New dinosaur just dropped: Ptychotherates bucculentus! Described from a smashed skull from the late Triassic 210-205 Mya.

Kiana Khansmith

No title available

JBB: An Artblog!
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
Stranger Things
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
Monterey Bay Aquarium
Three Goblin Art
d e v o n

shark vs the universe
Today's Document

roma★

#extradirty
sheepfilms
Not today Justin
will byers stan first human second
tumblr dot com
Cosmic Funnies

Janaina Medeiros
$LAYYYTER
seen from China
seen from France
seen from United States
seen from Croatia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Spain
seen from Romania
seen from Congo - Kinshasa
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United States
@deinonychusfloof
New dinosaur just dropped: Ptychotherates bucculentus! Described from a smashed skull from the late Triassic 210-205 Mya.
Basically, yes. My ‘outreach profile’ was part of the reason I was hired as a Tenure-Track Assistant Professor.
this blog literally got me into grad school and I wish I was lying
My instagram 100% helped and also helped me land jobs.
Fossil Crocs of 2024
Another year another list of new fossil crocodilians that greatly expand our knowledge of Pseudosuchia across deep time. Happy to say that this is my third time doing this now, so I'm not going to bog you down with the details and get right into it.
Benggwigwishingasuchus
Our first entry, sorted by geological age of course, is Benggwigwishingasuchus eremicarminis (desert song fishing crocodile) from the Middle Triassic (Anisian) of Nevada. It was a member of the clade Poposauroidea, which some of you might recognize as also containing such bizarre early croc cousins like Arizonasaurus and Effigia. Also notable about Benggwigwishingasuchus is that it was found in the Fossil Hill Member of the Favret Formation. Why is that notable? Well the Fossil Hill Member preserves an environment deposited 10 km off the Triassic coastline and also yielded fossils of animals like Cymbospondylus, the giant ichthyosaur. Despite this however, Benggwigwishingasuchus shows no obvious signs of having been a swimmer or diver. Instead, its been hypothesized that it was simply foraging around the coast and might have been washed out to sea.
Artwork by Joschua Knüppe (@knuppitalism-with-ue) and Jorge A. Gonzalez
Parvosuchus
Fast forward some 5 million years to the Ladinian - Carnian of Brazil, specifically the Santa Maria Formation. Here you'll find the one new genus on the list I did not write the wikipedia page for: Parvosuchus aurelioi (Aurélio's Small Crocodile). With only a meter in length, Parvosuchus is amongst the smallest pseudosuchians of the year and a member of the aptly named Gracilisuchidae. Santa Maria was actually home to multiple pseudosuchians, including the mighty Prestosuchus (and its possible juvenile form Decuriasuchus), the small erpetosuchid Archeopelta and larger Pagosvenator and one more...
Artwork by Matheus Fernandes and Joschua Knüppe
Schultzsuchus
Yup, Santa Maria has been eating good this year. Before the description of Parvosuchus, scientists coined the name Schultzsuchus loricatus (Schultz's Crocodile). Now this one's not entirely new and has long been known under the name Prestosuchus loricatus (by which I mean since 1938). What's interesting is that this new redescription suggests that rather than being a Loricatan, Schultzsuchus was actually an early member of Poposauroidea like Benggwigwishingasuchus. Even if it was no longer thought to be close to Prestosuchus, it was liekly still a formidable predator and among the larger pseudosuchians of the formation.
Artwork by Felipe Alves Elias
Garzapelta
Our last Triassic pseudosuchian and our only aetosaur of the year came to us in the form of Garzapelta muelleri (Mueller's Garza County Shield). It comes from the Late Triassic (Norian) Cooper Canyon Formation of, you guessed it, Garza County, Texas. As an aetosaur, the osteoderms are already regarded as diagnostic, tho unlike some other recent examples there is a little more material to go off from. It's still primarily osteoderms, but at least a good amount and even some ribs.
Artwork by Márcio L. Castro
Ophiussasuchus
Our only Jurassic newcommer is Ophiussasuchus paimogonectes (Paimogo Beach Swimmer Portuguese Crocodile), but arguably you couldn't find a better posterchild for Jurassic crocodyliforms. This new lad is a goniopholidid from the Kimmeridgian to Tithonian Lourinhã Formation, yup, Europe's Morrison. It's anatomy is perhaps not the most exciting, like other goniopholidids it had a flattened, very crocodilian-esque snout and was likely semi-aquatic like its relatives.
