Reading Response: Photography in the Future and Social Photography
We were assigned two readings this week, one of which speaking of the possible future for photography and how machines may play a much more critical part, and then how in recent years people have mapped the rise and constant flow of photography as a social dynamic.
The article, for me, was probably the more interesting of the two. It spoke of ow we already store billions of photos a day, which leads to trillions and beyond by the end of a year. The insinuation of how many photos are probably out here is overwhelming. But, what Malik said that interested me the most was the fact that machines are already using algorithms to try and mimic how we take photos. And Google and others are already working on making that program better.
At the very end of the article, there is a line mentioning that eventually the desktop photo software may be nothing more than outdated nostalgia brought out to remember the old days. But in that lies another, possibly more disturbing assertion. If machines do eventually master the art of photography, will that art be lost to us as humans once we have a device that can do all of that for us at the push of the button?
And with what the social photography reading mentioned, with the massive amounts of photos, where they are taken, by whom, and all of that. With a device that can take photos for us, will we even need to really travel to these places ourselves anymore? What individualism will photography have when it is all done by machine?
It’s possible also, that I am reading too much into this of course. But in the end, the question is, will the future of photography stay in our hands, or will it be a lost art that is left only to the old masters and zealous hobbyist?