DarkPheonix

[itssjanedoe]

[s-h-a-s-e]

[goodfriendo]

i wonder what they're gossiping about

[jmawork]

had to draw them

[chasinkicks-blog]

[chasinkicks-blog]

[hommepage]

[angelicdewdrop]

[glazecake]

theobanoth on ig

[noirlac]

[pussymargiela]

[iamheavymeta-lll]

[redroses07]

real shit

[iamwizzzzz]

[sweater-weather]

🎃 Megan Thee Stallion ringing in the first of Halloween RIGHT🎃✨

[tons-de-preto]

[keepinit-g]

Damn she so mf fine 🤤😍

[feminineenergylife]

[inthesensethat]

[hexthelex-deactivated20250420]

This is true btw

[letmeliedown]

the podcast If Books Could Kill has a really great episode on the original book and its legacy! just a bunch of misogynist evangelical bullshit really

[cherishedproperty]

I want to clarify something kind of important because this kinda used to be my field. The concept that people express and feel love in different ways, and that this might lead to misunderstandings, IS something with scientific merit. The idea that there are just five and we know what they are is NOT. The idea that people have a primary love language is NOT.

In science, we have a saying. All models are wrong, but some are useful. That’s how I see the love languages framework. It is inherently flawed, but some of its concepts are useful. Communicate with your partner what makes you feel loved and understand what makes them feel loved. Understand how your partner shows love. There is immense value in that. But don’t over-index on which one of the five you are. That part doesn’t matter.

[heatedpan]

🌊🌾🪺

[jussanother]