DC Schools

DCSchools.com is the complete directory of schools in Washington DC. Browse all 330+ public, charter, private, and parochial schools by ward, grade level, and program type. Includes OSSE star ratings, lottery information, and key dates for the 2026-27 school year.

[dcschoolscom]

Leaders representing Washington DC's charter school sector are voicing concerns about equity issues in the District's school funding formula, according to recent reports. The debate centers on how the city allocates public education dollars between the District of Columbia Public Schools (DCPS) and the charter school sector. In DC, both traditional public schools and public charter schools receive per-pupil funding from the city, but additional considerations—including facility costs, transportation, and special education services—can create disparities in how resources flow to different schools. Charter schools in Washington DC educate nearly half of the city's public school students, with approximately 130 charter school campuses operating across all eight wards. These publicly funded, independently operated schools have been a significant part of DC's education landscape for over two decades. The equity concerns raised by charter leaders likely relate to funding mechanisms that may not equally account for the full costs of educating students across both sectors. Unlike DCPS, which has dedicated facilities and central services funded through the city's operating budget, charter schools often must use their per-pupil allocations to cover building costs and administrative functions that traditional public schools receive separately. Why This Matters for DC Families Funding equity directly affects the educational opportunities available to students. When resources aren't distributed fairly, some schools may struggle to offer comprehensive programs, maintain facilities, or provide adequate support services. For families navigating DC's complex school landscape—where school choice is the norm and students can attend either traditional public schools or charter schools—understanding how funding works helps explain differences in what schools can offer. Parents evaluating schools across both sectors should be aware that funding structures can impact class sizes, extracurricular offerings, facility quality, and specialized programs. As these equity discussions continue, they may lead to policy changes that affect resource allocation across the city's diverse school options. Families can stay informed about these developments as they may influence the programs and services available at schools they're considering for enrollment. Source: WTOP

[dcschoolscom]

The District of Columbia Council is moving forward with its first vote on the city's annual budget, a critical decision that will shape education funding for families across all eight wards. The budget process determines how much money flows to DC Public Schools, public charter schools, and various educational programs that serve the city's students. This initial vote marks an important step in finalizing the fiscal plan that will impact classroom resources, teacher hiring, school facilities, and student support services for the upcoming school year. For families researching schools in Washington DC, budget decisions have direct consequences. The per-pupil funding formula—which provides the baseline amount spent on each student—affects both traditional public schools and charter schools equally. Additional funding allocations may target specific initiatives like special education services, English language learner programs, or school modernization projects. The budget also influences class sizes, availability of extracurricular programs, mental health support, and technology resources that parents often consider when choosing between schools. Families in different wards may see varying impacts depending on where capital improvement funds are directed for facility upgrades or new school construction. Private schools, while not directly funded through the DC budget, can be affected by decisions about scholarship programs or tax credit initiatives that help families afford tuition. The DC Council's budget process typically involves multiple votes, with the first vote allowing council members to propose amendments before final passage. This means the funding picture may still shift before becoming final, though the initial vote provides strong signals about the council's priorities for education spending. Parents and guardians evaluating school options should monitor how these budget decisions unfold, as they will determine the resources available at schools across the district for the coming year. The final budget will establish funding levels that schools use for planning staffing, programs, and services well before the next academic year begins. Source: WUSA9

[dcschoolscom]

Mayor Muriel Bowser has selected Kim Jackson, a longtime District of Columbia Public Schools administrator, to serve as interim chancellor of the city's traditional public school system. Jackson brings extensive experience within DCPS to the role, having worked in various leadership positions throughout the district. Her appointment provides continuity as the system serves approximately 50,000 students across eight wards in the nation's capital. What This Means for DC Families The interim chancellor appointment comes at a critical time for families navigating school decisions in Washington, DC. As the head of DCPS, Jackson will oversee day-to-day operations including enrollment, academic programming, and resource allocation across all traditional public schools in the district. For parents researching school options, this leadership transition may influence several key areas: Enrollment and Lottery Processes: The chancellor's office manages the My School DC lottery system and enrollment policies that affect thousands of families annually. Academic Programs and School Improvements: Leadership decisions impact curriculum implementation, school modernization projects, and program offerings across neighborhood schools. Budget and Resources: The chancellor works with the mayor and DC Council on the DCPS budget, which determines staffing levels, facility improvements, and program funding at individual schools. Understanding DC's School Landscape DCPS operates separately from the city's charter school sector, which serves approximately 45% of DC's public school students. While the chancellor leads only traditional public schools, decisions at DCPS often influence broader education policy conversations in the District. Jackson's familiarity with the system may help maintain stability during the interim period. Families with students currently enrolled in DCPS or considering enrollment for upcoming school years should monitor announcements from the chancellor's office regarding any policy or programmatic changes. The mayor's office has not announced a timeline for selecting a permanent chancellor. Interim leadership periods can last from several months to over a year, depending on the search process. Source: WUSA9

[dcschoolscom]