Artwork by @manusuchus and Joschua Knüppe
Enalioetes
Another quintessential group of Jurassic crocodyliforms are the metriorhynchoids, however, 2024's only new addition to this clade was actually Cretaceous, specifically from the earliest Cretaceous (Valanginian) of Germany. Like Schultzsuchus, Enalioetes schroederi (Schroeder's Sea Dweller) is new in name only, as fossil material has been found at the latest in 1918 and given the name Enaliosuchus "schroederi" in 1936. This kickstarted a whole series of taxonomic back and forth until the recent redescriptoin finally just gave it a new name and settled things (for now). Looking back I realize that I really need to take the time and fix up the Wikipedia page. Tho I've written its current status, I was kinda limited by being on vacation and never dived into the description section.
Artwork by Joschua Knüppe and Jackosaurus
Varanosuchus
Another Early Cretaceous crocodyliform is Varanosuchus sakonnakhonensis (Monitor Lizard Crocodile from the Sakon Nakhon Province), described from Thailand's Sao Khua Formation. It lived around the same time as Enalioetes, but otherwise couldn't have been more different. Where Enalioetes was fully marine, Varanosuchus was more a land dweller as evidenced by the deep skull and long, slender legs. At the same time, some other features, like its more robust limbs compared to its kin, might suggest that Varanosuchus could have still spent some time in the water like some modern lizards. Tho one might be reminded of Parvosuchus from earlier, Varanosuchus is a much more recent example of small terrestrial croc-relatives, the atoposaurids, which are much closer to todays crocodiles and alligators.
Artwork once again by Manusuchus
Araripesuchus manzanensis
Yet another example of a small, gracile land "crocodile" comes to us in the form of Araripesuchus manzanensis (Araripe Basin Crocodile from the El Manzano Farm). And once again, it belonged to a completely different group, this time the notosuchian family Uruguaysuchidae. Now Araripesuchus is well known as a genus, in part due to the work of Paul Sereno and Hans Larsson (who popularized the names "dog croc" and "rat croc" for two species). Tangent aside, A. manzanensis is known from the upper layers of Argentina's Candeleros Formation, corresponding to the Cenomanian (earliest Late Cretaceous). The same locality also yielded A. buitreraensis, from which A. manzanensis can be distinguished on account of its blunt molariform teeth in the back of its jaw. This dentition, which corresponds to a durophageous diet of hardshelled prey, could explain how it coexisted with the related A. buitrensis at the same locality, allowing the two to occupy different niches. There is a neat little animation done for this animal you can watch here.
Artwork by Gabriel Diaz Yantén
Caipirasuchus catanduvensis
We're staying in South America but moving to Brazil's Adamantina Formation for our next entry: Caipirasuchus catanduvensis (Caipiras Crocodile from Catanduva). This one is a little more recent, tho the age of the Adamantina Formation is a bit of a mess far as I can tell, ranging anywhere from the Turonian to the Maastrichtian. One could also argue that C. catanduvensis is part of the "lanky small croc club" that Parvosuchus, Varanosuchus and A. manzanensis belong to, but I feel that the very short snout helps it stand out from that bunch more easily. Anyhow, Caipirasuchus catanduvensis is a member of Sphagesauridae, related to Armadillosuchus, and herbivorous. What's really interesting tho is that the internal anatomy suggests the presence of resonance chambers not unlike that of hadrosaurs, possibly suggesting that these animals were quite vocal. This could also explain why baurusuchids appear to have had very keen hearing.
Artwork by Joschua Knüppe and Guilherme Gehr
Epoidesuchus
We're staying in the Adamantina Formation for our last Mesozoic croc of the year, Epoidesuchus tavaresae (Tavares' Enchanted Crocodile). Tho also a Notosuchian like Araripesuchus and Caipirasuchus, this one belongs to the family Itasuchidae (or the subfamily Pepesuchinae depending on who you ask), which stand out as being rare examples of semi-aquatic members of this otherwise largely terrestrial group. Epoidesuchus was fairly large for its kin and had long, slender jaws. Like I said, Epoidesuchus and its relatives were likely more semi-aquatic than other notosuchians, something that might explain the relative lack of semi-aquatic neosuchians across Gondwana. They aren't absent mind you, but noticably rarer than they are in the northern hemisphere.
