Part One of “Calling Out” Sakri, or Kaveh, former Chococritters staff.
Trigger warning for mentions of: grooming, pedophilia, age-play kink, pet-play kink, rape-play kink, and if you dislike opinions
Well it appears the account has been found by some of the biggest contributors of the Chococritters controversy! How unfortunate that Sakri found it upon himself to preemptively block this account when, as of writing this, nothing has been posted yet! It’s almost as if he knows that he has been spreading rumors and showing extreme bias to the point of spreading misinformation while presenting information about this situation.
In this post I will be making what I believe to be fair critique of how Sakri (collective, as we are unsure who is in front when this will be posted) has shared his insider information, and his opinions on CC/Reki.
Starting in chronological order of Sakri timeline, we start with an ask of Anon defending Kaveh about his demotion. Anon mentions Kaveh allegedly badmouthing CC tickets in vc. [Sidenote: At this point in his blog he is using sign off emojis instead of graphics, I cannot find the key to this system on his page anymore. For this posts sake I will be referring to the collective name, Sakri. This is not meant to be disrespectful.] Sakri denys this claim, and rebuts its by stating that he was made to handle two tickets covering grooming and pedophilia on his third-or-fourth day of being a trial. I do not doubt the nature of the tickets themselves, however I doubt that Reki forced Kaveh to take these tickets either, and had Kaveh spoken up about being uncomfortable with handling these tickets, another staff would be assigned to handle them. This is supported in a later post, stating, “I will give Reki the smallest, and I mean smallest amount of credit. He did not force those tickets onto us.”
The first post showing voluntary withholding of evidence is very soon in the timeline. Anon asks if Sakri has any information on the allegations against Reki, the owner of CC. The mentioned allegations being: ageplay, petplay, and rapeplay. Sakri stated that the short answer is yes, he does have screenshots, video recordings, and more to back up these allegations. However, he cannot share them as he was sworn to secrecy by his source. This will be touched on later when his source is revealed. Despite supposedly having all of the evidence necessary to prove these disgusting allegations against Reki, he refuses to post them. For someone so dedicated to the truth and uncaring of others reputations, you think he would be more than willing to share the so-called concrete evidence he has.
🍹-Anon asks if Sakri has any evidence either way of Reki’s partner, Kai, being truly inactive in the server. Sakri responds saying that is the only truthful statement in all of Reki’s response. This is odd as he is incredibly defensive about his own statements being misconceived and invalidated, yet in this statement completely invalidates Reki’s traumas and the undeniable proofs brought up in his statement.
Silencing or Attacking of Others
Skipping over a few posts that will either be referenced later or irrelevant, this post is not originally from Sakri, but reblogged from his friends tumblr: Confidential-Critters. I’m this post Anon states that Kaveh was only a trail for two weeks; may not be exactly 14 days but roughly true. All he did was post a hoyoverse character of the day: from an outsider view this could be true but it does seem more likely that he was doing more behind the scenes such as tickets instead of monitoring chat, and finally, that nothing changed when Kaveh was demoted: undeniably, from a wide server perspective, true. Confidential-Critters, instead of being even slightly professional, or merely not entertaining Anon, responds with a meme. This is a perfect example of how seriously Sakri and his friends take this situation, especially when it involves such serious allegations. Sakri reblogs with his own meme underneath.
Withholding of Information 2.0
In this post Anon points out that Al Haitham’s claim of Reki and Kai talking behind the scenes is not true as Kai lives in a costal Australian town and does not have frequent access to the internet. More points on this topic get brought up later but in the context of this post (and the fact it is still up as of writing this), this is what Al Haitham stands by. [Sidenote, this is where posts now have a signoff graphic stating who is speaking. I will now be referring to whoever is speaking in each post by name and hopefully the correct pronouns. Feel free to send an ask if I get a name or pronouns wrong on any post!] Al Haitham states again that he has insider information from an unknown source about Reki and his partner, Kai. He states that he knows for 100% certain that they are in contact. Al Haitham also makes a point that Anon is trying to “throw us off”, this is unclear what its referring to but oddly accusatory as Anon was very respectful and seemed to be attempting to reduce any misinformation spread to the best of Anon’s ability.
Reki attempting to bring Kaveh back to the staff team (allegedly)
In this post, Anon asks for proof of Reki attempting to bring Kaveh back onto the staff team. In a rare case of Al Haitham actually providing contextual, on topic, screenshots, he prevails. Though many are censored/blurred due to “personal information”. Al Haitham however states the actual screenshot of Reki confirming that she wanted to coax Kaveh back into staff is again sworn to secrecy. Al Haitham states that the server rules for Chococritters were changed after Kaveh’s demotion to allow IRLS and DA’s to use puralkit after learning of Kaveh’s delusional attachment. Previously, the rules only allowed DID/OSDD systems to use proxies. Al Haitham claims that Reki took a whole 11 days to reply to his dm, alleging that she only reached out after the majority of her staff team stepped down. Al Haitham follows the screenshots up with a series of questions, while still not proving his original claim of Reki wanting him back as a server moderator.
This is a part one to a series of posts that will be released to “call out” Sakri for his insincerity. These will be posted in order of going down his timeline.
Apologies for the breaking up into parts, I am writing this on mobile as my laptop is out of commission and there is an image limit of 10. I do not want to leave out any evidence for the purpose of being entirely transparent. These posts should be posted in parts, some may come out sooner than others based on information and the time I have to write them. I do have a life outside of this drama.
This blog is not targeted only toward Sakri or Kaveh, but as he took it upon himself to block out account before we went public he incriminated himself further. There will be other posts, not only from me either, focusing on others who have spoken about the Chococritters/Chocoperrito controversy.
All of the people mentioned have made themselves public figures by choosing to make their own blogs or in any way publicly speak about the situation. This is not intended to harass, encourage others to harass, or defame anyone.
Any feedback, criticism, correction, or discussion of this post should be directed to our asks.
