Olympic affair, pt. 2
There’s nothing new to be said about the Olympus XA. It’s a diminutive stroke of genius. A suitable representative of Yoshihisa Maitani’s design and development legacy.
In brief, this pocketable gem is a manual focussing rangefinder with aperture priority automatic metering, and a six-element 35mm f2.8 zuiko lens with max shutter speed of 1/500th. It’s a cult-favourite, give it a google.
The relatively short working distance and small window of the range finder can be a bit tricky (virtually unusable in very low light). It’s perfectly adequate in most lighting situations, with a little practice. Fortunatly the electronic shutter is so smooth and quiet it’s generally easy to stop down that lens a little for deeper depth of field and sharper corners.
When wide open corners are noticably soft. In addition, vignetting is pronounced (at least by my copy). It’s not an unpleasant effect, if that’s what you’re into, and I suspect most people who still shoot 35mm these days are looking to add such distinctive features in their images.
Olympus XA, Kodak gold
Olympus XA, Kodak ultramax, that vignetting tho’!
XA, kodak ultramax. The focussing scale above the lens helps to zone focus in low light where the tiny rangefinder split-image is virtually invisible.
XA, kodak ultramax.
Whatelse can you ask of a pocket camera? It’s weaknesses are as well documented as it’s strengths. Short fucussing distance, hair-trigger shutter release, thumb wheel film advance, a some what weak plastic “dust barrier” clamsheel cover, all features wholly integral to the compact design.
Ironically, I now find myself drawn back to the OM-1 for careful and precise TL composition. As fun and quick as rangfinders are, not to mention portable, I just don’t find myself trusting the view finder. It’s utterly baseless, by we all have our prejudices in gear.