Artwork by Guilherme Gehr
And thus we move into the Cenozoic and towards the end our or little list. From here on out, say goodbye to Notosuchians or other weird crocodylomorphs and get ready for Crocodilia far as the eye can see.
Ahdeskatanka
The first Cenozoic croc we got is Ahdeskatanka russlanddeutsche (Russian-German Alligator), which despite its name comes from North Dakota, specifically the Early Eocene Golden Valley Formation. Ahdeskatanka is similar to many early alligatorines like Allognathosuchus in being small with rounded, globular teeth that suggest that it fed on hardshelled prey. This would have definitely helped avoid competition in the Golden Valley Formation, which also housed a second, similar form not yet named, a large generalist with a V-shaped snout similar to Borealosuchus and the generalized early caiman Chrysochampsa, also large but with a U-shaped snout.
Artwork by meeeeeeee
Asiatosuchus oenotriensis
We had an alligatoroid, so now its time for a crocodyloid. Asiatosuchus has been recognized from the Late Eocene Duero Basin of Spain for a while now, but now we have a name: Asiatosuchus oenotriensis (Asian Crocodile Belonging To The Land Of Wine). Asiatosuchus is a complex genus, most often not really forming a monophyletic clade and likely representing several distinct or at least successive taxa that form the "Asiatosuchus-like complex". Within this complex, A. oenotriensis is thought to have been close-ish to Germany's Asiatosuchus germanicus.
Artwork by Manusuchus
Sutekhsuchus
Rounding out the trio of major crocodilian clades is Sutekhsuchus dowsoni (Set's Crocodile/God of Deception Crocodile), representing our only gavialoid of the year. Originally described as Tomistoma dowsoni in 1920 based on fossil remains from the Miocene of Egypt, Sutekhsuchus has been at times regarded as distinct and at other times lumped into Tomistoma lusitanica. It was one of several early gavialoids to inhabit the coast of the Tethys during the Miocene and appears to have been most closely related to the genus Eogavialis, clading together just outside of the American and Asian gharials. A fun little personal anecdote, I prematurely learned about this one due to a friend highlighting the name in a study on Eogavialis. Never having heard of "Sutekhsuchus" I took to google scholar, where I found a single result: a reference to the then unpublished description, which naturally I ended up eagerly awaiting.
Artwork by Manusuchus and Joschua Knüppe
Paranacaiman
Two more and we're done. First, completely arbitrarily, Paranacaiman bravardi (Bravard's Caiman from Parana) from the Miocene Ituzaingo Formation of Argentina. Material of this genus has originally been referred to Caiman lutescens, described in 1912 but now considered a nomen dubium. Paranacaiman is known from limited material only, just the skull table, but that would indicate a "huge" animal. My personal scaling recovered a size of almost 5 meters in length, similar to large black caimans today.
Once again, credit to me
Paranasuchus
Last but not least, Paranasuchus gasparinae (Gasparini's Crocodile from Parana). Coming from the same deposits as Paranacaiman, this one too has been known as a species of Caiman for some time before being assigned its own genus, though it at least got to retain its old species name. Alas, I have not scaled it myself, tho its material is at least more extensive than that of Paranacaiman, including even parts of the snout. A little nitpick because I don't have much to say, but I personally think the name was ill conceived. On its own both Paranacaiman and Paranasuchus are fine names don't get me wrong, but together, coined by the same authors in the same study no less, they strike me as needlessly confusing to non experts. Both are caimans, both are from Parana, so the distinction between "Parana Caiman" and "Parana Crocodile" is entirely arbitrary and doesn't really distinguish them. Not helped by the fact that they are even closely related in the original description. Other than that tho another good addition to our understanding of fossil crocs.
No artwork on this one, but fossil material from Bona et al. 2024
And that wraps up 2024. I hope This post, or my posts throughout the year or even my work on Wikipedia has helped to make these fascinating animals just a little bit more approachable and a massive thanks to all the artists who took their time to create fantastic pieces featuring these incredible animals. Special shout outs to Manusuchus, who diligently illustrated a lot of the featured animals and Joschua Knüppe, who had to listen to me suggest Ahdeskatanka every Sunday for about two months straight now.
Fossil Crocs of 2023
Fossil Crocs of 2022
Often when I teach someone about how birds are dinosaurs, it starts because they said something along the lines of "did you know that chickens are related to dinosaurs?" I've heard this so much, and it leads me to wonder, why is it just chickens? Why are they the only birds people seem to understand are related to the dinosaurs they're familiar with? Are they "more dinosaur" or something?
