[balaclava-trismegistus]

Who's pjackk?

Recently-martyred electronic saint

[gaycop]

[mylimoji]

people really say 'where are the sissies, where are the faggots' and then can't even handle fauxcest or cnc, like besides the pedojacketing all the trans women on this website (which, of course, is their main goal, and i'm not minimising that) like what do you want then? you want weird fags and then you get icked out by some intox play? it's genuinely all aesthetics for you, people, huh. truly the punk website of it all.

[diagnosisunclear-archive]

considering remaking my blog (again) bc this one has a lot of glitched things

[juchechat]

According to a WHO (World Health Organisation) report in 2014, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea had a lower death rate by malnutrition (per 100,000) than France.

[juchechat]

The malnutrition rate in the DPRK is lower than that in India, Nepal, Bangladesh, Indonesia, Philippines, Pakistan, Laos, Cambodia, and by some estimates Myanmar and Vietnam. Despite this, it’s often only the DPRK who receives crocodile tears from the western media and left, since apparently “Kim” is “starving his own people.” They’ll even go so far as to say that the DPRK’s nuclear and missile programs are what cause such food shortages, as though they’re using grain to produce graphite ablator and dinitrogen tetroxide. Little is ever mentioned about how sanctions limit the DPRKs ability to import goods in general, and that were similar sanctions imposed on the RoK (which relies on imports for 70% of its food supply) they would starve. Sanctions are genocidal in intent, they aim to starve a populace and cripple their economy in order to provoke rebellion. The u$ and its dogs have done this in place like Cuba and Iraq, yet somehow it’s always “the regime” at fault for the conditions created by blockades and sanctions. Those who support such sanctions aren’t supporting “the Korean people”, they’re supporting attempted genocide.

[writingdose]

I am once again begging people to realize that AI checker doesn’t work. it’s never worked. it’s notoriously known to have flagged human-made works as AI and AI-generated works as human-made. and by feeding it people’s works, you are feeding more works to AI, because apparently the machine itself is AI.

the only thing AI checker does is harm genuine artists and people in general too.

[luceliamercury-deactivated20260]

Tumblr actively hunts down and deletes legit trans womens blogs as a policy but encourages and cultivates porn bots that use stolen trans sex worker's content. This is propaganda and affects how we're viewed by other users, makes our own tags unusable for us, is unfathomably transmisogynistic, and reveals a lot about how staff views us. Our bodies are a commodity that they want on their website, but our words are not welcome.

[diagnosisunclear-archive]

blatantly the reason i got termed is because i told a transmisogynist to kill themselves. and not even repeatedly, not egging them on, not encouraging harm as their (staff) paper thin excuse was.

not because of the content itself—they couldnt care less about people telling each other to kill themselves on this website. if that was the case there would be no user base left.

it wasnt harassment literally by definition because it was only one sentence of the entire interaction. they (other user) chose to have a discussion about science and couldnt actually engage in a topic they were supposedly getting paid to go to school for.

the literal only reason they (staff) took it ‘seriously’ is because it was a transmisogynist and i named them as such before telling them to kill themself.

staff doesnt care if the trans women on this site get stalked and sent death threats and actually legitimately harassed but god forbid someone tells a transmisogynist to die once.

[sailatina3]

Today i learned that tunblr straight up does not consider leaking an IP address to be against the law or tos. Holy shit lmao

[magi-magi-tamamoland-chan]

neither is reblogging a trans woman's post to tell her how bad you want to kill her

[vague-humanoid]

OnlyFans owner Leonid Radvinsky dies at 43

Leo Radvinsky became a billionaire after investing in the site, known for its pornographic content.

[juan-republic]

[trezzles2]

[milkshake-meltdown]

Don't forget to be angry at @staff, today.

Your trans sisters are still missing from Tumblr.

[diagnosisunclear-archive]

so the claim of targeted abuse/harassment doesnt stand up. neither does unwanted sexualization/sexual harassment (???). i didnt encourage anyone to kill themselves - implying egging on - i made an inflammatory statement once in a reblog during a mutually engaged discussion wherein someone kept going back even when they couldnt adequately engage in a topic they’re apparently being paid to get a degree for (yikes). so the only factor im getting here is this is an excuse Because i told them to kts for being transmisogynistic. because you have people telling people to kts on here alllll the time, people report it, and they never get termed. but i explicitly tell this person its because they were transmisogynistic and now tumblr is holding the line 🧐?

