevsandi
After releasing the video from San Francisco yesterday, I took some time to edit the one from my trip to Japan 2 weeks ago.
Hope you’ll enjoy it!
A small video about the week we spent around the Bay Area back in February. Hope you’ll enjoy it, that’s my first try editing a video :)
Pepper x Java (and a bit more)
So, Im just back from a week in Tokyo. The primary reason I was travelling was to attend Java Day Tokyo: a few months ago, Stephen Chin and the japanese Oracle team told us they’d be happy to welcome Pepper during the keynote to announce the release of the Java SDK to the japanese community.
Tuesday 7th was the rehearsal day. The conference was taking place at the International Forum, a huge venue close to Tokyo Station. It was about 3km away from my hotel in Akasaka, and the path to follow sounded great on Google Maps, so I decided to walk to it, though it was raining.
I took the blue path
Hanami under the rain
The view on Tokyo Station Area from the Imperial Palace
We met with the staff, other speakers, and did all the setup for our 10mn slot. Pepper would be on stage from the very beginning, hidden under a cardboard box, and revealed only once our speaker would enter and start his demo. We had to make sure Pepper would stay quiet for more than an hour, would stay connected to our wifi network (based on a smartphone) so as to allow us to easily start the demo from our laptop, connected to the same network. Needless to say we were all a bit nervous while leaving the room at the end of the afternoon.
Reheasals with Pepper
Testing different setups
I spent the evening with Lem Fugitt, editor of Robots Dreams. That was my 5th time in Japan, and I never had the opportunity to meet with him before. He came to pick me up at my hotel, and we went to a cool little restaurant 200m away from it. At first, I was a bit impressed. Im pretty tall myself, and Im not so used to meet with people who are taller than I am. But behind that first impressive contact, he’s a really warm and kind guy, with an impressive background with everything robots-related. I was really interested in hearing his views upon several topics.
You can live without a selfie? :)
As far as Japan is concerned, he’s got an interesting point of view about the potential categories of clients for Pepper on the consumer market: geeks and otakus of course, but also old women and parents.
Old women, because they tend to feel alone. They live longer than their husbands, but even when both are alive, men tend to live outside, spending time with other men, doing different kind of activities. Old men have no need a robot could fulfill. But their wives, assuming enough content is available to create a real connection over time, would clearly be ready to buy a robot like Pepper.
When talking about adults, Lem said he would target parents, with entertaining and educational contents for the kids. Just like old women, kids are looking for connections at home, and parents tend to work a lot, not being so present. If robots can engage with these kids, and at the same time help them learn, parents could also think about buying it. But he’s not sure they would buy a robot for themselves in the first place, though they could get used to it over time.
At 7.30 on wednesday, I was at the Starbucks in front of the forum, taking some fuel for the day after a short night.
At 8.00, all the team was backstage, preparing the robot and polishing the tablet. Laurent Lec, our speaker, did some last minute adjustements. And also, the CEO of Oracle for Japan asked to have a picture with Pepper for the 20th birthday of Java.
At 9.00, the conference started, and by 10.15 or something like that, our speaker was on stage. And everything went all right. No demo curse for us this time. He rocked it!
Laurent Lec on stage during the keynote
We spend the evening with the Java community and the JJUG. They were having some kind of party in a restaurant close to the venue, and invited us to attend. That was my first japanese party, and I don’t regret it. There are community events where you can feel some distance between people. They miss some kind of glue that turns meeting into memorable community meetings. And you have the other community events. Those where you can feel some magic. And that was the case here.
Contrary to the CEO cake, this one was real
On the last day, I visited our Atelier in Akihabara. That was my first time here since it opened. It’s set in an old school, and the space is shared with other smalls shops or places for artists. That’s a great place to visit, filled with robots <3
the Atelier in Akihabara
Pepper says Hi!
In a few weeks, they are going to hold their first Java workshop over there. It seems that the event is already sold out, but others should take place. If you’re in Tokyo and would like to try some Java on Pepper, best thing to do is to get in touch with them for next sessions.
And that’s it. Three days, and it was over. For some reasons, I was a little sad when came the time to fly back. It happens to me all the time when I leave California for instance, but that was the first time I felt that for Japan. I think it took me a while to start understanding a bit the culture. And it’s so delicate that it’s hard to resist it once you start!
RaaS anyone?
