Istanbul Food

[foodistanbul]

Early Education in Bulgaria

During the Turkish domination, up until the political emancipation of Bulgaria on February 19, 1878, schools were run mainly by national religious communities. Despite the challenges posed by the Turkish authorities and the Greek Church, which had spiritual control over Bulgarian communities until 1872, organized schools continued to exist throughout the country.

These schools often had very limited resources, relying only on private donations and church foundations for funding. Yet, they educated many Bulgarians who later became leaders in the struggle for religious and political freedom. These individuals, when the country gained independence, played key roles as politicians, officials, and educators, helping to build the young Bulgarian state.

Focus on Public Instruction After Emancipation

After the Russo-Turkish War, one of the first priorities of the new Bulgarian authorities was the reorganisation of public education. In Eastern Roumelia, schools were placed under the Direction of Public Instruction, while in Northern Bulgaria, a special Ministry of Public Instruction was created Istanbul Tours.

Primary education was made compulsory for all children, both boys and girls. In Southern Bulgaria, this was regulated by the “Provisional Regulations” published by Governor-General Prince Alexander Bogoridi. In the Principality of Bulgaria, Article 78 of the Constitution confirmed that elementary education is obligatory for all inhabitants.

Reorganisation of Schools

Once the Direction of Public Instruction and the Ministry of Public Instruction were established, they immediately began reforming the school system. Special laws were passed in 1880, covering both primary and secondary education, aiming to standardize the curriculum and improve the quality of teaching.

When Bulgaria and Eastern Roumelia united, the educational laws of Eastern Roumelia were repealed, and the Principality’s laws, regulations, and educational programs were applied uniformly across the entire country. This ensured consistent education standards and helped integrate the two regions into a single national system.

Despite centuries of foreign domination and limited resources, Bulgaria maintained organized schools. After independence, the government made education a national priority, introducing compulsory schooling, reforming the curriculum, and creating a modern and unified educational system to support the development of the country and its citizens.

[foodistanbul]

Religious and Minority Courts

Separate Tribunals for Different Faiths

Under the new administrative system in Bulgaria after 1878, different religious communities were allowed to have their own tribunals. This included the Orthodox Christians, Mahommedans (Muslims), and Jews. Each of these groups could settle certain civil matters according to their own traditions.

The idea was to respect the diverse customs and traditions of the population while introducing a modern system of justice. However, plans to create commercial courts in major trade centers were never fully implemented.

Military Courts

The military courts continued to function as they had since the proclamation of July 1, 1877. Their jurisdiction and procedures were maintained, ensuring that military matters were handled separately from civil cases Istanbul Tour Guide.

Tolerance Towards the Mahommedans

The new government showed great tolerance toward the Mahommedans, who had recently been the ruling class under Ottoman rule. Several measures made this tolerance clear:

The official language of the courts was Bulgarian or Russian, which the Turkish population often could not understand.

The courts were instructed to respect local and national customs until new laws could be prepared.

These policies were designed to show that the new regime was different from the previous Ottoman system, which had been strict and intolerant toward the Christian population.

Special Turkish Civil Courts

To implement these principles, the Provisional Rules allowed the creation of special Turkish civil courts. These courts were distinct from the traditional religious courts that the Mahommedans had under Ottoman rule.

The Mahommedan courts had the same jurisdiction as the ordinary courts when both parties in a case were Muslims.

If the parties were of different nationalities, the case was heard jointly by the Mahommedan court and the ordinary court. The oldest member of the courts would act as the presiding judge.

This system ensured that justice respected both national and religious diversity, while gradually introducing the population to the new civil procedures of the Principality.

The creation of religious and minority courts was a key feature of early post-liberation Bulgaria. It allowed communities to maintain their traditions while ensuring fairness in civil matters. By combining Councils of Elders, ordinary courts, and special Mahommedan tribunals, the Provisional Rules created a flexible and inclusive system of justice that recognized the diverse population of the Principality.

[foodistanbul]

Forests and Vegetation

Forests of the Plains and Mountains

The plains of Bulgaria are mostly covered with oak forests (Quercus species). These oaks grow widely and are the most common trees in the lower areas. Above 500 metres, the beech tree (Fagus sylvatica) becomes the dominant species and is the most important tree of the Bulgarian mountains.

In the middle mountain zones, oaks and beeches grow together. Oaks cover the lower slopes, while beeches dominate the upper slopes. Evergreen oaks are found above 1,000 metres. Other trees mixed with oak and beech include hornbeam (Carpinus betulus), elm (Alnus glutinosa), and plane trees (Acer pseudoplatanus) Turkey Sightseeing.

Above the beech forests, particularly in the Rhodopes and Rilo mountains, conifer forests are common. These include fir trees (Abies pectinate, Picea excelsa), pines (Pinus silvestris, Pinus laricio), and juniper (Juniperus nana). In some areas, the beech has replaced the conifers, making them rare in the Stara-Planina and Ossogovo mountains.

