snaddy (snake daddy)

sam || 27 || homo #cannabutch.about women only - ALL males are blocked

[cannabutch]

TEMPLE OF DROPLETS IS CONQUERED 🔥

[cannabutch]

last element let’s fuckin gooooo

[cognitohazardous]

no one is stupid in quite the same way as a tumblr user

[bourtange]

the only thing you're allowed to watch between the ages of 0 and 17 is barney the dinosaur and the only thing you're allowed to watch once you turn 18 is cannibal holocaust

[gnomebutch]

I’m soooo fucking jealous of gay men why are all their events for explicitly gay men. all the lesbian events are “everyone but cis men!!” WHERE ARE THE HORNY DYKESSS💔💔💔💔💔

[msasterisk]

meows big and loud at you ok

[kkoffin]

I’m glad the “het-partnered women are braindead leashed-bitches semen-dick-slaves and women are stupid” (literally all real things i’ve seen these people say, and be proud of saying) “radfems” have started calling themselves something, “blackpill”, bc now I can easily tell them to fuck off, and state that I’m openly opposed to their misogynistic bullshit.

Far as I’m aware, you’re a radfem if you agree with radical feminist literature and theory, not because you get the most likes or because you’re the most extreme. The “radical” means “root”, not extremist. If you refuse to read radical feminist literature bc you don’t agree with the authors maybe that’s a good sign you aren’t a radfem to begin with. Hot take: Hating men doesn’t inherently make you a feminist. Being a feminist may make you hate men, but misandry doesn’t automatically mean you’re part of a women’s liberation movement, especially when you hate most women and talk about them like they’re dogs. There’s a difference between criticism of heterosexual relationships and this gross misogynistic purity culture and sexual-shaming. I want to stress, I have no issue with sensible criticism of het-partnerships and culture.

If you don’t think “women are stupid” and “het-partnered women are dick-slaves, leashed by men via their semen” then congrats!! This post isn’t about you, and you don’t need to get defensive! If you do think these things, feel free to get mad, but I won’t take you any more seriously than any other non-radfem who’s angry about my posts. If you’re angry, I’m assuming you agree with those two statements. If you don’t know what this post is talking about, please scroll on, enjoy ur day, and ignore this.

I really didn’t want to get involved with this kinda stuff. I don’t want to spend my time fighting feminists I mildly disagree with when there’s bigger issues and worse “enemies”, but at this point I don’t consider anyone who took “leashed bitches” seriously or thinks 90% of female population to be stupid to be a “feminist” of any sort, for what I thought were obvious reasons. At this point they’re hurting the movement honestly more than most other individual threats, directly pushing women away from or out of radfeminism from the inside.

[2lazy-2die]

Explain in 5 sentences how can you be a "liberated woman" while still partnering with your supposed oppressor, letting him fuck you and sharing your resources with him, I'll wait

[kkoffin]

did i say you could? or did i say “calling het-partnered women leashed sluts and saying women are stupid is not radfem”? and bonus round: did i not literally say “I have no issue with sensible criticism of het-partnership”

blackpill do literally anything besides put words in other peoples mouths challenge impossible. it’s literally insane how yall can’t do anything but strawman. “calling women whores is bad” “OH SO YOU ARE A HOMOPHOBE? OH SO YOU THINK HET PARTNERING IS GREAT?” what the actual fuck is wrong in ur heads. this is why no one bothers arguing with you anymore, it’s a waste of time.

[lorynna]

News flash! Radfem doesn't equal female separatist! I've made a post about this a while ago, if anyone is interested here's the link to it.

The gist is that separatism is a tool of radical feminism, a strand, but not a core tenet. If your definition of radical feminism would have excluded its founders then maybe you're not a radical feminist? You can call yourself a separatist feminist, that's fine too. :)

[goddessrevolt]

Why are yall so obsessed with defending men

ALL MEN are evil, they all benefit from patriarchy and they all deserve to die

[kkoffin]

when did anyone defend men? did i miss something? or is it that you genuinely believe not calling women “sluts” and “braindead leashed bitches” is “defending men”? are you serious? are we fucking serious???

[goddessrevolt]

There’s no need to strawman me, you say that you can be a radfem and date men - which you can’t bc see my original post. It’s not my fault that yall are such birds that you freak out the second someone insults your precious moods

[kkoffin]

please highlight where i ever said or even implied that

and did you notice the part, already reiterated once in this post, where i said i do not have an issue with criticism of het partnership?

also i think you might wanna sit the “strawman” argument out this time bc i’m not sure bringing it up will end in your favour

[goddessrevolt]

You’re still failing to actually address my point which is about what I’d expect.

You think women can be in het relationships and I think you can’t call yourself a radfem if you’re not 4b.

You can keep snarking at me all you want it doesn’t change the fact that you’re wrong :)

[kkoffin]

once again, did i say women “can” be in het relationships, or just that you shouldn’t call them “braindead leashed bitches” for it? and was i not in fact, very specific about that?

i also don’t think women should wear makeup but i don’t think they should be called some insane sexually degrading slur for it. what the actual fuck about “don’t call women sluts and bitches” is so fucking hard for yall? we are so literally not talking about men, we are talking about what slurs you throw at women.

[goddessrevolt]

Yeah no dude just keep strawmannig me bc you’re mad. I never said any of that.

You’re like the magats making up shit to be mad about lmao

[kkoffin]

you never said any of what exactly? you never said anything about what the post is about??? idk if you noticed the highlighted text above but there’s no need to take issue with the post unless you think women should be called those things, so what exactly have you said? something entirely irrelevant? and my original point stands that no one was talking about defending men?

[radfem-amber]

[bruzum]

[twilighttrekkie]

[geddyqueer]

there is this thing called a "kitty cat". and you can get one for inside your home, and it will sit on all of your surfaces, and you can pet it.

[gynja]

dont ever compare butch women to men i will kill you

[sacred-portal]

[mrscancelled-1]

[punkcherries]

UNHAND ME FOOL

[stargoyle]

Big announcement:

Fucking petting hims

[pinnipurr]

It's 2026 and i haven't seen anyone come up with a way to get the human body to curl up in a little comfy circle like a cat or a dog why don't we have the technology where i can look like this ⚫ like what are we even doing anymore

[theoretical-terf]

It's absolutely insane that you can say something like "if you watch hundreds of hours of videos of women being beaten, choked, and raped, that says something about how you view women" and people on this website will categorise you with nazis doing book burnings or christians doing witch trials.

[gently-radical]

Unpopular opinion but women shouldn’t have to write 6 paragraph text posts to defend their right to refuse sex with anyone for any reason. Anyone who disagrees with that statement is a rapist or a rape apologist. End of story.

[sapphos-darlings]

A reminder for this Pride month that female homosexuality is real, innate, unchangable and beautiful! It's a privilege to be born a lesbian! Despite everything we have to fight against to simply be allowed to exist, it's all worth it because of love for our fellow women.

Lesbian pride will never die because we will never stop existing! ✊

[greelin]

do you know how many times i’ve been sent this