Probably a lot of bad puns...

Biromantic/Demisexual/Nonbinary They/Them Main blog. Super random.

[waspsinyouryard]

admittedly i know little of the subject but one would think, at 45 years of age, he would be a ryan goose by now

[wholesome-animal-images]

[ladyshinga]

Really wish we'd, on the left, stop laughing and assuming this is ACTUALLY about strippers. I'd be willing to bet this ISN'T about some one with the actual job of stripper being somehow hired and sent to a school, that indeed DOESN'T happen - instead it will be used to target any female teacher who, like, wears a bikini on social media one time. She'll be called a "danger" to children and fired, as a cover for the fact that she's pro-queer or too far left or doesn't support ICE enough on that same social media. The bikini pic will just be the legal tool used to ruin her life

[ladyshinga]

A friend helped me out by looking up the actual bill and YUP, it's to target queer people and sex education. NOT. STRIPPERS. STOP MAKING IT ABOUT THE FUCKING "STRIPPERS".

[theshampyon]

Anyone who thinks ladyshinga might be off track, here's the breakdown.

Actual bill name: Stop the Sexualization of Children Act.

Purported purpose: "to protect children from being exposed to explicit material in the classroom".

How it's sold in the press: "Ban strippers and porn from classrooms!"

Actual text of the bill: Expands the meaning of "sexually explicit content" to include the words "or involves gender dysphoria or transgenderism".

Not and. Or. Meaning "involves gender dysphoria or transgenderism" is in and of itself enough to be classified as sexually explicit.

Actual result: Illegal to mention the existence of trans people or admit to being trans in a classroom under threat of being prosecuted as a child sex offender.

[adibkhorram]

This is HR7661—also known as the Federal Book Banning Bill. It would remove books by, about, or including trans people.

If you want to fight:

Stop the Federal Book Ban Bill!

We made it easy to take these four actions to fight against HR 7661 and stand up for your right to read!

[heliophile-oxon]

The headline is there to get you to stop thinking. A salutary reminder to question who wrote the fucking headline and why.

To get you to stop thinking, that's why. Many on the right really are that stupid, but the people behind the headlines - and making sure to get those headlines in front of your eyes - are not.

(and with things like the too-hot coffee lawsuit, most of us stopped at the headline and it was years before we heard the real story about the deliberate company policy, the third-degree burns and the ruined life. They use headlines because it works)

[thefingerfuckingfemalefury]

I feel like we just need a handy video like that bit in "The Big Short" to get this through to people

"Here's Margot Robbie in a bathtub to explain it to you":

"Any time a politician starts using the words "protecting children"?

That's FASCISM

Whatever they're trying to get passed using those words?

Is gonna be fascism"

[importantpics]

[lesvegas]

[lesvegas]

Ok I think this might be funnier with context actually. This is a review for a strip club in Toronto.

[marvelladiesdaily]

She ignores reason because this is her preferred outcome, and she will fight for it against her own rational mind. Liff isn’t dead. She got there in time. Somehow it’s going to be okay. - Adrian Tchaikovsky, Children of Memory

[hyperculture]

OH OKAY......

[exitwound]

I have a disease called I can’t reply to your text. I love you

[constantinnen]

[yellow-cat]

do u think i can go for a run today or is that something only normal people are allowed to do

[thisisdogs]

weird animals run all the time dude

[yellow-cat]

im going to go for a scamper and scare everyone

[yellow-cat]

i could be your pet rock. id be very good at it

[yellow-cat]

ive had some time to think and honestly i dont think id be a very good pet rock. i dont know what i was thinking. theres too much anger in me

[sagevalleymusings]

I see a lot of posts on tumblr about how horrible ozempic is. I always feel weird disagreeing. But I think it's important to talk about why I disagree.

Ozempic is not, as many people, including my previous doctor, would say, an appetite suppresant. It is a GLP-1 agonist. The primary function of an agonist is to bind to its respective organic compound to promote secretion of hormones - in this case, insulin. Its presence in the body also decreases glucagon. GLP-1, like most hormones, is complex, and what it does to the body is complex. A side effect of increased GLP-1 activity is reduced appetite.

The reduced appetite is a *side effect* not the purpose, and for people like me who take ozempic to treat for diabetes, it's been life-changingly helpful.

I do not want a world in which ozempic is banned because it's a "weight loss drug" because it's not. I do not appreciate the posts about how serious the side effects are, because it's the safest diabetes medication on the market. I do not consider people posting things with the tag "anti-ozempic" to be my allies, because that reductive view on medicine is the same all or nothing mentality as doctors that refused to treat me for ten years because I was fat.

Has Novo Nordisk done some shitty things regarding advertising and scarcity? Yes they have. Is using ozempic for the sole purpose of weight loss bad? Absolutely. But I think it's really, really important that we stay clear and consistent about why.

Taking away life-saving medication from people with a debilitating lifelong condition in the name of thinness has and will kill people. Fatphobia is often also ableism. Ozempic helps people like me, people with diabetes, live their lives. And the fact that my voice has been drowned in a sea of healthy people complaining about "ozempic face" is the problem. The fact that Novo Nordisk started marketing their product as a weight loss medicine knowing they wouldn't be able to keep up with demand is the problem. Ozempic itself is not the problem.

[carnival-toys]

it should be socially acceptable for everyone to bring stuffed animals with them wherever they want tbh

[rinsknifetbd-deactivated2018061]

Girls with thick thighs

Pros:  Extra squishy Super great pillow Looking really good in skirts,dresses, shorts etc. They.Jiggle. Soft Could crush a watermelon literally anything else

Cons: None. They’re perfect

[sanguine-raven]

well, y'know what they say

[sd-d0-l1y]

<nodding> awabawababa

[sanguine-raven]

that's right

[rubedeckillerofficial]

Drives me genuinely insane that kids-only spaces on the internet like Club Penguin were destroyed because companies realised that there’s only so much profit you can squeeze out of children with no disposable income, so now kids are being forced into adult spaces on the internet where the profit model is to find the most viewers you can passively expose to ads that nobody is clicking on so all online media is slowly turning into Mr Beast Elsagate nightmares, and for adults this means giving your ID to companies owned by businessmen with Epstein connections to keep the kids “safe.” Clown internet.

[asksloyxp]

Maybe if I just work harder, this empty cup will pour again