I think it’s just a meme. Other people talk about chickens, this new people talking about it do. It’s annoying either way, since all birds are in a single clade nested within dinosauria.
I’ve definitely seen it suggested because chickens are just the bird we use a lot in science so a study using a chicken that also looks at T. rex gets filtered and distilled from “birds are dinosaurs, this is the one we’re using for this study that talks T. rex” to “the chicken is T. rex’s closest relative”. Since that it’s for sure become a meme. Seen it feature multiple times as a fun “fact” too.
Take home: most people suck at scientific literacy.
Went to the Liverpool World Museum today.
This is their model of Allosaurus.
I’m in love.
@palaeofail-explained
I went to the museum yesterday and
They removed that glorious little Potato Allosaurus and replaced him with this pretender. My heartbreak is immeasurable.
RIP little potato on legs, you were the best boy </3
Nooooo! This is heartbreaking but also have they accessioned the original model or is it up for grabs 👀
A little result from tonights #paleostream. We looked into the diversity of aetosaurs, Triassic tanks that are actually related to crocodiles.
Jurassic World and other media things: Have their raptors have ridiculously wiggly tails
Actual raptor tails:
the tail is so stiff the tendons became bones
… that’s not a result of fossilization? I am genuinely asking out of confusion.
nope! Those are ossified tendons, and they were important for raptors - their tails being so stiff helped them balance, which aided in hunting as well as mobility. In fact, their general lightweight nature meant they could engage in a variety of interesting behaviors with their fully-fledged wings (like raptor prey restraint and wing-assisted inclined running), where a stiffened and straight tail would help immensely for balance
In fact, the stiff tail of the dinosaurs closest to birds became stiffer, eventually shortened, and became the modern stiff pygostyle of living birds! So it's also an important step in the evolution of avian tails. Birds now have stiff tail feathers and only the pygostyle in terms of bones, the evolutionary conclusion of this trend. If you look at a roadrunner, a dinosaur with much in common ecologically with extinct raptors, you can see how the stiff tail feathers aid in pursuit.
This is EXTREMELY common in a lot of dinosaurs. You know what dinosaur DIDN'T have ossified tendons in its tail? STEGOSAURUS. Smackity smack.
yup! as a general rule, dinosaurs had stiff tails - unless they were using them for something else
Stegosaurs are a great example, but so are Diplodocids!
Man, the more I learn about dinosaurs the more I fall in love with them
I should hope so, Literal Goose, seeing as - if you are indeed literally a goose - you are one!
While ossified tendons are common in ornithischians, that is not what we're looking at here in dromaeosaurs. Ostrom has a great diagram of how it's the vertebrae that make those stiff rods:
Look at those weird ass zygapophyses and chevrons!!! It's so cool!! And really cool convergent evolution with ornithischians!
Jurassic World and other media things: Have their raptors have ridiculously wiggly tails
Actual raptor tails:
the tail is so stiff the tendons became bones
… that’s not a result of fossilization? I am genuinely asking out of confusion.
nope! Those are ossified tendons, and they were important for raptors - their tails being so stiff helped them balance, which aided in hunting as well as mobility. In fact, their general lightweight nature meant they could engage in a variety of interesting behaviors with their fully-fledged wings (like raptor prey restraint and wing-assisted inclined running), where a stiffened and straight tail would help immensely for balance
In fact, the stiff tail of the dinosaurs closest to birds became stiffer, eventually shortened, and became the modern stiff pygostyle of living birds! So it's also an important step in the evolution of avian tails. Birds now have stiff tail feathers and only the pygostyle in terms of bones, the evolutionary conclusion of this trend. If you look at a roadrunner, a dinosaur with much in common ecologically with extinct raptors, you can see how the stiff tail feathers aid in pursuit.
This is EXTREMELY common in a lot of dinosaurs. You know what dinosaur DIDN'T have ossified tendons in its tail? STEGOSAURUS. Smackity smack.
yup! as a general rule, dinosaurs had stiff tails - unless they were using them for something else
Stegosaurs are a great example, but so are Diplodocids!
In dromaeosaurs, the stiffened tail is achieved by extending zygapophyses of the vertebrae. Those aren't tendons, that's it's bones.
"I don't know what words to use anymore!"