When I was a student at Grenoble Business School, I followed a course called Services Marketing. It was a while ago, back in 2000 (the year that’s famous for its dot com crash...). Our professor spent a semester explaining us how we were about to transition on a wide scale from owning things to paying for services, and how to take advantage of that as would-be marketing professionals.
More than 10 years later, this idea is so popular that, of course, there’s an acronym for that: “*aaS”.
We have SaaS for Software as a Service; IaaS for Infrastructure as a Service, PaaS for Platform as a Service, HaaS for Hardware as a Service and many others, invented on what seems to be a daily basis.
So, I started thinking about how this could work with robots. In fact, I posted something about Robot as a Service on Twitter, as a joke, but came to realize it was maybe more than a joke.
Humanoid robots are seen as hardware mainly. That’s the first contact. You can touch it. And that’s true to some extend. I remember Bruno Maisonnier saying that because of all the mechanics, it was closer to a car than to a computer for instance, even more in the way you have to take care of them. But robots are also software; I mean, Aldebaran’s robot are platforms mainly. Software, and apps, give life to this hardware, give a purpose to the interaction.
So, creating a dedicated app is definitely something that can be called service. That’s what companies like Hoomano, Intuitive Robots or Emotion Robotics are doing. But let’s think about the companies they work with.
If you plan to really invest in robotics, you definitely want to own the robots, and thus you have to buy them. But what about all these companies that want to use one or two robots for marketing purposes? I think they’d rather rent the robot. They don’t want to take care of it if it breaks. They don’t want to deal with technical stuff at all. Store it at night. They just want the robot to show up for the event, do the job, and hit the road.
In some cases, I even think that trying to sell robots is the best way to fail. All people don’t want to own them. Maybe just because they don’t want to have to explain to their boss a year after the event why they had to buy it whereas it’s been doing nothing since that moment apart from catching dust.
So, if you rent the robot (hardware) and if you invest in a dedicated behavior where the robot is taking advantage of your specific context (software), then what would prevent us from talking about RaaS?
new workshop for (small) kids
as I said when I talked about my experience running the Devoxx4Kids workshop in Berkeley, I had to work on a new workshop, taking into account all the feedback I had.
Here the new workshop I created. I won’t write hundreds of words about it, but here’s a small highlight of the features:
- it targets kids from 8 to 12
- it can be done only with the simulator inside Choregraphe. You don’t necessarily need a real robot (not that I recommend to run the workshop without robot, but at least kids can try what they do along the way)
- it’s based on creativity. The goal is to tell a story, so kids taking the workshop are going to have to make some decisions by themselves. Pretty interesting if you think about how this could be linked to some “literature” course (as an example so something a school can do with a robot not involving only STEM)
- available in french and in english at the moment
- the library is common to both languages, and can be downloaded on Aldebaran community website at this address
NAO robot workshop for kids #2 (english)
from
Nicolas RIGAUD
NAO robot workshop for kids #2 (french)
from
Nicolas RIGAUD
Pepper commercial for Japan: hello consumer market o//
Lessons from my Devoxx4Kids workshop
on saturday 14th - which was also Valentine's day - I gave a workshop in Berkeley with Devoxx4Kids USA, for about 30 kids
I already did one with the US chapter of Devoxx4kids last year, but that was before the release of NAOqi 2. By that time, I used the workshop created by Daniel De Luca. This year, I updated it.
First, since I don't always have a red ball with me, I decided to change that part for a handkerchief, which you will find almost everywhere. It's also easier to get the robot to grab it.
Another decision I took was not to divide the workshop into chapters (which was wrong, but Ill talk about it later). I made up my mind based on the fact that with the new boxes that have been implemented, the workshop is really faster to go through.
Valentine's Day starts with @NaoRobot @wtfirl @DevNAOJamesD at Black Pine School, Berkeley pic.twitter.com/WrrzD3DUNw
— Devoxx4Kids USA (@Devoxx4KidsUSA)
14 Février 2015
Great #Devoxx4Kids workshop by @wtfirl @DevNAOJamesD thanks for helping @PBhatter @menkag pic.twitter.com/MsAbpkFOaH
— Arun Gupta (@arungupta)
14 Février 2015
The workshop went fine, as you can see; but I wasn't really satisfied, and after discussing it with the organizers, with my coworker James and with some other people, I think Ill need to rework it.
Here are some of the problems I identified in the end:
- the workshop is too long for kids between 8 and 14 years old. Chapters would have allowed kids to have a break and test what they were working on. Going through all the workshop first has been hard for them.
