Documentation + Analyzation of Decentlydrawndoppio / Daggit’s Furaffinity
TW: unsanitary, pedophilia, general nsfw, ableism.
Just to preface this, this isn’t a call out post, rather a compilation of Dag’s behavior in light of recent events. Documentation of the content on Dag’s furaffinity hasn’t been adequately compiled prior to this post, so with this in mind this post was made to shed light on the event as a whole and allow people to see and decide for themselves whether he is worth defending. Also, the person writing this was not involved prior to Dag’s furaffinity being shared and is only writing this to clarify the situation.
Below the cut will be some examples of art Dag has displayed on his furaffinity.
All visual examples were made between 2016 and 2017.
The content below was tagged with Babyfur, for perspective.
It’s not necessary to explain why this criteria is pedophilic in nature, since it’s literally depicting children in (generally) suggestive or sexual scenarios. The fact that Dag used this category means he either was indefinitely depicting children, or was hoping to reach an audience that was looking for pedophilic content.
While the pictures aren’t explicitly nsfw, he has drawn child-like characters in sexual situations, despite him saying he would not do so:
Examples of this include (nsfw and unsanitary in link): Â x x x x x x x x x
In addition to this, these tendencies (infantilization and fetishization of child-like mannerisms, for example) shone through even in Dag’s daily blog: consistently surrounding Doppio with toys and depicting him as a child which, given that Doppio is a character depicted having DID, has detrimental and borderline ableist connotations. Due to Dag’s daily blog and twitter being deleted there are limited examples of this, but this characterization was consistent.
As a side note, there are several points of contention between people siding with Dag that are worth addressing because they are 1) misinformed or 2) not aware of the content of Dag’s Furaffinity, so I’ll attempt to clear these misconceptions.
Despite the majority of Dag’s work on Furaffinity being commissions, he still willingly drew what would by any other account be considered pedophilia, if not fetishizing children. It is completely acceptable to decline commissions, and his entire gallery being filled with the same content disproves that the art depicted didn’t express his own interests. (ie. fetishistic content regarding or including children)
All the art presented in this post has been drawn within the past two years and is relatively recent.
Basically, everything portrayed here that he has drawn is obviously sexual in nature because he, as a grown man, should not be drawing children in such scenarios shown above, regardless if he’s being paid for it.
