Despite its widespread use in architectural discourse, the term ârepresentationâ is not often sufficiently understood to operate simultaneously on two different semantic regimes. The first alludes to a graphic or physical depiction (a floor plan, a model, etc.) that stands for an outside referent (a work of architecture) on which it is dependent, and therefore subordinate to. The second arises when a work of architecture, formerly a primary referent, becomes that which stands for another, whether internal or external to the work itself. In this case, the work represents values pertaining to a particular realm (e.g. political, social, vernacular, ethical, religious, etc.), and by embodying these values it acquires a certain meaning. Symbolism, ornament, adornment, and related notions around the question of signification typically fall into this register.