- the workshop is also too ambitious. There's no need to create an entire application with kids this age. It should be focused on more basic tasks, maybe independent from each other.
- going through all the workshop before testing makes something else difficult: debugging. Instead of debugging step by step, when you wait until the end of the workshop, it's really hard to find where the error comes from. Plus, when one bug is solved, you redownload the app on NAO, test it again, and might face another bug. Time consuming and useless.
- I also faced a lot of problems connecting NAO to Macs. Mine wasn't able to see the robot, even with a wire connexion, and it was the same with kids with Macs. Anyway, when I realized this at the end of the workshop, I decided to focus my attention on a kid (any of them) with a PC, so as to be able to at least show once to all of the kids what they had been working on all morning long. If I can't test it with every kids, I want them to see it at least once for one of their peers. Except it seems it's not the way to behave in the US. As Arun Gupta told me, here that's not something you can do. We're more like we all succeed or we all fail.
So, Im going to build a new workshop:
- divided in small chapters of 30mn: 20mn of programming and 10mn of test..
- all chapters will be independent, but Ill try to make them complementary.
- Im going to focus on things you can test in the simulator, without necessarily connecting to a real robot each time.
Anyway, if you want to use it, here's the workshop. You'll also need a custom library that can be dowloaded here
NAO Robot workshop for kids (english)
from
Nicolas RIGAUD
Meeting Henry Evans
Andra Keay is running a group called Silicon Valley Robotics. Her goal is to gather all people interested in robotics around the Bay Area: hobbyists, researchers, CEOs, start-up founders, technology providers, VCs and so on.
On wednesday 11th, we attended an event called Robots for Humanity. To be very honest, while preparing my trip, I took our tickets, but never paid so much attention to what the content would be.
Two people were invited to talk. The first one was Steve Cousins. He was CEO of Willow Garage (makers of PR 2) and is now CEO of Savioke. He in fact introduced the second speaker, with who he's been working on that Robots for Humanity project.
The second speaker was there since the beginning. During the cocktail before the talk, he was in the middle of everybody, chatting with people and making new friends. The only difference with the rest of us was that he wasn't having any beers or sandwiches. You couldn't suspect him to just be there to take advantage of free food and drinks.
This guy has a name of course. Henry Evans. And guess what? He's pretty much of a rock star. I wasn't able to remember it before the beginning of the talk, but I already saw a TEDx talk by this guy. A pretty impressive talk. The kind of talks you feel smatter after than before.
Did I forget to mention that Henry Evans is quadriplegic?
As a quadriplegic, he's got very specific needs in terms of robotics. He explains this part very well in his talk. But he also shared new concepts, new things he's working on with robotics companies and labs worldwide.
Tele-tourism is interesting for example: being able to travel with your relatives thanks to telepresence robots. Visit museums. Hotels. Share the moments as they happen. Or travel alone. For real, thanks to drones, cameras and virtual reality headsets like Oculus. Or use other people's footages.
Henry Evans is a great guy, full of energy, talkative, driven by passion. I must also say that he's really lucky to have a wife such as Jane, who's all smile all the time. But there are many people like him around the world. The research that is done today, the prototypes that are tested could be tomorrow released on broader scales.
Id like to see how we could do something with Henry. His family is planning to visit Paris. If he's part of the trip, Ill try to set up a visit of the Atelier. That can be a first step in order to raise some attention on him at the office. And then, who knows what can happen?
Nice video clip where we can see that NAO raised a lot of attention during MGF London
beware: I did this talk in english, but Im dubbed in Polish, and you won't hear my voice at all... The slides are available here
Developer Podcast #5
We released our 5th podcast last week. It's our first podcast of 2015.
This time, we have an interview with Line Patris, software engineer at Aldebaran working in the dialog team. She's presenting the new dialog engine and the possibilities it opens. We also have an interview with my friend Steve Chin who working as a Java evangelist for Oracle. He's been playing with NAO for more than a year, and he's giving us details about what he did with him.
Robots need Game Designers
With Céline Boudier, software engineer at Aldebaran, we'll have a talk next week at the Mobile Game Forum in London. We'll try to explain to mobile game developers why they should pay attention to robotics.
