Bulgaria

[bulgariant]

Financial Stability and Growth in Bulgaria

When the new financial privileges are fully established, it is expected that Bulgaria’s income from excise and customs duties will increase from four to five million francs. This increase in revenue will further strengthen the country’s already solid financial position and allow for continued economic growth.

The General Financial Condition

To understand the financial situation of the Principality, it is enough to look at the official balance sheet of the State. This document shows both the country’s assets and liabilities, including state-owned properties. According to the balance sheet from January 1, 1907, Bulgaria was enjoying a firmly established and healthy financial condition Istanbul Daily Tours.

The country’s total assets and reserve funds show that the government had a strong foundation for further development. The reserves from the loans of 1902 and 1904 provided additional financial security, while investments in the Bulgarian National Bank, as well as funds for railways, harbours, and state buildings, represented important assets contributing to the national wealth.

Assets of the Principality (as of January 1, 1907)

General assets: 74,671,416 francs

Reserve fund of 5% Loan (1902): 2,500,000 francs

Reserve fund of 5% Loan (1904): 1,000,000 francs

Cost of railways and harbours: 189,500,000 francs

State buildings: 41,980,000 francs

State properties: 29,712,872 francs

Capital invested in the Bulgarian National Bank: 25,495,385 francs

War materials: 166,000,000 francs

Total assets: 509,859,673 francs

Liabilities of the Principality

General liabilities: 39,912,890 francs

Consolidated debt: 357,208,000 francs

Total liabilities: 397,120,890 francs

After subtracting these liabilities from the total assets, the country enjoyed a surplus of 112,738,783 francs, which reflected strong fiscal discipline and effective management.

The Public Debt Situation

As of January 1, 1907, Bulgaria’s public debt consisted mainly of loans taken between 1888 and 1904. These included:

Bulgarian 6% Loan (1888)

Bulgarian Mortgage 6% Loan (1889)

Bulgarian 6% Loan (1892)

Bulgarian 5% Loan (1902)

Bulgarian 5% Loan (1904)

In addition, there were debts owed to Eastern Roumelia, the Bulgarian National Bank, the Bulgarian Agricultural Bank, and in Treasury bonds.

The financial data from 1907 clearly shows that Bulgaria’s economy was on a stable and prosperous path. With a significant surplus and well-managed debts, the Principality demonstrated sound fiscal policy and growing economic confidence during the early 20th century.

[bulgariant]

Population in Bulgaria

Regular Census of the Population

According to Bulgarian law, a census of the population is carried out at fixed times. This important responsibility is given to the Direction of Statistics, an official institution in charge of collecting and analyzing information about the people of the country. Thanks to its careful methods, the results of the census are considered very reliable.

Since the liberation of Bulgaria, every government has paid close attention to the work of the Direction of Statistics. The institution has provided valuable information that helps the state plan for the future. Its importance continues to grow as Bulgaria develops socially and economically Istanbul Tour Guides.

Role of the Direction of Statistics

The Direction of Statistics is well organized and employs trained workers who know how to gather accurate data. Because of this, the institution has detailed knowledge about different areas of national life that can be measured in numbers. These include the size of the population, economic activities, and social changes.

Census of 1905

The census taken on December 31, 1905, showed that the Principality of Bulgaria had a total population of 4,035,646 inhabitants. The following table presents the results of earlier censuses and shows how the population grew over time:

Census Year Male Population Female Population Total Population 1905 2,057,175 1,978,471 4,035,646 1900 1,909,567 1,834,716 3,744,283 1892 1,690,626 1,620,087 3,310,713 1887 1,605,389 1,548,986 3,154,375 1884 476,462 466,218 942,680* 1880 1,027,803 980,116 2,007,919

(*The figures for 1884 may cover only a part of the territory.)

Growth of the Population

From this table we can see that the population of Bulgaria grew quickly between 1880 and 1905. During this 25-year period, the number of inhabitants increased by 1,085,047 people. This rise shows the natural growth of the population, supported by better living conditions, greater stability, and the progress of the young Bulgarian state.

The steady increase also demonstrates how important accurate statistics are for understanding the development of a country. With such information, the government can make better decisions about health, education, economy, and infrastructure.

[bulgariant]

The Provinces Left Behind

After the Treaty of San Stefano (1878), many Bulgarian provinces briefly experienced the light of freedom. However, the Treaty of Berlin (also 1878) reversed much of this progress. These provinces were placed once again under the control of the Ottoman Sultan, losing the independence they had just begun to enjoy.

The Treaty of Berlin did include promises that the Ottoman government would grant some degree of liberty and reforms to these areas. A draft plan for reforms was even prepared in 1880, but it was never carried out. As a result, regions such as Macedonia remained almost unchanged, still under heavy Ottoman domination, just as they had been before the Russo-Turkish War.