Federal financial aid policies are shifting in ways that may affect students pursuing education in lower-wage career fields, including religious studies, cosmetology, and the arts, according to recent reporting. For Washington DC families, these changes could have particular relevance when considering post-secondary pathways. The District is home to numerous specialized institutions that focus on these fields, including theology programs, cosmetology schools, and arts-focused colleges. Students from DC public and charter high schools who plan to pursue these career paths may find their financial aid options altered. The changes come at a time when DC families are already navigating complex decisions about post-secondary education and career preparation. Many District high schools offer Career and Technical Education (CTE) programs in fields like cosmetology and arts, preparing students for both immediate employment and further education. Financial aid accessibility has traditionally been a critical factor in whether students can continue their education beyond high school, particularly for families in lower-income wards. For DC students interested in religious vocations, the changes could affect enrollment at local seminaries and religious colleges. Similarly, aspiring cosmetologists who plan to attend licensed beauty schools and arts students considering specialized programs may need to reassess their financial planning. The implications extend beyond individual students to the broader DC education landscape. School counselors at both traditional public schools and charter schools will need to stay informed about these financial aid changes to properly advise students on post-secondary options. Families should be encouraged to complete the FAFSA (Free Application for Federal Student Aid) regardless of these changes, as aid eligibility calculations remain individualized. DC families with high school students should discuss these potential changes with school counselors and financial aid advisors at prospective colleges. Understanding how federal aid policies affect specific programs can help families make informed decisions about education investments and career preparation. As these federal policies continue to develop, it's important for DC families to remain engaged with their school communities and seek up-to-date guidance on financial aid options for all post-secondary pathways. Source: The Washington Post

[dcschoolscom]

The U.S. Supreme Court has issued a ruling that allows states to enforce laws restricting transgender women and girls from competing in female athletic categories. The decision represents a significant development in ongoing legal debates about transgender student participation in school sports nationwide. While the ruling addresses state-level legislation, the District of Columbia operates under its own jurisdiction with locally controlled education policies. DC Public Schools and the DC State Athletic Association have their own guidelines governing student athletic participation. The District's charter schools, which serve approximately half of DC's public school students, operate with considerable autonomy but generally follow DC-wide athletic association standards. For families researching schools in Washington DC, this ruling primarily affects how they might think about athletic policies and inclusive practices at different institutions. Private schools in the District maintain independent authority over their athletic participation policies and may each approach these questions differently based on their institutional values and philosophies. DC families should know that local school athletic policies remain under District control and are not directly governed by this Supreme Court decision, which centers on state-level restrictions. However, the ruling may influence ongoing policy conversations within individual schools and athletic associations. Parents evaluating schools for their children—particularly those with transgender children or those for whom inclusive athletic policies are important considerations—may want to directly contact schools of interest to understand their specific participation guidelines. Questions about eligibility criteria, competitive fairness approaches, and inclusion practices can help families identify schools whose policies align with their values. The decision also underscores the importance of understanding that athletic policies can vary significantly across DC's diverse educational landscape, which includes traditional public schools, public charter schools, independent private schools, and parochial schools. Each sector and individual institution may interpret and implement athletic participation standards differently. Families can find information about school athletic programs and policies by visiting individual school websites or contacting athletic directors directly during the school selection process. Source: The Washington Post

[dcschoolscom]

Mayor Muriel Bowser has appointed Dr. Kim Jackson to serve as interim chancellor of DC Public Schools, marking a new chapter in leadership for the district's traditional public school system. The appointment comes at a critical time for DCPS, which serves approximately 50,000 students across all eight wards of the District. As interim chancellor, Dr. Jackson will oversee the day-to-day operations of more than 100 neighborhood and specialized schools, guiding academic programs, budgeting decisions, and policy implementation during this transition period. What This Means for DC Families For families currently enrolled in DCPS or considering enrollment, leadership changes at the chancellor level can signal shifts in district priorities and initiatives. The chancellor's office plays a crucial role in shaping policies that directly affect classroom experiences, including curriculum decisions, teacher recruitment and retention, school modernization projects, and resource allocation across neighborhood schools. Families should pay attention to how the interim leadership approaches key ongoing challenges facing the district, including enrollment patterns, academic achievement gaps, and school facility conditions. The chancellor also works closely with individual school principals and the State Board of Education to ensure schools meet performance standards and serve diverse student needs across the city. Understanding DCPS Leadership The DCPS chancellor position is one of the most influential education roles in the District, appointed directly by the mayor rather than elected. This structure, established through mayoral control of schools, means the chancellor serves as the chief executive of the city's traditional public school system, distinct from the DC Public Charter School Board that oversees charter schools. Parents and guardians can typically expect to learn more about an interim chancellor's vision and priorities through upcoming community meetings, school visits, and official communications from DCPS. Families with questions about how leadership transitions might affect their specific schools should reach out to their school principals or parent liaisons for information. As the search for a permanent chancellor likely continues, Dr. Jackson's interim appointment ensures continuity in district operations and decision-making during this period of transition. Source: FOX 5 DC

[dcschoolscom]

