felixdwqins

janet / twenty two / jungkook love blog

[windows-in-art]

Heather Ihn Martin

[gendernewtral]

*missing the charging port on my phone* don’t think about it don’t think about it don’t think about it

[lanszhan]

TXT - Blue Hour

[jjunies]

☠️💀

[snwenaz]

TXT — 2021 SEASON’S GREETINGS

[pinkmatters-deactivated20220507]

“I would rather be young at heart and always looking for a new challenge than become some mature know-it-all. And no matter what others think, I want to be someone who stays true to himself. I want to defend what I believe in and break down the wall built of the world’s stereotypes and prejudices any time I come up against it. As an artist, I would like to become someone who can make others feel better through my music. After all, I myself have found comfort in other people’s music“- Yeonjun, “My failures made me who I am today”

[magicislnd]

[mainflopgirl]

can we all stop acting like a woman’s life is over the moment she turns 30

[mainflopgirl]

at the age of 37 maggie gyllenhaal was told that she was too old to play the love interest to a 55 year old man. Judging a woman by how young (and let’s be real- fuckable to men) she looks while males are allowed to age gracefully with no consequences leads to lower self-esteem in women, possible discrimination in the workplace, and a culture of pedophilia persisting when only 20-somethings are deemed appropriate love interests to older men. it is so fucking gross let women age naturally without deeming them worthless because you’re scared of graying hair you fucking cowards

[suga-kookiemonster]

[jjeongukie-deactivated20210409]

the most beautiful angel

[cutegirlonline-deactivated20181]

me when i go to barnes n noble and spend $38.78

[jiminslight]

babie says hi

[alisonzai]

[exhaled-spirals]

“Online, we easily find “company” but are exhausted by the pressures of performance. We enjoy continual connection but rarely have each other’s full attention. We are lonely but fearful of intimacy. Our networked life allows us to hide from each other, even as we are tethered to each other. Digital connections may offer the illusion of companionship without the demands of friendship. [They offer] just the right amount of access, just the right amount of control, [putting] people not too close, not too far, but at just the right distance. The world is now full of […] people who take comfort in being in touch with a lot of people whom they also keep at bay.”

— Sherry Turkle, Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other

[whitepeopletwitter]

[chaoskirin2]

XD this is hilarious but it’s actually a compliment to Dr. Gotian and she’s probably very excited about this!

A lot of peer reviews are double-blind, which means the reviewer doesn’t know whose work they’re reading in order to prevent bias. (Especially in STEM, where the Good Old Boys tend to dismiss the expertise of women.)

Other fields are starting to employ double-blind methods as well, such as auditions for prestigious orchestras, where bias also leans toward white men.

In any case, what this means to Dr. Gotian is that the peer reviewer had read her work extensively enough to be like “HOLY SHIT SOMEONE IS PLAGIARIZING MY FAVE!!!! HOW DARE THEY!!!!” and told the “writer” (who happened to be the reviewer’s fave :D) that they really ought to properly credit their research.

It also means that the reviewer refused to let someone benefit from Dr. Gotian’s research without crediting her, which is huge. I think some reviewers would have let this slide.

So good on the mystery reviewer for catching this and ensuring proper credit… Even if the result is a bit embarrassing.

[leaving-this]

much uwu about nothing

[ihatemynose]

wish i could take my brain out and blow on it like a nintendo ds game card