Round 2
most iconic asexual
Susan Pompoms
Stanford Pines
Susan is seemingly Aegosexual, which makes her literally the only Aego rep I am aware of
Glad to see people having their “there’s a word for that” moment because of this
trying on a metaphor
Sade Olutola
AnasAbdin

Discoholic 🪩
occasionally subtle

@theartofmadeline
Misplaced Lens Cap

oozey mess

if i look back, i am lost
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
KIROKAZE
No title available
ojovivo
Monterey Bay Aquarium

Janaina Medeiros

Love Begins
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

izzy's playlists!

JBB: An Artblog!

Kaledo Art
seen from United States

seen from Australia

seen from TĂĽrkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Japan

seen from United States

seen from Brazil
seen from Norway
seen from Australia
seen from Ireland

seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from India

seen from Uruguay
seen from Canada

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Switzerland
seen from Romania
@breadstick47
Round 2
most iconic asexual
Susan Pompoms
Stanford Pines
Susan is seemingly Aegosexual, which makes her literally the only Aego rep I am aware of
Glad to see people having their “there’s a word for that” moment because of this
More characters ending disabled and happy NOW
Lea from Crosscode
Without getting too into it, the way the story and setting set things up it would have been *super* easy for the devs to get rid of her disability at the end
But instead her happy ending is her getting an AAC device
Round 2
most iconic asexual
Susan Pompoms
Stanford Pines
Susan is seemingly Aegosexual, which makes her literally the only Aego rep I am aware of
Round 2
most iconic asexual
Thalia Grace
Jonathan Sims
If im remembering correctly she joined the hunters of Artemis who all swear off sexual relations.
I mean, taking a vow of chastity isn’t necessarily the same as being asexual
Iirc her main reason for doing it was to stop aging, since there was that ominous prophecy about a child of the big three reaching 16
let's play: are you on the ace spectrum! An introduction to microlabels
As an Aego… no, this is wrong
Im not sure what definition of sexual attraction is meant to be used here, but the one I usually see in aspec spaces is something like “a desire to have sex with a person” which definitely doesn’t apply to aego
Besides that we have “no desire to participate in sexual activities with another person”. Which, sure, but that’s not remotely specific to aegosexuals
Aegosexual means having a disconnect with the subject of arousal. It means you don’t want to be involved both in practice (real sexual activities) and in theory (fantasies etc are all about other people, no self inserts or first person or anything)