DC high schools Statistics (2026): 25+ Data Points on Enrollment, Achievement, and Graduation Rates More than half of all D.C. high school students were chronically absent in the 2024-25 school year, a figure that underscores the profound challenges facing the city's secondary education system. Despite this, the District's citywide four-year graduation rate reached a record high of 78.7%, and student proficiency in English Language Arts is the highest on record. High school enrollment in the public charter sector grew 3.6% while declining 1.2% in DCPS schools, signaling a continuing shift in where families choose to enroll. We aggregated data from the Office of the State Superintendent of Education (OSSE), the DC Policy Center, the DC Public Charter School Board (DCPCSB), and dozens of other primary sources to build the definitive reference for DC high schools in 2026. Key Takeaways 78.7% of students graduated in four years, a record high for the District (OSSE 2025 DC School Report Card) Public charter high schools posted an 83.0% four-year graduation rate, outpacing the DCPS rate of 77.6% (OSSE 2025 DC School Report Card) Only 15.0% of high schoolers met or exceeded expectations in math on statewide assessments (OSSE, 2025 Statewide Assessment Results) 38.8% of high school students met or exceeded expectations in English Language Arts, the highest rate on record (OSSE, 2025 Statewide Assessment Results) Chronic absenteeism affected 57.6% of all students, with the highest rate among 9th graders (58.7%) (DC Policy Center, State of D.C. Schools 2024-25) Public charter high school enrollment grew 3.6%, while DCPS high school enrollment fell 1.2% (DC Policy Center, 2025-26 enrollment analysis) Approximately 20% of DC students meet the SAT's college-ready benchmarks, compared to a national average of ~40% (DC Policy Center, "Rising Graduation Rates and Falling SAT Scores") The My School DC lottery processed 26,117 unique applications for the 2025-26 school year (My School DC, 2025 Lottery Data Report) 1. Graduation Rates Reach Record Highs The District's four-year adjusted cohort graduation rate (ACGR) has climbed for six consecutive years, reaching an all-time high in 2025. This citywide success is driven significantly by the public charter school sector, which posted an 83.0% graduation rate, a massive 5.5 percentage point increase from the prior year and well above the DCPS rate. While the 78.7% citywide rate is a major achievement, it still trails the most recently reported national average of 87% (National Center for Education Statistics, 2019-20). The steady upward trend, from 69% in 2018, demonstrates systemic progress across the city's high schools. Metric Value Source Citywide 4-Year Graduation Rate (SY2024-25) 78.7% OSSE 2025 DC School Report Card Public Charter 4-Year Graduation Rate 83.0% OSSE 2025 DC School Report Card DCPS 4-Year Graduation Rate 77.6% OSSE 2025 DC School Report Card Citywide 5-Year Graduation Rate (SY2024-25) 80.2% OSSE 2025 DC School Report Card Year-over-Year Growth (Citywide 4-Year Rate) +2.6% OSSE 2025 DC School Report Card Graduation Rate in 2018 69.0% DC Policy Center / OSSE historical Further data is available via the OSSE annual report card results. 2. Post-Pandemic Academic Recovery Gains Momentum Statewide assessment scores for high school students show the largest post-pandemic gains recorded to date, a positive signal of academic recovery. Proficiency in English Language Arts (ELA) now slightly exceeds pre-pandemic levels, a significant milestone. However, math achievement remains a critical area of concern; despite a 3.6 percentage point increase, only 15% of high school students are proficient. The 38.8% ELA proficiency rate stands as the highest on record for the District, indicating that focused interventions in literacy may be yielding results across both DCPS and public charter sectors. Metric Value Source ELA Proficiency (Met/Exceeded Expectations) 38.8% OSSE, 2025 Statewide Assessment Results Math Proficiency (Met/Exceeded Expectations) 15.0% OSSE, 2025 Statewide Assessment Results Year-over-Year Gain in ELA Proficiency +5.2% OSSE, 2025 Statewide Assessment Results Year-over-Year Gain in Math Proficiency +3.6% OSSE, 2025 Statewide Assessment Results The full results from the DC Comprehensive Assessment of Progress in Education (DC CAPE) can be found on the OSSE website. 3. Chronic Absenteeism Remains a System-Wide Crisis The most alarming statistic facing DC high schools is not academic but logistical: getting students to show up. A staggering 57.6% of students across the District were chronically absent in the 2024-25 school year, meaning they missed at least 10% of school days. The problem is acute in high school, where 9th graders post the highest absenteeism rates, jeopardizing their transition and long-term academic trajectory. This crisis-level absenteeism directly impacts every other metric, from test scores to graduation rates, and represents the single greatest challenge to educational equity and achievement in the city. Metric Value Source Districtwide Chronic Absenteeism Rate 57.6% DC Policy Center, State of D.C. Schools 2024-25 Districtwide Chronic Truancy Rate 50.1% DC Policy Center, State of D.C. Schools 2024-25 9th Grade Chronic Absenteeism Rate 58.7% DC Policy Center 12th Grade Chronic Absenteeism Rate 58.4% DC Policy Center The DC Policy Center provides in-depth analysis of attendance trends in its annual State of D.C. Schools reports. 4. Enrollment Shifts Toward Public Charter High Schools While overall public high school enrollment saw a modest 1% increase for the 2025-26 school year, the underlying numbers reveal a distinct trend. The District's public charter school sector saw its high school enrollment grow by 3.6%, while DCPS high schools experienced a 1.2% decline. This continues a multi-year pattern of families opting for charter high schools, which now educate approximately 48% of all public school students citywide. The growth in the charter sector highlights its increasing role in the city's secondary education landscape. Metric Value Source Total Citywide Public School Enrollment 99,135 DC Policy Center, 2025-26 enrollment analysis Public Charter Sector Share of Enrollment ~48% DC Policy Center, 2025-26 DCPS Sector Share of Enrollment ~52% DC Policy Center, 2025-26 Charter High School Enrollment Growth +3.6% DC Policy Center, 2025-26 enrollment analysis DCPS High School Enrollment Change -1.2% DC Policy Center, 2025-26 enrollment analysis Total Number of DCPS Schools (All Grades) 116–117 DCPS At-a-Glance, 2025-26 5. School Choice and Lottery Competition Are Intense The universal lottery is the primary gateway to most public high schools in the District, and competition is fierce. The My School DC lottery processed over 26,000 applications for the 2025-26 school year, with high school seats being the most sought-after. While the overall match rate was 71%, this figure masks the intense competition for a limited number of seats at top-performing and selective high schools like School Without Walls and Banneker. For families navigating the DC school lottery, understanding preference points and application strategies is critical. Metric Value Source Unique Lottery Applications Processed (SY25-26) 26,117 My School DC, 2025 Lottery Data Report Citywide Lottery Match Rate (PK3-12) 71% My School DC, 2025 Lottery Data Report Lottery Results Release Date (SY25-26) March 28, 2025 My School DC / OSSE Competitiveness Level for High School Seats Highest My School DC, Applying to High School 6. College Readiness Metrics Show a Divided Picture DC's high school students present a paradox in college readiness. On one hand, DCPS reports the highest Advanced Placement (AP) exam participation rate in the nation, with a 52% increase in test-takers over the past five years. On the other, only about 20% of DC students meet or exceed the SAT's college-ready benchmarks, a rate that has been stagnant since 2018 and is half the national average. This data suggests that while access to rigorous coursework is expanding, the foundational skills needed to succeed on standardized college entrance exams are not keeping pace for the majority of students. Metric Value Source Students Meeting SAT College-Ready Benchmarks ~20% DC Policy Center, "Rising Graduation Rates and Falling SAT Scores" National Average for SAT College-Ready Benchmarks (2023) ~40% DC Policy Center DCPS AP Exam Takers (Most Recent Year) >2,700 DCPS Know Your Stats / AP Score Data Sets 5-Year Growth in DCPS AP Exam Takers +52% DCPS Know Your Stats / AP Score Data Sets Top-Ranked Public High School in DC School Without Walls U.S. News Best High Schools (2024) Graduation Rate at Banneker Academic HS ~100% PublicSchoolReview 2026 Largest High School by Enrollment Jackson-Reed HS PublicSchoolReview 2026 DC high schools by the Numbers Metric Value Source Citywide 4-Year Graduation Rate (SY2024-25) 78.7% OSSE 2025 DC School Report Card Public Charter 4-Year Graduation Rate 83.0% OSSE 2025 DC School Report Card DCPS 4-Year Graduation Rate 77.6% OSSE 2025 DC School Report Card ELA Proficiency (High School) 38.8% OSSE, 2025 Statewide Assessment Results Math Proficiency (High School) 15.0% OSSE, 2025 Statewide Assessment Results Districtwide Chronic Absenteeism Rate 57.6% DC Policy Center, State of D.C. Schools 2024-25 9th Grade Chronic Absenteeism Rate 58.7% DC Policy Center Students Meeting SAT College-Ready Benchmarks ~20% DC Policy Center Total Citywide Public School Enrollment 99,135 DC Policy Center, 2025-26 enrollment analysis Charter High School Enrollment Growth +3.6% DC Policy Center, 2025-26 enrollment analysis DCPS High School Enrollment Change -1.2% DC Policy Center, 2025-26 enrollment analysis My School DC Lottery Applications (SY25-26) 26,117 My School DC, 2025 Lottery Data Report Citywide Lottery Match Rate (PK3-12) 71% My School DC, 2025 Lottery Data Report 5-Year Growth in DCPS AP Exam Takers +52% DCPS Know Your Stats Largest High School by Enrollment (J-R) ~1,855 PublicSchoolReview 2026 Sector Split (DCPS / Charter) ~52% / ~48% DC Policy Center, 2025-26 Methodology and Sources This analysis is based on publicly available data from government, research, and educational organizations. Each statistic is cited inline. We prioritize primary sources and the most recent data available. Office of the State Superintendent of Education (OSSE), 2025 DC School Report Card https://osse.dc.gov/page/dc-school-report-card-and-star-framework Office of the State Superintendent of Education (OSSE), 2025 Statewide Assessment Results https://osse.dc.gov/service/dc-statewide-assessment-results DC Policy Center, State of D.C. Schools 2024-25 https://www.dcpolicycenter.org/publications/state-of-dc-schools-2024-25/ DC Policy Center, 2025-26 enrollment analysis DC Policy Center, "Rising Graduation Rates and Falling SAT Scores" My School DC, 2025 Lottery Data Report DC Public Schools (DCPS), At-a-Glance, 2025-26 https://dcps.dc.gov/ DC Public Schools (DCPS), Know Your Stats / AP Score Data U.S. News & World Report, Best High Schools, 2024 Niche, 2026 Best Public High Schools https://www.niche.com PublicSchoolReview, 2026 data https://www.publicschoolreview.com Last updated: June 2026 We update this page quarterly with the latest data from OSSE, DCPSCB, and federal sources.