The Passing of Time

A little more than twenty-five years passed after these events. In both Russia and Bulgaria, anniversaries of the war and liberation were celebrated with great solemnity. In Sofia, plans were made to raise a monument to Tsar Alexander II, known as the Tsar Liberator, as a symbol of gratitude from the Bulgarian people for Russia’s role in their freedom Turkey Sightseeing.

A Nation Transformed

During this quarter of a century, Bulgaria changed greatly. What was once a Turkish province filled with misery and devastation became a young and flourishing state. The Bulgarian people, once oppressed and treated as second-class citizens under Ottoman rule, had now begun to show their talent for progress, education, science, and industry.

Signs of Progress

Many signs of modernization appeared throughout the country:

New towns were founded and old ones expanded.

Railways connected distant regions, speeding trade and travel.

Well-maintained roads linked even the smallest villages.

Telegraph lines showed the advance of communication.

Modern harbors were built, opening Bulgaria to international trade and maritime commerce.

In total, close to one billion francs were invested in public works. Yet the most remarkable achievement was not the money itself, but the energy, determination, and persistence with which Bulgarians worked to raise their country to the level of European culture and civilization.

In just twenty-five years, Bulgaria proved itself capable of rapid transformation. From an oppressed province under Ottoman rule, it became a country full of energy, ambition, and promise for the future.

[bulgariant]

Prisoners of the Tower of Anemas

Georgius of Trebizond and Emperor Andronicus

Georgius, Duke of Trebizond

Before Michael Anemas received his pardon and release, another famous figure was imprisoned in the Tower of Anemas. This was Georgius, Duke of Trebizond, who in 1107 attempted to make his province independent from the Byzantine Empire. In some ways, his actions foreshadowed the later creation of the Empire of Trebizond in the thirteenth century.

Georgius proved to be a difficult and rebellious prisoner. He constantly cursed his imperial master and showed no signs of repentance. To win him over, his old friend Caesar Nikephoros Bryennios, husband of the historian Anna Komnene, visited him many times. At first, all efforts failed. Georgius refused every attempt at reconciliation. Yet, over time, the long years of confinement wore him down. His defiance slowly gave way to exhaustion and despair. Finally, he submitted to imperial authority. In reward for his surrender, he was released, restored to favor, and even granted wealth and honors.

The Imprisonment of Andronicus Komnenos

The next and most notorious prisoner of the tower was Emperor Andronicus I Komnenos. He was remembered in Byzantine history for his cruelty, corruption, and tyranny. In 1185, his brutal rule sparked an uprising in Constantinople. When he tried to flee, he was captured and thrown into the Tower of Anemas Private Balkan Tours.

This was not Andronicus’s first time in prison. During the reign of Emperor Manuel Komnenos, he had been arrested twice but managed to escape each time. The Tower of Anemas, however, was to be his last place of confinement. From there he emerged only to face one of the most violent deaths ever recorded in Byzantine history.

Humiliation and Torture

After his capture, Andronicus was treated like a wild animal. He was chained by the neck and feet and dragged before his successor, Emperor Isaac II Angelos. Instead of showing mercy, the new regime unleashed the fury of the people. Andronicus was beaten, spat upon, struck in the face, and mocked. His hair and beard were torn out by the roots. His teeth were knocked out, and his right hand was cut off with an axe. Then he was thrown back into his cell without food, water, or medical care.

When he was finally brought out for execution, his humiliation continued. Dressed as a slave, blind in one eye, he was forced to ride a sickly camel through the streets of Constantinople. The citizens, enraged by his years of tyranny, hurled insults and abuse as he passed. The parade ended in the Hippodrome, the great arena of the capital.

The Death of a Tyrant

At the Hippodrome, Andronicus was tied upside down by his feet between two columns decorated with figures of a wolf and a hyena—symbols of his cruelty. Despite his suffering, he endured with quiet dignity, crying out, “Kyrie Eleison—Lord, have mercy. Why do You break the bruised reed?” But his pleas fell on deaf ears. No pity was shown.

Finally, three men stepped forward and killed him with their swords, competing to display their skill. Thus ended the life of one of Byzantium’s most infamous emperors. His brutal death reflected not only the hatred of his subjects but also the dark extremes of Byzantine justice.

[bulgariant]

A Dramatic Entrance to Sarajevo

As the train approaches the city of Sarajevo, it passes through a famous gorge that leaves a lasting impression on travelers. The railway tracks cling closely to the steep granite cliffs that surround the Narenta River. This part of the journey is often compared to the Black Canyon of Utah in the United States.

