rumor tracking anon @brf-rumortrackinganon - Tumblr Blog

Guys, I ate way too much at afternoon tea. Ordered seconds of almost everything.

So according to Rob Shuter (I know, but bear with me), the reason why no one saw Meghan last week was because she wore disguises the whole time! She wore hats, wigs, and sunglasses just like she used to when she and Harry were dating.

Tell me you’re upset no one cared you were here without telling me you’re upset no one cared you were here.

(Personally I think she just went without the bronzer.)

#sussexes

Pretty sure I just saw Starmer and/or Burnham drive by to enter BP for the meeting with Charles. Man, to be on the state rooms’ tour right now at the Grand Entrance…

When I first came by at 9ish, the Union Jack was up over both BP and Clarence House (and press were setting up in the back garden). I finished in the King’s Gallery around 11:30ish, caught the tail end of the Changing of the Guard, and BP’s flag had changed to the Royal Standard. It was impressive to see in person.

I was going to cross the street to get a closer view but a police officer held us back. Five minutes later (and down the other side of the palace), police outriders and two black SUVs drove along.

And this is beyond incredibly to see in person, up close. There will never be another like it.

#brf #royal weddings #rumor goes traveling

I personally don't think that meeting Charles helped them because we wouldn't hear so much about William needing to forgive if it did. Last year, the narrative was that William was jealous and so less. This year, the narrative is that he needs to forgive because family lol. Clearly, having a relationship with Charles is not enough.

Yep.

Almost as if someone’s finally realized monarchy will go on after Charles is gone.

#pr shenanigans

What the visit demonstrated to me about their situation.

1. The back and forth in public for security proves that they don't actually have people behind the scenes who do their bidding for them. Which means there is no project thaw.

2. The 6 days/two weeks/6 days visit with public engagements proves that they couldn't find charities wanting to be used as pawn by them. Which is bad for a return on any form.

3. The fact that we see more and more media pressure for William to "forgive", "move on" or whatever proves that meeting Charles doesn't actually help them. It doesn't even help the media, because we have more articles trying to include William than articles celebrating the meeting.

The William stories confirm a few things for me:

1-That Harry and Charles both understand there’s no reconciliation without William’s support and participation.

2-That Charles also understand the public did not like this meeting and he’s using William to smooth this over as a representative to the public. As in, “see, William supports this and you like William, so it’s not bad.”

3-That someone (I’d say it’s Harry but I truly don’t know — I think it could be James Holt or a BP/CH staffer sympathetic to Harry) understands that for Harry to keep his “back in” status for the rest of his squirrelly lifetime, he needs the support of those who come after Charles to maintain and sustain it. That William rejects Harry now as Prince of Wales doesn’t bode well for when he’s king but if “they” can get William on Harry’s side now, then William is likely to continue supporting Harry when he’s king — very much the same way Charles continues to support Andrew now despite threats to cut him off made when he was Prince of Wales.

#waleses #brf

So first, I am not a lawyer. These are opinions based on following celeb divorces, Bravo, and the internet.

First there are three types of debts:

Debt you came into the marriage with. This is yours and yours alone. You brought it in, you take it out. Your partner can help you pay it down during the marriage, of course, but you alone are responsible for it.

Debt you and your partner incurred during the marriage. This s the responsibility of both partners so sometimes that kind of debt has to be resolved in order for the divorce to be finalized but sometimes that debt remains on the books after the divorce and both parties remain financially tied. (This is usually the case when a divorcing couple sells their house — they sell the house to pay off the joint mortgage and split the proceeds.)

Debt you yourself exclusively incurred during the marriage. This is usually the responsibility of the partner who made it, especially if the other partner can prove he (or she) had nothing to do with it - eg their name isn’t on the paperwork, they live frugally within their means, etc.

So things like the mortgage, joint credit cards, other joint accounts — they’ll probably have to make the accounts full to be fully and finally done with each other in the case of a divorce.

So the investments for As Ever, Meghan’s accounts with Sunshine Sachs and WME, etc — if Harry isn’t anywhere on the contracts or the paperwork, then he probably isn’t responsible and there’s nothing Meghan can do about it. This is where the rumors that Harry and Meghan fight constantly about money - that he doesn’t make enough and she spends way too much - can work in Harry’s favor. If he can prove (aka has receipts) that he lives within his means and that Meghan’s spending exclusively makes them live above their means, a good lawyer will probably be able to get him out of it.

And if that indeed is what happens, then I can see a divorce being dragged out forever and ever as they fight over the debt and the money.