That's okay! I will help!
Do you mean "the evolutionary group that consists of all things called dinosaurs"? ----- use the word Dinosaur!
Do you mean "what we classically considered dinosaurs"? ----- use the term Nonavian Dinosaur!
Do you mean "dinosaurs that are studied by paleontologists"? ----- use the term Fossil Dinosaur!
Do you mean "any organism studied by paleontologists"? ----- use the term Fossil Organism!
Do you mean "dinosaurs from before history"? ----- use the term Prehistoric Dinosaur!
Do you mean "any living thing from before history"? ----- use the term Prehistoric Life!
Do you mean "just the dinosaurs that survived the end-Cretaceous mass extinction"? ----- use the term Neornithine! or bird. or Cenozoic Dinosaur.
Do you mean "just the dinosaurs that are around today"? ----- use the term (Living) Bird! or living dinosaur
Do you mean "Dinosaurs and Pterosaurs/Pterodactyls"? ----- use the term Ornithodiran!
Do you mean "Just the dinosaurs from the Mesozoic Era"? ----- use the term Mesozoic Dinosaur!
Do you mean "large classical reptiles"? ----- use the term Large Nonavian Reptiles
Do you mean "big lizards"? ----- then you aren't talking about dinosaurs, even a little bit, and should just say Big Lizards
Do you mean "something that is an evolutionary dead-end"? ----- there's no such thing; most organisms go extinct bc of happenstance, not because they were doomed to fail. lol.
Do you mean "something old and outdated, behind the times"? ----- then say Something old, outdated, or behind the times
Do you mean "something that hasn't evolved or changed in millions of years"? ----- No such thing. Every population is constantly evolving, and if something looks unchanged, that just means the change happened somewhere you can't see it.
Do you mean "something that looks like it hasn't evolved or changed in millions of years"? ----- I still recommend you drop this idea from your brain, but if you MUST, use "living fossil" or "prehistoric vibes". living fossils aren't a thing btw.
Do you mean "Dimetrodon"? ----- then say Dimetrodon
Do you mean "any large reptile that is extinct"? ----- then say Extinct Reptilian Megafauna (and accept that includes some large birds)
Do you mean "any large [traditional] reptile that is extinct"? ----- then say Extinct Nonavian Reptilian Megafauna
Do you mean a big reptilian monster? ----- then say Monster
I'm sure there are some I'm forgetting but here you go! words and terms that mean things!
Sincere question about things that haven't changed in millions of years: do you know of large changes detected by biologists in crocodilians? That always comes up as the default "unchanged organism".
mostly genetic, but there are TONS of fossil crocodilians and they occupy a lot of different niches and ecologies, even through the cenozoic era. Being limited to the one niche (semiaquatic ambush predator) is a fairly recent development
What did t-Rex arms do? Like did they actually use them to pick stuff up off the ground
Vestigial. Only so much space for so much muscle mass. They used their heads more, so they needed strong neck muscles. That took away space from arm muscles. Arms not being used, so grew smaller and less useful over time. Eventually, probably would have lost them, if not for asteroid.
Are there any creatures still around they are like that? Only two legs, no arms, wings, or forelegs?
not today, but the extinct Moa lost their wings!
The extant amphisbaenian Bipes (my beloved) only has forelimbs!
guys i just found out about this site that does a daily guessing game, it’s phylogenetic wordle- so fun!!!
Become a supporter of Kulindadromeus today! ❤️ Ko-fi lets you support the creators you love with no fees on donations.
Just a reminder, if you like my content (shitpost or educational), I have a Ko-Fi, and I could use every penny. Love y'all
DMM ROUND TWO MASTERPOST
Ornithischians
Changmiania vs Sinocephale
Bisticeratops vs Gobihadros
Tlatolophus vs Jakapil
Stegouros vs Spicomellus
Sauropodomorphs
Mbiresaurus vs Bagualosaurus
Kholumalumo vs Amanzia
Bajadasaurus vs Lavocatisaurus
Ibirania vs Australotitan
Nonavian Theropods
Berthasaura vs Ceratosuchops
Asfaltovenator vs Maip
Daurlong vs Ambopteryx
Caihong vs Falcatakely
Avians (Neornithes)
Vorombe vs Asteriornis
Conflicto vs Annakacygna
Cryptogyps vs Miosurnia
Heracles vs Heliothraupis
REBLOG! SHARE! DEBATE!
