NRL Judiciary System Makes a Blunder
Round One of the NRL has gone by quickly already. With biffs, upsets and crazy skills from different players of different teams, round one has been one of the most exciting rounds I have seen in a while.
In late 2013, after Paul Gallen’s on field fight in origin with Nate Myles, the NRL introduced stricter laws about the ‘biff’ and the serious consequences players would receive if they were to get into a fight with another player (or referee) during a game. Fans were completely outraged across Australia and New Zealand with these new rules, however, after a few months there was no more biffing and/or outrage from fans.
In round one this season, fans were met with two different fights in two different games. Joey Leilua from the Raiders and Gavin Cooper from the Cowboys squared up, and so did Will Chambers from the Storm and Sam Kasiano from the Bulldogs – with Suliasi Vunivalu also joining in on the action.
Usually, in previous years, after a fight on the field, players would be sin binned and placed on report for their wrongdoing, with the judiciary system dealing with their actions later in the round. Usually, players would miss a few games depending on previous offences.
The judiciary system this round messed with fans’ (and most likely players, coaches and staff member’s brains). Some players were sinbinned during the game, some were not. Some players faced fines, some players did not. Where is the justice and equality in this?
With Chambers and Kasiano being put in the sin bin, but Vunivalu who also threw a punch in the mix staying on- how can referees decide who stays on and who doesn’t? In my opinion, all players involved (throwing punches that is) need to have the equal time off in the sin bin. Especially when a day later, Leilua (Raiders) punched Cooper (Cowboys), he was not sent off, and scored a try a mere 10 minutes later
I understand the fine system however. With Chambers copping the first fine of $1,100 for his actions (the first in the new system) and Leilua copping a $1,350 fine because of his prior offences- which is understandable.
With all of this, we do have the on-field referees who do make mistakes because they cannot (for obvious reasons), be in 100 different places at once and watching all players. However, ‘The Bunker’, should’ve stepped in and helped them make the decision as to who gets sin binned and who doesn’t – after all, isn’t the whole point of ‘The Bunker’ about making fairer and non-biased decisions for all 16 clubs? How do we make the playing field more equal from here?
Leave your thoughts below.