Now two other things. You mentioned school fees and As Ever.

So for school fees, if the Sussexes can’t pay, then the kids get kicked out and the debt is sent to collections. There’s always public school, which is tuition-free here in the US.

For As Ever, there’s nothing they can do about expired overstock. Meghan has to eat the costs. There’s no way around it. Now if she signed paperwork for investors saying “I’ll pay you back,” then the investors can go after her for repayment. But if it’s Harry’s own money (as alleged by rumors), then he’s probably SOL.

Lastly, for a loan to be enforceable, there needs to be paperwork - like an email or a signed document or a promissory note. Without some kind of written documentation about the loan, it can’t really be enforced or called to collect. So if a friend loaned the Sussexes $2 million but there’s no paperwork, they’re better off claiming it as a gift and writing it off as a loss because no way in hell would someone as squirrelly and questionably moral like Meghan would pay something back she doesn’t have to.

So how do they pay off this allegedly massive debt? There are three options:

Commercialize themselves and hope they make enough money to repay everyone. (Doubtful - Meghan’s divorce narrative might make a substantial whack at it, but they’re in debt to the turn of multimultimulti-millions and I don’t think she could pull it off.)

Have Charles pay off all the debts as a condition of divorce. (Doubtful - Harry would have to be reconciled and back in for Charles, which I don’t see happening.)

Declare bankruptcy and wipe the slate clean. (Winner, winner chicken dinner. Bonus points because Meghan has already declared bankruptcy once.)

But would Charles allow his darling boy to publicly declare bankruptcy? I don’t know. So it’s going to be really interesting to watch.

But getting back to the question: how can Meghan make a claim to a certain lifestyle for child support when there’s all this alleged debt?

Simple. Meghan can make all the claims she wants. It’s up to the judge to decide what’s legitimate and reasonable, and yes, they’ll be looking at the finances. So it will be the judge determining whether her claims are credible based on the facts available. If the lifestyle is propped up by a mountain of debt, the child support payments likely won’t sustain that lifestyle because the judge had to go by the actual income being brought in, and probably inclusive of debt payments.

Which is the wrinkle there - if Harry is privately helped by Charles regularly, consistently, and reliably, then that counts for income and that’s something the judge will consider.

Sorry if this is rambly.

@flamelilyfiveandtwenty

#sussexes

Angry William was started by Camilla in the 90s, her "friends" would say that he had screaming matches with Charles and that she was afraid of him, it was a successful campaign that Harry ended up using and amplifying for his advantage in the past few years.

Thanks!

But I think we all know that public behavior matters when it comes to anger. Who have we seen angry in public more often? Harry and Charles.

Who have we rarely seen angry in public? William.

#brf

The narrative of william is angry/has anger issues definitely came from Camilla’s (and Charles) side. I read a lot of Camilla biographies (they are pretty repetitive so I usually skim through it) and in almost every single book, there is always a passage saying Camilla is afraid of William or Camilla always makes herself scarce around William because he has explosive tempers. When William was still doing his pilot job for East Anglia Ambulance, there’s also stories claiming that his father is always recoil and can never say no to William and how Charles lamented that he never seen his grandchildren.

Well, according to William and KP, Charles never sees his grandchildren because Charles prefers to work.

It goes both ways.

#brf

I believe at some point meghan will have to show lili and archie's faces... i thought Invictus... but i think she might sell them in a few years? to vogue?

Meghan isn’t important or controversial enough for Vogue anymore.

#sussexes

Isn’t it a bit weird that neither William or the RF account said anything about Englands win yesterday??? Usually William posts quickly or within a few hours and it’s nothing so far…I’m guessing they’re on vacation but a draft with the communications team would have been prepared, no?? 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔

I mean…I’m in London and there is absolutely zero coverage of England’s win here.

3rd place is just 2nd loser.

What do you think of the ‘angry William’ narrative that has been artificielly pushed (at least to me it seems like that) in the press in the past couple years ? My gut tells me it is one of Charles / Camilla henchmen who did it.

Considering the only public evidence of “angry William” is when he, his wife, and his children were being harassed by a paparazzo and Harry’s book that has been debunked with a couple of lies (and which has a disclosure that Harry doesn’t know his own memory)…yes, it’s a press campaign. It by Charles and Camilla?

Perhaps.

Or consider this.

The thing about having an angry personality is that you are constantly angry and it is always leaking out. Like Harry. We have seen Harry’s anger publicly manifest on many occasions, since childhood. Thomas Markle even called Harry out on it once.

