untitled

Kiana Khansmith
Doug Jones

No title available
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!
𓃗
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
Cosimo Galluzzi
Not today Justin

pixel skylines
almost home
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
$LAYYYTER

Andulka

Product Placement
d e v o n
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Xuebing Du

gracie abrams
seen from Nepal
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Puerto Rico

seen from Bangladesh
seen from Bangladesh
seen from United States
seen from Russia
seen from Ukraine

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Ukraine
seen from United States

seen from Argentina

seen from Germany

seen from Colombia
seen from North Macedonia
seen from United States

seen from Ukraine
seen from Bangladesh
@conservative-intp
Cisphobic people
Cisphobic person: wow cis people have such an easy life haha
Cis: actually, cis people deal with problems, too.
Cisphobic person: pfft like?
Cis: first off, your cisphobic bullshit...
Spread love, not hate. There’s no need to get rid of 95% of the population because your sjw cultism screams that they’re all oppressive. There’s no need to use a goddamn Robot and two nine year olds who’s gender is up to the player to promote your shitty, genocidal agenda. Seriously, you’re all like, fourteen. Where are your parents? -MC
Reasons I want all men to suffocate in their sleep
1. They deserve it for always being so hateful towards women and just being disgusting pigs in general. 2. It will rid women of all of their problems and fears in life. 3. It would be funny as hell. 4. Suffocation would be a 100% appropriate cause of death for men because it would finally show them how it feels t be oppressed and not being able to do anything about it. 5. Women would be truly free. 6. No one would have to deal with hate online. 7. No more war. 8. No more oppressive religions. 9. No more sexism in the media or anywhere at all! 10. It would be fun to watch them all helplessly struggle for air in their sleep.
And that ladies and gentlemen is an edgy snowflake who wants the world to die because without men, we loose the ability to start life. Women become meaningless at that point 😂😂
Why Johnlock is such a big deal
When Johnlock becomes canon in January there are probably going to be some people who say that it’s not that big of a deal because they’re just two cis white men and… I mean, they are but it really is so much more.
You could say that 2016 has not been a great year for LGBT representation because many of our favourite queer TV characters (a lot of whom were POC) were killed off, a lot of relationships ended and the word “bisexual” wasn’t said nearly enough times. Despite all this, we’ve been able to enjoy some amazing gay storylines in shows like Yuri on Ice, Supergirl or Skam and right now there’s more diversity than ever, but we still have a really long way to go.
Sherlock is not just a random TV show with a small number of fans. Over 100 million people watched Season 3 and it’s likely that the new series will have even more viewers. It is definitely an international phenomenon. So when the rug is finally pulled and it is revealed to have been a love story since the start, it will shock so many people because they didn’t see it coming. It will be a surprise that the two main male characters of one of the most watched TV shows ever have actually been in love all this time. This will be television history (thanks Amanda).
Something this mainstream almost never features gay couples and if it does it’s usually for like 5 seconds and Sherlock is going to be almost 20 hours of this (because let’s be real, the whole show is about John and Sherlock). This is gonna be a huge “fuck you” to queerbaiting and to anyone who still treats gay ships as a joke. Because even though this story has always been gay, it’s not just about being gay and that’s what’s so great about it. It shows that you can have amazing main characters who happen to be gay or bisexual in a really succesful TV show. It will open so many doors for all the media that’s yet to come.
So that’s already a pretty big deal on its own but we have to remember that this is Sherlock Holmes and John Watson we’re talking about. The most famous detective of all time and his loyal companion. The greatest fictional “friendship” to ever exist. Two of the most widely adapted characters in history will be able to kiss in public for the first time in 130 years! They finally get to be who they’ve always been because it’s not 1895 anymore and someone is finally getting this right.
It’s a fact that Sherlock wouldn’t have these many fans if people knew it’s gay so it’s obvious that this wouldn’t have the same effect if Sherlock had literally said he was gay in the first episode (even though he practically did) or if Mark and Steven had said that this is what they’re doing in any random interview ever, which is why they’ve lied so many times and why they’ll keep lying until the new series airs. This is a conspiracy. It’s real and we’re a part of it.