IT'S DINOSAUR MARCH MADNESS!!!
In case you haven't seen it yet, FORGOTTEN BLOODLINES has a Kickstarter now! I seriously recommend backing it!
Agate needs all the support it can get! It is the chance to show the world what a paleo documentary entirely produced by paleo people can look like!
We love to complain all the time about the state of paleo-media, this could help with changing it for the better!
(also it's voiced by NIGEL MARVEN)
Here the Kickstarter and trailer for the project!
Also: the coming Saturday we will have a special FB stream on Twitch, talking about the project and producing little sketches for people who backed the project ;)
DMM ROUND ONE MASTER POST
Ornithischians:
Sanxiasaurus vs Changmiania Iyuku vs Sinocephale Bisticeratops vs Crittendenceratops Kelumapusaura vs Gobihadros Ajnabia vs Tlatolophus Jakapil vs Bashanosaurus Stegouros vs Patagopelta Spicomellus vs Jinyunpelta
Sauropodomorphs:
Gnathovorax vs Mbiresaurus Bagualosaurus vs Issi Ngwevu vs Kholumolumo Bagualia vs Amanzia Lingwulong vs Bajadasaurus Lavocatisaurus vs Ruixinia Abditosaurus vs Ibirania Australotitan vs Mansourasaurus
Non-Neornithine Theropods:
Berthasaura vs Vespersaurus Spectrovenator vs Riparovenator Asfaltovenator vs Meraxes Suskityrannus vs Maip Daurlong vs Natovenator Bannykus vs Ambopteryx Caihong vs Hesperornithoides Falcatakely vs Janavis
Neornithes:
Vorombe vs Protodontopteryx Asteriornis vs Panraogallus Anachronornis vs Conflicto Annakacygna vs Nasidytes Aviraptor vs Cryptogyps Miosurnia vs Primoptynx Danielsraptor vs Heracles Eofringillirostrum vs Heliothraupis
REBLOG! SHARE! DEBATE!
ITS DINOSAUR MARCH MADNESS!
ITS TIME
FOR
DINOSAUR MARCH MADNESS 2k23!!!!!!!!!!!!
Starting NEXT WEEK, we begin the ultimate competition:
DMM: RISING STARS
These are ALL dinosaurs that have been discovered in the past five years!!! New friends from old times!!! Including such new fan favorites as Bajadasaurus, Jakapil, Meraxes, and Anachronornis - and that's only four of them!
From the weird to the wonderful, these dinosaurs are here to indicate that just because they were found recently, doesn't mean that they aren't destined to become icons like the names we already know and love. Get ready to learn about some new paleontological excitement - and debate angrily over which ones are better ;)
Round One will go from March 1st through the 7th
Round Two will extend from March 8th through the 14th
Round Three will then go from the 15th to the 21st
Round Four from the 22nd to the 28th
And the FINAL FOUR SHOWDOWN (Ornithischian Vs Sauropodomorph vs Nonavian theropod vs Bird) will occur from March 29th through April 4th!
Thanks to the new tumblr poll feature, reconstructions and mini factfiles for each dinosaur will be on the post with the poll itself! No need to leave tumblr, no personal research, no google quizzes - just rapid learning and immediate voting!
Get ready to vote! Get ready to debate! Get ready... for DINOSAUR MARCH MADNESS!
Round One Matchups under the readmore :)
Kulinday Approaches!
It’s been a while folks! for those who’ve joined the Palaeoblr community in the last couple years and don’t know, Kulinday (July 24th) is the day when we celebrate the announcement anniversary of the most wonderful of dinosaurs, our dear Kulindadromeus!
(art by @drawingwithdinosaurs)
It’s a tradition that @a-dinosaur-a-day began, and while the festivities have been limited the last few year because of everyone’s hectic lives I am very excited to announce that….
We’re bringing back the Kulinday Livestream!
We’d like to invite you to join us on the ADAD Twitch channel on Sunday, July 24th at 5pm EST, to celebrate all things Kulinda! I’ll be doing various drawing shenanigans, there’ll be gameplay of Planet Zoo and Zoo Tycoon 2, and some palaeo narrative storyboards presented by @otussketching!
We’ll be streaming for several hours so yeah, please do drop in and celebrate the anniversary of a special little Floof! And if you feel so inclined, post your Kulinda art and tag it with #Kulinday2022 to join in the festivities!