The gorge stretches for twelve miles, and on both sides, tall peaks rise up to 6,000 or 7,000 feet into the sky. The rock walls are nearly vertical, reaching 1,000 feet above the riverbed. The scene is dramatic, powerful, and unforgettable—a true natural wonder on the way to the Bosnian capital Sofia Daily Tours.

Sarajevo A City of Two Worlds

Sarajevo is a city where the old and the new meet. It is a place of contrasts, where Turkish traditions and Austrian influence blend together. The city’s architecture and urban layout show signs of both Eastern (Oriental) and Western (Occidental) styles.

This unique mixture makes Sarajevo especially charming and colorful. While parts of the city are modern, many residents still follow their traditional customs. These customs add character and a feeling of authenticity to the city’s daily life.

A Crossroads of Cultures and Costumes

People often say that Sarajevo has a greater variety of Eastern ethnic groups than even Constantinople (modern-day Istanbul). In the city’s bazaar, you can see a wide range of traditional clothing from different parts of the world. It is possible to spot outfits that come from places as far as the Straits of Gibraltar to the Red Sea.

It takes someone with experience and a deep understanding of traditional dress to tell the difference between a Dalmatian and a Serb, a Magyar and an Albanian, or a Greek and a Jew. But no matter where these people come from—whether they are Slavs, Turks, Greeks, Jews, Arabs, Moors, Swedes, Spaniards, or others—they live together in peace and mutual respect.

Peaceful Coexistence Under Austrian Rule

Thanks to the firm but fair rule of the Austrian government, the people of Sarajevo live in harmony. They respect each other’s religions, cultures, and traditions, even if their faiths differ. The city is an example of how many different groups can coexist peacefully when there is understanding and tolerance.

Women and Traditional Dress

The local women’s clothing also reflects the rich cultural mix of Sarajevo. Many women still wear their traditional costumes, especially in the lower and rural classes. However, the wives and daughters of the middle class are more likely to dress in modern Western styles.

You can often tell a woman’s religion by how she dresses. For example, a veiled woman is usually Muslim, while those who leave their faces uncovered are likely to be Christians or Jews.

[bulgariant]

Yachts for Safety not Just Comfort

Although the steam yachts near the foreign embassies in Constantinople may look like luxury transport, they actually have a much more serious purpose. These yachts are emergency escape boats for diplomats in case of danger. This important reason is not often talked about, but it is known among those who live in the area.

The situation in Turkey at the time was similar to what happened in China during the Boxer Rebellion, when foreign diplomats in Peking (Beijing) were attacked by local mobs. In Turkey, there was a constant threat of violence from fanatical religious groups, especially mobs of angry Muslims who believed it was their duty to kill non-Muslims (Christians and others) Guided Tour Ephesus.

Constant Risk for Foreign Diplomats

If such a mob took control of Constantinople, it would not matter whether someone was English, Austrian, or Armenian—anyone who was not Muslim could be attacked. These mobs would not distinguish between foreigners and local minorities. Sadly, the Turkish police and officials were usually unable to control such outbreaks of violence. Because of this danger, embassies needed to be prepared at all times to evacuate quickly.

This is why a long line of steam yachts was always docked near the foreign district of the city. These boats were ready to take diplomats and their families away to safety if needed.

Gunboats as Extra Protection

In addition to the yachts, some countries—Germany, Russia, England, France, Austria, and Italy—also kept small warships or guard boats (gunboats) in the Bosphorus. These boats were there to protect citizens and diplomats in case of violence. The Turkish government did not normally allow large warships to pass through the Dardanelles, a narrow waterway, but these small boats were allowed by special agreements or treaties. Even the Turkish police admitted that the presence of these boats was necessary.

Foreign Nations Do Not Trust Turkish Mail

Another sign of low trust in the Turkish government was the fact that many European countries had their own post offices in Turkey. Nations like Britain, Germany, France, Austria, and Russia ran separate mail systems for their citizens living in Turkey.

This special arrangement was made with the permission of the Sultan and was part of international treaties. These foreign post offices were open to the public and could be used by anyone. Mail was sealed in bags and sent by railroad to the nearest city in the home country. For example:

British mail went to London, French mail went to Marseilles, Austrian mail went to Budapest, Russian mail went to Odessa

The mail bags were opened only upon arrival, and then the letters were handed over to the regular postal system of each country.

At these foreign post offices, regular stamps were sold, but they were marked with Turkish currency values. All of the foreign post offices followed this system.

[bulgariant]

Research on the Roman Baths and Amphitheater of Pergamon

By Lea Geisler, Hüseyin Çınarlık, and Neele Menter

Technical University of Berlin, Institute of Architecture, Department of Historic Building Research and Monument Preservation

Exploring Ancient Roman Architecture in Pergamon

In recent years, students and researchers from the Technical University of Berlin have been working on the Roman-era buildings of Pergamon, an ancient city in present-day Türkiye. This work is part of the TransPergMicro project, led by the German Archaeological Institute in Istanbul (DAI).

