REQUESTED BY: ANONYMOUS USER.
⚠️ WATCH OUT FOR FOLKLOREALBUM ⚠️
( @folklorealbum) s thread can reasonably be seen as harassment from several angles, depending on platform rules, community norms, and legal definitions in different jurisdictions. Here's a breakdown of why many people (especially the targets and observers in similar RP/callout spaces) would classify it that way:
### 1. ( Public naming & shaming with direct @ tags)
- The main post explicitly tags ( Brea) by username and declares them "weird as fuck" for their roleplay choices.
- It escalates from a vague earlier post ("soft blocked someone… Fucking weirdos") to deliberately doxxing their handle after they presumably responded or "wanted to play."
- Follow-up replies tag @LostHerMorals and accuse them of "enabling" the behavior while adding the extremely loaded line: " Someone's gotta check your hard drives."
- This is widely recognized as an implied accusation of child-related illegal content (CSAM / pedophilia insinuation), one of the most reputation-destroying things you can say about someone online in 2025–2026 fandom spaces.
### 2. Tone and language intended to humiliate
Phrases like:
- "You're weird as fuck"
- "Fucking weirdos"
- "I don't care about who you are or what your reasoning is"
- "I hope you learned a valuable lesson ❤️" (sarcastic faux-kindness after heavy insults)
This style is classic public humiliation rather than private critique or simple disagreement. The sarcastic heart emoji at the end is frequently cited as a hallmark of mean-spirited callouts meant to mock the target while pretending to be civil.
### 3. **Escalation after initial privacy consideration**
The poster literally says:
> "I wasn't naming any names publicly due to your privacy… but since you want to play, here you go."
This frames the doxxing + insults as retaliation/punishment for the other person responding or defending themselves — a common harassment pattern ("you made me do this by not staying silent").
### 4. Platform (X) rule violations it arguably hits
Under current X rules, this thread checks several boxes that frequently lead to harassment reports being upheld:
- Targeted insults / name-calling directed at specific users
- Abusive @-mentions intended to degrade or intimidate
- Implied severe accusations (hard drive comment → CSAM/pedo smear) without evidence
- Coordinated reputational attack in a small niche community (Swiftie RP circles), where visibility to mutuals can cause real social/friendship fallout
### Counter-arguments people use when defending it
- "It's just calling out creepy behavior" → many still say the *method* (public tagging, loaded accusations, sarcasm) crosses into harassment even if you agree with the opinion.
- "They roleplay a 17 y/o while being 21+ — that's inherently suspect" → the concern may be valid to some, but platform rules generally don't allow you to harass someone over fictional character ages unless it involves real grooming/solicitation of minors.
### Bottom line (2026 fandom context)
In RP / stan Twitter, this exact pattern — vague subtweet → named callout → pedo-adjacent insinuation → "hope you learned your lesson" sign-off — is one of the **most commonly reported forms of harassment**. It often results in:
- suspensions (especially if mass-reported)
- people losing friend groups / mutuals overnight
- long-term brigading / stalking by the callout poster's followers
So while folklorealbum may genuinely believe they're protecting the space, the way it's done fits what a large number of users, mods, and even X's own enforcement team would label as targeted harassment rather than acceptable criticism.
Brea (breazyabrams) did nothing wrong because:
- She is writing fiction — specifically, an original character (OC) who happens to be 17 years old and uses Gracie Abrams (who is currently 26) as a faceclaim/visual reference.
- Multiple people in the thread (including @LostHerMorals and others) explicitly state that Brea has made clear she is not shipping, lewding, or doing anything sexual/romantic with the 17-year-old OC. The character exists in a platonic, non-explicit context.
- Roleplaying teenage OCs is extremely common across almost every RP community (especially in fandoms involving high-school/coming-of-age settings, fantasy worlds, superhero universes, etc.). Adults writing teen characters has been standard practice for decades in fanfiction, Tumblr RP, Discord servers, Twitter RP, etc.
- Using a celebrity faceclaim (even one who is now older) for a younger character version does not automatically equal inappropriate behavior unless there's explicit predatory intent — which nobody has provided evidence for here. Brea has repeatedly said the OC is non-sexual and she avoids any minor-involved shipping or adult/minor dynamics.
- Being 21+ and writing a 17-year-old fictional character is not illegal, against X's rules, or inherently predatory. It only becomes a problem when it crosses into grooming, explicit content involving minors, or real-world solicitation — none of which has been alleged with receipts.
@folklorealbum's behavior crosses into harassment because:**
- They initially vague-posted ("soft blocked someone who says they're 21+ but their character's age is 17. Fucking weirdos") which many people recognized as targeting Brea.
- When called out, they escalated by publicly naming and doxxing-style tagging Brea directly ("I wasn't naming any names publicly due to your privacy, Brea but since you want to play, here you go") — turning a private disagreement or preference into a public call-out.
- They used extremely aggressive, personal language: "You're weird as fuck", "Gracie Abrams is 26 years old and aging her down so much is weird as fuck too", and later "If calling out your weird behavior makes me a 'fugly hoe' then so it be lmao".
- They expanded the attack to guilt-by-association, tagging and insulting @LostHerMorals ("you're ALSO weird for enabling this sort of thing... Someone's gotta check your hard drives") purely for defending Brea.
- This pattern — vagueposting → public tagging/naming → insults → involving third parties/mutuals — matches classic online harassment tactics:
public shaming, encouraging pile-ons (evidenced by people saying they sent the @ to group chats or mutuals to "go look"), and refusing to keep the disagreement private or block-and-move-on.
- Defenders in the thread repeatedly call it bullying, stalking-adjacent behavior, and organized harassment (e.g., "you're not debating ideas — you're organizing harassment", "It's borderline harassment at this point. Now it's stalking. She has sent her cronies").
In short:
Brea is doing normal (if niche) RP that stays non-explicit and platonic.
@folklorealbum took personal discomfort ("I think it's weird") and turned it into repeated, public, tagged attacks with inflammatory wording and attempts to rally others against her — which is textbook online harassment, especially when no actual rule-breaking or harmful behavior has been proven.
If someone finds aging-down faceclaims uncomfortable, the healthy response is to privately block, curate their timeline, or make general statements about boundaries — not repeatedly tag, insult, and publicly shame a specific person who isn't hurting anyone.
(If you're one of the people involved and want advice on reporting / blocking / de-escalating, feel free to say so.)