HAPPY SANS SWEEP QUEEN DEATH DAY
Happy 1 year anniversary of whatever this was
wallacepolsom

oozey mess
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
No title available
AnasAbdin
will byers stan first human second

pixel skylines

祝日 / Permanent Vacation
Acquired Stardust
noise dept.

izzy's playlists!
Monterey Bay Aquarium
sheepfilms

JVL
we're not kids anymore.
$LAYYYTER
hello vonnie
cherry valley forever

ellievsbear

JBB: An Artblog!

seen from Israel

seen from United States

seen from Brazil

seen from Italy

seen from Türkiye
seen from T1

seen from Australia

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Italy

seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from Canada
seen from Australia

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Ireland
seen from Malaysia
@everythingfromdust
HAPPY SANS SWEEP QUEEN DEATH DAY
Happy 1 year anniversary of whatever this was
i thionk we should dump hundreds of gallons of acid on lady liberty to turn her copper again. i think itd be cool. and i think the hudson bay could handle all the acid because its got that new yawk spirit.
here's how this will work. i will teach you the concept of baseball and linear time. and in return, you will give me some coping strategies to deal with the loss of my beloved wife.
trade offer!
[id: a digital drawing of Benjamin Sisko from Star Trek Deep Space Nine, the drawing is a redraw of the trade offer meme. Sisko is standing and facing forward, he's holding his palms against the other and infront of his chest and he has a serious expression. Above his head is a red box with yellow danger triangles on each side and text in the middle of the box that says, "trade offer". On the left of Sisko is centered text that says, "i receive: coping mechanisms." On the right of him is centered text that says, "you receive: the concept of linear time, baseball." The background is a medium purple with various lines pointing outwards. /end id]
Hey is the ds9 fandom psychic? Because I just watched the pilot for the first time last night and now I am given this
I’m not saying it’s right, but I understand (x)
I’m saying it’s right
I’m saying it’s right
I’m saying it’s right
im saying it’s right
A people’s hero
Me: I guess I was technically homeless for awhile as a kid, but we weren't, like, really homeless? After we got evicted from our rental house, we had to stay in a small industrial warehouse that was being rented for storage by some family friends. Like, it sucked, and I wasn't allowed to go outside, and it was a huge secret I had to keep from everyone at school because my parents were terrified I'd be taken away by CPS, and if the cops or property owner had found us we definitely would have been in trouble, but, like. We had a roof over our heads. Does that count as homeless? I dunno.
My friends who have genuinely never been homeless, ever: ....that is not normal, holy shit!?!?!?!?!
Me: ...okay so I guess I was homeless, then.
Anyway, this is a reminder that homelessness encompasses more than just "lives in a box under an overpass." Like, yes, that is definitely a real experience with homelessness, but it isn't the only one. Homelessness can look like couch surfing, living in your car, living illegally in a rented storage unit, living in a tent at a campground, living in a motel room, or any number of other things.
(Also, impostor syndrome around homelessness is just about the weirdest feeling in the world, tbh. The "was I suffering enough to say I was suffering?" thoughts are eternal.)
Need to put together a spreadsheet for every single time they buy something with Latinum to figure out it's conversion to the 2024 dollar
Click for better quality.
I zoned out for two and a half hours and came to with this 81 line spreadsheet on my screen. Everything ranging from tipping culture on Ferenginar to Quark's price to (help) kill 28 million people at 10 million bars. The only thing I didn't want to include was all the tongo sales and risks and whatnot.
The best thing I can point to for a place to base this conversion rate around is the 16 bottles of root beer being ~10 slips of latinum or .005 bars.
I just started watching ds9 for the first time last night so I'm keeping this for my research
tumblr is, if anything, the Appalachia of social media...easy to get lost, sparsely populated, out of the loop with fast-moving modern trends. Attached to tradition. Close-knit communities. Believe in "talk shit, get hit." Everyone is doing their own thing in their own obscure little holler. Prone to pulling the most inventive turns of phrase you've ever heard out of nowhere. Somebody's always starting a racket. We sometimes repel outsiders with much aggression. Lots of talk about hell and damnation to be found. Everybody tends to forget about us for some reason
What is pirating media but the moonshining of the internet
so like I said, I work in the tech industry, and it's been kind of fascinating watching whole new taboos develop at work around this genAI stuff. All we do is talk about genAI, everything is genAI now, "we have to win the AI race," blah blah blah, but nobody asks - you can't ask -
What's it for?
What's it for?
Why would anyone want this?
