the world-historical significance of "dudes rock"

titsay
untitled

tannertan36
The Bowery Presents
Sade Olutola

pixel skylines
No title available
Interview Vampire Daily
RMH
taylor price
official daine visual archive
No title available
YOU ARE THE REASON
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
cherry valley forever
todays bird

oozey mess
EXPECTATIONS
Mike Driver
Game of Thrones Daily

seen from Romania

seen from Canada
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Argentina
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Jordan

seen from United States

seen from Paraguay
seen from United States

seen from Lebanon
seen from Portugal
seen from Uzbekistan
seen from Dominican Republic

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from United States
@dog-uncrushed
the world-historical significance of "dudes rock"
The shape of a plant reflects the history of what [it] has sensed
Peter Godfrey Smith, Metazoa 96
"Cool could even prove to be the new mode of individualism, an adaptation to life in post-industrial consumer democracies, much as the Protestant work ethic that Max Weber described was a way of living the discipline of industrial societies."
Cool Rules: Anatomy of an Attitude (13)
Pelligrinis
...discovering platonic forms in the mud
William H. Glass
…in that sense –– that’s the animistic, the thing that the scientific side (properly) goes as far away from as possible but there’s a certain part of us I think that still likes to feel that we are living in a world that’s alive, and has to be respected. And can be angry at us. And our car won’t start because it doesn’t like us for some reason.
- William H. Gass
The contemporary post-Marxist left seems to me to differ from the earlier Marxist one mainly in that the latter had a specific revolution in mind –– one in which selective replacement of private by public ownership of capital would bring about far-reaching desirable consequences, and in particular increasingly participatory democracy. From the point of view of that earlier left, it was plausible to claim that Dewey-style reformist tinkering had become merely an obstacle to the required revolution. But contemporary radicals have no such specific revolution to support. So I find it hard to see their purported non-membership in the culture of the liberal democracies, and their vehement anti-Americanism, as more than a wistful desire that there be some sort of revolution, any sort. This desire is, perhaps, the result of an understandable rage at the very slow extension of hope and freedom to marginal social groups, and at the frequent betrayals of past promises. But I do not think that the over-theoretical and over-philosophized form this rage is currently taking is of much use.
In particular, I think that a lot of the energy of leftist intellectuals in the contemporary American academy is being wasted, just insofar as they hope that work within such disciplines as philosophy and literary criticism can be geared in with political action in some direct way (as opposed to a long-term, atmospheric, indirect way). One symptom of this hope is the conviction that it is politically useful to “problematize" or "call into question" traditional concepts, distinctions, and institutions. My own view is that it is not much use pointing to the "internal contradictions" of a social practice, or "deconstructing" it, unless one can come up with an alternative practice –– unless one can at least sketch a utopia in which the concept or distinction would be obsolete. After all, every social practice of any complexity, and every element of such a practice, contains internal tensions. Ever since Hegel, we intellectuals have been busy winkling them out. But there is little point in exhibiting such tensions unless you have some suggestions about resolving them. The Deweyan liberal left and the Marxist radical left of my youth both tried to work out utopian visions –– to suggest practices that would minimise the tensions in question. My doubts about the contemporary Foucauldian left concern its failure to offer such visions and suggestions.
Richard Rorty, Objectivity, Relativism and Truth 16
if there were an ultimate ground we would know, for there would be some who stand on it. Yet this much of history has already passed and still we see the priest by the altar and think: what an astonishing feat for contingency!
collective solipsism
there can be no shame if you were just 'following a rule'
Mankind lies groaning, half-crushed beneath the weight of its own progress
Henri Bergson, Two Sources of Morality and Religion 275