READING DIARY: Broken Grammar (Bowdidge)
The Cut-Up Method of Brion Gysin
Burroughsâ writing about the cut-up method presents an intriguing way to disrupt the normative approach(es) to writing. The first thing that comes to my mind upon reading the text is the chance operation and the work of John Cage, although I appreciate the distinction made in the introduction between what a random generator produces and what the Surrealists/Burroughs intended for the method. I find it much more interesting to use the random generator as a way to trigger thoughts or access connections that would not otherwise have come to a creatorâs mind than to present what the generator has provided as the completed product for dissemination or display. Of particular interest to me is the Italo Calvino quote:Â âIt is only in juxtaposition with our personal and social ghosts that randomly retrieved words resonate.â
Ludwig Wittgenstein
Beginning with the summary of points laid out in Tractatus, this reading was very much one that I had to just stick with, hoping that it would eventually âclickâ. While there were snippets that my mind could latch onto in this first section, it took until very close to the end for me to gain a broader understanding of the works implications (and therefore, its value). That said, I find what Wittgenstein outlines to be ânonsenseâ and âsenselessâ intriguing, but have a lot of fun exploring what would be defined as nonsense and think it holds great value.
Sections 3.3â6 resonate with me the most. I (quite accidentally) support myself by editing, and âmeaning as useâ, ârule followingâ and âprivate languageâ are all notions that I have contemplated in depth many times prior to encountering this reading. To effectively transmit ideas from person A to person B via words, a delicate balance must be struck between the traditional rule book, the receiverâs rule book and the emergent conventions of the time and place. I also love and loathe how many permutations of meaning a few words can have. But this, as I understand it, is why Wittgenstein views philosophy as an essential activity. In some ways I think I may have been better off reading this piece backwards, as only upon finishing it can I begin to chew on this foundational idea from Tractatus: âTautologies and contradictions, the propositions of logic, are the limits of language and thought, and thereby the limits of the world.â












