Interstellar : Things that don't make any sense
There are some theories that are used to explain the movie, such as Einstein's general relativity equations. Relativity were use to depicts the wormholes and the black hole. In creating the wormhole and a super massive rotating black hole (which possesses an ergo sphere, as opposed to a non-rotating black hole), Theoretical physicist Kip Thorne collaborated with visual effects supervisor Paul Franklin and a team of 30 computer effects artists at Double Negative.  The on-screen result is an exotic object that twists its in falling disk of dust and gas into complex shapes, with the overall effect further complicated by gravitational lensing â a real astronomical phenomenon in which a massive foreground object (such as a black hole) warps the light emitted by stars and other bodies located much farther away. The collaboration between Thorne and the "Interstellar" visual-effects people was so successful that the people believe it was real and awesome.
But there is also a couple of points on the record here: The film  do strives for some scientific credibility. The filmmakers really make us to think this might really happen, because, in terms of relativity theory, itâs straight out of a textbook. Thorne, for example, has long said that time travel is possible but you canât change the past, thereâs only one version of space time. You can go into the past but only do what you already did, which doesnât really make any sense. The movie also includes all this space-cowboy stuff, with McConaughey channeling Han Solo and Chuck Yeager, feeling the air as he flies into a completely alien planet, not to mention into wormholes and black holes and somehow never getting mushed out. At one point he steals a spaceship when no oneâs looking. Really? Each plot twist seems too impossible and unlikely to happen. Â
The second question is âWhy would we even consider choosing a planet that close a black hole? Surely, robots do not fear death but they also donât make decisions based on emotions. At one point Brand tells Cooper they arenât looking for a new home, but a rock to cling to for a moment while humanity catches its breath. But much like time, âa momentâ in human history is relative. Humans have to not only get to their new home but reestablish themselves and rebuild technology and then flee to a more hospitable planetâŠonly this time without a convenient worm hole. So wherever we end up choosing, it needs to sustain us until we figure out faster than light travel. A planet orbiting a black hole is a ticking time bomb. Humans are stressed out enough about survival without doing science against the clock.
Nevertheless, while the movie might not deliver a perfect sci-fi space adventure movie, the filmmaker do succeeds in  producing a thought-provoking piece of science fiction. For fans who genuinely enjoy cerebral films that require some interpretation, Interstellar should offer a satisfying next installment in Nolanâs well-respected career. That said, for viewers who are simply looking to get lost in a thrilling adventure with memorable character, Interstellar may not provide enough traditional entertainment value to balance out its brainy scientific theorizing. On many levels, itâs a very good film, but Interstellar could leave certain moviegoers underwhelmed â and feeling as though they are three-dimensional beings grasping for straws in a five-dimensional movie experience.
source :
wikipedia
Wall, Mike. The Science of Interstellar: Black Holes, Wormholes and Space Travel. Â November 10, 2014.www.space.com














