Jules of Nature
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
Today's Document
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
dirt enthusiast

No title available
One Nice Bug Per Day
DEAR READER
No title available
Claire Keane
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
occasionally subtle

tannertan36
No title available

roma★
wallacepolsom

JVL

No title available

Origami Around

seen from India
seen from Denmark

seen from Malaysia
seen from United Arab Emirates

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from Singapore

seen from Malaysia
seen from France
seen from United Kingdom

seen from South Korea

seen from United States

seen from Guatemala
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from Indonesia

seen from United Arab Emirates
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Vietnam
seen from Türkiye
@enilua
ザザーン Zazahn - Return of Ultraman
Josemaria Ibañez’s Mapocho Arereo (via here)
Works by Maggie Vandewalle
Relationship anarchy could be about so much more than the freedom to fuck.
“I need to tell you something” the guy I just took to my tiny hotel room tells me as we lie down on the bed “I am a relationship anarchist”. This is of little importance to me. We just hooked up in a bar (an anarchist bar so this is also no surprise to me). I am on vacation and moving out in 3 days. Why should I care about how he conducts his relationships? But he seems to think this requires further clarification. “That means I have sex with multiple people and I do not label those contacts as relationships. I see people when I want to see them.” Again, this is of little importance to me.
But his words linger. Is that what relation anarchy is? Polyamory combined with non-commitment? I really hope not. That kind of individual freedom, the freedom to not form lasting relationships, the freedom to always follow your own desires, the commitmentless fucking around, sounds more like relationship capitalism to me. Yet this guy wasn’t the first ‘relationship anarchist’ I’ve met who defined relationship anarchism as ‘I do whatever I want’.
I guess why relationship anarchy rarely appeals to me is because its practioners often seems too obsessed with nonmonogamy.
Anarchism, to me, is very much about commitment. About building communities. Communities that reject the ‘rules’ of capitalism, of ownership, of jobs, of productive and unproductive members, of competition. Communities that instead choose care, cooperation, equality, acknowledgement that our differences make our strengths, and each to contribute according to their his ability and to receive according to their need. And in that community, we make the rules that suit us, and end them when they no longer suit our community.
Relationship anarchism then, to me, means community. A community of two or of many. A community that rejects the ‘rules’ of relationships, of enforced heterosexuality, enforced monogamy, of partners being entitled to sex, of marriage, of childcare being a two-person job and of the idea that we need a romantic or sexual relationship to be complete. A community that instead choses care, cooperation, equality, acknowledgement that we are more than our relationship and that we all have different needs. And in that community, we make the rules that suit us, and end them when they no longer suit our community.
By that definition, an anarchist relationship is first and foremost one of cooperation and setting our own rules. By that definition, it is not self-serving but always mutually beneficial. By that definition, it can be a monogamous relationship if that’s what makes the people involved feel happiest. By that definition, it can be about friendship, about romance, about sex, about a selection of those things, but by definition it will be about care. And intuitively, I’d say an anarchist relationship is a mutual support system against the brutal, oppressive capitalist world around us. The world is an extremely fucked up opressive place that seeks to divide us but we have chosen to support each other, to create a safe space within the rooms that we share when we share them, to help each other through tough days and tough years, to remind each other that we’re in this together.
This automatically-polyamorous commitment-free ‘I do whatever I want’ version of relationship anarchism feels nothing like that.
“An anarchist relationship is a mutual support system against the brutal, oppressive capitalist world around us.” Love it!
National Geographic August 1968
South to Mexico City
“Sweet-ride shores,” surfers call the beaches at Mazatlan.
Jemand der sich verrannt hat auf dem weg zu sich selbst aber gut wem passiert nicht dass man einmal vom weg abkommt wer immer nur auf sich selbst zu rennt der muss sich ja verlaufen so haben wirs gelernt wir schreiten fort egal was kommt und die längst vergessenen die nie wirklich weg waren fordern wir sagen sie fordern grenzen stehen da als chor schreien grenzen endlich bitte wieder grenzen schauen sie der boden der zitternde der bebende der vibrierende der hält zu viele menschen gar nicht aus nur wer dem boden hier entstiegen ist darf bleiben dafür braucht es grenzen braucht es wieder damit die freiheit hier bleibt hinter unseren mauern damit der wohlstand hier bleibt die risse tief im sediment die wollen wir mit grenzen kitten die grenzen sind jetzt wieder zu die wunden sind noch offen
Thomas Köck: paradies. spielen.
8. Juli 2018, Wanderlust in der Alten Nationalgalerie Berlin.