I want to infect you with the tremendous excitement of living, because I believe that you have the strength to bear it.
Tennessee Williams, The Selected Letters, Vol. 1: 1920-1945

gracie abrams

@theartofmadeline

roma★
official daine visual archive
Monterey Bay Aquarium
almost home

bliss lane
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!

Kiana Khansmith

izzy's playlists!

Andulka
Doug Jones
cherry valley forever
Sade Olutola

titsay
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

if i look back, i am lost
RMH
Not today Justin
seen from Malaysia
seen from Türkiye

seen from Germany
seen from Czechia
seen from United States
seen from Venezuela

seen from Russia
seen from Bulgaria
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from Canada
seen from Russia

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia
seen from Vietnam
seen from United Kingdom
@funeralmourners
I want to infect you with the tremendous excitement of living, because I believe that you have the strength to bear it.
Tennessee Williams, The Selected Letters, Vol. 1: 1920-1945
It weeps (Es weint) by Paul Klee, 1939
Shenavan, Lori Province, Armenia.
Daniele Accossato, wrapped nº𝟤 (jesmonite, rope, wood), 𝟤𝟢𝟤𝟣
Hammock, Pilsen, Chicago, 2002, by Paul D'Amato
i did have a premonition that iwtv as a whole had a mild twinge of idiotic writing and it was when they retconned the whole book handling with gloves thing. so they write a scene in season 1 with daniel wearing gloves to handle claudia’s diaries. people online poke fun at it, saying that you should really not handle old books with gloves, it is worse for their preservation. they jump up immediately and write a scene in season 2 where someone (daniel i think) snootily corrects someone else about how you’re not supposed to wear gloves while handling old books. i think to myself: why were 10 seconds even wasted on this stupid correction? who really gaf? please simply write lines that further the story and don’t just respond to internet comments
i was watching that tvl finale while falling asleep, i actually quite liked the hallucinatory element but that may have been because i was falling asleep. when i woke up the next day and realized it was the finale i was a little shocked because it seemed like the bottle episode before the finale in which characters gain mental clarity prior to the climactic conflicts. it did not speak to me of a season of television in which many things happened and many arcs were drawing to a close. i did like armand’s scenes but i just don’t think he would say “armends”, that was very odd. not even vampires talk like that
Queue unicorn by Bell Canto
Lotte Pritzel - garman doll maker, costume designer & painter Deutshe Kunst und Dekoration, Darmstadt, A. Koch, Bd27 (1910)-Bd.53 (1923-1924)
“Few tasks are more like the torture of Sisyphus than housework, with its endless repetition: the clean becomes soiled, the soiled is made clean, over and over, day after day.”
— Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex
ok tvl again: i don’t think this writing speaks to any understanding of being black. why would claudia’s spirit even call louis nappy-headed in the middle of all that…?? why would she demean his black features in that moment, like why would she think his blackness has anything to do with his sins…?? also egregious use of the word slave, lowkey you cannot be doing all that and then wrapping up the scene with no further exploration. very unnuanced. “YOU’RE A SLAVE LOUIS!! GOODBYE!!”
Arman Galstyan (Polish, 1994) - Untitled (2026)