And remember, the Sussexes and Sussex Squad often make accusations about the Waleses that they’re guilty of. So is William angry?

Or is Harry angry?

#brf #waleses #sussexes #anger management

I think the rumour is not that he is cheating, but that he is in love this time. Combining that will the PR that he is regretting Megxit, well, makes you go 🤔

Sorry but Harry falls in love with every woman who makes him feel special. It doesn’t mean diddly squat.

#sussexes

I hope you are enjoying your trip!

Have you heard the latest rumours?

A) Harry has a mistress and is his own age. Apparently is common knowledge around Montecito

B) Olive Garden is on Meghan's name

I find A difficult to believe because no sane woman in her forties would want to take on Harry. But B? I bet the house is registered in some shady way that only benefits Meghan. Although if everything is on Meghan's name, wouldn't Harry be able to claim alimony in case of divorce?

Rumors of Harry dating/stepping out on the marriage have been around since 2022ish. New woman, I guess.

I hate to break it to you but being with someone doesn’t necessarily mean spending the rest of your life married to them. Yes, even in your 40s, even when you’re older. When you’re the mistress, or even the girlfriend, you’re not responsible in the same way that a wife is. Harry can be pretty appealing in that “here for a good time, not a long time” kind of way.

Just the same, rumors of who truly owns the house or whose name is on the deed have also been around for a while too. It pops every now and again.

And no, if everything is in Meghan’s name, that doesn’t necessarily mean Harry gets alimony. Alimony is based on spousal support, not who owns what. All the things can be in Meghan’s name, but if Harry’s the one bringing the most income into the marriage that sustains their comfort of living, then he can owe Meghan alimony.

The other thing here too is that even if Meghan’s name is exclusively on the deed, that the house was purchased during the marriage means it’s a matrimonial asset, which means Harry could make a play for the house due to having “beneficial interest” — meaning he lived there too, his money supports the household maintenance, he has equity. So it isn’t cut and dry that Meghan automatically gets and keeps the house if in the case of divorce. Especially since there isn’t a prenup, especially since it wasn’t a premarital asset, especially if the rumor that used the remainder of his Diana money to purchase the house is true.

So most likely if there is a divorce, then probably one of two things would be likely to happen:

1) Meghan keeps the house but due to Harry’s beneficial interest, she has to buy him out, which may mean just paying out his equity. Or

2) Meghan can’t afford to keep the house without Harry’s income so she sells the house but due to Harry’s beneficial interest she has to pay back his investment - the down payment that used his money.

But IANAL so this is just conjecture based on google. Do not take this with any kind of seriousness.

(Also just to be clear here - alimony is a recurring payment, usually monthly. Alimony is not usually a one-and-done payment to close accounts.)

I’ve mentioned these before on the blog but it’s worth mentioning again:

1-Spousal support (aka alimony) is based off who provides the money. If Meghan uses Harry’s income to maintain their lifestyle, then Harry may be required to pay Meghan alimony. But if Meghan’s the one generating the household income — such as when her PR claims she’s sold millions of dollars worth of As Ever jam and she’s the one bringing home the bacon while Harry mooches — then she could end up paying him alimony. Which is why she needs to be very careful with her PR.

2-it’s also about the children. Child support comes into play here as well. Child support is based on maintaining the accustomed lifestyle for the children. Depending on how custody is awarded if there’s a divorce, if Meghan is awarded primary custody, then she can claim that the kids are used to this multimillion dollar lifestyle and if found credible, Harry can be on the hook for huge monthly payments to support his children. And vice versa.

Child support is different from spousal support. Usually they go hand-in-hand but not always, and that’s why a Sussex divorce would be so interesting to watch fall out.

#sussexes #rumors

do you think the monarchy will be abolish after charles or during charles reign? with all the andrew, harry drama? And William not doing as many engagements?

No.

This painting is even more incredible in person - and so much bigger! Easily 3ft by 3ft.

#waleses

The latest briefings are their usual PR manifesto. As we all know about the sussexes, give them an inch and will take a mile. They are even now floating Highgrove as their base next year when they are in the UK for IG, and again using their children as leverage.

This may be a surprise to you but…they’ve done exactly this same PR campaign before. Earlier this year.

Literally, the same PR manifestation — Highgrove base, kids for leverage.

#sussexes

when we will see Kate and william again?

After school holidays.

#waleses

Trending Blogs

Recently Viewed Blogs

rumor tracking anon