The research focuses on the Upper Gymnasion Terrace, where two large bath complexes—the East and West Baths—have been studied. These buildings are valuable for understanding Roman construction technology, building materials, and construction methods Sofia City Tour.

Construction Methods and Building Phases

The study closely examines how these baths were built. By analyzing the types of stones, bricks, mortar, and other materials used, the researchers can trace the steps of construction. This also helps them understand the different phases of construction.

Some parts of the buildings were built in earlier times, while others were added later. The way the walls were layered and the materials used give important clues about how the construction process was managed.

The Relationship Between Building and Nature

Another focus of the study is the connection between the buildings and the landscape. The East and West Baths were built on a high terrace overlooking Pergamon, and the builders had to adapt to the hilly terrain. The team also investigates how much stone and other natural resources were used, where they were taken from, and how they were transported. This helps us understand the economic and environmental impact of building large structures in ancient times.

The Amphitheater of Pergamon A Rare and Impressive Structure

One of the most important and rare buildings in Pergamon is its Amphitheater. Amphitheaters were a unique Roman invention and are symbols of Roman culture and architecture. Surprisingly, only a few have been found in Anatolia (modern-day Türkiye).

In addition to Pergamon, the only known amphitheaters in this region are located in:

Kyzikos (near Erdek, Balıkesir)

Anazarbos (in Kozan, Adana)

Mastaura (in Nazilli, Aydın)

These buildings are not only architectural wonders, but they also show how the Romans used land and resources. The amphitheater of Pergamon stands out because of its large scale and strategic location, making it an excellent case for studying land use, material consumption, and urban planning during Roman times.

[bulgariant]

Bulgaria’s Top Winter Ski Resort

While Mount Vitosha near Sofia offers enjoyable and low-cost skiing for beginners and casual skiers, it doesn’t match the full experience available at Bansko, Bulgaria’s number one winter resort. Located 150 km southeast of Sofia, Bansko is easy to reach and offers a wide range of both on-piste (ski slope) and off-piste (freestyle and backcountry) activities.

Bansko is well developed and welcoming to tourists, with modern ski facilities, cozy hotels, traditional restaurants, and a lively après-ski scene. Whether you’re a beginner or an advanced skier, the resort has something for everyone—including snowboarding, snowshoeing, spa visits, and cultural tours in the old town Coastal Bulgaria Holidays.

If you’re planning a trip, don’t miss the “Bansko In Your Pocket” guide. It provides detailed local information, including where to stay, eat, and what to see. To access it, visit www.inyourpocket.com and click on “Bansko.”

Arriving in Sofia First Impressions

Your first few minutes in Sofia, Bulgaria’s capital, might feel a bit overwhelming—especially if you don’t read Cyrillic (the local alphabet) and if airport staff aren’t too eager to speak English. But don’t worry! A little patience and a good sense of humor will go a long way in helping you settle in smoothly.

Getting to Sofia by Plane

Sofia International Airport is located about 10 km east of the city center. The airport has two terminals:

Terminal 1: Older and used mainly by low-cost carriers.

Terminal 2: Modern and more frequently used by national and international airlines.

Both terminals have cafés, car rental desks, ATMs, and currency exchange booths. However, exchange rates at the airport are usually poor, so only exchange enough money for basic needs like transport.

Getting to the City Center

Avoid taxi scams by skipping the people who approach you inside the airport. Instead, go directly to the official yellow taxi rank outside the terminal. A trip to the city center should cost no more than 10 Bulgarian leva (around €5).

Another option is to take the public bus:

Bus 84 from Terminal 1

Bus 284 from Terminal 2

Both buses go to Orlov Most near the city center and run every 10 to 15 minutes from 05:00 to 23:00. Tickets cost 0.70 leva if bought from the kiosk by the stop, or 0.80 leva from the driver. If you have large luggage, you must buy an extra ticket per bag, or you may face a fine if checked by inspectors.

Final Tips

Sofia may seem unfamiliar at first, but it’s a welcoming city full of history, culture, and charm. Whether you’re passing through on your way to Bansko or staying for a few days, you’ll find plenty to discover in Bulgaria’s growing travel scene.

[bulgariant]

Moving Beyond Blame

Some time ago, people criticized Bulgaria and questioned her reputation. However, it’s the job of history—not politics—to decide who was truly at fault. Right now, Bulgaria must focus on the present, not the past. There are more urgent and serious issues that need attention.

The Future of the Slavic People

The Slavic nations are at a turning point. The outcome of the great war (World War I) will decide whether they are freed or face worse oppression. Russia, the traditional protector of the Slavs, is now fighting alongside England and France, who have always supported freedom and independence in Europe.