[diagnosisnegated]

@covid-safer-hotties

That whole thing pissed me off so much I went through all of those articles myself.

COVID is not “endemic,” and these papers do not prove that it is.

Here’s the core issue:

Most of the papers people cite to claim COVID is endemic are not actually demonstrating that. They are assuming it, using it as background framing, or borrowing a policy/administrative label and treating it like epidemiological proof.

That is a much weaker claim

In epidemiology, “endemic” doesn’t mean “it’s still around” or “we’re used to it now.” It means a disease has reached a stable, predictable baseline level in a population. Predictability is the entire point. If transmission is still producing irregular surges, shifting baselines, and ongoing large-scale impact, that is not endemic equilibrium—it’s instability.

Also, quick clarification: the issue is not that COVID has zero seasonality. It’s that it does not have clean, stable, flu-like seasonality. SARS-CoV-2 circulates year-round, often with both summer and winter waves, instead of settling into a single predictable season. That alone undermines the idea that it has reached a steady endemic pattern.

What these papers actually do

There are three main ways “COVID is endemic” gets smuggled into research:

Assumption framing: “In the endemic phase…” (no proof provided)

Policy framing: “After reclassification to endemic…” (government decisions ≠ epidemiology)

Modeling shorthand: “Under endemic conditions…” (a scenario, not a conclusion)

None of these are evidence that COVID has actually stabilized.

Source Breakdown

1. MDPI (Germany insurance data study)

This paper literally defines 2022–2023 as the “first year of endemicity.” That’s not something they prove—it’s something they decide in advance.

And then their own data shows:

hundreds of thousands of cases

multiple peaks (October and March)

thousands of hospitalizations

significant mortality in severe/critical cases

That is not a stable baseline. That is ongoing wave behavior.

So even within their own “endemic phase,” COVID is still spiking and causing substantial harm.

2. ScienceDirect (South Korea social contact study)

This paper is about who people interact with, not whether COVID has stabilized.

“Endemic phase” appears in the title and intro, but:

• there is no analysis of transmission stability

•no demonstration of a predictable baseline

•no test of endemic criteria at all

The word “endemic” is just scene-setting language.

This is like saying “in the modern era” before studying traffic patterns. It tells you nothing about whether the disease itself has reached equilibrium.

3. ScienceDirect (clinical / infectious disease paper)

This paper uses “endemic phase” language—but again, it’s not proving anything about transmission stability.

What it actually is:

•a clinical/infectious disease analysis

•focused on patient outcomes and disease burden

What it does NOT do:

no demonstration of a stable baseline

no evidence of predictable transmission patterns

no test of endemic criteria

Instead, it still describes:

ongoing cases

continued clinical burden

active disease impact

So what you have is a paper about a disease that is still actively affecting patients—

written during a time the authors are calling “endemic.”

That’s not proof. That’s labeling.

4. American Journal of Epidemiology (excess mortality letter

Even this paper—while using the phrase “endemic COVID era”—doesn’t actually support the claim.

It explicitly notes that excess mortality may still reflect:

delayed care

cardiovascular effects

indirect consequences of infection

In other words, the system is still dealing with ongoing downstream impacts, not a neatly stabilized disease state.

5. MDPI (anticoagulant prescribing trends)

This paper is about medication use over time, not COVID transmission dynamics.

“Endemic era” is just a time label, not a conclusion supported by the data.

It does not demonstrate endemicity at all.

6. JAMA Network Open (vaccination cost-effectiveness model)

This is a model, not observational evidence.

It assumes an endemic scenario and then simulates outcomes. That’s a hypothetical framework, not proof that the real-world system has stabilized.

Even within that model, COVID still produces:

ongoing hospitalizations

deaths

long-term health burden

So even the assumption of endemicity still includes substantial disruption.

7. Environment International (wastewater + hospital cases, Japan)

This paper defines “endemic” based on a government reclassification date.

That is a policy decision—not an epidemiological transition.

