The Porta Nigra
The Porta Nigra, the North Gate of Ancient Trier, is one of the exemplary monuments of the Roman Empire’s military power outside of Rome itself. The gate was part of the city’s wall, which, at the gate, skirted the river. To the east, the gate incorporated a wall of the amphitheater. The outer side of the wall is the most frequently photographed side. It boasts the round sides of both semi-circular towers, which are flat in this photo. I have chosen to focus on the interior side of the wall as an example of Roman architecture.
Built in the late 3rd or early 4th century, C.E., the Porta Nigra owes its survival to the fact that, like the Pantheon, it was used as a church during the Dark Ages. It is made of sandstone, which has blackened over time, giving the Porta Nigra (the Black Gate) its name. These sandstone blocks are held together not by concrete, but by iron clamps.
On the inner side of the gate, the one pictured here, there are two towers visible - one per each side of the gate. Both were, originally, four stories high. These are connected by a three story connecting unit with two large arches at the center, at road level. There is a roadway going through each of these arches, as there was when the structure was erected.
What sets this building apart from other architectural pieces is its zealous fenestration. Three stories of half-columnades frame Roman arch windows. In fact, these windows, and the columns around them, are comparable to the interior of Roman basilicas that were being constructed around the same time. The Porta Nigra is the perfect combination of Religion and Rome. The column design may remind passerby of a church or a temple. The windows these designs framed, however, served a very Roman purpose: military advantage. As enemies approached the gates of Trier, a battalion would await in these archways, ready to rain a terrifying torrent of weaponry upon those who drew near.
Keep reading
Hey Mia! I really love this analysis, how you incorporated how it was used with its style and features. I especially liked that even though this was a factual analysis, I could still hear your own voice and thoughts - it sounds like you're really interested in this piece! Nothing stood out to me as "missing," if anything, you could add a little bit about the outer side of the wall to give a different perspective, but I recognize you were focusing on the inner part, so it's not really necessary.


