On the hills and lower slopes, forests are replaced by shrubs, brambles, and thorns. Among these, lilac groves (Syringa vulgaris) are especially characteristic. The north ridge of the Rhodopes provides a clear example of the vertical distribution of trees:

Oaks grow up to 700 metres

Beech trees up to 1,300 metres, mixed with conifers above 1,100 metres

The highest tree-covered region reaches 1,900 metres

Southern Bulgaria and Agriculture

Southern Bulgaria, sheltered from cold north winds by the Stara-Planina, is rich in southern plants. The main crops grown are wheat, maize, and barley. Other crops include rye, oats, millet, and spelt, while buckwheat is rare. Rice is common in the Maritza valley, and potatoes are being introduced in less fertile areas.

Fruit cultivation is important. Grapes grow well up to 500 metres, while mulberry trees thrive in lower zones. This combination of forests and fertile plains makes Bulgaria rich in natural resources and agricultural potential, supporting both mountain and lowland communities.

[foodistanbul]

The Crusaders and the Walls of Blachernae

The Setting of the Attack

In the early 13th century, the forces of the Fourth Crusade reached the walls of Constantinople. The Venetian fleet, flying the banner of St. Mark, entered the Golden Horn under the leadership of Doge Enrico Dandolo. On land, the Crusader army, commanded by Baldwin of Flanders, set up their camp on the hill just west of the Palace of Blachernae.

The city’s defenders were well-prepared. On the towers and walls stood the famous Varangian Guard, composed mostly of Englishmen and Danes. Known for their loyalty and bravery, these warriors were considered equals to the Crusaders in courage and strength. Meanwhile, Emperor Alexius III and his court looked on from the palace windows, watching anxiously as events unfolded Private Tours Bulgaria Varna.

The Grand Assault of July 17, 1203

On July 17, 1203, the Crusaders launched a large-scale attack by both land and sea. The army on land struck at the fortress formed by the Walls of Heraclius and Leo, while the fleet targeted the nearby harbor defenses.

With the help of long ladders, fifteen knights and sergeants managed to climb the outer wall. They fought fiercely against the defenders at the top, engaging in a desperate hand-to-hand struggle. The attempt was bold, but the defenders had the advantage. Armed with swords and heavy battle-axes, the Varangian Guard fought with deadly force. Two of the attackers were captured, and the rest were forced back down, retreating in defeat.

Many other Crusaders who came to support the assault were wounded. The fighting was so hard against the Latins at this section of the wall that the balance began to turn in favor of the Byzantines. Although Dandolo and the Venetians had already captured twenty-five towers along the harbor fortifications, he was forced to leave his gains and sail back quickly with his fleet to aid his struggling allies on land.

The Siege of 1453

More than two centuries later, during the final siege of Constantinople in 1453, the walls of Blachernae were once again at the center of history. By that time, the moat in front of the walls had been filled with earth. To strengthen the defenses, it was excavated again by the crews of the Venetian galleys under the command of Aluxio Diedo.

The moat was dug 200 paces long and 3 feet wide, with Emperor Constantine XI and his court present at the work. On a nearby hill, two sentries kept watch on the Turkish forces, who were preparing for their decisive assault.

The walls of Blachernae witnessed some of the most dramatic moments in Byzantine history. In 1203, the Crusaders failed to break through their defenses, despite the determination of the Venetians and knights. In 1453, during the empire’s final days, the same walls saw desperate efforts by Byzantines and their Venetian allies to hold back the Ottoman tide. Both episodes reveal the symbolic and strategic importance of this part of Constantinople’s fortifications—standing as a barrier between empire and invader for centuries.

[foodistanbul]

Women and Men Working Together

In modern Bosnia, Muslim women now work side by side with men, just like in Hungary. This change reflects the country’s social progress. In the past, many Muslim husbands would not allow their wives or daughters to be treated by Christian doctors, believing it was against the will of Allah. However, this old superstition is slowly disappearing. Today, many enlightened Muslim families recognize the benefits of Western medicine, and they now accept treatment from non-Muslim doctors, especially when it is necessary.

Western Influence and Cultural Change

Muslims in Bosnia who have seen the positive effects of reforms—such as improvements in farming, education, and government—are beginning to change their ways of thinking. While they remain strongly attached to Islam, they are also starting to adopt modern habits and customs from the Western world. This includes improved roles for women, greater public participation, and a more open-minded view of society.

Women’s Position is Improving

As a result of these cultural changes, the lives of Muslim women in Bosnia are slowly becoming more free and meaningful. They are no longer limited to the low status they traditionally held in other Muslim societies. Today, Bosnian women have more opportunities, and they are less restricted by old customs.

There is a common misunderstanding that Islam teaches that women have no souls or cannot go to paradise. This is not true. In fact, the Qur’an clearly teaches that women have souls and are eligible for eternal life in Paradise, just like men. The reason women do not attend mosques at the same time as men is not religious law, but long-standing cultural tradition. In many mosques, there are special times set aside for women to pray, though in some mosques they may not be allowed to enter at all Sofia Guided Tours.

Misconceptions About the Turk

Although the Turk has often been portrayed as cruel or harsh, this is not always the case. In fact, he has many admirable qualities. His religion, Islam, promotes many virtuous values, and most Muslims respectfully follow the Prophet’s teachings.