The Allies and Their Mission

The goal of Russia, England, and France is to defeat German militarism, which threatens the peace and independence of small nations all across Europe. If the Allies succeed in breaking this dangerous power, then all Slavic countries, including Bulgaria, will gain—both in territory and in freedom Guided Tours Turkey.

The Risk of Defeat

But if the Allies fail or only partially succeed, then all Slavic nations will suffer—especially Bulgaria. The old enemy of the Slavs, the Ottoman Turks, have joined forces with Germany and Austria in the Pan-Germanic League. If these powers win, the Turks might return to Europe and take back the lands they once controlled—lands they ruled with cruelty and violence for centuries.

Bulgaria’s Difficult Position

Bulgaria may still feel bitter toward its former allies from the First Balkan War. It might even want to see them suffer. But this war is bigger than past rivalries. If Serbia falls, Bulgaria and all Slavic nations are in danger. This is no longer about one country—it’s about the survival of the entire Slavic people.

[bulgariant]

America Refuses to Recognize Bulgarian Elections

In 1947, the Bulgarian newspaper Zname, which was linked to the Democratic Party, published a strong message:

“America will not recognize the elections for a constituent assembly or the current government.” This statement reflects the political tension between the West and the pro-Soviet regime in Bulgaria. After World War II, Bulgaria fell under Soviet influence, and the democratic world, especially the United States, did not accept the new communist-controlled government as legitimate.

Traditional Bulgarian Farming Before Communism

Before 1944, farming in Bulgaria was mostly done on small or medium-sized private farms. Almost every peasant family owned some land. According to data from 1946, about 57.9% of farmers owned between 12.5 and 50 acres of land, while only 3.9% had between 50 and 125 acres. Large landowners were extremely rare.

Here is a breakdown of Bulgarian farms in the 1930s based on their size:

Farm Size (acres) % of All Farms Type of Farm Up to 2.5 11.78% Very small 2.5 to 5 12.31% Very small 5 to 12.5 32.86% Small 12.5 to 25 28.13% Medium 25 to 75 14.30% Large More than 75 0.67% Very large (rare)

Brutal Collectivization Begins

In April 1945, the new communist government known as the Fatherland Front passed a law to begin creating collective farms. These collective farms were owned and managed by the state, not by individual families. The government forced peasants to give up their land, animals, and farming tools.

This process of collectivization was not peaceful. Many peasants were physically attacked, threatened, or even killed if they refused to give up their property. Farmers lost not only their land but also their oxen, horses, cows, sheep, and equipment like ploughs and tractors Istanbul Tours Guide.

Soviet Influence and Class Struggle

On July 12–13, 1948, the Bulgarian Communist Party held a meeting and officially decided to follow the Soviet economic model. This meant a stronger push for collectivization and a harsh campaign against the so-called kulaks—wealthier peasants who owned more land or livestock.

From 1950 to 1954, this class struggle became especially intense. The government used fear and violence to pressure farmers into joining collective farms.

By 1958: Nearly All Land Was Taken

By 1958, 92% of Bulgaria’s arable land had been turned into collective farms. This shift affected 93% of all farming households in the country. What had once been a land of independent farmers had been transformed into a state-controlled farming system, following the Soviet model.

The forced collectivization of Bulgarian agriculture is one of the darkest periods in the country’s post-war history. Peasants lost their land, their independence, and often their dignity. Driven by Soviet ideology, the Bulgarian Communist Party reshaped rural life through fear and control, leaving long-lasting scars on the countryside and its people.

[bulgariant]

Visit of Key Figures to Bulgaria (1926)

In 1926, Ellen Gleditsch, the Chairwoman of the International Federation of University Women, along with Ms. Klem and Ekaterina Zlatoustova, visited Bulgaria. Zlatoustova was an important figure, having worked in Italy as a delegate in the Italian-Bulgarian Mixed Arbitration Court in Rome. She was also elected to the board of the International Federation of Women Jurists in 1936 and nominated to the Committee on the Status of Women with the League of Nations in 1938.

Leadership of the Lawyers’ Section

The Lawyers’ Section of the Bulgarian Association of University Women (BAUW) had several important leaders. The third chairwoman of this section was Fany Kesyakova, a Bulgarian female jurist. She graduated in law from Sofia University and worked as a secretary in private companies and foreign diplomatic missions.

Focus on Professional Rights of Women Jurists

The main goal of the Lawyers’ Section was to fight for the professional and political rights of Bulgarian women jurists. Dimitrana Ivanova, the leader of the Bulgarian Women’s Union in the inter-war period, and Vera Zlatareva, a leader of the Lawyers’ Section, were key figures in the fight for women’s inclusion in the legal profession. Their efforts were great examples of women’s activism Holidays Bulgaria.