[dcschoolscom]

American colleges and universities are experiencing a significant decline in international student enrollment, creating financial pressures that could reshape higher education planning for DC-area families. International students have historically paid full tuition at many U.S. institutions, providing crucial revenue that helps subsidize financial aid, research programs, and campus facilities. When these students choose to study at home or in other countries instead, colleges face budget shortfalls that may lead to reduced program offerings, higher tuition for domestic students, or both. For DC families with students in high school, this trend carries several implications. Universities that have relied heavily on international student revenue may increase their recruitment of full-pay domestic students, potentially making admissions more competitive for those seeking financial aid. Some institutions may also reduce spending on academic programs, student services, or campus improvements as they adjust to lower enrollment numbers. The District's college-bound students should consider how this shift might affect their target schools. Families may want to research whether prospective colleges have been significantly impacted by declining international enrollment and how those institutions plan to address any resulting budget gaps. This information can often be found in college financial reports or news coverage about specific universities. Additionally, DC students attending schools with diverse international populations have historically benefited from cross-cultural learning experiences. A continued decline in international enrollment could mean fewer opportunities for domestic students to engage with peers from different countries and educational backgrounds. For DC families beginning college planning, this development underscores the importance of thoroughly researching institutional stability and financial health when building college lists. Questions about enrollment trends, budget planning, and how schools are adapting to changing demographics should be part of conversations during campus visits and with admissions counselors. While the full impact of this trend remains to be seen, families should stay informed about how shifting international enrollment patterns may influence college affordability, program availability, and campus diversity at institutions their students are considering. Source: The Washington Post