The Muslim character is sometimes full of contradictions. For example, it is often said that in Turkish courts, justice is influenced by bribery, and that many officials are corrupt. However, those who know Muslim communities well say that a Muslim’s word or oath, especially when dealing with another Muslim, can usually be trusted completely.

The Power of an Oath

In places like Bosnia and Egypt, when there is a legal dispute between two Muslims, the defendant will often demand that the plaintiff be required to testify under oath. This is because Muslims believe that if someone swears an oath, they must speak the truth. Their faith teaches that lying will prevent them from entering the afterlife. Therefore, falsehood is considered a very serious sin.

Corruption Is Cultural, Not Religious

The widespread corruption found in Turkish-controlled regions is not caused by the Islamic religion, but actually exists despite it. Islam itself teaches honesty, justice, and fairness. Unfortunately, these principles are not always followed in practice, especially by those in positions of power.

[foodistanbul]

Prince Alexander's Return to Bulgaria

After his forced abdication, Prince Alexander returned to Sofia, where he was welcomed with great enthusiasm by the Bulgarian people. They celebrated his return in triumph. However, staying true to his honest nature, Prince Alexander immediately sent a telegram to Czar Alexander III of Russia, saying:

“I received my crown from Russia. I am ready to return it to the hands of her sovereign whenever it is demanded.”

The Czar’s response was swift and predictable. He expressed his disapproval of Prince Alexander’s return to Bulgaria and criticized his administration. Despite the support of Stambouloff and other Bulgarian leaders, who begged Prince Alexander to stay and challenge Russia, Alexander decided that it was best for him to step down to avoid a potential war with Russia Ephesus Sightseeing.

Prince Alexander’s Decision to Abdicate

In his final act as ruler of Bulgaria, Prince Alexander demanded a promise from the Czar. He asked that Russia would allow the Bulgarian people to manage their own affairs without interference. Sadly, this promise was broken within thirty days, and Russia continued to interfere in Bulgarian politics.

After appointing a regency, Prince Alexander officially abdicated the throne. Despite his departure, he left Bulgaria with the love and respect of the people. He went into retirement in Austria, taking the title of Count Hartenau, where he remained until his death in 1893.

The Search for a New King

Once Prince Alexander abdicated, Bulgaria needed a new king. The first choice was Prince Waldemar of Denmark, a member of the royal family and the brother of several European monarchs, including the Queen of Great Britain. However, Prince Waldemar refused the offer, fearing that accepting the throne would upset his brother-in-law, Czar Alexander III, who had forced Alexander to give up his crown.

To find a new ruler, a committee was sent to various European capitals, looking for a suitable king. During this time, Stambouloff, the president of Bulgaria’s parliament, took control of the country as regent. His policies were openly anti-Russian, and he refused to follow any orders from Russia.

Stambouloff’s Leadership and Russian Defeat

Despite Russian efforts to regain control, including sending two commissioners to Bulgaria and sending Russian warships to the port of Varna, Stambouloff stood firm. He treated the Russian officials respectfully but made it clear that Bulgaria would not follow their demands.

Eventually, the Russians became frustrated and withdrew all their officials, including consuls and military personnel, leaving Bulgaria to govern itself. It is unclear what Czar Alexander III had hoped would happen. He might have expected chaos in Bulgaria, which could give him an excuse to send in the Russian army. However, this did not happen. Instead, Bulgaria remained peaceful and stable.

Stambouloff’s Successful Leadership

Stambouloff proved to be an effective leader. He ruled the country well and followed many of the policies that had been set by the deposed Prince Alexander. His anti-Russian stance continued, but he managed to keep Bulgaria peaceful and prosperous during a time of great political uncertainty.

[foodistanbul]

Doubts About the Earliest Wall

Some historians believe the account of an early city wall around Byzantium may be just a legend. It might have been based only on guesses, especially the idea that the Arch of Urbicius and the Arch of the Milion once marked the gates in an ancient wall. These structures could have given later writers the impression of an earlier, larger defense system.

However, it is very likely that early Byzantium was much smaller than it became later in history. In that case, the arches could indeed show where the first walls built outside the Acropolis once stood. This means the story may hold some truth, though it might not be entirely accurate Sofia Daily Tours.

The Third Line of Walls

We now move to the third and most significant set of walls that protected ancient Byzantium. These walls were responsible for making the city one of the greatest fortresses in the ancient world. According to historical sources, these walls enclosed a circuit of thirty-five stadia (about 6.5 kilometers), which included most of the land occupied by the First and Second Hills of the city.

Ports Along the Golden Horn

The walls ran along the Golden Horn, starting from the tip of the promontory and reaching the west side of the bay. This area is where the valley between the Second and Third Hills—now known as the Valley of the Grand Bazaar—meets the water.

This bay was a key center of trade and activity. It had three ports, which were either natural or man-made. These served the busy shipping industry of Byzantium. One of the best-known ports was at the Neorion, near today’s Bâğçe Kapısı.