So yeah, Johnlock won’t end homophobia. It won’t end queerbaiting. It won’t end heteronormativity. But it’s a really big step forward and it’s definitely something that’s going to be talked about for decades. Things will never be the same.
And if that wasn’t already enough, just think about how this show and the TJLC community specifically have helped so many people figure out their sexual orientation or make friends or just feel less lonely. This video shows it a lot better than I ever could (thank you @quietlyprim ). And the best part of all this is that it will continue to help even more people when it’s happened. Because, like @marcelock said, queer people get to be people like Sherlock Holmes. We deserve this, all the LGBT people who came before us deserved this and we finally get to see it. This is for us, for them and for everyone who’s ever had to hide like Sherlock and John.
AAAANNNNDDDDD Johnlock never became cannon just like that producers said😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
How To Spot A Transtrender:
1.) Them being trans is everything about them, not just a part of who they are This is a big one. When I say everything about them, they seem to put being trans infront of every other characteristic of that person
2.) They only seem to bring up them being trans in an argument to gain leverage These are usually social justice warriors that are teenage girls and extremely against cis and straight people. A majority of the time have an excessive amount of self diagnosed illnesses as well
3.) They make little to no effort to appear either male, female, or androgynous, but then get very angry when people ‘misgender’ them Usually this is just another ploy to get an excuse to hate cis people (their “oppressors”) and bully everyone who doesn’t agree with them
If you have any more, please feel free to add
A summary
Me: trans people have the same worth as cis people and they still can be dangerous just like cis people can be
Tumblr: uM NOo THATS NOT COrrEct…dOWN WITH Cis IF U TRans u ARE auTOMATicaLLY BETER than CIS PPLS…
Cis positivity
Cis people are so beautiful and important…I love them… They r nice n good and very precious and we should protect them 💕
referring to a trans woman as anything other than a woman/female is transphobic. referring to a trans man as anything other than a man/male is transphobic. referring to a nonbinary person as anything other than nonbinary/their gender is transphobic.
misusing science to harm others is anything but scientific, ur using it as a base to harm ppl, to justify ur hatred and bigotry.
You can't not be a gender and be transgender at the same time. It's logic lol. It's in the freaking name😂😂
Real transgender: u shouldn’t hate all cis people for something a few cis people have done
Trans™ on this hellsite: I cAN HATE THEM BECAUSE THEY ARENT ME!!! OMG U TRANSPHOBE
the fact the “down with cis” bus is made up but the “down with trans” bus is very real and out there speaks volumes about reverse oppression bullshit
And you're not oppressing us by creating a down with cis bus? Honey honey honey, this is all in response to your actions
most hetrosexual people are cis, most gay people are cis, most lesbians are cis, most bisexuals are cis, most asexuals are cis, trans people transition so they can feel the way cis people feel all the time. WHY THE FUCK WOULD YOU MAKE FUN OF PEOPLE FOR BEING CIS?!?!
listen friend cis people have been erasing and killing trans people for decades, so i think y’all can put up with a few jokes made about you on a microblogging website
“I can be a cunt because people who are not you did shitty things to people who are not me” -you
Literally every cis person has at some point in their life done something transphobic or done something that contributes to transphobia why is this so hard for people to understand
Literally every trans person has at some point in their life done something cisphobic or done something that contributes to cisphobia why is this so hard for people to understand
Next time hun, don’t be a hypocrite, I have no issue with trans people. It’s the moment they start pushing cisphobia on me that I get mad. Kinda the same way you get mad if someone pushes transphobia on you.
Planned Parenthood’s Abortion Quotas
Another instance of the “non-quota” quota. “It’s not a quota, it’s a sales goal.”
Pro-life or Pro-choice doesn’t matter. You should be concerned about the ethics of pushing life changing medical procedures for profit.
This seems unnerving
Okay, that’s good propaganda and all, but exactly how many of those claims can be corroborated by empirical evidence?
@milquetoast-is-unsung, perhaps you should kindly ask @PlannedParenthood corporate headquarters for their empirical evidence that incriminates them on their “healthcare” centers’ abortion quotas.