[dcschoolscom]

Washington, DC's education reform efforts, which have driven notable improvements in student achievement over the past decade, are entering a period of political uncertainty that could reshape the District's approach to public education. The reform initiatives have included school choice expansion, charter school growth, teacher evaluation systems, and school closure decisions based on enrollment and performance data. These policies, implemented across DC Public Schools (DCPS) and the city's charter sector, have been credited with helping lift academic outcomes for District students. The political test comes at a critical moment for DC families. The reforms have fundamentally changed how parents select schools, with thousands now participating in the citywide lottery system that provides access to both traditional public schools and charter options. Families in every ward have seen new school options emerge, while others have experienced the closure of neighborhood schools deemed underperforming. For parents navigating DC's school landscape, the political debate matters because it could determine whether current policies continue, expand, or face significant rollback. Issues on the table likely include school closure protocols, charter school authorization and oversight, funding formulas that follow students to their chosen schools, and accountability measures that evaluate schools based on test scores and other metrics. The conversation affects practical decisions families make daily: whether new high-performing school options will continue opening in their neighborhoods, how schools will be held accountable for student progress, and whether the current enrollment and application systems will remain stable. DC operates a unique two-sector system, with DCPS serving approximately 49,000 students and charter schools enrolling roughly 45,000 students. Both sectors are publicly funded and free to attend, but they operate under different governance structures. How political leaders balance these systems, allocate resources, and measure success will directly impact which schools thrive and which face pressure to change or close. Families researching schools should pay attention to these policy discussions, as decisions made in coming months could affect school quality, availability, and the criteria used to evaluate educational options across the District. Source: The 74

[dcschoolscom]

The Trump administration has established a Religious Liberty Commission that advocates for reduced separation between church and state, a move that could significantly impact education funding and school choice options for District families. The commission's work may influence ongoing debates about public funding for religious schools, a particularly relevant issue in Washington DC where approximately 40% of students attend private schools, many of which are faith-based institutions. The District's unique funding structure and status as a federal district makes it especially susceptible to federal policy changes affecting religious education. For DC families navigating school options, this development could affect several existing programs. The DC Opportunity Scholarship Program, which provides federally funded vouchers that can be used at private schools including religious institutions, has long been at the center of church-state debates. Changes in how religious liberty is interpreted at the federal level could expand or protect such programs, potentially making faith-based schools more accessible to families seeking alternatives to DC Public Schools or public charter schools. The commission's stance on church-state separation also raises questions about potential shifts in how religious charter schools might be treated under federal law. While DC's charter school sector has remained largely secular, national discussions about religious charter schools in states like Oklahoma have highlighted this as an evolving area of education policy. Additionally, any changes to federal interpretation of religious liberty could affect existing protections and regulations at traditional private religious schools throughout the District, which serve families from all eight wards. These schools range from Catholic institutions with long histories in DC neighborhoods to Jewish day schools, Islamic academies, and schools affiliated with various Protestant denominations. Parents evaluating school options should monitor how federal policies develop, particularly if they are considering using scholarship programs or vouchers for private school tuition. The intersection of religious liberty policies and education funding may create new opportunities or limitations depending on how courts and agencies interpret these guidelines in the coming months. Source: The Washington Post

[dcschoolscom]

More than one quarter of children in Washington DC are currently living in poverty, according to recent data highlighting the economic challenges facing many families in the nation's capital. This increase in child poverty has direct implications for DC schools, which serve as crucial support systems for vulnerable students. Schools across the district provide not only education but also essential services including free and reduced-price meals, mental health counseling, and family resource coordination. As poverty rates climb, the demand for these wraparound services increases accordingly. For families researching school options in DC, understanding a school's capacity to support students facing economic hardship is increasingly important. Many DC public and charter schools have expanded their community school models, offering extended learning time, food pantries, and connections to social services. These resources can make a significant difference for families navigating financial challenges while ensuring their children receive quality education. The rise in child poverty also affects school funding and resource allocation. Schools with higher concentrations of low-income students receive additional funding through federal Title I programs and DC's at-risk funding formula, which provides extra dollars for each student from a low-income household. This funding supports smaller class sizes, additional teachers, and intervention programs designed to close achievement gaps. Families should be aware that poverty status can affect school enrollment options and priorities. Some DC schools offer enrollment preferences for students qualifying for free and reduced-price meals or living in certain geographic boundaries. Understanding these policies can help families identify schools equipped to meet their children's needs. The data underscores the importance of school-based support systems in DC. As families evaluate school options, they may want to inquire about available student services, meal programs, after-school care, and family support initiatives. Many schools maintain family liaison positions specifically to connect households with resources ranging from housing assistance to job training programs. This trend reminds DC families that schools function as community anchors, particularly during times of economic uncertainty. Parents seeking schools should consider not only academic outcomes but also the breadth of support services available to help students thrive despite economic challenges. Source: WAMU

[dcschoolscom]