Strong and Advanced Fortifications

The walls were famous in ancient times for their great strength. Builders used large, squared blocks of hard stone that were carefully fitted together. Metal clamps held the stones in place, making the walls so solid that they seemed like a continuous rock formation.

One of the towers was called the Tower of Hercules, named for its impressive size and durability. Seven other towers were believed to be so finely built that they could echo even the quietest sound, alerting soldiers to enemy movements and preventing surprise attacks.

Built After Victory Over the Persians?

The style of the construction suggests that these walls were likely built soon after Pausanias, the Greek general, defeated the Persians at Plataea and later drove them out of Byzantium. This period marks the beginning of Byzantium’s rise as a major defensive stronghold in the ancient world.

[foodistanbul]

Cultural Delights in Sofia

If you can tear yourself away from the fashion and sports channels in Sofia’s cafés and bars, you’ll discover a rich world of cultural experiences. Sofia offers high-quality art, music, theater, and more—and the ticket prices are surprisingly affordable by Western standards. There’s really no excuse to miss out.

Art Galleries Worth Visiting

Sofia is full of diverse art galleries showcasing both local and international talent. Here are some top choices:

Art Gallery Paris (B‑4, ul. Parizh 8; tel. [phone]; gallery‑paris.com)

A charming gallery representing young Bulgarian artists, especially those working in expressive, figurative styles Mystical Bulgaria Tours.

Open: 11:00–19:00, Mon–Fri

Closed: Sat–Sun

Galeria Akademia (B‑4, ul. Shipka 1; tel. [phone]) Hosted by the Bulgarian Academy of Fine Arts, it features prestigious group exhibitions.

Open: 11:00–19:00, Mon–Fri

Goethe-Institut Sofia (B‑4, ul. Budapeshta 1; tel. [phone]; goethe.de/sofia) Germany’s cultural centre hosts contemporary art exhibits and cultural events.

Open: Mon–Fri 10:00–14:00; Tue–Thu 14:00–19:00

Closed: Sat–Sun

Krug+ (Circle Plus) (B‑4, ul. Budapeshta 5; tel. [phone]) A cool gallery space showcasing cutting-edge work by local and international artists.

Open: 10:00–19:00, Mon–Fri; Sat–Sun 10:00–18:00

Lessedra Gallery (C‑3, ul. Milin kamak 25; tel. [phone]; lessedra.com) Specializes in Bulgarian and international prints and graphics. A great place to buy art.

Open: 15:00–19:00, Mon–Fri

Closed: Sat–Sun

Maksim (B‑2, ul. Loryn 11; tel. [phone]) Features contemporary work by leading Bulgarian painters and sculptors.

Open: 11:00–18:30, Mon–Fri

Closed: Sat–Sun

Rakursi Gallery (C‑3, ul. Khan Krum 4A; tel. [phone]; rakursi.com) A small private gallery with a mix of established and emerging Bulgarian artists. Offers paintings, prints, photos, and sculptures at all price levels.

Open: 10:00–19:00, Mon–Fri; Sat 11:00–18:00

Closed: Sun

Shipka 6 (B‑5, ul. Shipka 6; tel. [phone]; abhart.com) Located in the Bulgarian Artists’ Union building, Shipka 6 hosts a variety of exhibitions by local and international artists.

Open: 10:00–18:00, Tue–Sun

Closed: Mon

Sibank Gallery (B‑3, ul. Slavyanska 2; tel. [phone]) Run by a major bank, it showcases big names in Bulgarian contemporary art. Expect conceptual installations and modern works.

Open: 11:00–19:00, Mon–Fri

Closed: Sat–Sun

Sofia City Art Gallery (B‑3, ul. Gurko 1; tel. [phone]; sghg.cult.bg) This municipal gallery features high-profile shows by Bulgarian and international artists. It’s run by a creative curatorial team and is one of the best places to explore current Bulgarian art.

Open: 10:00–18:00, Mon–Fri; Sun 11:00–17:00

Closed: Mon

Tea Gallery (E‑2, ul. Dimitar Hadzhikotsev 10; tel. [phone]) A small spot featuring quirky and edgy contemporary paintings.

Open: 10:00–20:00, Mon–Fri; Sat 11:00–15:00

Closed: Sun

The Red House Cultural Centre

The Red House (Chervenata Kashta) (C‑4, ul. Lyuben Karavelov 15; tel. [phone]; redhouse-sofia.org) An early twentieth-century building converted into one of Sofia’s leading independent cultural centres. It features exhibitions, small concerts, video screenings, drama, and workshops. This creative hub attracts Sofia’s artsy crowd and hosts cutting-edge events.

Why Sofia’s Cultural Scene is a Must-See

Affordable prices: By Western standards, tickets to galleries, shows, and events are cheap.

Variety: Sofia offers a range of cultural experiences—traditional art, conceptual exhibitions, small performances, and community-led projects.

Fresh perspectives New galleries like Krug+ and Tea feature experimental and daring artwork.

Taking even a small break from TV will open you to an exciting, rich cultural world hidden in Sofia’s galleries and cultural centres. Whether you’re an art lover, a curious traveler, or just looking for something different, Sofia’s cultural scene is there, waiting to impress.

