Swimming through substrate costs an arm and/or a leg
by Mark D. Scherz
Last week, a paper was published in the Open Access journal PLoS ONE, entitled âDistinct Patterns of Desynchronized Limb Regression in Malagasy Scincine Lizards (Squamata, Scincidae)â, by AurĂ©lien Miralles and colleagues. This paper dealt with a fascinating case of repeated convergent evolution, and I thought I would share my thoughts on it.
As some readers may know, snakes are phylogenetically nested within the lizards. That is to say, all snakes actually belong to one giant radiation of legless lizards. They are possibly the oldest surviving lineage of legless squamates, and certainly the most successful, with multiple thousands of species. But they are far from the only ones. In fact, limb loss is something of a fad among reptiles. Members of numerous families have undergone these changes, the most familiar in Europe being the slow worm, Anguis fragilis; the most familiar in America being the glass lizards, with the creative name Ophisaurus (=snake lizard). Both of these are anguid lizards. But the vast majority of legless lizards belong to a different family: the skinks.
Skinks seem to have a penchant for losing legs. They are typically long, slender lizards anyway, but something about them has led them to lose their limbs dozens upon dozens of times, independently.
Madagascar makes an excellent case study for this phenomenon (although Australia is also a popular choice). In Madagascar, we have five genera of skinks that have lost their legs. The parsimony-lover might stack these all as being sister to each other, and leave it at that. Surely they all followed the same path, and it results in maybe just a few instances of limb loss, right? Nope.
Keep reading here!
First photo of Pygomeles trivittatus by Mark D. Scherz 2012; Second figure of the focal species of the discussed study, taken from Miralles et al. 2015 PLoS ONE 10(6):e0126074 under CC BY 4.0 license.