Basically, Joan Da Silva was supposed to be the one talking. He was previously Creative Director at Rovio, and now works as Creation and Content Director at Aldebaran. The organizers invited him so as to talk about what he learned transitioning for the video game industry to robotics. Aldebaran recruited several people from that industry in the last year, and it seems that this is raising a lot of questions among developers.
But for some reasons, Joan can't make it, and Ive been asked to talk with Céline. Which I will be honored to do!
Robots Need Game Designers (C. Boudier / N. Rigaud) from Nicolas RIGAUD
At first, Joan gave us some slides he created so as to help. And that was kind! But also strange: I wasn't feeling confortable with them. His "story" wasn't making sense to me with my background, and I couldn't imagine myself on stage talking about something Im not completely convinced with. So I took some time, some of his arguments and insights, and I wrote my own talk.
Last year, I did almost the same for the RSA Conference in San Francisco: I had no real experience about security (as it is the case today with the mobile game industry), so I talked a lot about it with Rodolphe Gélin (the guy managing the Romeo project at Aldebaran) and I tried to find an approach where things seemed logic to me, and where I felt confortable telling a story.
On her side, Céline has been working a lot on demos, so as to show the difference between what we were creating at first with just developers and animators, and what we create now with our multidisciplinary teams.
This two-days conference will also allow me to spend some time with our UK NAO User Group. We have lots of topics to talk about and Im pretty excited! My only concern is about the fact that our meeting is set in a pub... Ain't it look like a trap? :)
Happy New Year 2015 with NAO robot :)
Im posting another video that was recorded during Devoxx 2014. That's an interview for the new website Voxxed that was launched during the event. Im just answering some questions about NAO and his future.
I just discovered that our session with Erwan Pinault at Geecon in Krakow in May has been recorded...
The following article contains information obtained with the authorization by current and former employees of Aldebaran Robotics, who wished to remain anon
Changing my mind: from B2C to B2B
Last week, Robotic Business Review issued its annual report about personal robotics. They seem to think that 2015 will be the big year for this, because consumers are now supposed to be ready.
On this image, when you look at what people expect a personal robot to do, the approach is very rational.
According to it, the first thing people want is not to have to deal with technical stuff (understand voice, self maintenance, remote diagnosis, updates and even full autonomy) nor with a toy (fully programmable). The level of expectation is terms of user experience is definitely really high. Potential buyers want to deal with something that is beyond technology.
Than people want the robot to accomplish tasks for them (monitoring/alarm, security, surveillance, control center for the home, domestic services). We're focused on "cold" tasks and usefulness. This is not surprising, because that's the easiest way for a consumer to evaluate the return on investment on the robot.
It's only after that that we get to the right side of the brain. That's where we have items like conversational speech, entertainment, emotions and personality. Does it mean that we're wrong at Aldebaran with our focus on emotions? Or is it just that we can trust people? Remember Henry Ford ? :)
I don't know who are the people answering the poll, but I think that most of the people do not realize what can already be done by and with robots. And we're still kind of afraid of them. They'll take our jobs after all :) So the way I see it could be:
I won't make no effort in their direction (not to have to deal with technical stuff)
Ill keep control and they'll have to prove me they're useful (accomplish tasks)
then maybe Ill accept and trust them (getting personal)
Judging ratings go from 0 to 5, we can see that there's no item below 2.5 in the list. So, if we change the scale, starting from 2.5 to 5, we got the average at 3.75. It means that all the items related to the right side of the brain are below average.
We can also notice from this poll that the robot needs to be connected (control through the internet, connexion with other devices, fully programmable). But we're in the era of everything-is-a-platform, so that's no surprise.
I also notice less interest for domestic services (41% to 30% judging it really important). I wonder how this is linked to announcements such as Jibo for example. We'll have to pay attention to that.
Anyway, even if these results are interesting to discuss, Im in fact less and less convinced of the real interest of focusing first on the consumer market.
SoftBank, from my point of view, has a really smart approach (in a country that is culturally ready for robots!): get people used to robots with the B2B market (robots in SB shops, robots for Nestlé) before opening the B2C market.
We should learn from that. Im maybe to focused on developers myself, but for them, and if it's about making a living, I don't see this happen in a close future thanks to a consumer market. On the contrary, I believe there's money to make with companies. They'll need dedicated apps. And Im not sure they'll make them themselves in every case.
In retail, in events, in schools, in hospitals. I think we'll see robots in these places before they hit our homes. We'll want them at home because we'll see how useful they are in these contexts.