[foodistanbul]

O'Mahony Letters on the Balkans in 1914

First Letter: The Bulgarian and Serbian Treaty Before the War of 1912 November 2nd, 1914

Great Britain’s Declaration of War

Great Britain declared war on Germany because Germany broke a treaty, and by doing so, Britain gained eternal honor. In 1913, Bulgaria was forced to go to war with Serbia because Serbia broke a treaty. So, are treaties made by Great Powers more important than treaties made by smaller countries?

The Problem with Small Nations and Treaties

Since the Treaty of Berlin, which was one of the worst decisions in modern European history, the freedom of small nations has been ignored, and promises made to them have been broken. Military power and territorial greed have shaped the decisions of Europe’s leaders Sightseeing Turkey.

When Germany took control of Alsace and Lorraine, it made war between France and Germany inevitable. Similarly, if the Treaty of San Stefano had been respected, Bulgaria would have grown stronger and acted as a defense against aggression from more powerful neighbors.

The Treaty of Berlin’s Impact

The Treaty of Berlin placed the mainly Bulgarian population of Macedonia back under Turkish control. It also split the Bulgarian race into two smaller states. This decision put the Balkans at the mercy of powerful neighboring countries, and it set the stage for war between Austria and Russia, a war that was only a matter of time.

Britain’s Responsibility

Great Britain, which played a leading role in the Treaty of Berlin, bears a heavy responsibility for the division of the Bulgarian people. This responsibility still affects Britain more than any other European country today.

[foodistanbul]

Underground Resistance Groups in Bulgaria

Underground Resistance Groups in Bulgaria (1950-1951) During the early years of communist rule in Bulgaria, many underground resistance organizations Underground Resistance Groups in Bulgaria (1950-1951)

During the early years of communist rule in Bulgaria, many underground resistance organizations were formed to oppose the regime. These groups were mainly made up of young people, students, farmers, and intellectuals who rejected the communist government and its policies. The organizations fought for freedom, independence, and democracy, aiming to end the dictatorship of the Communist Party. Below are some key underground organizations formed in the early 1950s:

Key Underground Organizations

Agrarian Youth Union (1950) The Agrarian Youth Union was an underground organization created in Sofia in 1950. It aimed to fight against the communist regime and its policies, focusing on the rights of peasants and workers Private Bosphorus Tours.

Bulgarian Resistance Movement (1950) This underground movement was set up in Sofia in 1950. It was formed to resist the oppressive rule of the communist government and to promote democratic values.

Underground Organization of Samokov (1950) Formed in the autumn of 1950, this group was led by Kiril H. Besov, Atanas B. Batashki, and Vasil Mishev. With 68 members, the organization sought to take up arms and overthrow the regime.

“Call for Freedom” (1950) A youth-based underground organization established in the summer of 1950 in the Ihtiman region. It was led by Slavcho Zashev, who was sentenced to death and executed by firing squad in 1952. His brother, Assen Zashev, was imprisoned for many years.

Youth Organization Against the Fatherland Front (1951) This organization was formed in Sofia and Plovdiv in 1951. It aimed to challenge the communist-controlled Fatherland Front and its policies.

“Partisan Students” (1951) Established in 1951 in Sofia, this group was made up of expelled students. They formed a resistance movement against the regime, demanding freedom of expression and an end to communist rule.

This underground organization was formed in the Plovdiv region in 1951. Its members were dedicated to fighting against the communist government and promoting Bulgarian identity and freedom.

The Goriyani Resistance Movement

The Goriyani Bulgarian Resistance Movement (1951) On April 15, 1951, the Goriyani Bulgarian Resistance Movement was set up in Plovdiv. The group’s main objective was to train and support armed underground resistance groups. By the end of 1951, the organization had established four Goriyani detachments in the Kazanluk, Karlovo, Assenovgrad districts, and the Parvenets region near Plovdiv.

Role of Youth in Resistance

Many of the underground resistance groups were led by young people. They saw their struggle as a fight for freedom and democracy, not just for themselves but for future generations as well. They used various methods to resist the communist regime, including armed uprisings, underground publications, and radio broadcasts.

Resistance Through Radio

The Goriyani underground movement also used radio as a tool for spreading its message. They created a radio station that became the voice of the Bulgarian people’s resistance against the communist dictatorship. One of their broadcasts in May 1955 included a call for freedom and independence from the Bolshevik regime, urging the people of Bulgaria to continue the fight for democracy.

The underground resistance groups in Bulgaria during the 1950s were a significant part of the country’s struggle for freedom. These groups, formed mostly by ordinary citizens and led by young people, fought against the oppressive communist regime that was trying to control every aspect of life. Despite facing severe punishment, including executions and long prison sentences, their courage and determination helped keep the spirit of resistance alive in Bulgaria.