I sit in so many meetings and listen to genuinely very intelligent people talk until steam is rising off their skulls about genAI, and wonder how fast I'd get fired if I asked: do real people actually want this product, or are the only people excited about this technology the shareholders who want to see lines go up?
like you realize this is a bubble, right, guys? because nobody actually needs this? because it's not actually very good? normal people are excited by the novelty of it, and finance bro capitalists are wetting their shorts about it because they want to get rich quick off of the Next Big Thing In Tech, but the novelty will wear off and the bros will move on to something else and we'll just be left with billions and billions of dollars invested in technology that nobody wants.
and I don't say it, because I need my job. And I wonder how many other people sitting at the same table, in the same meeting, are also not saying it, because they need their jobs.
idk man it's just become a really weird environment.
Like, I remember reading an article and one of the questions the author posed and that's repeated here stuck with me, namely: what is it for? If this is a trillion dollar investment what's the trillion dollar problem it is solving?
I finally think I have an answer to that. It's to eliminate the need to pay another person ever again. The trillion dollar problem it's solving is Payroll.
Except like... it's not solving that either.
A metaphor I've been using lately is that being a tech-interested person and watching the AI hype is like if you had followed the development of blenders for years. You watched them go from prototypes that were basically just a spinning open blade all the way to a design that has the potential to be a consumer Vitamix! It's really cool! Blenders have come such a long way, and they're ready for prime time!
And then you turn on the news and see otherwise rational, intelligent people saying "gosh, imagine, soon we'll replace all of our chefs, and our surgeons, and our high school teachers with blenders!" and your friends and family all nod and agree and say things like "wow, blenders can basically do everything now!" And when you ask people "are you HIGH?!" they show you the new blender they bought, and how well it makes a smoothie, and then they act like that's evidence for a statement like "blenders will replace 90% of the workforce" not being utterly nonsensical and deranged.
"Scientists just have to fix the hallucination problem!" they say. When you ask what the hallucination problem is, they say "I'll show you" and then they put their unfinished math homework into the blender and hit pulse. "You see, I wanted it to solve those math problems, but it just shredded the paper. It must have hallucinated a world where the answer to 2+2 was puree." When you point out that it did exactly what it was designed to do, because a blender cannot do math and it will never do math and expecting it to be able to do math just because it can make both smoothies and soup is ludicrous and bizarre, they tell you that they're sure that blenders will be able to do math any day now, just you wait, "I mean, look how far they've come! A year ago I would have said that blenders could never be strong enough to blend ice into sorbet, but now they can. So who are you to say they'll never do math???"
The thing is, there are plenty of things that LLMs and generative AI are good for. OCR is still a vital need, and AI is excellent at it. Facial recognition is an area where AI has a lot of potential. It can be used as a screening step for the analysis of all sorts of large datasets. Better autocomplete on your phone is a real thing that real people want. There are a ton of problems that these tools genuinely do solve!
...But none of them are trillion dollar problems, and that's an issue, because no one wanted to pour a trillion dollars into "improved OCR" and "somewhat better autocomplete".
So, we get snakeoil to make up the weight. It'll solve payroll; it'll democratize visual art; it'll make it so that anyone can do anything – you name it, blenders will do it, eventually! Once we've fixed the problems with using blenders to do everything, including tasks which aren't blending things, then blenders will be worth the trillion dollars that people have already spent developing them! Look at the progress we've already made: we're working on attaching a calculator to the blender, and that could make it so that blenders can do math! Don't you dare suggest that calculators already exist and work just fine without being attached to blenders – we need our blenders to do math, because we promised that one day they'd be able to do everything! And they will! Blenders are the future and don't you dare suggest that maybe that future is just "we can blend things now"; if you so much as breath those words, the bubble will pop.
the thing about graphic design is that people will hire a graphic designer to design something for them and then you do and they go "okay but can you make it worse"
umm awesome ad i just got wtf
No, Google Docs, there is a distinct difference between "cussing" and "cursing."
Calling google ‘googie’ is such a power move imo
Tis indeed! Thank you for this addition. Here are some photo examples of the Googie style.
IT HAS A PROPER NAME?!