In 1929, the International Federation of Women Jurists began to support these women’s efforts. However, despite the support, the Federation was unable to intervene because the issue was considered a constitutional law problem, not a labor issue, as argued by powerful male politicians of the time.

Legal Struggles and Women’s Suffrage

At first, the Lawyers’ Section focused on a legal battle against the Lawyers’ Act and tried to gain political support for changing the Legal Structure Act. However, after the authoritarian regime took power in 1934, the Ministers of Justice refused to discuss this issue with the BAUW. As a result, the section shifted its focus to another key goal: demanding women’s suffrage.

[bulgariant]

Melons Everywhere

Every market I visited in the Balkans was filled with melons. It seemed like the people were living by selling and eating each other’s melons, much like how people in the Scilly Isles make a living by washing each other’s clothes, as Sydney Smith once said.

The Busy Market

The market was loud and busy. It was dirty, but also had a certain charm. It was easy to tell the difference between Greek and Bulgarian women, but not as clear with the men. They had different clothes and physiques. Like peasants everywhere, the women were heavy, solid, and their faces often showed little intelligence Customized Daily Istanbul Tours.

Sometimes, you might see a pretty peasant girl, but hard work, starting early in life, taking care of children, and working in the fields from sunrise to sunset, wears them down. By middle age, the women looked tired and worn out, with faces that showed sadness from struggling to survive.

Life in the Balkans

There are no committees trying to improve conditions here, and no scientific studies about the people’s health. The people live with quiet acceptance, except when it comes to politics and religion. Sadly, half of the children born in Macedonia die from malnutrition.

The Road to Ochrida

We traveled on a flat road that curved around the hills from Resna to Ochrida. There was a shorter path over the hills by a faint mule track, and that’s the one we took. We quickly crossed a plain, then suddenly climbed up into the hills. The path was rough and full of jagged rocks. We leaned forward in our saddles and held onto our horses’ manes as they struggled up the steep, rocky climb.

Through Nature

We passed through a mix of plants and dry, empty land. We climbed through rocky gaps that felt like an oven, and found shade in cool, green areas with trickling water. At the top of a rocky hill, we stopped, turned our horses around, and looked back at the valley we had climbed from. In front of us was a shimmering lake, with a long range of dry, red rocks blocking the view of the world beyond.

[bulgariant]

The Conditions for Returning Home

Refugees from the Adrianople and Monastir regions, who were staying in Burghas, a Bulgarian port on the Black Sea, shared their conditions for returning to their homes. They said: 1. An International Commission must oversee their return. 2. The money needed to rebuild their villages, churches, and schools should be kept in a European bank, under the Commission’s control. They also wanted their stolen goods returned. 3. A full amnesty must be given to everyone involved. 4. Most importantly, their properties, lives, and honor must be protected through strong, long-lasting reforms. They called for a Christian Governor-General, chosen by the Great Powers, and permanent international control to ensure their safety Dragalevtsi Monastery.

The Refugee Situation in Burghas

Around 13,000 refugees were living in and around Burghas, and two-thirds of them were women. Additionally, there were at least 3,000 children under the age of ten or twelve. Colonel Massy, sent by the British Government to report on the refugees, described the situation: “They had nothing but their clothes, which were very few. Most of them were crying because their husbands had been killed. Many were sick, and everyone looked miserable. Some men had returned to the Kirk Kilise district, believing there was little danger, hoping to see if they could salvage anything from their destroyed homes. But they were killed when they returned.”

The Refugees’ Despair

When Colonel Massy asked the refugees if they would go back home, they smiled bitterly and said they had no homes left. They added that if they returned to Turkey, they would be murdered unless there was European supervision to protect them.

[bulgariant]

The Bulgarian Desire for Independence

The Bulgarians are a democratic people who strongly value their independence. They have a strong sense of freedom and are reluctant to accept any form of aristocracy. However, Prince Ferdinand’s attempts to create an aristocracy do not sit well with the people. Around him, there is a group of ministers, some of whom are above reproach, but many are suspected of using their power for personal gain. Political corruption in Bulgaria is as common as it is in the United States. The ruling party, which supports the Prince, stays in power because they use money to bribe voters and influence elections.

Many educated Bulgarians are tired of this system and want to see change. However, efforts to bring about honesty and fairness are often overwhelmed by corruption. While Bulgaria’s Constitution is supposed to be democratic, in reality, it is more autocratic. The Prince holds more power than most constitutional monarchs. He actively interferes in politics, and his ministers, who are loyal to him, also have considerable power. The Sobranje, or Parliament, does not truly represent the people, as it lacks the power of other European legislative bodies. The government has systems in place, not always reliable or honest, to control election outcomes Adventure Bulgaria Tour.