[foodistanbul]

Bulgarian Feminists and Their Struggles

During this time, Bulgarian feminists focused on several important issues. These included:

Peace and anti-war movements. The sexual double standard, where men and women were judged differently for the same behaviors. The abolition of prostitution and other forms of sexual exploitation. Equal pay for equal work. Addressing women’s unpaid labor and housework. Increasing women’s participation in political organizations. Ensuring women’s access to positions of power. The citizenship of married women and their rights. Influence of the International Women’s Movement

Between the two World Wars, Bulgaria’s women’s movement followed the same goals and priorities as the international women’s movement. It mirrored the same features, challenges, and conflicts seen in global women’s organizations Bulgaria Holidays.

Socialists and Women’s Rights

Socialists, including women socialists, saw women’s activism as part of the larger socialist movement rather than as a separate cause. They believed that women’s oppression was caused by the capitalist system and saw socialism as the solution for all types of unfair systems, including those affecting women. They argued that women’s rights would be automatically achieved with the victory of the socialist revolution.

Because of this, socialists rejected bourgeois feminists who were fighting for gender equality within the current social system. In Bulgaria, this was particularly true for the orthodox or strict socialists.

The Division within Bulgarian Socialism

However, there was a reformist branch of socialism in Bulgaria (known as “broad” socialism), which became social democracy after World War I. This group developed a more active and visible women’s organization.

Leftist Women’s Groups like the Bolshevik-linked group and the social-democratic group distanced themselves from “bourgeois feminists”. They viewed feminist efforts as bourgeois ideas and refused to cooperate with bourgeois women’s groups, calling them “separatists”, meaning they were separate from the socialist movement.

[foodistanbul]

Albanians and the Turks

Why I Had an Escort

Let me explain why I had an escort. I didn’t pay anything for it. The Turkish authorities didn’t send the escort because they wanted to honor me personally. In fact, I would have preferred to travel alone with my guide. However, the Turks knew that if I traveled alone, there was a big chance I could be captured by one of the revolutionary “bands” in the hills. If that happened, there would likely be a conflict, and I wouldn’t be released until a ransom was paid, which could be anywhere between £6,000 and £12,000, or even more.

To avoid that, the Turkish authorities sent the escort. They wanted to prevent the situation where their country looked unstable, and they also didn’t want to pay a large ransom. The escort was provided because it was safer for them, especially in areas where these “bands” operated Istanbul Daily Tour.

In the Wildest Part of Turkey

This arrangement was fine as long as I was traveling in areas where the revolutionary “bands” were active. However, once I reached the wildest parts of European Turkey, it wasn’t necessary. The Albanians, unlike the Turks, had no reason to harm me. The Albanian people have always been enemies of the Turks, but they don’t have any issue with Europeans, especially with people from England.

When I spoke with local Albanian peasants, they weren’t sure if I was Austrian, German, Italian, or French at first. But as soon as they realized I was from England, their attitude changed. They seemed eager to treat me with respect and honor.

Albanians and the Turks

In general, Albanians can be seen as brigands towards the Turks. However, even though there were bandits in the hills, I was confident they had no intention of harming me. Albanians may kill, but they don’t steal from Europeans. If my guide and I had been wearing Turkish fezzes, we might have had trouble with the bandits. But the Albanian hillmen who might have been watching us from a distance knew we were Europeans and had no interest in causing any problems.

I liked to think, and still do, that instead of the Turkish soldiers protecting me, it was actually me who saved them from being caught in a storm of Albanian gunfire.

[foodistanbul]

The British Consulate in a Small Turkish Town

In the far distance, he imagines himself becoming a full Consul, earning £800 a year, or even rising to the position of Consul-General with £1,000. But right now, he is Acting Vice-Consul in the British Levant Consular Service, earning £400 a year.

The Town and Its Lack of British Interests

It’s unlikely you’ve heard of the small, rundown Turkish town where he represents British interests. In fact, there are no British interests here. There are no British people living in the town, and any British trade has been replaced by active Austrians and Germans. Still, he writes long reports to the Foreign Office, some of which are quoted in Blue Books that no one reads or are stored away in the vaults of Whitehall to gather dust. Despite this, he remains a cheerful young man. His greeting might be formally English, but his handshake is firm. Later, he says a visitor is a rare and welcome event Socialist Museum.

The Vice-Consulate’s Poor Conditions

The British Vice-Consulate in this remote Turkish town is far from the grandeur of the British Empire. The British taxpayer often complains about rising costs, and the officials in Whitehall, who manage the funds, are hard-hearted when it comes to consular requests. A small amount called “office allowance” is given to cover the rent and the salary of the kavass (a messenger), but the main costs are covered by the Vice-Consul himself. So, after paying his rent, which could be anywhere from £40 to £90 a year, furnishing his house, buying two horses, hiring a cook and a servant, paying the kavass’s wages, and feeding everyone, there isn’t much left from his salary.

[foodistanbul]

My Room and Its Decorations

A Colorful Rug

The main decoration in my room was behind the bed. It was a brightly colored rug showing an Arab sheikh escaping with a beautiful woman. She was sitting on the horse’s neck, with her arms around her captor. In the background, there was an Eastern town full of mosques. The rug had as much art as the samplers that our grandmothers used to make, but it had a lot more color.