posts that provide surprise knowledge, balancing out posts that provide net zero knowledge gained, what a rich ecosystem we live in
passages that make you whisper "oh my god"
Here's a key part of the transfemme experience that is very overlooked: when you don't pass, people don't actually see you as a man, or treat you like a man.
Men are generally treated with a level of respect and seriousness that transfemme people don't get. Even if they don't see you as a woman, they still know they can talk over you, they still know to view you as a sexual object.
I think this is also why discussions of "male socialisation" are often very unproductive. I sure as hell wasn't getting treated like the other boys, my abusers definitely understood that. There must be a better word to describe it, but I think there's a huge difference between growing up as a boy and growing up as a "faggot".
its a key part of the policing and reinforcement of masculinity that if you fail to meet the standard of masculinity you are A Faggot and the faggot is someone you can harass and assault. the fear of that disenfranchisement is what drives the performance of masculinity to such a ridiculous degree that people don't wash their assholes or whatever. the benefits of masculinity are not conferred by default they're the reward you receive for being strong and dominant and heterosexual. deviate and you are no longer a man, you are a weak degendered pansy. faggot is the third gender
i think for women who are utterly denied any access to male privilege, it looks binary: on or off. men have it, women don't. all men have an advantage over all women.
but the thing is that it's not a free ride or even a birthright. IT'S A CONTRACT.
you are awarded male privilege when you achieve masculinity and the way you achieve that masculinity is in maintaining, promoting, and enforcing male supremacy. if you break your contract by failure, or even worse by deliberate abdication of the terms, boop! you're punished until you stop or escape or die. privilege means private law, and it cuts both ways: the benefits men award their winners are much nicer than what women get, but the punishment the losers and the traitors get are much worse.
source: im a trans man.
Another reason the "socialization" argument is bullshit is that this demand to uphold the contract goes ALL ways.
If you are a man, you must be the MANLIEST man, and you must PROVE it by punishing those Less Manly Men for their "failure".
And if you are a woman, you must be the PERFECT woman, and you must demonstrate it by punishing other women for their "failures". We just don't tend to see it as being equivalent thanks to...you guessed it, misogyny!
We don't see girl-on-girl gendered bullying for the abuse it is, because "girls are too weak to do serious harm" - it's just "cattiness", it's just "chick fights", it's just what girls do (because they're just all a bunch of overemotional harpy bitches, right?).
It's mothers, not fathers, who are the primary purveyors of "sweetie don't get your dress dirty" "when are you going to get married and give me grandkids?" "it's just ONE dinner please just wear the dress" "you'll never get a boyfriend if you go out looking like that" and all that other bullshit.
You say you don't want kids while being perceived as a woman, and who shows up to INSIST that you're wrong and you'll DEFINITELY change your mind some day? Mostly women - it often feels like the simple phrase "I don't want kids" is a summoning call for every damned tradwife or wannabe tradwife in a 50-mile radius.
Women aren't immune to patriarchal ideology by virtue of being harmed by it - in fact, they have a key role in upholding it.
This said, I would argue that it's not entirely true that the punishment that men get for failing at their role is necessarily worse. It's stricter, how far you can deviate before "punish the freak" kicks in at full force, in some respects (I've never known a 5-year old girl to be smeared as a probable sexual predator for wanting to play with trucks, but MANY kindergarten-age boys being treated as such for wanting to play with Barbies, for example) but more forgiving in others (see: how the threshold for being considered "fat (derogatory)", for women, is "letting it be visible that you have any subcutaneous fat at all like some kind of human"), but once you deviate far enough, it's been my observation that we all kind of meet at the bottom - that is to say, you have the Men, who are valued more than the Women, but BOTH of them are valued more than the freaks, the faggots, the dykes, the trannies, the hermaphrodites, the failures.
But, society at large will dangle a carrot on a string for us. "Just be cisgender", they say. "You can't hack it as a man but you made a perfectly fine tomboy, nothing wrong with that," people say. "You'll never be a real woman, just admit you're a man who likes pink," they say-
Hoping that we forgot that they didn't fucking like that either.
perhaps one of my hotter takes as a queer person but i’m never coming out again. you can figure it out or live in pure ignorance but either way it’s not my problem. the worst thing society ever tried to teach us was that coming out is an obligation. it’s not. it’s a privilege for you to know the depths of who i am, my sexuality included.
I'm at a :.|:; for words.