What the study actually finds:

wastewater continues to track COVID cases strongly

transmission remains widespread

surveillance became more difficult after policy changes

This is measuring before vs. after a policy shift, not proving that the disease became stable.

What endemic would actually look like

If COVID were truly endemic in the strict epidemiological sense, you would expect:

a consistent baseline level of transmission

predictable seasonal patterns

limited, stable variation over time

What we actually see instead:

year-round circulation

multiple unpredictable waves

shifting or rising baselines

continued hospital burden and mortality

reliance on wastewater and emergency-style surveillance

That is not a system in equilibrium.

Final point

Across all of these sources, “endemic” is never demonstrated through stable transmission data—it’s declared, and then everything else is analyzed inside that declaration.

Calling COVID “endemic” right now is not a neutral scientific conclusion. It’s a framing choice.

And when you actually read the papers people cite, they are not showing a virus that has quietly settled into the background. They are describing one that is still persistent, unstable, and actively shaping public health outcomes.

That’s not endemic.

That’s just something people have decided to call endemic.

[covid-safer-hotties]

My argument stands that rhetoric is not the same thing as data. Thanks for doing the heavy lifting!

[diagnosisunclear-archive]

hiii my other blog @diagnosisnegated got termed last night for telling a transmisogynist to take a walk off a pier <3 im back on this blog

basics because im too tired to make this more in depth

ada, tme, usamerican, early-mid 20s

marxist leninist

from milfstalin, “transandrophobia / transmisandry is not a material axis of oppression; it implies the existence of a system of misandry in general which is objectively incorrect. the phenomena described by transandrophobia is sufficiently described by the term transphobia.”

feminism is inclusive of transfeminism, and misogyny is inclusive of transmisogyny. posts discussing feminism or misogyny therefore apply broadly.

when discussing experiences or theory specific to trans women, I’ll tag those posts explicitly as transfeminism/transmisogyny.

multiply physically disabled & mentally ill/disordered and this causes a fluctuation of cognitive ability from day to day, hour to hour, & honestly moment to moment. this means my articulation etc can and will fluctuate as well.

if you’re unserious i wont engage with you seriously.

[gatheringbones]

think this idea of parenthood explains much about how people come to resent the idea that they should do anything for anyone else ever -- "why would I help my friend move/why would we go to the grocery store together" is a reaction to the belief that helping your friends can only mean taking on parent-substitute obligation, and that reciprocal partnership does not exist

that’s the thing— some of these anons took my rejection of any form of paternalism as a rejection of all forms of care. they can’t conceive of caring for someone like an equal and a fellow traveler. If I’m your friend: I’ll help you move, I’ll remove shrapnel from your gut wound, I’ll chew your dried moose until it’s soft enough to eat, I’ll give you head till you cry, I will take care of you, but not like a father or a mother.

[diagnosisunclear-archive]

cool! gonna lose the storage unit. im fine

[greenmossloveisreal1998iloveyou]

this man sees 40 moves ahead

[nourasbasha]

In a tweet that garnered massive resonance in Japan, Ms. Mika wrote:

"Returning unidentified bodies found inside bags, and these are bodies of people whose hands and feet were bound, bearing burn marks, crushed by tanks, showing signs of torture, with their bones broken... etc."

If these were not Palestinians, this incident would have become a huge scandal and a major issue on a global level.

In this incident, the disregard for the value of human life and its dignity is clearly manifested, along with the inhumane perspective that justifies neglect and marginalization.

[nourasbasha]

Today, the Israeli Transportation Minister publicly proposed burning the body of Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar. Such statements, made openly and without shame, reveal a shocking disregard for human dignity and international law. This cruelty harms victims, their families, and the very principles of morality, demanding the international community to speak out and defend justice.

[nourasbasha]

After all the brutality we’ve witnessed, from tortured bodies to a public proposal to burn victims, we feel powerless in the face of the world’s silence. Gaza is no longer a place to live—it’s a prison for children who chose nothing. My four children face fear, hunger, and sorrow every day, and all we dream of is giving them the chance to play, sleep safely, and learn like any other child in the world. Supporting our campaign is not a luxury—it’s their right to life. Every share, every donation, is a step toward leaving this hell and giving our children the future they deserve.