A Northwest Washington DC school is dealing with a rodent infestation, according to reports from an educator at the facility. The situation has drawn attention to ongoing challenges some DC schools face with facility maintenance and pest control. While the specific school has not been publicly identified in initial reports, Northwest DC encompasses several wards including Wards 1, 2, 3, and 4, which contain a mix of DC Public Schools (DCPS) traditional schools, public charter schools, and private institutions. The area includes both older historic school buildings and newer facilities, with building age and maintenance often playing a role in pest control challenges. Why This Matters for DC Families School facility conditions directly impact student health, safety, and learning environments. Rodent infestations can pose serious health risks including the spread of disease, trigger allergies and asthma, and create unsanitary conditions in classrooms and cafeterias. For families evaluating schools, facility maintenance and cleanliness are important factors alongside academic performance. DC families have the right to ask questions about facility conditions during school tours and open houses. Parents should inquire about: Regular pest control schedules and protocols How the school reports and addresses maintenance issues Recent facility inspections and their results Building age and renovation history Under DC law, schools must maintain safe and healthy environments. DCPS facilities are overseen by the Department of General Services, while charter schools manage their own facilities but must meet health and safety standards set by the DC Public Charter School Board. Moving Forward When pest issues arise, swift action is essential. Professional pest control services, proper waste management, building repairs to seal entry points, and ongoing monitoring are all critical steps in resolving infestations. Families with children at Northwest DC schools who have concerns about facility conditions should contact their school administration directly and, if needed, can file complaints with the appropriate oversight agency depending on whether the school is traditional public, charter, or private. Source: WTOP

[dcschoolscom]

The Los Angeles Unified School District, serving approximately 575,000 students as the nation's second-largest district, has approved comprehensive new restrictions on student screen time and personal device use during school hours. The policy marks a significant shift in how major urban districts approach technology in classrooms, coming amid growing concerns about social media's impact on student mental health, academic focus, and classroom engagement. While specific enforcement details vary, the restrictions generally limit when and how students can access personal phones and other devices during the school day. Relevance for DC Families Though the policy change occurred across the country, it carries implications for Washington DC families evaluating educational options. DC's diverse school landscape—including DC Public Schools, nearly 70 public charter schools, and numerous private institutions—means families encounter widely varying technology policies depending on which schools they're considering. Some DC schools have already implemented their own device restrictions, while others maintain more permissive approaches that integrate personal technology into learning. As national conversations around screen time intensify, DC families may see local schools revisiting their own policies in the coming months. For parents researching schools, understanding each institution's approach to technology and device use has become an increasingly important factor. Questions to consider during school tours include: How does the school handle personal devices during instructional time? What technology supports learning objectives? How does the school address digital citizenship and responsible device use? The Broader Context The Los Angeles policy reflects nationwide momentum around reassessing student device access. Multiple states and districts have explored or enacted similar measures, driven by research linking excessive screen time to attention difficulties, sleep disruption, and increased anxiety among young people. For DC families, particularly those with middle and high school students, these national trends underscore the importance of asking detailed questions about technology policies when evaluating schools. Different approaches may align better with individual family values and student needs. Source: The Washington Post

[dcschoolscom]

School districts across the country are implementing cellphone restrictions, with some calling for complete bans during the school day. However, education experts are raising questions about whether these policies will deliver on their promises to improve student focus, mental health, and academic performance. The phone ban movement has gained momentum as educators report increased classroom distractions and concerns about social media's impact on student wellbeing. Several states and districts have introduced policies ranging from limiting phone use during instructional time to requiring devices be stored in pouches or lockers throughout the day. For DC families evaluating schools, the cellphone policy debate highlights important questions about school culture and student support systems. While some schools tout phone restrictions as solutions to distraction and cyberbullying, critics argue these policies may not address underlying issues such as curriculum engagement, mental health resources, and digital literacy education. DC public and charter schools have taken varying approaches to phone use. Some schools already restrict devices during class time, while others incorporate smartphones into learning activities. Private schools in the district have similarly adopted different philosophies, with some emphasizing student self-regulation and others implementing stricter controls. Parents researching schools should ask about each institution's approach to technology and how it aligns with their family's values. Beyond phone policies, families may want to explore how schools address the root concerns driving phone ban discussions: Are there adequate mental health services? How does the school build community and engagement? What digital citizenship education is provided? The effectiveness of phone bans likely depends on implementation details and whether schools simultaneously invest in addressing broader student needs. A blanket ban without corresponding support for student wellbeing, engaging instruction, and healthy technology habits may fall short of its goals. As this debate continues, DC families should view phone policies as one factor among many when evaluating schools. The most important consideration is whether a school's overall approach to student development, technology, and community aligns with what individual students need to thrive. Source: The Washington Post

[dcschoolscom]