A Problematic French Door

The room also had a French door, but of course, it got stuck and wouldn’t open properly. The door led to a balcony that seemed so weak and unstable it looked like it could fall into the river below. But surprisingly, it didn’t fall, which puzzled me Ancient Bulgaria Tour.

A Quiet and Inexpensive Stay

I had definitely arrived in a quiet, out-of-the-way part of the world. For breakfast, I had six eggs, plenty of fresh butter, a plate of beans, and another plate of sliced tomatoes. I also had half a liter of wine and a cup of Turkish coffee. The total cost, including the meal for my driver, two glasses of brandy for him, and food for three horses, was just 1 shilling and 7½ pennies.

An Unpleasant Conversation

My conversation with the landlord, whose face looked sour, was short and not very helpful. But then, a cheerful and chubby little man appeared and excitedly said, “Me speak English!”

“Great,” I said, “Where did you learn it?”

“Me speak!” he repeated.

“Yes, I know,” I replied, “But where did you learn it? Did you learn in London?”

“No—small boy—ver’ small boy—two years—Australia; me Englishman; me speak eight languages. Me speak English good, eh?”

“Then can you please tell the landlord I want my room swept?”

“‘Swep’? Me no ‘stand swep’—me speak English, very good English, eh?” he answered.

[foodistanbul]

The Prague Spring

The Prague Spring was a period of political liberalization in Czechoslovakia that began in January 1968 and lasted until August 20, 1968. This movement worried the leaders of the communist parties in Bulgaria and other Eastern European countries under Soviet influence. The political changes in Czechoslovakia raised fears among these leaders, prompting them to take action.

Concerns of the Communist Leaders

As political liberalization unfolded in Czechoslovakia, the Bulgarian government, along with the Soviet Union, Poland, and Hungary, became increasingly concerned. The security services were given new tasks to monitor young people and intellectuals closely, fearing that similar movements could spread to their countries.

On August 3, 1968, party leaders from the Soviet Union, Bulgaria, Poland, Hungary, and Czechoslovakia met in Bratislava. They signed the Bratislava Declaration, which reaffirmed their commitment to communist ideology and condemned bourgeois ideas. Todor Zhivkov, the leader of Bulgaria, was the first to suggest military intervention in Czechoslovakia, a proposal supported by other leaders Rose Festival Tour.

Open Letter from Czechoslovakia

In response to the situation, a group of Czechoslovak experts in Bulgarian language and literature sent an “Open Letter” to the Bulgarian weekly magazine “Literaturen Front.” In this letter, they expressed their concern about the false information being spread in the Bulgarian press regarding events in Czechoslovakia.

Military Intervention

On August 2, 1968, the Bulgarian Council of Ministers passed a secret decree, known as Decree No. 39. This decree authorized military support for the Czechoslovak people in their fight against what the Bulgarian government described as counter-revolution.

The military intervention, called “Operation Danube,” began on August 21, 1968. Joint forces from the Soviet Union, the German Democratic Republic, Poland, Bulgaria, and Hungary invaded Czechoslovakia. Bulgaria contributed two rifle regiments, the 12th and 22nd regiments, totaling 2,164 servicemen and 26 tanks.

Roles of the Bulgarian Regiments

The 12th regiment was tasked with taking control of the areas around the cities of Banska Bystrica and Zvolen, where they needed to disarm local military units. Meanwhile, the 22nd regiment was assigned to secure the Ruzyne and Vodohosti airports near Prague.

Tragically, one Bulgarian soldier from the 22nd regiment was killed during this operation. The soldiers sent to Czechoslovakia were conscripts, meaning they were drafted into service and often did not know their destination until the last moment. Many of these young men were deeply shocked by what they encountered.

Emotional Impact on Soldiers

As some conscripts later recounted, they were traumatized when they saw Czechoslovakian young people, similar in age to themselves, standing in front of their tanks in protest. This moment highlighted the emotional toll that the invasion took on the soldiers, who were caught in a conflict that they did not fully understand.

The Prague Spring represented a significant challenge to the communist regime in Czechoslovakia and sparked fear among leaders in Bulgaria and other Eastern European nations. The military intervention demonstrated the lengths to which these governments would go to maintain control, while also exposing the personal struggles faced by young soldiers forced into a difficult situation.

[foodistanbul]

The Prague Spring

The Prague Spring was a period of political liberalization in Czechoslovakia that began in January 1968 and lasted until August 20, 1968. This movement worried the leaders of the communist parties in Bulgaria and other Eastern European countries under Soviet influence. The political changes in Czechoslovakia raised fears among these leaders, prompting them to take action.

Concerns of the Communist Leaders

As political liberalization unfolded in Czechoslovakia, the Bulgarian government, along with the Soviet Union, Poland, and Hungary, became increasingly concerned. The security services were given new tasks to monitor young people and intellectuals closely, fearing that similar movements could spread to their countries.

On August 3, 1968, party leaders from the Soviet Union, Bulgaria, Poland, Hungary, and Czechoslovakia met in Bratislava. They signed the Bratislava Declaration, which reaffirmed their commitment to communist ideology and condemned bourgeois ideas. Todor Zhivkov, the leader of Bulgaria, was the first to suggest military intervention in Czechoslovakia, a proposal supported by other leaders Rose Festival Tour.

