Cities for People notes: The human dimension and senses of scale
These are my reading notes from chapters 1 and 2 of Jan Gehlās book Cities for People.
-Focus within the city has shifted from interrelations of the city and common spaces to a focus on the individual buildings themselves, threatening the value of urbanism and the potential of the city or theĀ āurbanā
-Cars erode oneās ability to participate in city life
-Clear link between what people areĀ āinvitedā to do based on the form of the city and patterns of use
-Creating spaces that facilitate city life and pedestrian travel shift use patterns and create moreĀ ālifeā (Janette Sadik-Khan says simple, cheap changes to the streetspace shift usage and lead to positive benefits; Gehl says bench seating is a simple way to create street life)
City as a meeting place and democratic space:
-Unpredictability and unplanned, spontaneous actions are closely tied toĀ āurbanityā/city life and walking
-Character and the extent of city life are closely linked to the quality of outdoor public space- these quality spaces lead to unplanned, new social interactions
-Cities were onceĀ āthe meeting placeā- has this now shifted to online/tech at the expense of unity, togetherness, understanding, humanization?
-Enriching urban life by reestablishing the meeting place function may have much larger ramifications b/c of the face-to-face nature and unpredictability of interactions (leads to your beliefs being challenged)
-The meeting place function of cities isĀ āa good way to provide general information to everyone about the composition and universality of societyā, to help to offset biased, fear-provoking, dire imagery and narrative presented by the media
-City space is crucial as an area for protest, speech, and democracy at both a large scale (Occupy Wall St) and a smaller scale (collecting signatures, handing out flyers, etc)
Building to human senses of scale:
-100 meters is ourĀ āviewing wallā, the max width for plazas and squares because beyond which we cannot see what is going on (cannot see motion)
-35 meters is the threshold for seeing emotion
-We can see and understand best horizontally- action on the same plane (not as good for stuff above and below us)
-Taking into account our thresholds of sight and understanding gives spacesĀ āthe human dimensionā
-Interaction with the streetscape is limited after 2 stories- the facade and content of the first floor is most important b/c it is within our direct field of vision
-Moving too quickly (as in cars), the urban environment cannot be complex, interesting, emotional or detailed b/c we cannot take in information that quickly
-To build for certain types of interactions, know theĀ āhidden dimensionsā
0-18 in: intimate distance (emotional, love)
18 in-4 ft: personal conversations
4-12 ft: social (larger groups, less intimate)
>12 ft: public (teacher-student, street performers)
-Narrow tables create small, personal settings while wide tables stay formal
-Smaller, closely-packed spaces create emotion and connection
-āMake sure thereās never quite enough roomā- makes a space seem valuable, desirable, important if there arenāt enough seats
-Small spaces are warm, exciting, emotionally intense while large spaces are cool, impersonal, and formal
-Human scale urban environments encourage walking and cycling, are also more welcoming and perhaps economically viable (why malls, restaurants are built the way they are)
-Tall buildings are inevitable- but their lower stories must be human-scale, beautiful, and engaging