Education leaders are raising concerns that restrictive policies around artificial intelligence tools in schools could disadvantage students as AI becomes increasingly central to the modern workplace and economy. While many school districts nationwide rushed to ban AI tools like ChatGPT following their widespread introduction, some educators argue these restrictions may prevent students from developing essential digital literacy skills. The debate has particular relevance for DC families evaluating schools, as different institutions across the District have adopted varying approaches to AI integration. The discussion reflects a broader tension in education: balancing academic integrity concerns against preparing students for a technology-driven future. Some schools have implemented outright bans on AI tools, citing worries about cheating and diminished critical thinking. Others are experimenting with structured AI integration, teaching students to use these tools responsibly alongside traditional skills. For DC families comparing schools, understanding each institution's approach to emerging technology could be an important factor. Schools that prohibit AI entirely may appeal to families prioritizing traditional learning methods and concerned about overreliance on technology. Conversely, schools developing thoughtful AI curricula may attract families who view technological fluency as essential for college and career readiness. The implications extend beyond individual classrooms. Students graduating without experience in AI tools may find themselves at a disadvantage in college environments and workplaces where these technologies are standard. As AI capabilities expand across fields from healthcare to law to creative industries, familiarity with these tools could become as fundamental as word processing or internet research skills. DC's diverse educational landscape—including traditional public schools, public charter schools, and private institutions—means families have options in finding schools whose technology philosophy aligns with their values. As this debate continues, parents may want to ask prospective schools direct questions about their AI policies, whether they're teaching responsible AI use, and how they're preparing students for a technology-integrated future. The challenge for educators is creating frameworks that maintain academic rigor while acknowledging that AI tools are becoming permanent fixtures in professional and academic environments. Source: The Washington Post

[dcschoolscom]

DC Charter School Funding Fight 2026 — Why Families Say the FY2027 Budget Is Unfair In June 2026, nearly 400 charter-school parents and advocates packed the DC Council chamber over a single budget decision: Mayor Muriel Bowser put about $85 million for DC Public Schools outside the funding formula that is supposed to fund DCPS and charter schools equally per student. Charter families called it unfair to nearly half of DC's public-school children. "I was shocked this cycle to learn that DC government isn't funding the public schools equally," parent Devin Lambert told NBC4. This is a plain-language explainer of the fight: what the $85 million is, why "outside the formula" matters, the decades-old equity dispute behind it, and where the FY2027 budget stood as of late June 2026. Every figure links to its source. The $85 million, in plain terms Bowser's proposed FY2027 budget funded two DCPS priorities outside the Uniform Per Student Funding Formula (UPSFF), according to Council Chairman Phil Mendelson: Out-of-formula DCPS funding Amount Facility maintenance $60 million Teacher pay $25 million Total outside the formula ~$85 million Because this money runs around the per-student formula, it benefits DCPS students but is not matched per-pupil for charter students (NBC4). Mendelson sided with the charter sector: "What the mayor did with this budget is she funded two important initiatives for DCPS outside the formula, and that's what has the charter sector upset - rightfully upset." What the UPSFF is and why "outside the formula" matters DC funds DCPS and public charter schools using the Uniform Per Student Funding Formula - a single per-pupil dollar amount meant to keep funding levels equal across both sectors (NBC4). It traces to the DC School Reform Act of 1995, which requires public operating funds be distributed on a uniform per-student basis. Bowser's proposed FY2027 foundation level was $15,455 per student, a 2.55% increase (Mayor's office). The charter argument is structural: charters cannot tap the city's capital budget, so when money moves into non-formula categories, charters have no equivalent. "We don't have access to the capital budget, so when you move money around to these other categories, it means that charter schools have to figure out ways to fund their operations," DC Charter School Alliance Executive Director Ariel Johnson told NBC4. The per-pupil gap The Charter School Alliance calculated that the proposed budget created a per-pupil gap of about $1,850 in favor of DCPS students when it was released in April; by June, NBC4 and WTOP cited a gap closer to $2,000 per pupil. Johnson warned the impact is concrete: "for some of our smaller schools that might only serve 300 or 400 kids, that could be $2 million of funding for those students that they're not going to see this year," with the risk of "teachers maybe being laid off or specialty programs being curtailed or cut." The facilities gap A big piece of the fight is buildings. In the mayor's operating budget, the Washington Informer reports, charter schools receive $187 million for facilities while DCPS receives $484 million. Charters get a flat per-pupil facilities allowance (set in DC Code § 38-2908 and escalated 3.1% a year) rather than access to DCPS's capital budget - and the proposed FY2027 Budget Support Act would have paused that annual escalator. The mayor's defense The Deputy Mayor for Education's office said the proposed budget still provides $1.45 billion for public charter schools, up $52.6 million over FY2026, and maintains more than $187 million in charter facilities funding (NBC4). Putting the DCPS costs back through the formula, the office told WTOP, "would have required an increase of $100 million into the budget which the District simply doesn't have available at a time of declining revenues." Notably, this is framed by charter leaders as a systems issue, not a turf war. "This is not a charter school versus public school issue," said KIPP DC board member Brandon Woods (NBC4). This fight is not new DC has had this argument for over a decade. In 2014, the DC Association of Chartered Public Schools and two charter schools sued the District, arguing DCPS got supplemental funds outside the UPSFF in violation of the School Reform Act. A federal district court ruled against the charters in 2017, and in 2019 the DC Circuit dismissed the case on jurisdictional grounds - not on the merits - holding that the School Reform Act is local DC law, not federal. The dispute recurs almost every budget cycle because non-formula local dollars went from a rare emergency tool to a regular funding source from FY2022 onward, a shift documented by the DC Policy Center, intensified by the end of federal pandemic aid. Why it matters: nearly half of DC's students This is not a niche issue. About 130 public charter campuses serve more than 48,000 students - nearly half of all DC public-school students (NBC4, DC Charter School Alliance). DC has one of the highest charter market shares of any city in the country. For more on the sector, see our DC charter schools report and DC public schools funding overview. Where it stands (as of late June 2026) The Council did not leave the gap untouched. At its first vote on June 9, 2026, it raised the UPSFF increase from the proposed 2.55% to 3.84% (a foundation level of $15,648), generating about $15.7 million in additional formula funding for charters, and it reversed the proposed pause on the facilities escalator, restoring $42.3 million over the four-year plan. The Alliance said this narrowed the roughly $2,000 per-pupil gap by about 30% - progress, but not full parity. A final Council vote was scheduled for June 23, 2026, with the Alliance pledging to seek additional funding before then. As of this writing the gap had been narrowed but not closed, and the final result was not yet recorded. Bottom line The 2026 charter funding fight is the latest round of a structural DC argument: a per-student formula meant to keep two public-school sectors equal, repeatedly bent by money routed around it. Bowser's $85 million in out-of-formula DCPS funding reopened it; the Council partly closed the gap but not fully; and with a new mayor incoming in 2027, the underlying tension - how to fund a fixed DCPS footprint and a charter sector that now educates nearly half the city's students - is not going away. Sources NBC4 Washington, 'Shocked': Families call DC mayor's budget unfair to charter schools WTOP, Charter leaders raise equity concerns over DC school funding DC Charter School Alliance, Statement on the FY2027 budget proposal and First budget vote advances $15.7M ArentFox Schiff, DC Council Takes First Vote on Increased Education Support in 2027 Budget Mayor's office, DC public schools FY2027 funding announcement Washington Informer, Public charter schools and funding equity Washington Post, Federal judge rules against DC charter schools Washington Lawyers' Committee, DC Circuit orders dismissal of charter funding case DC Policy Center, The fiscal future of public education in DC DC Code, School Reform Act (Title 38, Chapter 18) and § 38-2908 facilities allowance Published June 22, 2026.