Open Letter from Czechoslovakia

In response to the situation, a group of Czechoslovak experts in Bulgarian language and literature sent an “Open Letter” to the Bulgarian weekly magazine “Literaturen Front.” In this letter, they expressed their concern about the false information being spread in the Bulgarian press regarding events in Czechoslovakia.

Military Intervention

On August 2, 1968, the Bulgarian Council of Ministers passed a secret decree, known as Decree No. 39. This decree authorized military support for the Czechoslovak people in their fight against what the Bulgarian government described as counter-revolution.

The military intervention, called “Operation Danube,” began on August 21, 1968. Joint forces from the Soviet Union, the German Democratic Republic, Poland, Bulgaria, and Hungary invaded Czechoslovakia. Bulgaria contributed two rifle regiments, the 12th and 22nd regiments, totaling 2,164 servicemen and 26 tanks.

Roles of the Bulgarian Regiments

The 12th regiment was tasked with taking control of the areas around the cities of Banska Bystrica and Zvolen, where they needed to disarm local military units. Meanwhile, the 22nd regiment was assigned to secure the Ruzyne and Vodohosti airports near Prague.

Tragically, one Bulgarian soldier from the 22nd regiment was killed during this operation. The soldiers sent to Czechoslovakia were conscripts, meaning they were drafted into service and often did not know their destination until the last moment. Many of these young men were deeply shocked by what they encountered.

Emotional Impact on Soldiers

As some conscripts later recounted, they were traumatized when they saw Czechoslovakian young people, similar in age to themselves, standing in front of their tanks in protest. This moment highlighted the emotional toll that the invasion took on the soldiers, who were caught in a conflict that they did not fully understand.

The Prague Spring represented a significant challenge to the communist regime in Czechoslovakia and sparked fear among leaders in Bulgaria and other Eastern European nations. The military intervention demonstrated the lengths to which these governments would go to maintain control, while also exposing the personal struggles faced by young soldiers forced into a difficult situation.

[foodistanbul]

Persecution of the Church in Bulgaria

Introduction to Marxist Ideology

The German philosopher Karl Marx famously described religion as “the opium of the people.” This statement reflects a core belief of Marxist ideology, which views religion as a tool used to control and pacify the masses. Following this belief, the Bulgarian Communist Party took significant actions against the church and religion in general.

The 1925 Cathedral Bombing

A shocking example of the communist party’s hostility towards religion occurred on April 16, 1925, when a bomb exploded at the “Sveta Nedelya” cathedral in Sofia. This tragic event resulted in the deaths of 213 people and injured around 500 men, women, and children. The bombing exemplified the extreme measures the regime was willing to take against religious institutions Istanbul Tour Guides.

Violence Against Clergy

After the communist coup on September 9, 1944, many individuals, including priests, were persecuted for simply performing their religious duties. During the first days of the regime, a significant number of Christian Orthodox priests were executed without trial or legal proceedings. More than 100 priests were murdered, alongside other religious leaders such as Rabbi Isaac B. Levi, Muslim priest Mohamed Rashidov, Armenian-Gregorian priest Garabed S. Karadzhiyan, and Protestant pastor Stephan Todorov. This wave of violence targeted those who upheld Christian morals and practices.

The 1949 Religion Act

On February 16, 1949, the government published a “Religion Act,” which mirrored similar legislation in the Soviet Union. This Act imposed strict control over all religious institutions in Bulgaria. It prohibited religious services outside of designated church buildings and allowed the state to confiscate all church property. The consequences for practicing religion were severe; students were expelled from schools for attending church services, while clerks and state employees risked losing their jobs if they were seen in church.

Persecution of Protestant Leaders

Between February 25 and March 9, 1949, the communist authorities orchestrated a trial against 15 Protestant pastors. This trial was marked by unfair proceedings, resulting in four pastors receiving life sentences for their religious beliefs and practices.

Execution of Priests

On November 11, 1952, at Sofia Central Prison, four religious leaders were executed by firing squad. The victims included three priests from the Order of the Assumption—Father Kamen Vichev, Father Pavel Dzhidzhov, and Father Yosafat Shishkov—as well as Monseigneur Evgeni Bosilkov, the Bulgarian Passionist bishop. This execution highlighted the extreme measures the regime would take to eliminate religious influence in society.

Campaign Against Bulgarian Muslims

In 1984, the Politburo of the Central Committee of the Bulgarian Communist Party decided to launch a campaign to forcibly change the names of Bulgarian Muslims. This initiative was another attempt to suppress religious identity and enforce a uniform national identity under the communist regime.

The persecution of the church and religious leaders in Bulgaria illustrates the harsh realities faced by those who practiced faith during the communist era. From violent attacks to legal restrictions and forced name changes, the regime sought to eliminate religious influence and control the spiritual lives of its citizens. This dark chapter in Bulgaria’s history serves as a reminder of the struggles faced by religious communities under totalitarian rule.