While you’re at it, you should try getting a hold of the mob and asking them for their private books on all their illegal activities as well.
Soooo… no evidence then? Just more “former abortion workers” making claims? Cool. My mind has been changed.
Oh wait, no it hasn’t. Prove it or drop it. And if you prove it, tell me how the (alleged and uncorroborated) wrongdoings of an abortion provider impacts the need for abortion services to be legal and accessible otherwise.
I’ll wait.
First of all, all the incriminating evidence in the world could not change a brainwashed ideologue’s mind. You will always find an excuse to obfuscate the truth in favor of your political religion.
Secondly, how would one prove a distasteful practice like this that is not shared with the public? If the testimonies of former PP workers are not good enough, what is?
There was unedited incriminating undercover film taken of Planned Parenthood staff negotiating the sale of baby parts, but you denied it.
We show you the eugenic roots of Margaret Sanger, and you either deny it’s true or just ignore it completely.
There was even a photo of a certificate awarding a center for exceeding their number of abortion visits for their half fiscal year (which PP has not denied), but that was not good enough either.
So, what kind of smoking gun, statistical evidence, or otherwise would meet your standard of incrimination?
The answer is nothing. You prove that in your last sentence.
You don’t care about the truth, you only care about your twisted belief system. Even if Planned Parenthood was indicted and sentenced for criminal behavior, you would defend them to the bitter end and then simply move on to defending the next abortion mill et infinitum. That is what ideological toadies do.
Yikes on that photo.
Planned Parenthood sets ‘abortion quotas,’ former employees say
Whistleblowers: Planned Parenthood Had Dead Baby Quotas
No quotas? Planned Parenthood budgeted for 1,135 abortions a year
The video shows a budget item with the number 1,135. “You know what that is?” the female narrator asks. “That’s their abortion quota.”
@zamarons-for-choice we are waiting for your response to the posted image of the attabitches memo from corporate… You are pathetic.
Don’t ever come at me with the Federalist and LifeNews as your sources. I’m not reading them. Get me evidence that would hold up in a court of law or gtfo. But sure, I’ll play along. I’m not seeing anything compelling in your “sources.” More “former employees” speaking out, with no proof of employment that I can see. And budgeting for services that might be provided based on projections is hardly evidence of any wrongdoing.
Internet debate rule #1 is basically “don’t back up your arguments with ‘sources’ that present with a very damning bias”.
If you want to post sources to back up your anti-choice agenda, try to find sources that don’t come from sites with explicit anti-choice agendas.
Actually, a good rule of actual debate instead of intellectual cowardice would be to refute the actual evidence contained within the biased sources themselves instead of eschewing from actually looking at them, brushing them off, or outright discrediting them just because they are “biased”. Because let me tell you, just about everything is biased and any outlets or writers who claim not to be are blowing smoke up your ass. And just because someone is biased, does not mean they are necessarily wrong.
Everyone is biased.
Don’t be lazy.
Debunk the content; not the source.
There’s no need to debunk content from a source that exists purely to push a narrative. That’s silly.
If the content exists elsewhere, pull it from elsewhere. I have no qualms with dismissing anti-choice propaganda from an anti-choice website. That’s not cowardice; that’s simply not playing a stupid game. If people were confident in their information, they wouldn’t have to pull it from such dubious sites.
And if the content does not exist elsewhere, what then? What if this is the only site that has put in the effort to supply facts regarding this particular subject? Do we come to an impasse on the subject or do you win the argument because you simply refuse to acknowledge the content of the source?
You claim to not want to play stupid games, but you are the one trying to discredit everything based on your biased opinion of the source. I’m not playing by your qualifications of source material. I am confident of the information provided by my sources; you are the one who is clearly intimidated by the contradicting information contained therein. I don’t care if you don’t agree with the narrative of the site, only whether the facts they purport are accurate or not.
And do you honestly believe that a pro-choice site is going to go out of their way to publish information that will contradict their own agenda? Come on, get real.
If you are going to discredit your way out of an opposing argument you are either lazy or a coward. Pick one. Otherwise, debunk the content or shut up.