was caption fun @ez-8 - Tumblr Blog

kingofthefae

come give mommy a kiss 💋

its-funnytwittertweets

technicoloryuri

tongue-twists

WAA NOT EXPECTING A FURSONA REVEAL THIS MORNING BUT IM SO HAPPY BECAUSE THEYRE SO CUTE

I LOVE ARIEL I HAVE HAD ARIEL FOR A LONG TIME BUT I NEED MORE ART OF THEM and also ahem of someone else but I haven't found the right artist yet

the-antlered-one

Please tell us more about Ariel sir :3

tongue-twists

Ariel is a Park Ranger who works in Yosemite National Park! They are wildly scatterbrained but passionate about outreach programs, they love teaching people about their park and the nature within it. Their favorite food is "rice with some bullshit in it" and they can eat several cans of pickled spicy mushrooms in one sitting if the show they're watching is good. They have excellent hearing and eyesight which makes them a little jumpy at times. Their favorite part of patrolling hiking trails is birdwatching and especially identifying bird calls. They have absences from time to time. Don’t worry about it. Don't worry about the chunks of time they don't remember. They don't worry at all. They know it's probably fine.

brdteeth

infinite and endless possibilities

tongue-twists

I love sunny mornings

ko-fi

renixie

a moment's rest~

tongue-twists

Hii sorry for the random ask, but I'm looking for more info on 15,000 year old depiction of lesbian oral sex and can't find anything online and was hoping u could help me source it tyty

Hi hello! Why of course I'm always happy to say more about 15.000 year old depiction of lesbian oral sex - it is from a series of carved slabs of limestone found in La Marche cave in France. It is one of 1.500 such slabs in fact, which all look very cool and have animals and human figures depicted clothed or naked or, in this case, well. The fact that it is a depiction of lesbian oral sex is not "confirmed" because it is almost impossible to ascribe meaning to paleolithic art, and also because it might have been carved in two parts, one figure then the other, rather than both at the same time and meant to be read as a couple interacting. But also maybe the second figure was carved on top of the other one in order to infer that interaction when it wasn't present with the first carving? very hard to say. I personally, with no authority on the matter whatsoever and no paleontology degree, declare it's a woman giving head from behind to another woman and that makes me happy.