[dcschoolscom]

DCPS Chancellor Lewis Ferebee Steps Down (2026) — His Record, Why He Left, and Who's Next Dr. Lewis D. Ferebee, the longest-serving chancellor in the history of DC Public Schools, left the district on June 19, 2026. Mayor Muriel Bowser announced his departure on May 20, and named a longtime DCPS educator, Dr. Kim Jackson, as interim chancellor. This is a plain-language summary of who Ferebee was, what his tenure delivered, why he left, and what the leadership change means for DC families heading into the 2026-27 school year. Every figure links to its source. Why he left Ferebee was not pushed out and did not retire. He left to become CEO of EdReports, a national nonprofit that reviews K-12 curriculum and instructional materials. He framed it as a chance to work "at a national level and to influence the conversation around high-quality instructional materials," per NBC4 Washington. He was selected after a nationwide search and succeeds EdReports' founding CEO, Eric Hirsch. How long he led DCPS Mayor Bowser appointed Ferebee in 2018, and the DC Council confirmed him in early 2019 — about eight years at the helm, making him the longest-serving chancellor in DCPS history. Before DC, he was superintendent of Indianapolis Public Schools, and he began his career as a teacher and principal in North Carolina (The 74). He replaced Antwan Wilson, who resigned in a 2018 scandal over his daughter's school transfer. His record, by the numbers Graduation rate: 78%, up from 65% when he joined (WTOP). Enrollment: about 52,000 students — described by the mayor's office as the highest in the city's history (NBC4). #1 in the nation for academic recovery: a Harvard CEPR Education Recovery Scorecard released May 13, 2026 ranked DC first of 38 states in math growth and first of 35 in reading growth from 2022 to 2025. The same data shows students remain modestly below 2019 levels (math about 0.4 grade-equivalents below, reading about 0.15 below), so this is recovery, not yet a full rebound. AP honor roll: 10 DCPS high schools made the College Board's 2025 AP School Honor Roll (NBC4). The cellphone ban: he championed the bell-to-bell phone-free policy that took effect for 2025-26. COVID reopening: he led DCPS through the pandemic, and DC was among the first big districts to reopen for in-person learning (WTOP). The criticism side is real too. Throughout his tenure, WJLA reports, Ferebee faced persistent pressure over chronic absenteeism and wide achievement gaps between schools and neighborhoods — the same gaps visible in DC's test-score data. Who is running DCPS now Mayor Bowser named Dr. Kim Jackson as interim chancellor (Fox5 DC). Jackson has been with DCPS since 2012, was named the district's Principal of the Year in 2015 while leading Seaton Elementary, and most recently served as Chief of Elementary Schools. Bowser called her "another lifelong educator at the helm of DCPS." What the change means for families The bigger story is timing. Mayor Bowser is not seeking a fourth term, and Janeese Lewis George won the June 2026 Democratic mayoral primary — effectively deciding the next mayor in heavily Democratic DC. During the campaign, the mayoral candidates signaled they would not keep Ferebee long-term, with priorities centered on early literacy, attendance, teacher retention, and special education. That means the permanent chancellor choice will likely fall to the incoming administration, not the current one. For now, the practical takeaways for DC families are simple: day-to-day operations continue under interim chancellor Jackson, the phone-free policy and existing calendar stay in place, and the next mayor will shape DCPS's longer-term direction. The 2026-27 lottery results and enrollment trends are unchanged by the leadership move. Sources WTOP, DC schools chancellor leaving for CEO job at instructional nonprofit NBC4 Washington, Lewis Ferebee, DC's longest-serving schools chancellor, to step down The 74, DC Schools Chancellor Lewis Ferebee to step down, take over EdReports Fox5 DC, DCPS interim chancellor Kim Jackson named by Bowser WJLA, DC schools chancellor steps down amid learning-loss and leadership questions DCPS, DC Leads Nation in Academic Growth, Ranks 1st in Both Math and Reading Recovery 51st.news, Election night results: DC primary 2026 Published June 22, 2026.