Thomas Theodor Heine, Angel (c. 1905)
YOU ARE THE REASON
Claire Keane

#extradirty
Cosmic Funnies

shark vs the universe
sheepfilms
RMH

titsay

Origami Around
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Cosimo Galluzzi
dirt enthusiast
will byers stan first human second
Jules of Nature
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
art blog(derogatory)
we're not kids anymore.

@theartofmadeline
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

blake kathryn
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Sweden
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United Kingdom

seen from France
seen from France

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Türkiye

seen from Germany
seen from Poland
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from Hong Kong SAR China
seen from Türkiye
@bussi21
Thomas Theodor Heine, Angel (c. 1905)
Much of what happens to us in life is nameless because our vocabulary is too poor. Most stories get told out loud because the storyteller hopes that the telling of the story can transform a nameless event into a familiar or intimate one. We tend to associate intimacy with closeness and closeness with a certain sum of shared experiences. Yet in reality total strangers, who will never say a single word to each other, can share an intimacy — an intimacy contained in the exchange of a glance, a nod of the head, a smile, a shrug of a shoulder. A closeness that lasts for minutes or for the duration of a song that is being listened to together. An agreement about life. An agreement without clauses. A conclusion spontaneously shared between the untold stories gathered around the song.
John Berger, "Some Notes on Song (for Yasmine Hamdan)"
« The obsessive fear of the Americans is that the lights might go out. […] In the tower blocks the empty offices remain lit. On the freeways, in broad daylight, the cars keep all their headlights on. In Palms Ave., Venice, California, a little grocery store […] leaves its orange and green neon sign flashing all night, into the void. And this is not to mention the television, with its 24-hour schedules, often to be seen functioning like an hallucination in the empty rooms of houses or vacant hotel rooms […].
There is nothing more mysterious than a TV set left on in an empty room. […] It is as if another planet is communicating with you. Suddenly the TV reveals itself for what it really is: a video of another world, ultimately addressed to no one at all, delivering its images indifferently […].
In short, in America the arrival of night-time or periods of rest cannot be accepted, nor can the Americans bear to see the technological process halted. Everything has to be working all the time, there has to be no let-up in man’s artificial power, and the intermittent character of natural cycles (the seasons, day and night, heat and cold) has to be replaced by a functional continuum that is sometimes absurd […].
You may seek to explain this in terms of fear […]. The skylines lit up at dead of night, the air-conditioning systems cooling empty hotels in the desert and artificial light in the middle of the day all have something both demented and admirable about them. The mindless luxury of a rich civilization, and yet of a civilization perhaps as scared to see the lights go out as was the hunter in his primitive night. »
— Jean Baudrillard, America
Hans Peter Feldman - Bilder 11
Bourbonese Qualk at the Zoppo in 1986
Photo by John Jakob
“In his Lectures on Fine Art, Hegel noted that human beings— understood as collectively likeminded beings, what he called Geist—are always struggling to realize or actualize (verwirklichen) some normative conception of themselves, and in having attempted such an actualization, having “externalized” such a self- conception (created some social or political institution, collectively acted in some way, debated and passed some law, engaged in some marriage practice, educated their children in some way), they are then, and only then, able to understand much more fully and concretely what they took themselves to be committed to in such a merely provisional and tentative self- conception, and thereby what it was they actually did. This is Hegel’s famous notion of “retrospectivity” (Nachträglichkeit) in self-understanding. In his terms in the Lectures, human beings must “double themselves” (sich verdoppeln) not only to understand themselves, but to be themselves, given their distinct mode of being, as self-realizing beings. That is, the mode of self- knowledge distinctive for such beings is self- constituting as well as self- reflective, as human beings struggle to become who they take themselves to be. Art is understood as a distinct modality of such self- understanding, “externalization,” and self- realizing.”
— Robert Pippin, Filmed Thought: Cinema as Reflective Form
School building in Monforte de Lemos Monforte de Lemos, Lugo, Galicia, Spain; 1975
Carlos Meijide Calvo
see map | about the architect
via “COAM Arquitectura” 212 (1978)
Dimitris Papaioannou
By Mark Borthwick for Vogue Italia
Heike Stephan,“Monelle”,1983
Shinya Arimoto, Tokyo Debugger
“A joke’s punch line, like a poem’s meaning, is not in its words, but in what we make of them—and they of us. […] The performing arts—which include comedy, poetry, music, dance, and magic, as well as theater—ask of us not only the theater’s well-known suspension of disbelief, but also suspension of foreknowledge. All partake of something that lies at the core of ritual: the reenactment of and entrance into a mystery that can be touched and entered but not possessed.”
— Jane Hirshfield, from “Poetry and the Constellation of Surprise,” Ten Windows: How Great Poems Transform the World (Alfred A. Knopf, 2015)
Romy Schneider and Jacques Dutronc in L’important c’est d’aimer (A. Żuławski)
Rebecca Horn
Unknown