Bulgaria’s Ambitions and Disputes over Macedonia

The Bulgarians are an ambitious people. They are proud of the progress their country has made since gaining independence from the Ottoman Empire. However, there is a sense that they may overestimate their strength and abilities. Many Bulgarians feel that they should reclaim lands that Austria took from them and gave to Serbia. There is also a strong desire to expand Bulgaria into a larger nation, and many people look towards the region of Macedonia. It is believed that many of the Christians in Macedonia are of Bulgarian descent.

Since Bulgaria gained its independence, many Bulgarians from Macedonia have moved to Bulgaria, hoping for more freedom. These immigrants are often more educated and intelligent than the average Bulgarian, but they do not always want to see Macedonia become part of Bulgaria. Instead, some of them are working for an independent Macedonia, with Macedonian Bulgarians in charge of the region, alongside other ethnic groups like the Turks, Serbs, Romanians, and Greeks.

As a result, there are two opposing groups in Bulgaria when it comes to the issue of Macedonia. One group wants a “Big Bulgaria,” which would include Macedonia, while the other wants Macedonia to be an independent country. This disagreement has led to strong feelings and tension between the two groups.

In summary, while the Bulgarians are proud of their independence and achievements, they face challenges both within their own government and in their relations with neighboring regions. The political system, marked by corruption and a lack of true democracy, continues to be a source of frustration for many. At the same time, the desire for territorial expansion, particularly regarding Macedonia, divides the nation and creates tension between different factions. Despite these internal conflicts, Bulgaria remains a country driven by ambition and the hope of greater freedom and power.

[bulgariant]

Confessions and Consequences of Bulgaria's Labour Camps

General Mircho Spassov’s Admission

In 1990, General Mircho Spassov made a significant confession to the Prosecutor involved in the Labour Camps’ Case No. 4. He stated, “We, members of the Politburo of the Central Committee and our Ministry, vigorously copied the Soviet comrades’ methods and drew from their experience.” Spassov, who was the youngest Deputy Minister of the Ministry of the Interior in 1959, was tasked with establishing the Lovech labour camp. His admission highlights the influence of Soviet practices on Bulgaria’s oppressive system.

The Skravena Camp

In the summer of 1961, 300 women from the Lovech labour camp were transferred to Skravena in the Botevgrad region. This move was part of a broader strategy of internment and repression during the communist regime.

The System of Incarceration

During the communist era in Bulgaria, there were 22 prisons operating alongside the labour camps. These facilities held political prisoners until the fall of the regime in 1989. The conditions in these prisons and camps were often brutal, with many inmates subjected to violence, torture, and inhumane treatment.

Impunity After the Regime’s Fall

After the collapse of the communist regime in Bulgaria, those responsible for establishing the labour camps and for the murders and tortures that occurred within them largely went unpunished. This lack of accountability left many victims and their families without justice Bulgaria Private Tours Kazanlak.

Tragically, actress Nadia Dunkin, who was a former prisoner and a key witness in the labour camp case, was found dead in her home just before she was scheduled to testify in court. The investigation into her death remains unresolved, and the labour camp case itself was closed in 2002 due to a statute of limitations, preventing any further legal action against those involved.

Statistics on Political Prisoners

By July 1, 1956, statistics revealed the social backgrounds of prisoners sentenced for counter-revolutionary activities:

Poor and middle-class peasants: 1,168 (42.58%) Tradesmen: 370 (13.49%) Workers: 357 (13.01%) State employees: 349 (12.72%) Freelancers: 175 (6.38%) Kulaks (wealthy peasants): 120 (3.37%) Members of Collective Farms: 100 (3.65%) Students: 67 (2.44%) Unemployed: 37 (1.35%) The total number of sentenced prisoners stood at 2,743.

Longest-Serving Political Prisoners

Some individuals served exceptionally long sentences in the communist prisons. Notable cases include:

Vasil Uzunov: 28 years Ilija Minev: 27 years Vasil Zlatarov: 20 years These long sentences reflect the harsh realities faced by political dissidents during this dark period in Bulgarian history.

The legacy of Bulgaria’s labour camps is marked by repression, suffering, and a lack of accountability. The testimonies of former guards and prisoners reveal the harsh realities of this era. Understanding this history is crucial for recognizing the importance of human rights and ensuring that such atrocities are never repeated. The stories of the victims and survivors continue to resonate, reminding us of the need for justice and remembrance.

