Itâs a question that has long perplexed those who study North Korea and one that continues to divide experts: How long can the leaders of the worldâs most isolated country stay in power?The question of the Kim regimeâs survival â and the potential problems a sudden collapse of the government could unleash â has taken on added significance this year following North Koreaâs sinking of a South Korean warship in March and the Nov. 23 bombardment of a populated island along the countriesâ maritime border.Some analysts say those attacks point to a weakening dictatorship trying to demonstrate its military prowess and shore up support at home. Others, however, say the regime has shown a surprising resilience in the face of economic hardship and famine, and shows no sign of weakening.âThere have been predictions of the imminent collapse of North Korea for decades, and so far itâs shown a rather extraordinary capacity to survive in conditions that should have led to a regime collapse,â said John Delury, a professor at Yonsei University in Seoul and associate director of the Asia Societyâs Center on U.S.-China Relations.âI donât think that itâs about to collapse, and it would be a serious mistake to operate on the idea that it is. Youâve got to work with what is, and that is a regime that is fully intact, and itâs one of the longest running regimes in the world. Two leaders since the 1940s â thatâs a pretty good track record.âHoping to better predict when North Korea might collapse, South Korea is spending $1.6 million to come up with a formula that measures the stability of the worldâs hardest-to-measure country, according to a recent Washington Post article.The formula will take into account political loyalty in the military, recent economic output, even the ups and downs of leader Kim Jong Ilâs health â all without verifiable information on any of those factors.âThe major problem with this is the lack of data,â according to one senior government official quoted by the Washington Post. The official spoke on the condition of anonymity because the project, known as the North Korea Situation Index, is under way.When the Unification Ministry finalizes the index within the next month or so, its assessment will represent an attempt to introduce some certitude into the increasingly polarized debate about the Northâs life expectancy.Leaked U.S. diplomatic cables show that the possible collapse of the North Korean government is a concern for China, South Korea and the United States. According to cables released by WikiLeaks and reported on by several media outlets, top diplomats have discussed a collapse within the past year, with South Korea even going so far as to assure the U.S. that China would tolerate a reunified Korea under democratic South Korean control.But Shunji Hiraiwa, professor of contemporary Korean studies at Japanâs Kwansei Gakuin University in Hyogo, said the regime is much stronger than it appears from the outside, in part because there is little opposition to the current government.Those in power know they are likely to lose their positions if the Kim government collapses, he said.âThey want to do their best to keep the present system,â he said. âThat is why internal conflict is least expected to happen.âAnalysts have predicted the demise of the regime for years, particularly after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 and the 1994 death of the âGreat Leaderâ Kim Il Sung, who had ruled North Korea since 1948. But some experts say last yearâs failed currency reform, chronic hunger and the designation of an heir to âDear Leaderâ Kim Jong Il, point to a country in deeper distress than ever before.Of particular concern is Kim Jong Ilâs health. If the ailing dictator, who is believed to have suffered a stroke two years ago, dies within a few years, his son and heir apparent, Kim Jong Un, may not have time to build the power base among the countryâs elites that he needs to stay in control.The younger Kim is believed to be approximately 27 years old and was named a general and introduced to the public this fall â a clear sign, experts say, that he has been designated the third Kim to lead the country.In contrast, Kim Jong Il had two decades to prepare for leadership before his father died.âIf Kim Jong Il dies within the next five years, the chances are 50-50 that Kim Jong Un wonât be able to hold that country together, simply because he doesnât have that power base,â said Bruce Bechtol, author of âDefiant Failed State: The North Korean Threat to International Securityâ and an associate professor of political science at Angelo State University.Planning aheadWhile some experts are trying to predict the governmentâs collapse, others want to see more planning for the fallout from such an event.Col. David Maxwell, a Special Forces officer and faculty member at the National War College, said that U.S. and South Korean efforts to deter a North Korean attack could ultimately result in the violent collapse of the Kim regime instead of peaceful reunification or a âsoft landing.âMaxwell said the U.S. and South Korea have the military expertise to deal with problems that may result from a collapse, but should be doing more strategic planning for it now.At an irregular warfare conference at U.S. Army Garrison-Yongsan this fall, Maxwell outlined steps including more discussions with China, and developing an end-state vision for what should happen to the two Koreas, and establishing a group of military and civilian âNorth Korea hands,â or experts, to make plans for a collapse.Most importantly, he said, they should be conducting an influence campaign that lays the groundwork for a post-Kim Korea. The message, aimed at North Koreaâs second-tier leaders and overall population, should be that the U.S. and South Korea are not their enemies.That campaign could include smuggling cell phones into the North, which has few links with the outside world, he said.âYouâve got to use all of the opportunities to engage the North Korean people at all levels,â Maxwell said.Experts say a collapse could unleash a wealth of problems, including floods of refugees trying to cross into China and South Korea and uncontrolled nuclear weapons.âEventually collapse is going to occur, and when collapse occurs, theyâre still going to have their nuclear weapons and to me, that is the biggest danger we face,â Maxwell said. âThe problem will be much, much worse than it currently is.âScott Snyder, director of the Center for U.S.-Korea Policy at the Asia Foundation in Washington, said the most serious problem that could arise after a collapse is a protracted civil war in which sides are looking for support from outside Korea.âImagine that the Gen. Kim is looking for support from Beijing and Gen. Park is looking for support from South Korea, and theyâre looking for support over whoâs going to control Korea,â he said. âThat would be the worst.âSnyder said that no matter how much planning is done before a collapse, nobody will feel prepared for it when it happens.âThere are just so many variables that will be shaped by factors that are in the moment,â he said. âYou could probably put together 100 scenarios to deal with all the factors that come into play, and I donât think thereâs a political plan that deals with all 100 of those scenarios.