[bulgariant]

Confessions and Consequences of Bulgaria's Labour Camps

General Mircho Spassov’s Admission

In 1990, General Mircho Spassov made a significant confession to the Prosecutor involved in the Labour Camps’ Case No. 4. He stated, “We, members of the Politburo of the Central Committee and our Ministry, vigorously copied the Soviet comrades’ methods and drew from their experience.” Spassov, who was the youngest Deputy Minister of the Ministry of the Interior in 1959, was tasked with establishing the Lovech labour camp. His admission highlights the influence of Soviet practices on Bulgaria’s oppressive system.

The Skravena Camp

In the summer of 1961, 300 women from the Lovech labour camp were transferred to Skravena in the Botevgrad region. This move was part of a broader strategy of internment and repression during the communist regime.

The System of Incarceration

During the communist era in Bulgaria, there were 22 prisons operating alongside the labour camps. These facilities held political prisoners until the fall of the regime in 1989. The conditions in these prisons and camps were often brutal, with many inmates subjected to violence, torture, and inhumane treatment.

Impunity After the Regime’s Fall

After the collapse of the communist regime in Bulgaria, those responsible for establishing the labour camps and for the murders and tortures that occurred within them largely went unpunished. This lack of accountability left many victims and their families without justice Bulgaria Private Tours Kazanlak.

Tragically, actress Nadia Dunkin, who was a former prisoner and a key witness in the labour camp case, was found dead in her home just before she was scheduled to testify in court. The investigation into her death remains unresolved, and the labour camp case itself was closed in 2002 due to a statute of limitations, preventing any further legal action against those involved.

Statistics on Political Prisoners

By July 1, 1956, statistics revealed the social backgrounds of prisoners sentenced for counter-revolutionary activities:

Poor and middle-class peasants: 1,168 (42.58%) Tradesmen: 370 (13.49%) Workers: 357 (13.01%) State employees: 349 (12.72%) Freelancers: 175 (6.38%) Kulaks (wealthy peasants): 120 (3.37%) Members of Collective Farms: 100 (3.65%) Students: 67 (2.44%) Unemployed: 37 (1.35%) The total number of sentenced prisoners stood at 2,743.

Longest-Serving Political Prisoners

Some individuals served exceptionally long sentences in the communist prisons. Notable cases include:

Vasil Uzunov: 28 years Ilija Minev: 27 years Vasil Zlatarov: 20 years These long sentences reflect the harsh realities faced by political dissidents during this dark period in Bulgarian history.

The legacy of Bulgaria’s labour camps is marked by repression, suffering, and a lack of accountability. The testimonies of former guards and prisoners reveal the harsh realities of this era. Understanding this history is crucial for recognizing the importance of human rights and ensuring that such atrocities are never repeated. The stories of the victims and survivors continue to resonate, reminding us of the need for justice and remembrance.

[bulgariant]

Forced Collectivization of Bulgarian Agriculture

Background of Bulgarian Farms

After World War II, Bulgaria was influenced by the Soviet Union, unlike other Eastern and Central European countries. Until 1944, most Bulgarian farms were small or medium-sized and privately owned. It was common for peasant families to own some land. By 1946, about 57.9% of peasants owned between 12.5 and 50 acres of land, while only 3.9% owned between 50 and 125 acres. This shows that land ownership was widespread, with most families having a stake in agriculture.

Characteristics of Farms in the 1930s

In the 1930s, the distribution of farm sizes in Bulgaria was as follows:

Farm Size (acres) Percentage of All Farms Characteristics Up to 2.5 11.78% Very small 2.5 to 5 12.31% Very small 5 to 12.5 32.86% Small 12.5 to 25 28.13% Medium 25 to 75 14.30% Big More than 75 0.67% Large-scale

The Start of Collectivization

In April 1945, the new authorities under the Fatherland Front implemented a policy to create collective farms. This process of collectivization was marked by extreme violence and intimidation. Peasants faced harassment, assaults, and even killings as the government seized their land and farming equipment. This included plows, carts, tractors, and livestock like oxen, horses, cows, and sheep.

Communist Policies Intensify

On July 12 and 13, 1948, a plenary session of the Central Committee of the Bulgarian Communist Party endorsed a Soviet-style economic model for Bulgaria. They called for intensified efforts against wealthier peasants, known as kulaks, and urged a broader class struggle in rural areas. This marked a peak in the conflict between the Bulgarian communists and the rural population, particularly from 1950 to 1954 Guided Tour Istanbul.

The Impact of Collectivization

By 1958, the situation had changed drastically. Collective farms controlled 92% of all arable land, impacting about 93% of households in the country. This transformation altered the landscape of Bulgarian agriculture and significantly affected rural life.

The forced collectivization of Bulgarian agriculture reshaped the country’s farming system, moving from privately owned small and medium-sized farms to large collective farms under government control. This transition was achieved through coercion and violence, deeply impacting the lives of countless peasants. The legacy of this period continues to influence Bulgaria’s agricultural practices and social structure today.